Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

[Emperor Julian]

Suppose it does, though? Suppose some time after the singularity, a sex change is as easy as buying a hamburger. You could change your appearance, your actual genome, or even turn into your fursona or whatever fucked up shit you're into. There would then be nothing unusual about it at all. How would troons cope, since they're completely addicted to shrieking about how persecuted they are. Someone who wanted to be a woman, or a man, or be either depending on what day of the week it was, could just do that.

I think troons would actually be really upset about this, because how could you be a repulsive, fat, ugly freak and claim to be persecuted for it when you could be anything else you wanted to be?

I'm a little embarrised since was exactly what I was trying to say...I really need to work on my writting. You've hit the nail on the head If you can turn yourself into scarlett johansson then that you can no longer hide from your mind and how much of the fucking loser you are.

Personally I plan on looking like charles dance/christopher lee so we get to skip the part where they try to persuade me of something I don't want or like.

 

[Sissy Galvez]

They would shriek if we could detect it via a test too. I’ve seen trannies cry about “genocide” if we could detect it but if you have a kid the last thing you want is an autistic tranny or downs kiddo. Not just because it’s ridiculously more difficult but imagine how hard it is on the kid to go through that? Why force someone to go through that if they don’t have to?

Even if medical science could magically change sex organs and your genome perfectly why? Just eliminate it before it’s an issue.

 

[Emperor Julian]

They would shriek if we could detect it via a test too. I’ve seen trannies cry about “genocide” if we could detect it but if you have a kid the last thing you want is an autistic tranny or downs kiddo. Not just because it’s ridiculously more difficult but imagine how hard it is on the kid to go through that? Why force someone to go through that if they don’t have to?

Even if medical science could magically change sex organs and your genome perfectly why? Just eliminate it before it’s an issue.

That's an interesting point, either way troon culture is on borrowed time. We either get the tech to ensure a smooth transition or we get the tech to ensure sad brains doesnt emerge from day 1. Possibly both, possibly something else. The point is someone saying the future is trans is an idiot for the same reason as someone talking about deaf culture.

The icing on the cake is that people like laurai are going to really misrable when they realize the root of their problems isnt between the legs it's what's between the ears.

 

[SiccDicc]

Suppose it does, though? Suppose some time after the singularity, a sex change is as easy as buying a hamburger.

I look forward to the McDonald's Gender Special™.

 

[Stock Photo James]

Okay this is bit off topic but all this future medical analysis nonsense is making me wonder: if there was a technology that could detect the child is going to grow up with gender dysphoria, and prevent that by applying changes to brain, with mother's consent. Would trans activists side with pro-lifers trying to define fetuses as unborn humans that have a right to self-determination, or would they concede (hahaha ha yeah right)? Would also be fun to watch the other side of spectrum too, religious conservatives agreeing to invasive brain fuckery because of their dislike of transexuals

 

[Syaoran Li]

"The Future is Transgender not Straight"
Welp, time to prepare for the eventual coming of our tranny overlords.

If the future is transgender, then I'm the Prime Minister of Ireland!

I'd hate to state the obvious, but basic human biology dictates that the future will remain straight for the forseeable future. They're the ones actually reproducing, not sterilizing themselves with hormones and other chemicals.

 

[SiccDicc]

If the future is transgender, then I'm the Prime Minister of Ireland!

I'd hate to state the obvious, but basic human biology dictates that the future will remain straight for the forseeable future. They're the ones actually reproducing, not sterilizing themselves with hormones and other chemicals.

What's funny about this is I'm actually watching the Outer Limits episode Unnatural Selection where they can illegally genetically enhance fetuses and there's a 1/10000 chance of getting G.R.S. - Genetic Rejection Syndrome - which creates a monster. You know what else G.R.S. can stand for? Gender Reassignment Surgery. Just funny - and a bit spooky - at the odds of all of this coming together.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

"The Future is Transgender not Straight"

Reminds me of how ADF thinks the ideal world is one where everyone has gender dysphoria.

 

[AnOminous]

Okay this is bit off topic but all this future medical analysis nonsense is making me wonder: if there was a technology that could detect the child is going to grow up with gender dysphoria, and prevent that by applying changes to brain, with mother's consent.

I like the Gattaca model, where you just fertilize a bunch of eggs, screen them for various disorders, and pick the best of the lot. This is a lot closer technologically to what we'll soon be capable of doing.

Who would pick a troon?

I'd hate to state the obvious, but basic human biology dictates that the future will remain straight for the forseeable future.

It will always be majority straight for this obvious reason, as it has been in the past, literally since mammals existed and probably before that. For some reason, this never eliminated homosexual behavior, though. Since it was never weeded out, it had to have had some beneficial or at least not destructive effects.

 

[Emperor Julian]

It will always be majority straight for this obvious reason, as it has been in the past, literally since mammals existed and probably before that. For some reason, this never eliminated homosexual behavior, though. Since it was never weeded out, it had to have had some beneficial or at least not destructive effects.

Their's some weird quirk where people with homosexual family members tend to have increased numbers of children. Their appear to be some perks on the gay genes
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26089486

A lot of what we are has to be considered from the perspective of us origionally being communal nomadic tribes with limited social taboos.

Trans is differant because despite posturing it's a visable disorder which requires some sort of medical treatment. Ignoring transtrenders, you're bassically talking about the wrong brain in the wrong body. Our society has certain negative connetations against having a medical illness which is where a lot of the troon ID shit comes from.
Unlike a lot of Farmers I don't really have a problem with actually Trans people since their's medical evidence to back it up and I can imagine it would be torture to be trapped in your flesh in such a way. However the vogue superficial nature of trans activism and our species' absurd social hang ups about vulrability is a terrible detriment to such people since it prevents them from acknowlaging they have a medical condition which should be treated, instead you have a load of post-modern retards telling them you can be a woman with a beard and a massive dick and that nothing is wrong with you because gender is a construct.

Gender may be a 'construct' but wanting to cut your own dick off because being a man is agony isnt and you need to see a doctors if you feel that way.

 

[AnOminous]

Their's some weird quirk where people with homosexual family members tend to have increased numbers of children. Their appear to be some perks on the gay genes
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26089486

A lot of what we are has to be considered from the perspective of us origionally being communal nomadid tribes.

A genetic benefit doesn't necessarily accrue to the person who has it. If it somehow increases the reproductive potential of people who do actually reproduce, it still leads to a continuation of that particular trait. So it could easily be that exclusive homosexuals direct their energy that others use in reproduction toward other socially beneficial activities that increase the likelihood that others related to them are more successful, too.

The weird arguments that somehow everyone is going to turn gay if we don't persecute gay people and then the human race will cease to exist is a mutant version of Kant's categorical imperative that can't possibly make sense.

 

[Emperor Julian]

A genetic benefit doesn't necessarily accrue to the person who has it. If it somehow increases the reproductive potential of people who do actually reproduce, it still leads to a continuation of that particular trait. So it could easily be that exclusive homosexuals direct their energy that others use in reproduction toward other socially beneficial activities that increase the likelihood that others related to them are more successful, too.

The weird arguments that somehow everyone is going to turn gay if we don't persecute gay people and then the human race will cease to exist is a mutant version of Kant's categorical imperative that can't possibly make sense.

Agreed, however personally destrimental traits can be carried onto other generations due to collective benifits, for example sickle cells resistance to Malaria ensures it carries on despite being a massive liability

Their's no way in hell we're all going to turn gay, since the gay genes by their nature ensure plenty of people up for fucking the opposite sex.

 

[Valstrax]

If the future is transgender, then I'm the Prime Minister of Ireland!

I'd hate to state the obvious, but basic human biology dictates that the future will remain straight for the forseeable future. They're the ones actually reproducing, not sterilizing themselves with hormones and other chemicals.

If everyone was transgender/gay, we would all have gone extinct in under a year.
Maybe a month?
A week?
Who knows.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Is transgenderism still considered a mental illness among mental health professionals?

If so, it shouldn't be surprising if such a view yields to political pressure in the West, such as from the likes of RationalWiki.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

When is fuzzy cat potato going to come back and explain to us why rationalwiki is awesome and why we're wrong to think they're biased? I love watching him wander out of his safe space and show that he can't debate his way out of a paper bag when he can't just ban the other person and delete their argument.

 

[TheImportantFart]

I recently read their article on Riley Dennis. It’s as fawning and one-sided as you’d expect but this part in particular about the infamous trans-exclusionary dating video caught my eye:

Yup, the first of those quotes is totally different from the second one. It’s not at all like we’ve just added more words so it looks like they’re saying different things, but the overall message is the same.

Fail.

 

[Jaimas]

Especially hilarious when you remember Riley's just as guilty of bandwagoning and harassment as he claims his critics are.

 

[Webby's Boyfriend]

RationalWiki seems to be quite good at deconstructing bullshit like conspiracy theories, new age woo, quackery, pseudoscience and the like. Their articles about scientific topics like astronomy, geography or history also deconstruct some myths and false beliefs. Unfortunately, it's totally irrational and sometimes very "SJW" when it comes to political and societal topics or especially, religion. Often, it is very biased and doesn't represent a neutral point of view which is essential for a good encyclopedia.

Just look at their page about "non-binary (read: made-up) genders".

 

[usernames can change now!]

RationalWiki seems to be quite good at deconstructing bullshit like conspiracy theories, new age woo, quackery, pseudoscience and the like. Their articles about scientific topics like astronomy, geography or history also deconstruct some myths and false beliefs. Unfortunately, it's totally irrational and sometimes very "SJW" when it comes to political and societal topics or especially, religion. Often, it is very biased and doesn't represent a neutral point of view which is essential for a good encyclopedia.

Just look at their page about "non-binary (read: made-up) genders".

It's literally a website for people who are too deep in the IngSocJus paint for Wikipedia, which is a feat in it's own right.

 

[Mrs Paul]

RationalWiki seems to be quite good at deconstructing bullshit like conspiracy theories, new age woo, quackery, pseudoscience and the like. Their articles about scientific topics like astronomy, geography or history also deconstruct some myths and false beliefs. Unfortunately, it's totally irrational and sometimes very "SJW" when it comes to political and societal topics or especially, religion. Often, it is very biased and doesn't represent a neutral point of view which is essential for a good encyclopedia.

Just look at their page about "non-binary (read: made-up) genders".

Oh, anything on anti-science type shit is great. I always get a perverse pleasure at seeing these asshats mocked.

What's the difference between non-binary and genderqueer? Is that basically the same as being androgynous? And how can you be non-binary AND trans/cis? That makes no sense whatsoever. I fear making up all these specific labels are just going to reinforce gender stereotypes, and only alienate people from one another, which I think is the opposite goal people are trying to achieve?
Perhaps just come up with one particular term that means, "I don't really feel that I fit into any particulary, so I'll just call myself X." Because the more terms you come up with, the less meanings these words have. I don't think it's transphobic or being a TERF to wonder that.