Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

That's why the Kiwis made this thread to mock the forever shame of the Democrats of losing to a guy who said "Only Rosie O'Donell's a pig." Honest man.
That was pure gold, and completely out of left field. I really can't decide who I want to watch debating him in 2020. Warren would be hilarious. I think the most lulz would be debating Booker, though tbh. Just a feeling. Booker is a fucking moron.
 
That was pure gold, and completely out of left field. I really can't decide who I want to watch debating him in 2020. Warren would be hilarious. I think the most lulz would be debating Booker, though tbh. Just a feeling. Booker is a fucking moron.
Booker would be funny as fuck. Heck even if somehow Trump lost, we would get Cory in the House memes from Booker
 
fa602d2cc85502c34591f81d842f545b.png


3babe69748012453548038c181084d5e.png
Doesn’t this mean that he’s already convinced Trump will win?
 

White men in MAGA hats being walked on leashes around Trump’s Hollywood star. You can’t make this up.


In case anyone was still on the fence about just how racist the Democrat party in the US become: fret no more, they only want to subjugate white people, maybe eradicate them too, time permitting. No biggie.

View attachment 684010





Casting call for the project:
CASTING CALL for 3.3 Performance Art / Music Video in Los Angeles with INDecline


Indecline, run by the same guys who paid homeless people to fight and sold tapes of it, and were arrested for trying to traffic dismembered baby parts out of Thailand. Real stand up outfit there.

Kinky.

I like how there are at least two white dudes in black in the first photo (I have suspicions about three more). Oh, except they don't "identify" that way. All white men have to do to avoid being put in leashes is to throw on a dress.
 
Newspapers do not really hire reporters and the person is trying to say reporters "only report facts" and that they're objective. A better way of showing that media is biased is that most journalists donated in 2016 donated to Hillary.
 
Last edited:
Watch it just be a piece where they pretend to be neutral, "examine" the facts, and conclude that orange man is bad anyway.

That or someone's about to be in a new line of work.
Someone is trying to come across as the trustworthy party in a media landscape full of dinosaurs who haven’t cottoned onto how easily they can be fact checked now. The point of the article is still Orange Man who is Bad, but now you just have one person breaking the kayfabe and telling their team to lie more convincingly.
 
Watch it just be a piece where they pretend to be neutral, "examine" the facts, and conclude that orange man is bad anyway.

That or someone's about to be in a new line of work.

No, in point of fact, he makes a couple of weak gestures toward "Trump is too focused on the wall and he says mean things", but mostly acknowledges that even if you want migration, we're unable to attend to the needs of so many so fast. He even points out that we can't handle medical attention and humanitarian efforts on the scale that mass migration would require, and uses the word "sovereignty" unironically as he points out that the migration doesn't allow us to determine our own policy.

Articles like this get written to test the waters, and they only get published with permission. I begin to suspect that things are about to go very, very wrong for the open-borders side...
 
91385be701a7361885f4b835ae0cd864.png

5dd35d442ef07dc5a26d07fe044c19ea.png
52bf560676cbabe5499df5eed9ab34c8.png


... This was published in Politico? How the Hell did that happen?
What is so hard to understand? Trump is manufacturing a crisis that just so happens to exist.

It's like when he talked about white farmer's land being seized and white farmers being murdered in africa. Sure, maybe it's true, but it's also a far alt-right white supremecist nationalist nazi talking point, which is more important.
 
No, in point of fact, he makes a couple of weak gestures toward "Trump is too focused on the wall and he says mean things", but mostly acknowledges that even if you want migration, we're unable to attend to the needs of so many so fast. He even points out that we can't handle medical attention and humanitarian efforts on the scale that mass migration would require, and uses the word "sovereignty" unironically as he points out that the migration doesn't allow us to determine our own policy.

Articles like this get written to test the waters, and they only get published with permission. I begin to suspect that things are about to go very, very wrong for the open-borders side...
They all saw that the public voiced support for the president’s immigration policy when specifically quizzed on it after the SOTU.
 
Back