StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

[Lemmingwise]

One is in most places legal to do (so long as you don't drive), the other involves illicit drugs which are illegal. Most people have been drunk at some point in their lives. The other is the kind of person I would avoid as drug takers can be dangerous (although that's my personal caution, some people can handle drug addicts, some can't)

Although if you're referring to any situation which someone takes something that can render them unconscious or incapable of fighting, whether knowingly or not, this is not free reign for a rapist to do what he or she wants. AFAIK there is no law protecting rapists in the case of someone being unconscious, no matter what the location. Nor do I see any reason for that to be ok, since being unconscious, whether aided by a drink or drug or not, is something we all have to put up with each and every night. And though we try not to do so around strangers, in some cases that just can't be helped.

There are a lot of things legal to do which would be good reasons to not commit to those people.

I've nowhere said anything about protecting rapists (or scammers) and it's completely irrelevant to the things I've said.

In the end it's just like having a greenlight but seeing a car speed recklessly towards where you want to cross the road. It's legal to cross the road. You're entitled to it. You would have bad judgement if you did cross it at that time. And it's stupid to continue walking and say: "Well I was entitled to it". Yes, the law is on your side, yes, the driver who runs you over will get legally prosecuted. But you're still a dumbfuck if you don't use your judgement in that situation.

It's completely unfathomable to me that even when I use these comicly extreme examples, you still defend the idiot protagonist of those examples.

 

[redcent]

There are a lot of things legal to do which would be good reasons to not commit to those people.

I've nowhere said anything about protecting rapists (or scammers) and it's completely irrelevant to the things I've said.

In the end it's just like having a greenlight but seeing a car speed recklessly towards where you want to cross the road. It's legal to cross the road. You're entitled to it. You would have bad judgement if you did cross it at that time. And it's stupid to continue walking and say: "Well I was entitled to it". Yes, the law is on your side, yes, the driver who runs you over will get legally prosecuted. But you're still a dumbfuck if you don't use your judgement in that situation.

It's completely unfathomable to me that even when I use these comicly extreme examples, you still defend the idiot protagonist of those examples.

Because you're blaming a rape victim.

Rape victims are not at fault, when involving the said rape.

I think that's what you want to really do, and you're using you little "who I want to shack up with" which nobody cares about as an angle to say it's their fault. That they're terrible idiot people that no-one should hang around or be with.

And while I did notice you were going to go on about divorcees, it certainly seemed you were ready to blame any female divorcee for using their "bad judgement"

You just want to blame. You're not interested at all in anyone who does fit your little list of standards, just looking for someone who doesn't.

 

[meinhausinneuberlin]

8-29-2019
I think this is a bit better than some of the other comics he has made recently. Reminds me of the skeptics thinking that their content would save the west. Also this comic appears to be setup better than normal like the punchline hits better I think. As well as the punchline being less obvious than some of them before. But best of all this is going to make some people on the right angry Im sure.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

View attachment 912443
8-29-2019
I think this is a bit better than some of the other comics he has made recently. Reminds me of the skeptics thinking that their content would save the west. Also this comic appears to be setup better than normal like the punchline hits better I think. As well as the punchline being less obvious than some of them before. But best of all this is going to make some people on the right angry Im sure.

This is probably the funniest comic he has made recently with how absurd the situation is and as you have said with skeptics believing they can save the west.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Because you're blaming a rape victim.

Rape victims are not at fault, when involving the said rape.

I think that's what you want to really do, and you're using you little "who I want to shack up with" which nobody cares about as an angle to say it's their fault. That they're terrible idiot people that no-one should hang around or be with.

And while I did notice you were going to go on about divorcees, it certainly seemed you were ready to blame any female divorcee for using their "bad judgement"

You just want to blame. You're not interested at all in anyone who does fit your little list of standards, just looking for someone who doesn't.

Lol, am I that transparent? Yes, you got me. I'm a blamer. A hater. A bully. Saying that women shouldn't go to Weinstein's hotel room and then get completely wasted/drunk is clearly my bigbrained idea of finding an excuse to blame all rape victims for their rape. I'm practically a muslim in that way. Obviously the only reason why someone would ever criticize irresponsible behaviour is a deepseated desire to blame. It couldn't possibly be the case that it's a bad idea to put yourself in vulnerable positions next to a sex offender so obvious that there isn't an english speaking person in this world that don't know Weinsteins predatory reputation.

It couldn't possibly be the case that you try to put words in my mouth, like transposing my original point to all rape victims, as if every single rape victim was so grossly irresponsible. It's completely impossible that you had claim that I think that nobody should hang-out with people that are raped.

And that last line is the real cincher. I secretly went looking for you. I am such a devious blamer, that I went into this thread, knowing in advance you would reply to me.

View attachment 912443
8-29-2019
I think this is a bit better than some of the other comics he has made recently. Reminds me of the skeptics thinking that their content would save the west. Also this comic appears to be setup better than normal like the punchline hits better I think. As well as the punchline being less obvious than some of them before. But best of all this is going to make some people on the right angry Im sure.

I'm not so sure. I think this one works from multiple sides. Instead of meaninglessness of podcasts, you can also look at the brunt of the joke being overzealous censors.

Reminds me of some of the sargonites I talked to at one point that believed that censorship really wasn't that bad because it would always streissand.

 

[redcent]

Lol, am I that transparent? Yes, you got me. I'm a blamer. A hater. A bully. Saying that women shouldn't go to Weinstein's hotel room and then get completely wasted/drunk is clearly my bigbrained idea of finding an excuse to blame all rape victims for their rape. I'm practically a muslim in that way. Obviously the only reason why someone would ever criticize irresponsible behaviour is a deepseated desire to blame. It couldn't possibly be the case that it's a bad idea to put yourself in vulnerable positions next to a sex offender so obvious that there isn't an english speaking person in this world that don't know Weinsteins predatory reputation.

It couldn't possibly be the case that you try to put words in my mouth, like transposing my original point to all rape victims, as if every single rape victim was so grossly irresponsible. It's completely impossible that you had claim that I think that nobody should hang-out with people that are raped.

False assumption "I'm calling you out on blaming one form of rape, therefore I'm calling all forms of rape irresponsible" kind of a leap in logic there, no?

And that last line is the real cincher. I secretly went looking for you. I am such a devious blamer, that I went into this thread, knowing in advance you would reply to me.

Oh that is rich. I said, and I quote;

You just want to blame. You're not interested at all in anyone who does fit your little list of standards, just looking for someone who doesn't.

"Just looking for someone who doesn't", why would that person be me? Did you honestly think I was one of your subjects of critique, a divorcee, a rape victim after a getting drugged or drunk or whatever you put on your list?

Big fat nope.

No, I never said you were looking for me. I thought you'd know better than to assume the only person standing up to your blame fest would be such a subject. Clearly not.

 

[Lemmingwise]

I just find it funny that you think the only reason someone could have for thinking negatively of doing something stupid is a deepseated covert desire to be a blamer.

So deepseated, that I wouldn't even apply that set of standards to who I choose to commit to.

It is among the weirdest things I've ever heard.

Looks like this one didn't get posted yet.

Also, another hottake from antifastonetoss:

 

[Doctor Placebo]

View attachment 914501

Another Antifatard who doesn't realize that the Nazis came to power in an environment of wide spread political street violence while piggybacking on the back of an attempted communist coup, not through debate.

If I took a shot every time I saw that, I'd need a liver transplant by now.

 

[redcent]

I just find it funny that you think the only reason someone could have for thinking negatively of doing something stupid is a deepseated covert desire to be a blamer.

Correction; we are referring to victims of a rape while intoxicated. Not someone who is stupid

Although this is an enlightening interaction. You're not defending that kind of predator or are one yourself, I'll give you that. It does make me think of another kind of person though; little scavengers, vultures too chickenshit to do anything of the sort but looking around for victims of whatever (in this case drunk rape. Probably divorcees too considering the slip up you had earlier too) to pick at the remains, looking for whoever replies to their bait post ("cause that must be one of the victims", judging from your assumption above) to convince them into a puddle of guilt "Oh, you're so fucking stupid, you should feel shame"

Or...? Whatever new kind of ass there is out there. You never know

So deepseated, that I wouldn't even apply that set of standards to who I choose to commit to.

Oh, noes, whatever will I do? Boo hoo, boo hoo.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Correction; we are referring to victims of a rape while intoxicated. Not someone who is stupid

Yes, you're right, women who go up to Weinstein's hotel room now and then get themselves intoxicated or drugged to the point of being severely vulnerable aren't stupid, they're brilliantly intelligent and responsible. I suppose Dutroux's schedule was full that they had to settle for Weinstein.

 

[redcent]

Yes, you're right, women who go up to Weinstein's hotel room now and then get themselves intoxicated or drugged to the point of being severely vulnerable aren't stupid, they're brilliantly intelligent and responsible. I suppose Dutroux's schedule was full that they had to settle for Weinstein.

Appealing to extremes isn't going to get you anywhere. You really should get some rest, it's late at the Netherlands, real late. Unless you've just been spending a night out on the town yourself, having a few beers. That would be "stupid", especially on your own.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Another Antifatard who doesn't realize that the Nazis came to power in an environment of wide spread political street violence while piggybacking on the back of an attempted communist coup, not through debate.

If I took a shot every time I saw that, I'd need a liver transplant by now.

To be fair, the social programme and promises to fight against the degeneracy of modernity from the Nazis were overwhelmingly popular in almost their entire sphere of influence. Orwell has a pretty good quote about that when he analyzed why Hitler was so well-received on the continent, and why he was so much more effective than the effete socialist movement. It goes something like "[Hitler] promised them an end with horror rather than a horror without end."

These visceral reactions from the DSA/antifa crowd are based on an innate knowledge that traditionalism and an ideology of struggle and vigor are more popular than the sedentary and vapid narcissism they offer. The problem is that they can't offer anything more compelling, like the Trade Unionists and traditionalists in Anglo countries ended up offering to stave off Nazi putsches in America and England. The only solution for them, without abandoning the things that give them their identities, is to violently shut up the people promising better.

 

[LatinasAreTheFuture]

New comic. It's pretty normal. I wonder when he'll make a weirder comic page again like when he made a comic about how jet fuel can't melt steel bars.

View attachment 893945

Ay that’s pretty good

 

[meinhausinneuberlin]

Another Antifatard who doesn't realize that the Nazis came to power in an environment of wide spread political street violence while piggybacking on the back of an attempted communist coup, not through debate.

If I took a shot every time I saw that, I'd need a liver transplant by now.

I mean outside of somewhere with outside support the communists has never been successful. Russia turned because of ww1 Germany china because of a weak nationalist government and russia north korea because of china and ussr same with vietnam. Even in spain they tried to be all subversive and got shut down by the military. If the "west" does become Facist it will be in part because of the communists. Although I don't know what you mean by "debate". I mean the voters have no real actual power in a Democracy there are tons of instances of Political elites going nah no thanks and shutting down what the voters voted for. The political elites control government and not the voters the voters merely get to make strong suggestions.

Appealing to extremes isn't going to get you anywhere. You really should get some rest, it's late at the Netherlands, real late. Unless you've just been spending a night out on the town yourself, having a few beers. That would be "stupid", especially on your own.

Yes, you're right, women who go up to Weinstein's hotel room now and then get themselves intoxicated or drugged to the point of being severely vulnerable aren't stupid, they're brilliantly intelligent and responsible. I suppose Dutroux's schedule was full that they had to settle for Weinstein.

This a thread about stonetoss and the groups surrounding him and I guess the the ideas surrounding him if you can call it that. why is there a 5 page discussion about rape or whatever. I mean shit your sperging is not funny anymore.



Since I rambled on for so long have some bizarre, unfunny and pointless antifastonetoss edits and some analysis of some of them. Edits seem to fall into three categories: 1 pretending stonetoss's comic doesn't exist by displaying what is usually inane everday stuff that someone does or not having a conflict in the comic 2 Communist propaganda and 3 an edit saying stonetoss is wrong in an unfunny manner that lacks any subtlety.

Edit: Editted to add more content because I want to actually contribute to this thread

 

[Doctor Placebo]

I mean outside of somewhere with outside support the communists has never been successful. Russia turned because of ww1 Germany china because of a weak nationalist government and russia north korea because of china and ussr same with vietnam. Even in spain they tried to be all subversive and got shut down by the military. If the "west" does become Facist it will be in part because of the communists. Although I don't know what you mean by "debate". I mean the voters have no real actual power in a Democracy there are tons of instances of Political elites going nah no thanks and shutting down what the voters voted for. The political elites control government and not the voters the voters merely get to make strong suggestions.

All I'm saying with the debate part is that Antifa and Antifa sympathetic people love to make posts about how debating the Nazis before WWII didn't work, therefore debating Nazis is bad and useless and Nazis need to be punched, blah, blah, blah and it's all bullshit. People in other political militias were not just punching Nazis, but stabbing and shooting them and Nazis were punching, stabbing, and shooting back.

As far as political elites controlling everything, we did get President Trump, which they clearly didn't want, and it looks like Brexit is going to happen now too. So their control is strong, far too strong, but it's not absolute.

 

[Shaka Brah]

As far as political elites controlling everything, we did get President Trump, which they clearly didn't want, and it looks like Brexit is going to happen now too. So their control is strong, far too strong, but it's not absolute.

And look at what happened to Trump. The entire permanent-Washington machine and the entire media class banded together across political boundaries to stop him from doing anything he campaigned on. Now all Trump does is kiss Israel's ass and virtue signal about "watching very closely" as people are shot and beaten in the street for supporting him.

If anything, that's proof that democracy is a sham. You can elect a spoiler/outsider to the highest office of a country and things will still get worse.

 

[AnOminous]

And look at what happened to Trump. The entire permanent-Washington machine and the entire media class banded together across political boundaries to stop him from doing anything he campaigned on. Now all Trump does is kiss Israel's ass and virtue signal about "watching very closely" as people are shot and beaten in the street for supporting him.

Maybe he was just full of bullshit all along.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Maybe he was just full of bullshit all along.

Yeah. I think the alt right was deluding themselves when they hoped a man whose son-in-law is the scion one of the slimiest Israeli finance-crime families would be harsh on international finance.

 

[meinhausinneuberlin]

tv tropes posted this comic of stones and then some special individual complained http://archive.is/2RoWN

This is their twitter totally mentally stable person here


And of course front and center there is a pinned tweet asking for money.

I mean this is twitter shit and twitter basically doesn't matter but this person gives you a window in to the type of people who obsess over stonetoss. Tons of the same type of people whenever something of stones that is more cultural get posted start reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeing vigorously.

 

[Shaka Brah]

View attachment 916648
tv tropes posted this comic of stones and then some special individual complained http://archive.li/2RoWN
View attachment 916716
This is their twitter totally mentally stable person here

View attachment 916725
And of course front and center there is a pinned tweet asking for money.

I mean this is twitter shit and twitter basically doesn't matter but this person gives you a window in to the type of people who obsess over stonetoss. Tons of the same type of people whenever something of stones that is more cultural get posted start reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeing vigorously.

You should see the whole thread. Anyone who finds this funny should. I browsed it this morning during breakfast and it was absolutely hysterical. No joke, every single person complaining was a pronoun-in-bio gay guy or tranny.