So many contradictions in one string of post caps. Not to be offtopic, but I never understood how that mentality worked(beyond the obvious answer). People like this think that you're transphobic for not wanting to have sex with a trans woman because they are trans. Thing is, such a reason is actually just a really broad stroke way of giving an actually understandable reason. So is the argument that you want to be with someone based on their birth/biological sex.
Because transgenders aren't natural. Not in some in your face religious way, but biologically. If you're born a man, you have certain genetics and whatnot that will likely give you some masculine features. Murdering your crotch, getting breast implants, hormone therapy, etc, won't make ALL of that go away in most cases(I agree there might be good passers out there, but more often than not it's glaringly obvious). Using the usual suspect, Brianna, as an example, the fucker looks like a six foot some odd inches tall abomination more than he does a woman.
So really, not wanting to have sex with a trans woman because they are trans is just a watered down, quick and easy way to say "I don't want to have sex with someone that doesn't have a natural vagina, that has a obviously manly jawline, that is clearly taller than me or almost as big as me mass-wise, that has these kinds of qualities of a man physically because I am into chicks".
At least, that's my take. Ontopic, this Ketkat person sounds like they actually try to debate more than they just block people who disagree with them, and I like that because it means the shitshow continues with reasonable substance.
