Manosphere Fschmidt / Franklin Richard Schmidt - Loveshy God

[Arkangel]

For all our sakes, let's hope he DOESN'T come back. He used to run his big rape apologist mouth every chance he got at one of the other message boards I regularly visit and it made everybody else there want to punch his lights out. Fschmidt-- or "Fshit" as I like to call him --is misogyny and hate incarnate.

Why? We're hear to laugh at lolcows. Not to be afraid of them. fschimdt is a joke and jokes are meant to be laughed at.

 

[CKO87]

Who said anything about being afraid? I just feel like we've all got better things to do on this board than put up with his raging paranoia or his idiocy.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Who said anything about being afraid? I just feel like we've all got better things to do on this board than put up with his raging paranoia or his idiocy.

I like to think the Holden thread has proven that raging paranoia and idiocy are the lolcow thread's bread and butter.

 

[namazuros]

I feel bad for his daughters. What a creepy person.

 

[Loke]

Lots of indentured servitude, then.

And actual, good old fashioned slavery. Leviticus details how one can own, beat, and keep a non-Jewish slave. Only Jewish slaves who owed money could be indebtured servants, and a propective master could force that Jewish slave to take a wife, and then he would be forced to stay forever. Old Testament is such a great template for a society! Let's talk about how the barbarian desert Jews committed genocide and took virgins as sex slaves again and again. Morals, my foot.

 

[Saney]

Trouble in the LS forums, as even the members there are disgusted with Fschmidt's attitude towards the terror attack in Paris. So, naturally, Marjan leapt to his hero's defence.

Bravo! I plan to write a post on CoAlpha this shabbat honoring the brave jihadists who risked their lives to kill the liberal French scum.

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? Since when do people deserve to die for mocking the prophet of one of the three major Abrahamic superstitions? You claim to oppose oppression, but you don't seem to have any qualms about oppression when politico-religious forces attack their opponents. You're a hypocrite: you like liberty when it works out well for you, but not when others use freedom of speech to point out the idiocy of your beliefs.

Who cares about that. They deserve to die because they created a society where idiots like you are kings.
Tell that to those 100 forums that banned him.

Aw, it's ok Marjan, you and Fschmidt are still welcome here. We still listen.

I am 100 % pro freedom of speech which means also being able to critique judaism, feminism and other current political correct viewpoints

So am I. Too bad modern culture disagrees.

 

[EI 903]

I'm curious now what Frank would consider the bravest thing he's done in his life. I bet coming here to confront us would make his top 10, at least.

 

[XH 502]

I don't think poor Frank is aware of what "freedom of speech" means or entails. At the very least he falls into the predictable "I support freedom of speech, but only in regards to myself and the people I morally agree with" philosophy.

I'm curious now what Frank would consider the bravest thing he's done in his life. I bet coming here to confront us would make his top 10, at least.

If I had to guess I'd say his Mexico adventure to find a willing bride is #1 on that list. He went out of his way to brave the perils of a country fraught with violence to seek the ever-elusive and highly dangerous female fuck toy. Frank is a goddamn veteran of the Loveshy war and should be respected as such.

 

[Saney]

I'm curious now what Frank would consider the bravest thing he's done in his life. I bet coming here to confront us would make his top 10, at least.

He so bravely faced us insane, modernist, liberal Kiwis. Then he bravely ran away when we wouldn't accommodate him. Bravely ran away, away, bravely ran away.

 

[Positron]

He's Jewish, so I can have an excuse to have anti semitic jokes

Even more fun: he is a Jew who supports Nazism.

 

[Trombonista]

Even more fun: he is a Jew who supports Nazism.

I need to shell out for the horrifying rating, don't I?

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

Even more fun: he is a Jew who supports Nazism.

Because the true enemy of the Nazi were the liberals!

Or something like that. I don't want to think about it too hard if he's not going to bother to show up.

 

[Saney]

First of all, while your basic idea that government and forums aren't the same is correct, [Fschmidt] wasn't critized. He was insulted and banned, simply for not having a PC opinion. He doesn't want to defend his ideas? He wasn't even allowed to.


And this is what liberals in the America want the government to do as well. Just like they largely achieved in Europe.

The irony is that liberalism is the most hateful ideology ever conceived, much more hateful than any radical Islam. It virtually sees various groups of people as utter scum based on their various traits that were always seen as postitive in sane societies.

@Holden, @fschmidt, you're both still welcome here, you can't say we've banned you.

Nazis don't deserve freedom

Are you saying that people with Nazi beliefs don't deserve freedom? Are you saying that the government should regulate our beliefs?

Makes about as much sense as your own oft-stated opinion that people you find immoral don't deserve to live.

So, how long do you think until he and Marjan ditch the Loveshy forum for being too liberal?

 

[Cuck Norris]

@Holden, @fschmidt, you're both still welcome here, you can't say we've banned you.







So, how long do you think until he and Marjan ditch the Loveshy forum for being too liberal?

If they did then we'd be all they have left.

 

[Saney]

Azazel, I never argued this is the more sane and moral approach. I just said that going to a hooker wasn't an option for me as I was LS, aka phobic.

Well, the mother thing was also not an option really, but just explaining why I couldn't consider a hooker.

As for WW, I never argued against his claim that fschmidt isn't persecuted in a way that he should fear for his life. But that's mostly because liberals are in majority and pussies. Why would they shoot anybody?

fschmidt feels persecuted because liberals (by which he means anyone to the left of the right end of the universe) don't kiss his ass and join his cult or whatever it is he has going. i don't know why the powers that be would have any interest in suppressing his cult, nor do i see anything that constitutes anything like the brutal crackdown he's portraying (if anything, useless cults like that are beneficial to them, so why bother with suppression?).

Barackalypse is totally right about that, too. The French government has pushed for some stupid horseshit like banning the hijab for no real reason except racist assholes want to. Shit like that to appease people who don't deserve appeasement doesn't help.

Yes alwayslate, you are proving yourself to be a model member of modern culture. What are the attributes of modern culture? Intolerance and dishonesty, both of which you have demonstrated in this thread. You have stated that you oppose free speech. Intolerance, check. Your quote above is a clear lie because I basically support ALL cultures except modern culture, which shows I have no interest in having my ass kissed. Dishonesty, check.

Yeah, I'm calling bullshit on that.

Damn right I don't tolerate you.
You're a pathological liar and have been for years so, uh, yeah. Also, what culture have you supported except those that conform to your bullshit, paleoconservative view of the world? Either you lack the reasoning capabilities to understand your own numerous posts, or you're not only a liar but proud to be a liar.
Fortunately you're also largely impotent, and have an inflated sense of your own importance. Starting your messianic cult or whatever must get to your head.

The problem is that people like you think that your bullshit is entitled to "fairness", even though it's a blatant and deliberate assault on intellectual integrity. You use free speech as a shield to insist that others cannot criticize you, and hurl an endless stream of shit loud enough so no one else can get a word in. People like you are a textbook example of how to game the freedoms of a liberal democracy (ooh, that word, liberal, funny that), in order to destroy a free society by using its own rules against it. People like you have done it many times, only they are much better at doing it because they're intelligent enough to actually do something, unlike you.

Now go back to your CoAlpha cult or whatever and engage in some mutual masturbation or whatever it is you people do.

Looks like they're getting real tired of his shit.

alwayslate is just another typical modernist moron who I am putting on ignore.

Pussy.

oh noes, i'm getting ignored. brb, sulking.

Told.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

@Saney, where was this?

 

[Saney]

@Saney, where was this?

LS Forum, on their guest viewable forums.

 

[WaterMoccasin]

More @fschmidt from FSTDT:

Spoiler: TL; DR Rape Apology

"Nazi Germany serves as a benchmark of evil, but I think American women are worse. In Nazi Germany, the Nazis had to pick particularly sadistic members of society to operate the concentration camps. The only crime of the average German was to look the other way. If the average German had been forced to see the suffering of the Jews in the concentration camps, they probably would have had second thoughts. Compare this to American women. The average American woman not only tolerates the suffering of single men, but actively contributes to it with their provocative dress. If confronted by the suffering of single men caused by sexual deprivation, the likely reaction of American women would be to giggle. In Nazi Germany, most Germans were not active in torturing people, but in Feminazi America, most women are active in torturing men. I do not think such women deserve any sympathy if they are raped, any more than Nazis convicted of war crimes deserve sympathy if they were punished.

The rape of most American women is justified because there is no other legal means for many men to get sex in America. This is similar to the reason that I feel Robin Hood was justified in stealing from the rich. In England at the time, there was no social mobility, and the poor had no other way of getting enough money other than to steal. What is normally a crime becomes justified when alternative means of meeting a person's basic needs are denied.

But saying rape is justified is a weaker statement than saying American women deserve to be raped, so let me explain this. Is a starving person justified in stealing from a rich person? I think so. Does the rich person deserve to be stolen from? Not if the starving person's condition isn't the rich person's fault. In fact, in this case, the rich person would be justified in defending his property from the starving person. Here we have two people in conflict, each of whom is justified in his actions, and neither of whom deserves this conflict. But now let's look at the case where the starving person is starving because of actions by the rich person. In this case, not only is the starving person justified in stealing from the rich person, but the rich person deserves to be stolen from. This is why Robin Hood is remembered as a hero, because not only did he provide for the poor who were in need, but he also stole from the rich who were the cause of the poor people's poverty, and therefore who deserved to be stolen from.

My argument regarding rape is the same, just applied to sex as opposed to wealth. An American woman who dresses provocatively and opposes legal prostitution is a cause of sexual starvation among single men in America, and therefore, not only is her rape justified, but she deserves to be raped. "

The whole idea that sex is just some transaction really gets my goat. I suppose I shouldn't be shocked to find that he supports prostitution, though. It's a model for his conception of sex in general. If I can think of anything else to say, I'll say it later.

Edited for formatting and addition of the last sentence

 

[Ruin]

More @fschmidt from FSTDT:

Spoiler: TL; DR Rape Apology

"Nazi Germany serves as a benchmark of evil, but I think American women are worse. In Nazi Germany, the Nazis had to pick particularly sadistic members of society to operate the concentration camps. The only crime of the average German was to look the other way. If the average German had been forced to see the suffering of the Jews in the concentration camps, they probably would have had second thoughts. Compare this to American women. The average American woman not only tolerates the suffering of single men, but actively contributes to it with their provocative dress. If confronted by the suffering of single men caused by sexual deprivation, the likely reaction of American women would be to giggle. In Nazi Germany, most Germans were not active in torturing people, but in Feminazi America, most women are active in torturing men. I do not think such women deserve any sympathy if they are raped, any more than Nazis convicted of war crimes deserve sympathy if they were punished.

The rape of most American women is justified because there is no other legal means for many men to get sex in America. This is similar to the reason that I feel Robin Hood was justified in stealing from the rich. In England at the time, there was no social mobility, and the poor had no other way of getting enough money other than to steal. What is normally a crime becomes justified when alternative means of meeting a person's basic needs are denied.

But saying rape is justified is a weaker statement than saying American women deserve to be raped, so let me explain this. Is a starving person justified in stealing from a rich person? I think so. Does the rich person deserve to be stolen from? Not if the starving person's condition isn't the rich person's fault. In fact, in this case, the rich person would be justified in defending his property from the starving person. Here we have two people in conflict, each of whom is justified in his actions, and neither of whom deserves this conflict. But now let's look at the case where the starving person is starving because of actions by the rich person. In this case, not only is the starving person justified in stealing from the rich person, but the rich person deserves to be stolen from. This is why Robin Hood is remembered as a hero, because not only did he provide for the poor who were in need, but he also stole from the rich who were the cause of the poor people's poverty, and therefore who deserved to be stolen from.

My argument regarding rape is the same, just applied to sex as opposed to wealth. An American woman who dresses provocatively and opposes legal prostitution is a cause of sexual starvation among single men in America, and therefore, not only is her rape justified, but she deserves to be raped. "

The whole idea that sex is just some transaction really gets my goat. I suppose I shouldn't be shocked to find that he supports prostitution, though. It's a model for his conception of sex in general. If I can think of anything else to say, I'll say it later.

Edited for formatting and addition of the last sentence

Prostitutes can refuse clients so Fsmitd and his Fuckbuddy Holden would still be out of luck.

 

[Positron]

In Nazi Germany, the Nazis had to pick particularly sadistic members of society to operate the concentration camps.

Unfortunately this is not true. Ref: the banality of evil.

If the average German had been forced to see the suffering of the Jews in the concentration camps, they probably would have had second thoughts.

Wishful thinking. Ref: Milgram experiment; Standford experiment.

The average American woman not only tolerates the suffering of single men, but actively contributes to it with their provocative dress. If confronted by the suffering of single men caused by sexual deprivation, the likely reaction of American women would be to giggle.

Women did not torture you with provocative dress. Most men, regardless of sexual satisfaction, can view sexy women without feeling attacked. You choose to torture yourself.

I'll skip that part about rape because it is old hat that we'd dealt with Marijan over and over.