Just to add up to what has already been said about the moderation : if you mock another member for having a low post account, you can be banned. It's against the rule. Problem is, the moderation also ban people frequently if they have a "junior account" (registered for 2 months or less) and decide to say something controversial. They absolutely factor your post-count in their decision and they're not afraid to shame you for that in their ban justification.
Perfect exemple recently :
Because it does look like the worst idea ever and those 73% on RT (which will be lower at the end of the process), doesn't change a thing. It's funny people to see some people clinging at what they might perceive as mixed/good reviews like it will save the trainwreck that is this movie. It just...
www.resetera.com
View attachment 749868
User banned 5 days (lmao) for mocking a Nintendo product, which is considered trolling while in "junior phase".
View attachment 749870
User warned for "post-count shaming", in the exact same conversation. Probably by the same moderator, which makes it even worse.
I know we're speaking about dumb persons, but that's reaching a new high of stupid moderation. The moderation themselves will punish you way harder for having an account with low post count. How can they warn/ban people for "post-count shaming" when they factor it in their decision ?
By the way, 5 days for saying fucking Detective Pikachu is a stupid idea and a cash grab

Just as a comparison, here's the thread about the Sonic upcoming movie (which looks as much as stupid) :
https://www.resetera.com/threads/sonic-the-hedgehog-first-trailer.114323/
19 pages about how the movie is a stupid idea and looks awful. Barely anyone banned for it. Mocking Detective Pikachu though ? Prepare your anus. Resetera smells like a Nintendo Gulag. I wouldn't be surprised if Isamu Fukui was paid by Nintendo themselves at some point, thinking this would be the new Neogaf and a big sphere of influence.
Lmao, you bastard. I'm going to steal that line.