Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I fully believe the left genuinelly considers tears a weapon.
938513fce68b42d883efb8335680b551.png
 
It's never good enough for these people, don't show emotion = toxic mascunlinity Show emotion = weaponizing tears.

THE FUCK DO THEY WANT FROM US.

Women want you to be a man.

Intersectional hyper hair hambeast bycycles want you to choke them while you rail them shut up and let them rule.
 
View attachment 559680

And maybe you can get arrested for harassment you moron, oh wait she is a socialist, double moron
We rarely arrest and almost never charge socialists in this country even when they assault people and do property damage. Generally because they do it in polities with rather socialist leadership. It's pretty sad tbh.
 
THE FUCK DO THEY WANT FROM US.
Obedience.

View attachment 559680

And maybe you can get arrested for harassment you moron, oh wait she is a socialist, double moron
If someone said to me "Do what I want you to do or I'll make the rest of your life a living hell, I'd be more inclined to do the opposite of what they wanted. Fuck 'em.
upload_2018-10-6_2-45-34.jpeg
 
If someone said to me "Do what I want you to do or I'll make the rest of your life a living heel, I'd be more inclined to do the opposite of what they wanted. Fuck 'em.

Doing that is the equivalent of children holding their breath because they are not getting what they want only that with adults and totally serious
 
There used to be a law that provided equality of coverage and while I don't like the idea of that sort of anti-bias censorship, I do like the idea of identifying yourself accurately. Truth in advertising and all that.

The Fairness Doctrine was joke, to the point where it was never enforced in it's forty-odd year life. However good the idea may look on paper, even ignoring the free speech implications, the fact is when you have the New York Times editorial board deciding what's "fair," you get... well, the New York Times editorial board.
 
Collins Speaking now.

If she votes yes, the confirmation should be almost certain. Judging from her speech so far, it sounds to me like she will vote yes.

EDIT: Sounds like Collins have actually read through Cavanaugh's previous verdicts and decisions and will make a decision based on his legal career! What a novel concept eh, Democratic senators?
 
Last edited:
Big dick swingin' Lindsey Graham and Hand wavin' Orrin Hatch give me hope for the GOP.

Graham telling protesters to move to South Carolina:

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1048287134803791874

View attachment 559694

WE ARE GOING TO TAKE OUT OF YOUR OFFICE

*whip a privileged cellphone with the most gay ass protector ever see by mankind*

and you call that screaming? jajaja

BELIEVE YOUR MOTHER BELIEVE YOUR SISTERS

but fuck your Father and brothers because they are white males
 
It is physically harder for a man to cry as our tear ducts are larger so take longer to fill up. That's why when you see tears rolling down a mans face you know he is feeling genuine emotion, it is difficult for a man to fake cry not impossible but difficult.

Wait, you mean there's science behind the single manly tear??
(no I can't ever get through that song without laughing)
 
I love how leftists are comparing the Trump Presidency to "A Handmaid's Tale," a fictional show where women are required to wear modest clothing against their will ... And yet they have Sharia Law supporter Linda Sarsour as the leader of their Women's March as she "Muslim-splains" why hijabs are a symbol of liberation for women.

L-O-fucking-L. The projection couldn't get any stronger than this, right?

Lets not forgrt Sarasiur openly defends forced female genital mutilation. You cant make this shit up.
 
Back