- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
I am still trying to wrap my head around how the defamation got through but not the TI.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Superchats on Nick's next show are gonna be unbearable.
Nick, at 2 AM, drunk and reading like an inner city 9th grader: "Hey Nick my dad just died of a massive hashtag heart attack and the vic case has me so depressed that I might kill myself. can I get a moment of silence for my sister who got brutally raped so I know what A REAL VICTIM is like. Please say this in Macho Man Randy Savage's voice. Hashtag I Stand With Vic."
"Wow. Uh. Sorry to hear that buddy. Mythos Serving says..."
But the clock is low.So much Black Pilling.
as Yogi Berra once said "it ain't over till it's over"
I am still trying to wrap my head around how the defamation got through but not the TI.
Chupp put a higher than tcpa requirement on TI by wanting specific numbers for damages.I am still trying to wrap my head around how the defamation got through but not the TI.
I am still trying to wrap my head around how the defamation got through but not the TI.
Different case, different court, different situation.I now worry for Richard Meyer's case.
Why? TCPA doesn't apply
This is a pretty entertaining recounting of things...
View attachment 925841
Meyer will be fine, Waid was dumb enough to not only commit TI, but to brag about it online after the fact and harrass the contract holder with messages trying to get them to say he didn't bully them into breaching contracts.I now worry for Richard Meyer's case.
I am still trying to wrap my head around how the defamation got through but not the TI.
Is it time to get a tin foil hat and assume the judge was bribed?
What about a bunch of fuckheads on twitter, he needs to please them right?
Please repond, my parents are dying.
Because the courtroom is considered the last ways to diplomatically stop SocJus. And if that fails....Why? TCPA doesn't apply
Can "Borrok'd" be a verb after a certain other judge who pulled this lazy BS? Let's remember, your average Texas Republican functionary isn't much different at the core than your average New York Democrat functionary. It just seems ridiculous a judge can throw out the majority of this before even brought to trial. It's completely different to say "no, they didn't commit TI/defamation" after a trial then to say "I won't even let you try and prove that case".My first thought is that Chupp can't be arsed with the case (because of the stupid amounts of filings and bickering or whatever) and decided that he didn't want to do what the people of Tarrant County pay him to do.
Wonder why "TI with prospective contracts" even exists then. Seems like a law you can safely ignore in Texas.Chupp put a higher than tcpa requirement on TI by wanting specific numbers for damages.
We have a word to describe the phenomenon of seemingly incoherent decisions that require further information to process.I am still trying to wrap my head around how the defamation got through but not the TI.
He can't really claim he won if the case wasn't dismissed, no.For now, it seems those "fuckheads" on twitter were in the right - but then who knows maybe Chupp will go Judge Dredd on the defamation claims and the case goes forward.
PS: Legal lads -> does this mean that Lemoine can finally claim he "won" a TCPA?