Stephanie Cianfriglia / Sapphire Crimson Claw / Yarrow Brown / the-ghost-fucker / transmascdruid / anarchoenby77 / darktwistedpussy / Druid of Endicot - Xe/xyr ghost-fucker, womb wizard, hand sanitizer sommelier, trans-boomer, violently abuses her elderly parents, has sexual fantasies about raping children

All of this depends on the sect and the translation of the Bible being used.

I appreciate the input, but I am not religious and I'm simply trying to unravel the most objective take across Abrahamic religions as I can. In fact, I already mentioned Lucifer a few pages back and the mistranslation surrounding the passage. Allow me to elaborate further (this is basically an essay):

Lucifer is a mistranslation of "Haylel" ( הילל), the Hebrew word for "morning star". It is not a reference to any entity - be they Angel or Demon - and humorously, was translated correctly in other passages of the Bible. One such place is 2 Peter 1:19; below I have included both the KJV (famously known as the version that spawned the Lucifer mistranslation in 1611) and the NIV (which is translated from the original Hebrew).

King James Bible
"We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:"

New International Version
"We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts."

Furthermore, here is the Latin Vulgate (405 AD) from whence Lucifer came:
"et habemus firmiorem propheticum sermonem cui bene facitis adtendentes quasi lucernae lucenti in caliginoso loco donec dies inlucescat et lucifer oriatur in cordibus vestris"

Lucifer (and by extension Haylel) were never supposed to be seen as proper names to begin with. Even Phosphorus (φωσφόρος) is a reference to the morning star - the planet Venus as seen in the morning. It is only in Isaiah 14:12-14 that Lucifer appears as a proper name and it is not in relation to Al-Shaitan/HaSatan, but again to Venus. Sure, the Christian God may have had a favorite Angel that he cast out of Heaven, but it was not Lucifer (and let us not get into the semantics of angelic naming conventions, which is another sign that Lucifer was never an Angel). In fact, I have no idea where it was ever stated that God had a favorite Angel, let alone one he cast out!

It is very true that "Satan" is nothing more than a title, as seen with Al-Shaitan/HaSatan vs. Shaitan/Satan. It is a job description that is be passed between those currently ruling Hell and/or given the task to test the faith of humanity. Azazel, Beelzebub, and Belial are all entities that have been deemed Satan in Judeo-Christian faith, while Iblis (to my knowledge) is the only entity in Islamic faith to be called Al-Shaitan. However, the fact that Satan is a job title that passes between the ruling deities of Hell does not mean that the enigmatic "Lucifer" was one of them, and nowhere do the scriptures directly OR indirectly refer to him as Satan (because it is a mistranslation).

From what I can glean, the Djinn were beings created of smokeless flame and are allegedly extremely hot-tempered, impulsive, intense, and very task-focused (much like other fire spirits across mythos). They ruled the Earth before mankind, but it was ultimately taken away from them because Allah/God was displeased with how they were utilizing it. Iblis was the most powerful of all of the Djinns and was the only one granted access to walk amongst Heaven with the angels. However, when Allah/God created Adam and demanded all of the Angels and all of the Djinns to bow before this new creation and love him, Iblis refused. They did indeed have a minor falling out, much like the Christian God and his fabled favorite creation. Here is Surah Al-A'raf 7:11-25 and other translations that use Iblis and Al-Shaitan/Satan interchangeably. TL;DR of the conversation:

Allah/God: Why do you not bow before him?
Iblis/Satan: I am simply better than he, that man is made of clay while I am made of fire!
Allah/God: You fool, you imbecile, get out of here you mean-ass bitch, begone. However, I will postpone Divine Punishment if you keep mankind on the straight path of God.
Iblis/Satan: I will lie in wait for them and then they will beg for your mercy, but they will not be grateful to you for the all-out assault I will bring upon them for deviating from your path.
Allah/God: Alright, just get out, go on your way. Anyone who follows you will get stuffed into Hell alongside you.

The Djinn who followed after Iblis became known as Shaitan, and Iblis was given the title Al-Shaitan.

I could continue, but forgive me for not caring THAT much. The above should be enough to explain and reaffirm that "Lucifer" was a mistranslation and not a proper name, which means he could never have been an Angel of any kind. He was neither a fallen Angel nor God's favorite Angel and, if I may be so bold, I could assert that no Angel - fallen or otherwise - has ever inherited the title of Satan. The passage 2 Peter 2:4 makes it quite clear that Angels cast out of Heaven would be chained and held in darkness until Judgment Day, rather than roam the earth as tempters of mankind like Demons/Djinn do, with Ashmedai/Asmodeus as their King.

As a side note, one could even argue that "Azazel" was not an Angel (rather a Djinn or degraded Babylonian deity according to the Book of Enoch), nor "Beelzebub" a Demon (rather another degraded deity of Canaanite faith), leaving only Belial to be an actual demonic entity of old. However, he is still a lesser accuser in comparison to Samael, the actual Archangel whose role Lucifer has usurped in Christian theology. Samael is the Angel of Death and HaSatan himself, tasked with tempting humanity to sin and bringing those who do before God as their accuser. He is the Great Prince in Heaven and ruler of Fifth Heaven, but also the Prince of Satans with an army of demons at his command.

Also, Samael totally married the she-Demon Lilith and together created a host of demon children, hence this symbol:
220px-SamaelLilithGoatPentagram.png

She's so genderspecial that she needs a whole Google Doc to explain it all.

That is such a long list to say something as simple as "straight cis woman".
Edit: I cannot WAIT for her to finally realize that I redesigned her ugly flags out of dedication to a ruse. She'll likely claim that the joke was on me all along and now her flags are bootiful.
 
it's so hard to keep up with her. one minute she's nonbinary, then she calls herself trans; she claims to be autistic but then backtracks and just says she has autistic symptoms; when people come at her for leeching of her parents, she's working REALLY hard on this super successful nonprofit (that hasn't even been set up yet to my knowledge?) but then she's begging on the internet for cash because she's a helpless cripple who can't even walk down stairs or wipe her own ass all of a sudden. i honestly think i'm going through whiplash right now
 
it's so hard to keep up with her. one minute she's nonbinary, then she calls herself trans; she claims to be autistic but then backtracks and just says she has autistic symptoms; when people come at her for leeching of her parents, she's working REALLY hard on this super successful nonprofit (that hasn't even been set up yet to my knowledge?) but then she's begging on the internet for cash because she's a helpless cripple who can't even walk down stairs or wipe her own ass all of a sudden. i honestly think i'm going through whiplash right now

This is EXACTLY what she does, she tries to keep people believing that she's this poor victimized troon so she can feel better about herself because of the attention.

I'd say the thing that pisses me off the most about her isn't even the fact that she's a troon or doesn't know about a religion that she claims is her sexual identity (still not sure how tf that works), it's that she pleads for people to help her and give her money because she's "disabled" or has "autistic symptoms/autism", and then she turns right around and tweets about how she went out for the whole day and did shit, while in her e-begging scams she tries to make everyone feel bad for her by saying she can barely even get outside. If she were really debilitatingly autistic, she probably wouldn't have been able to get her master's and she absolutely wouldn't have gotten a job doing social work. There are ACTUAL autists out there doing a hell of a lot worse than she is, but she's milking the autism cash cow because it's popular and she knows it'll get her a quick 20 bucks off some poor internet sap.

I'm sure all of us have people in our lives that have actual disabilities, and when you know someone with a disability and spend a lot of genuine time with them you realise when people are just begging for sympathy or have Munchausen's. There's a fundamental difference between Steph's case and most debilitating disabilities: Steph can go outside of her fucking house. She talks about it constantly, albeit trying to make the outside world seem like a scary place unless she has a safe space like the UU meeting, but she goes outside all the fucking time and it just gets me because if she can go out to the movies and restaurants and gay re.tard meetings she can get a damn job. There's a reason why she got denied disability and it's pretty glaringly obvious to me, she's not disabled.

Really hard :powerlevel: here but personally I've struggled with mental health issues a lot through my life and I would feel sympathy if she was trying to help herself, but if you have autism/depression/schizophrenia/bipolar or any other mental illness you can still get up off your ass and work. You bet your ass I would still get up and go to work at the very least and go to class every now and again even when I was sleeping 13+ hours a day. Even a part time job is something and bills need to get paid somehow, Steph. Not sure if she knows but food doesn't just magically appear out of her dad's ass and sooner or later he's going to want her out of his house.

TLDR; I honestly fucking hate her and her dumbass attitude but somehow I almost wish she would get better not just for the people who have to put up with her shit but for herself... maybe I'm a little too optimistic *sigh*
 
then she turns right around and tweets about how she went out for the whole day and did shit, while in her e-begging scams she tries to make everyone feel bad for her by saying she can barely even get outside.

Most people like Steph rely on the hopes that their e-begging posts will be circulated without context, which creates a false picture of their actual situation. She's banking that nobody will check her social media and see that she is, in actuality, a perfectly-functional grown ass woman playing pretend on the internet and throwing all of her skill points into mental gymnastics. The fact that she can't Google-fu her way through Theistic Satanism 101 is really telling of how much effort she puts into everything else.

Edit: also, I hope Steph knows that she's using the son of one of her "mom demons" (Lilith) as her astral babysitter.
 
Most people like Steph rely on the hopes that their e-begging posts will be circulated without context, which creates a false picture of their actual situation. She's banking that nobody will check her social media and see that she is, in actuality, a perfectly-functional grown ass woman playing pretend on the internet and throwing all of her skill points into mental gymnastics.

The thing is it's not even surprising coming from a tumblr cow, because it's such a common thing to see on tumblr. Back when I was still using the site pretty frequently I would get through about 10 posts before seeing an e-begging campaign with thousands of reblogs, then maybe another 20 or so posts before I saw another one. What makes me laugh the most about it is that no matter how many people circulate posts like that they never really get any money in the end, especially because tumblr plays oppression olympics and everyone has to write the most elaborate story ever to even get noticed. People would much rather donate to someone in a wheelchair who needs help paying their rent than someone like Steph who sits in her room which is all paid for, eating food that's been paid for, complaining on the internet that she's autistic and needs money to buy a new fedora.
 
I think the main reason Steph flip flops so much is because she has to have the best of both worlds. When she's arguing and trying refute a narrative of say... millenials are lazy, she has to present herself as a millennial with many achievements. In order to do this she exaggerates in that direction. "I have a Master's! I'm starting a non-profit trans advocacy group!" We all know she was babied through her Master's and her non-profit is pretty much non-existent, but that doesn't fit the narrative she's trying to push. But when she decides she wants donations or pity points she has to exaggerate in the other direction and talk about her autism and chronic pain. We know she's never been diagnosed with autism and her chronic pain was removed with her uterus but again that doesn't fit the narrative she's going for in the moment. @sarcasticslipandslide is right in that all this hinges on nobody she's arguing with or begging for asspats from actually going and checking her on the shit she says. We see it, though, and that pisses her off.
 
So if Heath Ledger isn't a "white cishet man" wtf is he? Because never once did he identify as anything other than white and cis
Best I can figure, here's what happened:
He played a gay man in a movie. And she fetishizes gay men. So, after his death, she retroactively decided he was queer. Just like she did with MJ. And Ramirez. And literally everyone else.
 
What the fuck is the difference between “sensual” and “sexual”? They’re practically synonyms! Ones only more of a descriptor than the other.

God I hate the mangling of language these idiotgenders have decended too. Half the time I think I can hear the screams of Latin tutors in the distance from their butchering.

"Sensual" means you'll kiss and snuggle and stuff but you won't put out.
 
So if Heath Ledger isn't a "white cishet man" wtf is he? Because never once did he identify as anything other than white and cis

He's a ghost who like to fuck fat schizophrenics, duh.

Real talk though I find it really fucked up that she projects like this onto real people. Why can't she just make an OC that's a genderspecial ghost of a serial killer? She can make that as much of a tortured femboy as she wants, and no one will morally object to a fictional serial killer.
 
This thread is great because I can have a chuckle at this batshit loony while learning so much about Christomythology. Interesting stuff, thank you guys for your contributions.

As far as the trans vs nb flip-flopping, the tumblr definition of "trans" isn't so much "transsexual" as it is "transition to a gender I made up myself based on an internet trend." Nearly every enby I've seen refers to themselves as trans, Staph included. It cheapens actual, psychological gender dysphoria. Just admit you're an conventionally unattractive woman who is into things that aren't conventionally feminine. This is not 1950, Staph. No one cares that you're not trophy wife material, especially in Bumfuck, NY, in this century.
 
This is EXACTLY what she does, she tries to keep people believing that she's this poor victimized troon so she can feel better about herself because of the attention.

I'd say the thing that pisses me off the most about her isn't even the fact that she's a troon or doesn't know about a religion that she claims is her sexual identity (still not sure how tf that works), it's that she pleads for people to help her and give her money because she's "disabled" or has "autistic symptoms/autism", and then she turns right around and tweets about how she went out for the whole day and did shit, while in her e-begging scams she tries to make everyone feel bad for her by saying she can barely even get outside. If she were really debilitatingly autistic, she probably wouldn't have been able to get her master's and she absolutely wouldn't have gotten a job doing social work. There are ACTUAL autists out there doing a hell of a lot worse than she is, but she's jerking off the autism cash cow because it's popular and she knows it'll get her a quick 20 bucks off some poor internet sap.

I'm sure all of us have people in our lives that have actual disabilities, and when you know someone with a disability and spend a lot of genuine time with them you realise when people are just begging for sympathy or have Munchausen's. There's a fundamental difference between Steph's case and most debilitating disabilities: Steph can go outside of her fucking house. She talks about it constantly, albeit trying to make the outside world seem like a scary place unless she has a safe space like the UU meeting, but she goes outside all the fucking time and it just gets me because if she can go out to the movies and restaurants and gay re.tard meetings she can get a damn job. There's a reason why she got denied disability and it's pretty glaringly obvious to me, she's not disabled.

Really hard :powerlevel: here but personally I've struggled with mental health issues a lot through my life and I would feel sympathy if she was trying to help herself, but if you have autism/depression/schizophrenia/bipolar or any other mental illness you can still get up off your ass and work. You bet your ass I would still get up and go to work at the very least and go to class every now and again even when I was sleeping 13+ hours a day. Even a part time job is something and bills need to get paid somehow, Steph. Not sure if she knows but food doesn't just magically appear out of her dad's ass and sooner or later he's going to want her out of his house.

TLDR; I honestly fucking hate her and her dumbass attitude but somehow I almost wish she would get better not just for the people who have to put up with her shit but for herself... maybe I'm a little too optimistic *sigh*
one of my customers is a man with cerebral palsy and he has one messed up arm and like messed up hands and he digs graves for a living. he has other health issues and told me recently that he has an open wound on his foot that got an earring stuck in it and he did not notice for two days. and he still gets up every morning and runs his own grave digging service, to support his family. most tumblrinas could not even fathom living that way
 
Earlier she asked what would happen after the surgery (if she needed hormonal replacement therapy) and she wondered what would happen if she went on T.

She talks about it in such a condescending way as if she could just walk into a chemist and buy herself a new gender. She seems like she doesn't understand that hormonal therapies cost actual money and are thus unavailable to many people that wriggle under the poverty line. Like, that would be a good thing to rally about in trans activism and she settles on being legitimately asking for it on twitter.

After this she begs for a flatmate for what's basically taking care of her needs in a way that feels like RNs or NAs here do. Pff.

Her life seems like a constant things-that-didn't-happen, that I do agree that no, she isn't trans and no, she doesn't know what she's doing.
 
Earlier she asked what would happen after the surgery (if she needed hormonal replacement therapy) and she wondered what would happen if she went on T.

She talks about it in such a condescending way as if she could just walk into a chemist and buy herself a new gender. She seems like she doesn't understand that hormonal therapies cost actual money and are thus unavailable to many people that wriggle under the poverty line. Like, that would be a good thing to rally about in trans activism and she settles on being legitimately asking for it on twitter.

After this she begs for a flatmate for what's basically taking care of her needs in a way that feels like RNs or NAs here do. Pff.

Her life seems like a constant things-that-didn't-happen, that I do agree that no, she isn't trans and no, she doesn't know what she's doing.
She really puts herself up on a pedestal 24/7, classic narcissism. Funny that since she’s supposedly trans she hasn’t researched what it takes to get on hormones AT ALL. There are always informed consent clinics but those typically take a lot longer to wait for an appointment (at least 3 months wait typically), but otherwise it usually takes therapist letters and an actual diagnosis of gender dysphoria (which she doesn’t have). Her misinformation and lack of research really follows through to every aspect of her personality, her boyfriends, her satanist beliefs etc. Time and time again she proves that she’s absolutely exceptional in everything she claims to be.
 
I'm rather late to the party here, but I used to follow Stephanie on Twitter -- quite a few years back. She wasn't extremely SJW when I first started seeing her content; it seems like she had this sudden influx of gender and sexuality shit start happening soon after and then I criticized something about made-up genders and she blocked me at some point. After a while, I really had only been following her to see how many more ridiculous things she would say, and have a good laugh, or wonder if she was remotely serious about anything she said because of how utterly melodramatic she was all the time.

I guess my biggest shock from reading her thread here was the fact that none of her "partners" exist. Now that I look at it, it's not that surprising, seeing as I do remember her talking about dating one guy, and then within the span of maybe a month or two, it was up to 3 (and now it looks like it's 4?). With how she behaves and dresses, I was incredulous about how one guy was apparently dating her, but this sudden harem? She also complained about her disease that made her vagina too small to have sex, but then tweeted about having sex with these "partners", and I chalked it up to it not being vaginal, or her lying. Then, as others have already posted here, she used it for oppression points to make up an intersex identity.

One thing I'd like to add here after finally going over all the pages of this thread in a few days, she really did go her local news to talk about her "nonbinary gender identity", but I believe the article has since been taken down, since I can no longer find anything related to it except her tweet to it and part of a transcript of it:
wbng.jpg

The original link to it (http://www.wbng.com/news/local/Male-female-other--323997471.html) leads to a server error.
A portion of the transcript is here: https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php?topic=195191.0;wap2.

Also, I've noticed people are quoting her saying that her PTSD is from "online harassment", but something I also remember her saying is that it's mainly from her old cat dying. Seems like she can't keep the story straight on that, either. Found the tweet:
catptsd.jpg
 
I'm rather late to the party here, but I used to follow Stephanie on Twitter -- quite a few years back. She wasn't extremely SJW when I first started seeing her content; it seems like she had this sudden influx of gender and sexuality shit start happening soon after and then I criticized something about made-up genders and she blocked me at some point. After a while, I really had only been following her to see how many more ridiculous things she would say, and have a good laugh, or wonder if she was remotely serious about anything she said because of how utterly melodramatic she was all the time.

I guess my biggest shock from reading her thread here was the fact that none of her "partners" exist. Now that I look at it, it's not that surprising, seeing as I do remember her talking about dating one guy, and then within the span of maybe a month or two, it was up to 3 (and now it looks like it's 4?). With how she behaves and dresses, I was incredulous about how one guy was apparently dating her, but this sudden harem? She also complained about her disease that made her vagina too small to have sex, but then tweeted about having sex with these "partners", and I chalked it up to it not being vaginal, or her lying. Then, as others have already posted here, she used it for oppression points to make up an intersex identity.

One thing I'd like to add here after finally going over all the pages of this thread in a few days, she really did go her local news to talk about her "nonbinary gender identity", but I believe the article has since been taken down, since I can no longer find anything related to it except her tweet to it and part of a transcript of it: View attachment 496902
The original link to it (http://www.wbng.com/news/local/Male-female-other--323997471.html) leads to a server error.
A portion of the transcript is here: https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php?topic=195191.0;wap2.

Also, I've noticed people are quoting her saying that her PTSD is from "online harassment", but something I also remember her saying is that it's mainly from her old cat dying. Seems like she can't keep the story straight on that, either. Found the tweet:View attachment 496909

I found the full article the other day but forgot to post it: [link] [archive]

The video, however, appears to be lost to time, which is a shame. She mentioned on her Facebook she had been wearing a lot of makeup for the interview so I am incredibly interested in whether she did the makeup herself or if it was the news team.

EDIT:

Uhhhh....

mQb0F2b.png

They took your uterus honey, not your whole gotdang pussy.
 
Last edited:
I found the full article the other day but forgot to post it: [link] [archive]
"It's really difficult because everything is gendered, absolutely everything is gendered," said Sapphire. "You can't pick up a razor without it being pink or blue."
Wow...it's almost like males and females have different needs.
"When you don't feel feminine, most of the time and you get called 'she, ma'am, miss.' It just kind of starts to grate on you," said Sapphire.
Hasn't she repeatedly referred to herself as a femme NB? and....
feminine.PNG

:thinking:
 
I found the full article the other day but forgot to post it: [link] [archive]

The video, however, appears to be lost to time, which is a shame. She mentioned on her Facebook she had been wearing a lot of makeup for the interview so I am incredibly interested in whether she did the makeup herself or if it was the news team.

It was definitely her and not the news team; I was 'lucky' enough to watch it when she did first post it, but seeing as it was over three years ago now, I can't remember all the details except that I know it was her own makeup... It was that usual chunky black eye makeup she does (complete with what I believe is the same dark lipstick she doesn't know how to properly put on), and I feel like she also had that black necklace someone posted with her selfies some pages back, but not the collar. The whole thing seemed awkwardly edited, too, but it was local news.

EDIT: I found the pictures of what she looked like in the interview. So... no news team makeup here.
wbng1.jpg
wbng2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back