- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
It would also show a fundamental misunderstanding on Saarkesian's part, of what her role in a production like that would be.If that's just true it just shows how pathetic and unimaginative these people are even in their power fantasies. If these people ever took over the world even their atrocities and genocides would be boring.
Large multi national companies will pay well, to have activist groups give them the mark of approval. eg look at where groups like the NAACP, SPLC, ADL etc get their corporate funding from. If she had set up feminist frequency in the right way, she could have sat back and let the corporate shekels flow in. All she would have had to do was cosy up to the right people, and issue a few press releases saying how the companies were woke AF.
Saarkesian at one stage had the financial resources to staff feminist frequency with people that could have engaged comfortably with large companies, media and corporate relations are genuine skills and you can't just get an unpaid activist intern to do it for you.
I get shit in other threads, for pointing out that woke commentators like Lindsay Ellis, Contrapoints, Dan Olsen etc are actually serious intellects, capable of understanding the subjects they're producing content on. Saarkesian however has an obvious lack of curiosity in what she's talking about, she would just rehash Mcintosh's opinons, and then when she split with him would recycle other peoples commentary without any real level of understanding.
Also she ignored the allegations made against her regarding her fundraising. She probably believed because mainstream media wasn't reporting on them she was safe, and the tard bucks were still rolling in at the time. However anyone in public relations would have told her that if there are allegations like that out there where the public can find them, then the public also need to be easily able to find a convincing denial. (I think there's actually a term for it in the PR world)