really there isn't any wow factor in this at all. That is why i could belive that it is legit. Phil reporting detractor videos and say he didn't. That doesn't even register as news for most people I hope. It's just something that is a semi interesting talking point. I hope no one is exceptional enough to fabricate this.
I guess for the sake of this being the subforum where Kimberlie Brink happened, I'll just go ahead and say that while the messages themselves are 100% not fabricated based on access to the Twitter account that there may be other things at play.
Short of someone having hacked DSP's verified Twitter account, someone infiltrating his house or Kat shitposting when he's not looking, or a CIA level operative having infiltrated Twitter HQ and hacked into his account then the messages shown are 100% true and authentic.
If we wanna get super exceptional, then the other possibility is that someone infiltrated the server I used for accessing the Twitter account just so that they could ignore all the other servers nearby that might actually contain worthwhile information just so that they could falsify the contents of a Twitter account.
Even if they are real, and given the Kimberlie Brink factor, it still doesn't leave out the
remote possibility that there other more human motives at play.
But that raises the question of how exactly this would even be used as some sort of positive propaganda for Phil. I guess since its DSP we have to think of the most autistic possibility and work backwards from there.
My autistic supertheory is this:
The source somehow worked with DSP to get him to send a bunch of DMs over a period of time showing that he was not telling the truth about being involved in flagging videos. Then they messaged me to provide these screenshots, and also once asked provided access to the account in question which proves they exist 100%... so they could turn around at a later date and...
That's where I got up to. There is really nothing to be gained from this that I can identify. I mean it could be a deliberate action in order to try and gain trust which wouldn't make sense because they specifically asked to remain anonymous.
In terms of what has happened in recent history that may have turned someone against DSP:
- dox saga
- tax saga
- 2nd/3rd/4th/5th tax saga
So I'm not so sure DSP is in the good books with his fanbase right now.
That I asked the question about logging into their account, rather than them offering it up instantly makes me think there probably aren't as many multicolored puzzle pieces at play here as something like the Kimberlie Brink situation (where they never provided even a photoshopped DM but rather just the illusion of there being a "mysterious DM")
As you said, its not a super amazing revelation, its just an interesting talking point. The only reason its actually interesting is because of how much time and effort DSP puts into insinuating that he doesn't care when
he obviously does. I'm not so sure why caring about stuff is such a big deal to him, but here we are, on page 2640 of the Kiwifarms most surely autistic subforum.
So yeah, if it turns out that Kimberlie Brink's distant relative went to work at Twitter for the past decade so they could ignore all the politicians Twitter accounts and instead focused on manipulating DSP's twitter account just so they could falsely show DSP watched detractor videos, I guess I'll throw that out there
just in case some super 10 dimensional autism reveals itself.