- Joined
- May 17, 2019
There were never real standards in anime dubbing, so something as horrific as what I described can happen.Please don’t make me think that. When it comes to sex and Japan, I would like to think that there are standards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There were never real standards in anime dubbing, so something as horrific as what I described can happen.Please don’t make me think that. When it comes to sex and Japan, I would like to think that there are standards.
If the exhibits are what's causing the length, it's probably filled with tweets or other nonsense in hopes something lands.490 pages?
I've read novels shorter than that.
T. Greg Doucette says that Ron and Monica have filed their TCPA motion. It's 490 pages. He's working on uploading it for everyone. edit: (or just the exhibits alone are 490 pages)
View attachment 847978
That's been their argument from the start, that the volume of "victims" makes it undeniable. This TCPA failing could be enough to unravel their whole strategy.490 pages?
I've read novels shorter than that.
Generally yeah, a TCPA/Anti-SLAPP motion is basically supposed to just say "this is free/protected speech, fuck off with this lawsuit" and then it shifts to the plaintiff to provide evidence that the suit is not a waste of time. This is baffling, and I'm waiting with bated breath to see what they decide to put in as evidence.Maybe I've misunderstood something. but aren't TCPA motions supposed to just be a "yeah, I shouldn't be involved in this at all" and not require 490 FUCKING PAGES to explain?
T. Greg Doucette says that Ron and Monica have filed their TCPA motion. It's 490 pages. He's working on uploading it for everyone. edit: (or just the exhibits alone are 490 pages)
View attachment 847978
Why would you need 490 pages of exhibits to show the facial deficiency of a 14 page complaint? If it were actually facially deficient, you would just need to point it out.
Generally yeah, a TCPA/Anti-SLAPP motion is basically supposed to just say "this is free/protected speech, fuck off with this lawsuit" and then it shifts to the plaintiff to provide evidence that the suit is not a waste of time. This is baffling, and I'm waiting with bated breath to see what they decide to put in as evidence.
It seems like a superlawyer tactic. My guess is that they are more interested in convincing their clients that their motion will be surefire due to the length of the damn thing, rather than making a serious effort to convince a judge of anything. Moronica probably fell for that hook line and sinker.Maybe I've misunderstood something. but aren't TCPA motions supposed to just be a "yeah, I shouldn't be involved in this at all" and not require 490 FUCKING PAGES to explain?
Motherfuckers are gonna cite the thesaurus and encyclopedia entries for rapist, sexual assaulter, pedophile, cuckoldry, and mean tweets.Generally yeah, a TCPA/Anti-SLAPP motion is basically supposed to just say "this is free/protected speech, fuck off with this lawsuit" and then it shifts to the plaintiff to provide evidence that the suit is not a waste of time. This is baffling, and I'm waiting with bated breath to see what they decide to put in as evidence.
Quality > Quantity young grasshopper.It seems like a superlawyer tactic. My guess is that they are more interested in convincing their clients that their motion will be surefire due to the length of the damn thing, rather than making a serious effort to convince a judge of anything. Moronica probably fell for that hook line and sinker.
Speaking of which, I posted this in the PULL thread but a PULL girl is looking to sue Vic for dream rapeanyone here suspect that part of the 490 pages is a print out of the PULL thread?
It's almost like the petition was more sufficient than Lawtwittertm let on.Why would you need 490 pages of exhibits to show the facial deficiency of a 14 page complaint? If it were actually facially deficient, you would just need to point it out.
They're pulling the old "No one is actually going to read 500 pages" trick, which is as juvenile and as effective as it sounds when there's a motion to compel and several sanctions over their head like a Sword of Damocles, and the only reason that sword hasn't dropped was Funi's TCPA, which the other defendants blew more holes in than swiss cheese.Maybe I've misunderstood something. but aren't TCPA motions supposed to just be a "yeah, I shouldn't be involved in this at all" and not require 490 FUCKING PAGES to explain?
Holy shit, please do it. For the love of god turn this exceptionalism Ferrari into an FTL engine of exceptionalism.Speaking of which, I posted this in the PULL thread but a PULL girl is looking to sue Vic for dream rape
View attachment 848029
Don't people usually get around this by filing online?