- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Yea wasn't looking at it from an angle and more of a "isn't this ironic" moment. Like someone who is Feminist AF is keyed in on Vic possibly attending said con but no qualms on who sponsors said con.
Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter mindlessobserver
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2019
Well then stop going to the biggest anime convention in North America because Fakku sponsors Anime Expo regularly, or at the very least has a huge presence.
I love it when cosplay thots get all moralistic about sex and sexuality. You know they're the people that keep the obnoxious yaoi sellers in business.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
For her, not bad. She's just shouting her feelings on a street corner. Its obnoxious, but not legally actionable from what I can see. Any sort of suit would get tossed on 1st amendment grounds. As it should IMO. Keep in mind what got Mark Waid in trouble was not him sperging about Meyer on twitter, it was sperging on twitter, saying he was going to call Antarctic Press about how evil Meyer does, then he DOES call Anatarctic Press, and then their contract with Meyer got shit canned. You really have to go out of your way to get in trouble. What is getting these idiots in trouble is not what they are saying on twitter specifically. Its them doing real actionable shit off of twitter, and then bragging about it on twitter. The tweets are evidence of the legally actionable stuff.
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2019
Maybe. Chris Sabat's back on Twitter. Where the fuck was he for almost two weeks?
Monica didn't even post the study. I found out about the study based on the figure she gave. These people tend to do that a lot. They read the headline of a certain article, and use that to state something without even looking at the study.
Jamie Marchi did the same thing. She's stated the "90-98%" likeliness of getting it right, based on the idea that 2-10% of sexual assault cases in the United States are "false". That 2-10% figure is true, but what's always been the problem stated in these studies is the definition of "false". "False" is generally considered two kinds of police reports: reports that are revealed to be false based on evidence, or reports that are listed as sexual assault in which the description of events doesn't constitute sexual assault.
Unsubstantiated reports are neither true nor false.
I've managed to find so little information about the statistics for unsubstantiated reports that I had to go to the Department of Defense website for sexual assault statistics in the military. Here's what I found:
- 62% of sexual assaults reported to the officials in fiscal year 2017 are cases where there was evidence to enact disciplinary on the assailant
- 2% of sexual assaults reported to the officials in fiscal year 2017 are cases where there was evidence to show that there was no sexual assault that happened, therefore disciplinary action was put on the accuser
- 36% of sexual assaults reported to the officials in fiscal year 2017 are cases where there was no evidence of any sexual assault happening, so disciplinary action could not be taken for anyone
https://www.sapr.mil/public/docs/re...ndix_B_Statistical_Data_on_Sexual_Assault.pdf (Page 22) (Not secure, be warned.)
But these people don't care. Because they're lazy. They're bimbos. They want to focus on the things they like, not the things that can destroy their viewpoint on society. All it takes is a little research instead of looking at the first headline you see on Google.
I don't know about this. It is true that you can't please these banshees that want Vic to die in a river, but at the same time, these court cases are not about whether the sexual assault happened. We know there's no evidence other than the words of the "witnesses". The investigation at Funimation, in all likelihood, only confirmed that these people were in the same place at the same time. Vic probably attested to that. The point of these cases is the defamation and other damages brought on because of them.
It's clear these people don't listen to lawyers. They don't listen to Nick or Ty and their streams. These people live in this massive-ass echo chamber. They have no knowledge of Texas state law. They have no knowledge of Defense by Truth. They just want to say their piece and be devoid of any criticism, debunking, or deconstruction of what they just said.
https://www.texaspress.com/law-a-the-media-in-texas-libel-defenses-01
Compare that with the fact that Jamie's GoFundMe is still not reached its stated goal after 17 days, despite the clout that this controversy received, meanwhile Vic's was funded in less than two weeks.
This isn't a competition. It shows that Vic's fans, and by extension the right and the just, will support him, while the progressives who say they support the people they claim they support don't.
Last edited:
Son of Sparda 84
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
Chris says Vic is an actor, but again I ask. WHY WOULD HE GO TO COURT? Does Chris think that Vic would try to be a sympathize with judge and jury? Try to fake cry so they can feel bad for him? Can y'all tell me when has the accuser ever been the one to suggest going to court?
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
CR is cancerous as fuck. Some of CR's staff either work with or signal boost AnimeFeminist, which is the base of one of those SJW tricks I mentioned before -- SJWs inside a company (US Localizers) using SJWs outside a company (AnimeFeminist) to create pressure to "force" them to do something they both want.
I would be absolutely gobsmacked if they have Vic back for season 3.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2019
I think I missed something.
They've been served, right? It's way overdue.
I'm under the impression they prob did get served but they're playing like they didn't?
They've been served, right? It's way overdue.
I'm under the impression they prob did get served but they're playing like they didn't?
I want to see them burn, dammit
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Nothing official yet, though Nick did strongly hint at some kind of letters being sent out late last week and arriving this week.
If anything, they might've received C&D papers (I forget the exact name), followed by papers telling them to preserve evidence. The actual lawsuit papers come after that.
If anything, they might've received C&D papers (I forget the exact name), followed by papers telling them to preserve evidence. The actual lawsuit papers come after that.
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2019
Unfortunately we've reached the part where we have to sit and wait. BHBH is generating !!FUN!! behind closed doors, things are developing at a similar pace to before the curtain was drawn, but we won't be able to see it for the next, and i base this estimate on my years of experience of pulling things out of my ass, 4-5 months since this is supposed to be a fast pace case.
I imagine every 3-4 weeks now we'll get a 3 hour Rackets stream rounding up all recent info that he's allowed to give, and when the floodgates eventually open we'll have a full week of autismal circus as the pails of well aged milk are brought forth. Hell, discovery data alone will probably wreck Nick's vocal chords and sleep schedule.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I'd assume a retraction request pursuant to Texas defamation law, because you have to send that before you can pursue an action if you want exemplary (punitive) damages.
Well, I wouldn't assume anything actually until we see it, but that's the most likely thing to be sent first.
- Joined
- May 20, 2016
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
The face of death
People are mocking Ron as a soy boy and what does he do? Does an open mouthed selfie with a chocolate cocktail.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2018
That's J. Michael Tatum. Cut from the same cloth, appearance-wise, though.
BoxofMonkeys
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2019
Looks too clear to be a chocolatini. Looks like maybe some Luxardo cherries perhaps a Kentucky flyer.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2017
I'll never understand the need to pose like a gaping moron when taking a picture.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
To our knowledge they have not been served with a lawsuit yet. But "rumor" is the initial and required formal lettrrs demanding retraction, and to preserve all evidence and communication went out last friday. At least to some parties. Once those go out they get some time to comply. Then the lawsuit gets filed.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
I don't have con stories since I've only attended my first and so far only one con a few years ago and nothing really stood out about it. I did get to be in the panel Maurice LaMarche had, and outside of being too nervous to get up and ask a question I didn't know what to ask, I didn't feel any kind of tension in the room. He was more than happy to tell stories (and got a bit choked up talking about his father), and he was personally sad that Rob Paulsen couldn't join him at that panel because he had thrown out his voice. Backing up what Doug TenNapel had said on Nick's stream about LA voice actors, Maurice didn't talk shit about anyone, not even when he briefly said to withhold judgment for the new Ghostbusters movie and give it a chance (don't remember what brought that up--I could always go look for the podcast that recorded that panel). On the other end of the building, my friend and his brother had a very positive experience with the Jess Harnell autograph session at the same con, and I imagine the energy meeting him is the same as with meeting Vic based on stories and videos I've seen.
So my takeaway is LA voice actors are thrilled to meet and chat with fans, people from Texas aren't.
On Tatum, the only thing I can think of that was funny is when he joked about going through the drive-thru at Jack in the Box and would roleplay as Enel from One Piece.
Oh, so it wasn't a one-time thing, then? I remember seeing a video of him recording a voicemail for someone; guess it's a special request, but the fact he doesn't charge extra for it is really sweet.
Speaking of voicemail requests:
(This was the video I was thinking of, I think, everything's getting buried by this drama.)
So my takeaway is LA voice actors are thrilled to meet and chat with fans, people from Texas aren't.
On Tatum, the only thing I can think of that was funny is when he joked about going through the drive-thru at Jack in the Box and would roleplay as Enel from One Piece.
Oh, so it wasn't a one-time thing, then? I remember seeing a video of him recording a voicemail for someone; guess it's a special request, but the fact he doesn't charge extra for it is really sweet.
Speaking of voicemail requests:
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2019
Pretty much. The best we can do is to just send Nick and Vic's lawyers any information that passes our way that involves these jesters sperging out on Twitter or could compromise these people and their credibility. All without bothering them about it. Besides that, we just have to chill and chat on Kiwi Farms about it until the time comes. I've sent whatever I could to Nick.
As for Vic, he might have to stick with Viz Media and others for now. He's still doing Jojo. He's also doing the second half of Baki. He might be in One Punch Man Season 2 or even Boruto. He could be in Blade Runner: Black Lotus, whenever that comes out. He has his audiobooks as well, and I think it's about time he steps his toe into video games, even if he ends up doing it for non-major roles, like additional voices or walla.
But I do wonder about these other studios these voice actors claim Vic's been kicked out of. Which ones are these? Do they even exist and can they be contacted about them? It seems that even if Vic got kicked out of these studios, he's still somehow making even more money and getting more popularity than before. It's just weird that this would be the case.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2019