Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only thing I see in play for the next 30 hours is Ford's therapy notes, which Grassley has already requested she deliver to the Senate but which her counsel wants to turn over to the FBI. Grassley already correctly pointed out to Ford's counsel that the only thing the FBI would do is turn those notes over to the Senate. I don't believe they've sent a reply yet.

Based on what Grassley said in that letter, I think he already knows what to expect.

Lastly, because I'm frustrated: Murkowski did a tremendous disservice to women by putting feelings over facts. Women already fight a lasting stereotype that we are irrational, ruled by emotion, and easily swayed by moral panic. So she votes no, then out and out admits in the interview afterward that she weighed the qualifications of a "good man" (her words) against her feelings and the bigger issues at stake and the man came up short.

Go to hell, Lisa.

Murkowski does an even bigger disservice to non-reptilians by pretending she has a moral compass at all, when she's really a sociopathic swamp creature who will eagerly kowtow to the dems if she thinks it'll get her reelected. Everybody who voted no could probably care less if Ford got raped (I guarantee you they keep silent about colleagues who do worse behind closed doors), it's all virtue signalling.
 
Last edited:
People like her need to be dragged into the sun and have their bullshit exposed in front of the world. How do people memory hole things like this? People can hold grudges for their entire lives but somehow politicians get away with this crap all the time. The world is a mysterious place...

Cellphones. Social media. CNN. Stephen Colbert.

I read a study somewhere that said only 7% of America is actively engaged in paying attention to anything outside of their 25 person bubble.

---
Apparently the "non-partisan" League of Women Voters has now come out against Kavanaugh. That means the ACLU and the LWV should both lose their Tax Exempt status.
 
04379f45fe018c6fa5050db1acfc3f3a.png

I actually missed that article the first pass around. I kind of wish that I'd missed it the second time, too. Years and years spent berating men for "being emotionless" and "hyper-masculine" and the second they get the opportunity, they start wailing on Kavanaugh for tearing up during his hearing. What a load of absolute horseshit.
If leftists didn't have multiple (not even just double) standards, they'd have no standards period.

And cross-posting from the Trump thread:

I swear every Trump tweet is a brainlet ideologue honeypot.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1048196883464818688

"Brett's 'prepared outburst' makes him unfit." - Wendiloo

View attachment 559582

Dave Goodman's mind exists in a different world. It's the only explanation for why he's seemingly hallucinating so hard.

View attachment 559584

Michelle has issues with projection. Arc Angel1 is just a dumbass.

View attachment 559585

Something something HYPOCRISY! DeyculmeBatman is the sole voice of reason here.

View attachment 559586

But does Hell have a bathroom too, Palmer? And Debra Strege needs to look up the term "expert for hire".

View attachment 559587

"It's just a conspiracy theory!"

View attachment 559591 View attachment 559592

Dean Obeidallah with those scorching hot takes.

View attachment 559593 View attachment 559588

I don't think you're comparing like to like here, Alicia.
View attachment 559589

Allegations aren't evidence, Jamie.
View attachment 559594

"Brett Kavanaugh is mean, so he shouldn't become a Supreme Court justice." - JRV

View attachment 559590
 
Now now dear. Don't get angry I don't want to break out the medicinal Brandy to calm you down.
Can I have some? I'm really more of a scotch person but I'll wear a corset and drink brandy if I have to.

04379f45fe018c6fa5050db1acfc3f3a.png

I actually missed that article the first pass around. I kind of wish that I'd missed it the second time, too. Years and years spent berating men for "being emotionless" and "hyper-macho" and expressing "toxic masculinity" and the second they get the opportunity, they start wailing on Kavanaugh for tearing up during his hearing. What a load of absolute horseshit.
This is, perhaps, one of the worst moments to come out of this... ordeal. A man have a genuine moment of weakness, shows actual, manly emotions and he's humiliated for it repeatedly by the exact same people who are always complaining about toxic masculinity. It just goes to show that they don't really give a fuck about men or their emotions. They don't care about men or how men express themselves. They want them to express themselves in a very specific way that gives them power over said men.
Also, weaponised crying? Anyone who's ever had a sister knows who really weaponises crying. Hell, I've done it. It works. I've gotten out of fucking speeding fines by crying.
 
I actually missed that article the first pass around. I kind of wish that I'd missed it the second time, too. Years and years spent berating men for "being emotionless" and "hyper-macho" and expressing "toxic masculinity" and the second they get the opportunity, they start wailing on Kavanaugh for tearing up during his hearing. What a load of absolute horseshit.
I fully believe the left genuinelly considers tears a weapon.
 
Cellphones. Social media. CNN. Stephen Colbert.

I read a study somewhere that said only 7% of America is actively engaged in paying attention to anything outside of their 25 person bubble.

---
Apparently the "non-partisan" League of Women Voters has now come out against Kavanaugh. That means the ACLU and the LWV should both lose their Tax Exempt status.
I think the NRA is also a tax exempt non-profit as are most super PACs under the 501(c)(4) tax status. I believe the ACLU is the same but don't know about the LWV (seems likely it is). Under this status, the organization is tax exempt, but contributions/donations are not tax deductible. This seems about fair to me, but maybe a few 501(c)(3) orgs should be changed to 501(c)(4).

Apparently Flake has decided he will vote yes. Be prepared to be disappointed when another actually Soros funded protester screams at him in an elevator again and he changes his mind though. I don't necessarily think he will change his mind, but it's certainly not unlikely either. http://dailycaller.com/2018/10/05/flake-reveals-vote-kavanaugh/
 
I fully believe the left genuinelly considers tears a weapon.

They're the same people who believe words can be violent.

That's why they're stunned that Trump, Kavanaugh, really anyone outside their little bubble aren't affected by their shrieks of "Nazi!" "Fascist!" "Rapist!" etc.
 
It is physically harder for a man to cry as our tear ducts are larger so take longer to fill up. That's why when you see tears rolling down a mans face you know he is feeling genuine emotion, it is difficult for a man to fake cry not impossible but difficult.

It's never good enough for these people, don't show emotion = toxic mascunlinity Show emotion = weaponizing tears.

THE FUCK DO THEY WANT FROM US.
 
I think the NRA is also a tax exempt non-profit as are most super PACs under the 501(c)(4) tax status. I believe the ACLU is the same but don't know about the LWV (seems likely it is). Under this status, the organization is tax exempt, but contributions/donations are not tax deductible. This seems about fair to me, but maybe a few 501(c)(3) orgs should be changed to 501(c)(4).

Apparently Flake has decided he will vote yes. Be prepared to be disappointed when another actually Soros funded protester screams at him in an elevator again and he changes his mind though. I don't necessarily think he will change his mind, but it's certainly not unlikely either. http://dailycaller.com/2018/10/05/flake-reveals-vote-kavanaugh/


I just think if you call yourself "Non-partisan" as a way to collect funds from both sides, you should have to actually perform that way.

It's one of the main reasons I hate the legacy media so much. CNN, the Washington Post and the New York Times claim impartiality but are clearly propaganda arms of the Left. At least Breitbart and their ilk state that they are conservative leaning.

There used to be a law that provided equality of coverage and while I don't like the idea of that sort of anti-bias censorship, I do like the idea of identifying yourself accurately. Truth in advertising and all that.
 
Back