Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I think they would rather jerk him around for 2 years with control of the legislation
Under normal circumstances yes, but they've stoked their insane hatred of Trump to a fever pitch. Anyone who does anything remotely civil with this administration is getting thrown off the boat.

If they take back the House I think they would almost be forced to make a play for impeachment, lest their lunatic scrum of a base turn on them.

Of course, that's a mighty big 'if' to hang it all on. I'm not entirely certain they'll retain the seats they have now.
 
d9c4786484c0b5eee15f23b96c83bac9f0d77f9e0961550f27bd8069b0ee2c8a.png
If you would have told me 5 years ago that far left progressives would be heralding the accomplishments of the CIA and FBI, I'd have spit in your face.
After all the Russian knob slobbing every fucking Democrat in existance did since... oh... 1955, any Democrat that says we should go to war with Russia should be swirlied in a Grand Central Station toilet. They spent decade slobbing on Communism, the Soviet Union, then Russia.

Now they want to go to war?

How about... GO FUCK YOURSELF!

Torn between "yes, throw more money at the inefficient, corrupt, and incompetent VA without bothering to reform it" and "yet again, Democrats only care about you if they can use you against someone".

Not sure which the Democrats want us to see them as: incurably stupid, or sociopathic.
And what is up with this "muh draft dodging" shit? Weren't Democrats protesting drafts at the time of, say, the Vietnam and Korean Wars? Aren't drafts bad? Shouldn't the ability to dodge a draft be seen as a good thing by them, as you're not throwing your life away pointlessly?
 
I've expressed this in private chats before, but sometimes I see politics as less a serious thing these days and more as a rodeo show to hoot and holler at and enjoy.
Even though I didn’t vote for him, prior to the election my stance was along the lines of “our political system has become a farce. Might as well have a farce of a president.”
 
Where is the actual proof to back this up?

No really, it's fascinating to me that these assholes just go on television, espouse whatever accusations and labels onto whoever they want, and then move right on past the stage of giving any kind of information or evidence to support aforementioned accusations and labels, directly into disavowal and scorn.

I would like those faggots to name one time Trump said anything bad about the GBLT. He's a new york liberal. I keep being promised that any day there will be death squads going door to door summarily executing faggots while ICE rounding up illegals & makes them watch while they molest their children, but this continues to not happen.

Well, I mean in the US. It was happening in ISIS territory while Obama was funding, protecting, and arming ISIS.
Just another case of Obama helping everyone who isn't a US citizen.
 
Proof that news media isn't bright said:
if “Democrats get a hold” of Congress after November, “they very well will move to impeach him” and Trump will go down in history as “maybe even the worst president of all time.”

Based on...racism?

What?

Even if true of Trump, since when is the n-word adequate grounds for impeachment? Did we become a theocracy while I wasn't looking, where only the doctrinally pure may be accepted and all else must perish?
 
I would like those faggots to name one time Trump said anything bad about the GBLT.

That's more Pence's thing, IIRC -- he's part of the religioius right. Which is why, despite the fact that I consider Trump to be a festering wart on the butt of humanity, I hope to god nothing happens to him. I do NOT want more fundy jagoffs in power.

(I think we'll have an easier time surviving Trump, strangely enough. Given his unpopularity even in his own party, he's not as likely to be successful. Pence, that's a different story. YMMV)
 
Jesus Fucking Krypton.

The judge in Paul Manafort’s fraud trial said Friday he has received threats over the case.

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III made the comments as the jury deliberated for the second day, and as he rejected a motion to release information about the jurors. He said he's confident the jurors would be threatened as well if their information was public.

Ellis said that because of the threats against him, he travels with U.S. Marshals.

“The Marshals go where I go,” Ellis said.

Earlier Friday morning, Ellis, a famously prickly judge known for his colorful comments, acknowledged facing criticism about how he’s handled this case.

Ellis told attorneys “I’m no stranger to criticism,” but said “this case has brought it to a new level.”

Ellis was responding to a number of news organizations – the Washington Post, New York Times, AP, CNN, NBC, Politico and BuzzFeed – filing a motion to unseal records in the case, including information about the jurors.

Rejecting the request about the jury, Ellis said he doesn’t “feel right” about releasing the names of jurors, adding, “to do so would create a risk of harm to them.”

The judge also denied a motion to unseal all the bench conferences and sidebars, which have been sealed. Ellis said all that will be released to the public at the end of the trial.

After a trial spanning nearly three weeks, Manafort, 69, is awaiting a verdict on tax evasion and bank fraud charges.

He has been accused of hiding income earned from his Ukrainian political work from the IRS. He’s also accused of fraudulently obtaining millions in bank loans.

Manafort has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Since the jury began deliberating Thursday, the defense has been expressing increasing optimism about its chances. Kevin Downing, Manafort's attorneny, told reporters he sees the continued deliberations as "a great sign for the defense."

On Thursday, Ellis read aloud a note detailing four questions from the jury, which covered foreign financial accounts, shelf companies, the definition of reasonable doubt and other evidence in the case.

The defense took those questions -- especially the one about reasonable doubt -- as good news.

“We’re in the game,” one source close to the Manafort team told Fox News.

Prosecutors have not addressed the media during jury deliberations.

But in closing arguments this week, prosecutor Greg Andres told the jury, "The government asks you to return the only verdict that is consistent with the evidence, which is guilty on all charges."

The jury resumed deliberations Friday morning. It takes a unanmious guilty verdict from all 12 jurors to convict on each count.
Okay, let's set aside the issue of the judge being threatened. This sudden interest in the jurors, in my opinion as a nonlawyer type, seems to step RIGHT up to the line marked 'jury tampering' if not sliding over it. What the FUCK do these people think they're doing?

I mean, holy shit, way to go morons, you're practically handing Manafort a chance to reverse or overturn ANY conviction.
 
Given his unpopularity even in his own party, he's not as likely to be successful. Pence, that's a different story. YMMV)
Lol what?
If 2016 told us anything its that there is a rather large difference in opinion between ordinary Republicans and people like Bill Kristol or John McCain.
Although that raises the question of if you can even consider Never Trumpers Republicans anymore considering how many of them have jumped right into bed with the Democrats because of "Muh Principles".
 
True, but I fear Pence more than I do Trump.

Aren't we right in the middle of Trump right now? What exactly am I supposed to be fearing right now? The only thing I'm fearful of is the media tripling down on screeching and making more anti-trump shows, anti-trump jokes in shows, anti-trump stage plays, anti-trump videogames. When they could be making stuff I actually want to watch/play.
 
Where is the actual proof to back this up?

No really, it's fascinating to me that these assholes just go on television, espouse whatever accusations and labels onto whoever they want, and then move right on past the stage of giving any kind of information or evidence to support aforementioned accusations and labels, directly into disavowal and scorn.
In Soviet America, fact-checking is alt-right.

I'm not even kidding. If you dare question or even politely ask for a shred of evidence, you're an evil cis bigot. The LISTEN and BELIEVE doctrine is more widespread than ever.
 
In Soviet America, fact-checking is alt-right.

I'm not even kidding. If you dare question or even politely ask for a shred of evidence, you're an evil cis bigot. The LISTEN and BELIEVE doctrine is more widespread than ever.
It's closer to:
"Only approved fact checkers are unbiased, have you gone to Snopes yet???"
 
Back