Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Dopey Cunt said:
I don't even think you need to be a lawyer to clearly see that Monika is doing everything in her power to avoid marrying Soye. Even in the face of a lawsuit, she still refuses to tie the knot despite the fact that doing it could potentially save her from SOME things such as him forcefully testifying against her or producing evidence against her if the court orders him to.

Man that is pathetic.
Click to expand...

I totally agree, I was giving @JosephTX the benefit of the doubt in being serious when responding to his post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exterminatus, Not A Bug and Dopey Cunt
you know, for all the exceptionalism of regarding monty and RT, I am convinced they are altering the script. Specifically, i'm talking about the writers.

they are on record as ignoring criticism and in their volume 5 commentary they inadvertently admit that it only worked because they are such fuck ups in the writing department that the exact opposite of what they wanted to convey was conveyed instead.

you cannot convince me that such fuck ups are staying loyal to monty's script, however vague. they went off the tracks at some point and its either volume 4, 5, or 6. also, fuck volume 6, god I hate salem.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminatus, madethistocomment, The Demon Pimp of Razgriz and 1 other person
JosephTX said:
You guys have to be careful with that since Texas still has common law marriage, and they already meet two prongs of the 3 prong test, all they have to do now is call each other husband and wife and at that moment they're legally married per Texas Law
Click to expand...

At the same time they may have only fulfilled one requirement - intent to marry

The third isn't met (soy is clear they're NOT married ergo they're not presenting themselves as such).

The second is where it gets interesting. Putting financials aside let's look at what we do know. She hasn't taken his last name which is something that it appears courts in Texas look for. The biggest issue may have is if soy is indeed a cuck that would torpedo the second prong right out of the water.

NB: Not a TX attorney that specializes in their form of common law marriage as such I'll defer to even a Texas paralegal on this.
 
Burnout said:
One of the prongs, according to this site is they "agreed to be married". In my not a legal professional opinion, they're going out of their way to NOT be married, considering they're specifically engaged.

It's ridiculously easy to pay a few bucks to get a marriage license - in some places there's a blood test and few days waiting period (72 hours in Texas) - and then have a county clerk make it official. I could be wrong, but I'm of the impression that a competent lawyer could successfully argue they've put effort into avoiding marriage.
Click to expand...
Actually being engaged, or specifically "making an agreement to get married" is one prong which being engaged clearly satisfies.

The other prong is living together.

The final prong is holding themselves out to be married publicly, which can be satisfied by a simple Facebook relationship status.
 
mindlessobserver said:
50k is optimistic. I refer everyone here to the case of Alex Mauer, which you can read about on the farms as it was recorded heavily too. Tl;dr it was a case of a chiptune writing troon doing fraudulent DMCA takedowns of YouTube videos covering a game made by an indie publisher who had not paid him. It was an autism storm that lasted an entire year. There were no facts in dispute and both the plaintiff and the defendant were broke, relying on crowdfunding and a YouTube lawyer (Leonard french) working at half rate. It cost 25,000 dollars in federal court. And that because Mauer disputed the initial filing pro se in a hand written affidavit that would have been better served written in crayons then pen

Lawsuits are fucking expensive.
Click to expand...
Ah, yes, the case that brought me to The Farms. That shit was fucking nuts. And I still, to this day, catch myself calling our favorite Youtube Copyright Attorney GoodBoy Lemnard.

I really hope Alex hasn't utterly and needlessly wasted anymore ice in local 7-11's since the last time we heard from him.

verissimus said:
...can anyone explain to me how all of the sudden EVS has met Vic because that sounds like 100% bullshit.
Click to expand...
So don't quote me on this because I'm not 100% sure, and if anyone can correct me feel free, but I seem to recall Ethan saying pretty early when this happened that he was on a phonecall with Vic to give him some advice about how to handle the SJW mob coming after him- this was before he lawyered up, before the GFM, and it wasn't said but I inferred that Nick got the two of them in contact since, obviously, EVS has been through his own riggeraramole with the Current Year Witchhunt. Again, though, could be wrong. I'll go look and see if I can hunt the video down when I have some extra time.

Negromancer said:
especially tranny whores

she's too fat to make a living as a whore
Click to expand...
She's definitely not too fat. She's not even too much of a cunt. Her problem is that she doesn't own her bad behavior. If she just came out and admitted to all the things that everyone knows that she does, just did it out in front for everyone to see and said, "Yeah, so what? What are you going to do about it?" she'd have more people lined up to be her paypiggies. But she tries to play coy, and is shit at it.

Vampy said:
All said and risking being called a moron myself: the hell is IBS? googling it gives me a medical issue (unless they are a medical issue, who knows).

Rude, Yamcha is endearingly pathetic.
Click to expand...
IBS and Irritable Bowel Syndrome are bascially one and the same now, so....

Also yes, Yamcha is doing his best and I, for one, respect it. It's cute how he keeps going out there and attempting to stop some baddies, even if all he's doing is wasting a bit of time so someone more powerful can come and stop them. Reminds me a bit of Mumen Rider, whom I love and adore.


I don't know what's funnier, the people who are playing along, or the people who are taking the bait.
archive.li

Believebulma on Twitter: "hes more of a man than you will ever be. He…

archived 17 Apr 2019 14:44:02 UTC
archive.li archive.li
728858
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Not A Bug and Vampy
BoxofMonkeys said:
At the same time they may have only fulfilled one requirement - intent to marry

The third isn't met (soy is clear they're NOT married ergo they're not presenting themselves as such).

The second is where it gets interesting. Putting financials aside let's look at what we do know. She hasn't taken his last name which is something that it appears courts in Texas look for. The biggest issue may have is if soy is indeed a cuck that would torpedo the second prong right out of the water.

NB: Not a TX attorney that specializes in their form of common law marriage as such I'll defer to even a Texas paralegal on this.
Click to expand...
Texas is a 3 prong test
  1. Cohabitation
  2. Agreement to get married
  3. Acting Married Publicly
Once all conditions are met you are legally married under Texas law but you have to go through the courts to get a divorce.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Exterminatus, Not A Bug and Recoil
JosephTX said:
Actually being engaged, or specifically "making an agreement to get married" is one prong which being engaged clearly satisfies.

The other prong is living together.

The final prong is holding themselves out to be married publicly, which can be satisfied by a simple Facebook relationship status.
Click to expand...

That's nice and all, but as I've already presented, they've gone out of their way to avoid actually being married. Further, they're NOT holding themselves out to be married. It "can" (possibly) be satisfied with a Facebook status, but that's only relevant if they actually DO that.

JosephTX said:
Texas is a 3 prong test
  1. Cohabitation
  2. Agreement to get married
  3. Acting Married Publicly
Once all conditions are met you are legally married under Texas law but you have to go through the courts to get a divorce.
Click to expand...

Now you're just repeating yourself and adding nothing to the conversation with this post. I'd even disagree with this, it only makes them potentially eligible for common law marriage which is NOT the same as "legally married" until it's declared. Common law marriage does not, for example, suddenly allow someone to change their tax filing status or insurance rates until it's recognized.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SinglePlayerCarl and Captain Manning
  • Like
Reactions: Interesting Hypothesis, Exterminatus, Francis York Morgan and 3 others
JosephTX said:
Texas is a 3 prong test
  1. Cohabitation
  2. Agreement to get married
  3. Acting Married Publicly
Once all conditions are met you are legally married under Texas law but you have to go through the courts to get a divorce.
Click to expand...
They don't meet 3. They do 2. 1 I'm having an issue with as it appears to be a bit more complicated than simple cohab (eg: does she use his last name? Are their financials commingled? Are they a spouse on one/the others insurance? Do they have children together - no doesn't count against them) however yes will help. Again however if you're an attorney in TX I'll defer.

What would be lulzy would be if they did go the "were married" route and then lost so they doubled their potential debt.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Burnout
Dopey Cunt said:
Thank you for gracing me with this truly exceptional piece of comedy.

"Waaah my mommy's dildo is a lawyer and he said you can't say mean things to me on the internet."
Click to expand...
My dog's girlfriend's dad's owner is also a lawyer. So if you bully me i am finna sue you and i won't even have to pay.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Recoil
BigDuckEnergy said:
Bait well and truly took?
Click to expand...
I don't know what to believe. If this BelieveBulma person actually believes their own crap or if they have the presence of mind to troll people to that insane level. Either way, lulz for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not A Bug
Hellshake Yano said:
SJW Spiderman (does he have a page or is he linked in the CG thread?) tweeted out for people to report TUG's stream last night. While looking at the replies, an Anime Feminist affiliate judges someones taste in fandom. Hmm... gatekeeping much?
View attachment 728730
Click to expand...
Drip Feed said:
They infight on any and everything, they need a carrot and stick in the form of a cosplay whore to just about stay on task.
Click to expand...

They sound like tryhards who only ever skimmed through Z.
 
Burnout said:
I totally agree, I was giving @JosephTX the benefit of the doubt in being serious when responding to his post.
Click to expand...
I don't see why I need the benefit of the doubt considering the fact I regularly make posts citing and explaining Texas law (mostly criminal and constitutional law; Civil law really doesn't interest me) in A&H when it's relevant; mainly due to the fact i study law partly as a side interest and partly because in my line of work we constantly have to be on top of and to the very letter of the law as we are on the very edge of legality on a regular basis.

Not only that but I know this first hand personally as I'm currently in the process of being common law married and I'm only one prong (cohabitation) away from satisfying it at which point I simply change my status on my taxes from single to married and it's indisputable from that point fourth.
 
  • Horrifying
  • TMI
Reactions: Kosher Salt and Mr. 0
Solo Wing Pixy said:
@ShortRound wasn't really sure about posting this here but since someone else did why not.

I did receive my Fear The Beard patch a few days ago. Thanks and keep it up you crazy WeebWars arms dealer.
Click to expand...
Thanks, Im glad you like it for anyone else that ordered please be patient, I ship USPS ground and its a 5 to 9 day window from when it gets dropped off at the post office.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Capsaicin Addict, Nobleberry, Burnout and 7 others
JosephTX said:
I don't see why I need the benefit of the doubt considering the fact I regularly make posts citing and explaining Texas law (mostly criminal and constitutional law; Civil law really doesn't interest me) in A&H when it's relevant; mainly due to the fact i study law partly as a side interest and partly because in my line of work we constantly have to be on top of and to the very letter of the law as we are on the very edge of legality on a regular basis.

Not only that but I know this first hand personally as I'm currently in the process of being common law married and I'm only one prong (cohabitation) away from satisfying it at which point I simply change my status on my taxes from single to married and it's indisputable from that point fourth.
Click to expand...
I don't think anyone is questioning your knowledge on the subject of Texas law. We're just saying that Soye and Rial are going out of their way to avoid crossing over the last boundary despite how laughably easy it is for them to do so and that even if they did, the most it would do is protect Rial from having Soye be forcibly ordered by the court to testify against her or produce evidence against her claims since they weren't legally married at the time of all the events Rial is accusing Vic of being inappropriate in.

So yes, it is just a teeny little thing keeping them from being recognized as a married couple in texas law as you've said, but they are refusing to do said teeny little thing to officially become husband and wife. For some reason they just refuse to publically acknowledge one another as husband and wife even if it offers some mediocre protection to Rial from Soye being forced to turn against her by the court. We're just laughing at them because of how retarded they and everything else in #kickvic is.

@Solo Wing Pixy Oh hooo? Really? I'm new so I haven't got a clue. There's a reason my name is Dopey Cunt.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Goober_au, Burnout, Exterminatus and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back