Marijan Š Šiklić Article

Null said:
You've basically argued with me for 2 weeks about the use of the word blackmail. Why would you lie?
Click to expand...
i didn't lie. the difference is that while i initially blackmailed her this didn't result in sex - me buying her stuff did.

if you think that initial attempt of blackmail followed by her making demands that i didn't initially offer is also blackmail that's ok, but silly.

if i had actually blackmailed her without buying her anything i'd be immensely proud. if i raped her i'd be even more proud. she deserves a shallow grave.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Dr. Boe Jangles Esq., Conrix, Saney and 2 others
Holden, failed blackmail is still you trying to blackmail.
The fact that you HAD to buy her stuff for her to have sex isn't the blackmail part.... it is, however, paying for sex. Which is prostitution. So congrats. @Null does this mean it's good enough for the article?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Venusaur
@Null, I'll work on the timeline then as long as you are busy with the main article.
Null said:
If you cite the same page twice, do this
<ref name="google">google.com</ref>
<ref name="google" />
<ref name="google" />

All references will point to 1 citation.
Click to expand...
If you're talking about the citation fest on the timeline article: Each archive.today link has an anchor to a specific passage on the mirrored blog posts, that is why there are so many of them. I thought this is more convenient if somebody wants to check the sources of my claims. But if you still prefer to have one citation for several things on the same blog post, then I'll revise the citations in question when the other stuff is done.
 
4Macie said:
Holden, failed blackmail is still you trying to blackmail.
The fact that you HAD to buy her stuff for her to have sex isn't the blackmail part.... it is, however, paying for sex. Which is prostitution. So congrats.
Click to expand...
I never said I didn't try to blackmail her. I just said it didn't go through.

As for the prostitution part, what is wrong about that? You're also against prostitution? And you don't understand why you're a radical feminist fanatic?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: DrChristianTroy and Conrix
as for that timeline, it's, like i said, years off and incorrect. some of the events are correct in their time setting since they were directly inserted . but since he is too dumb to follow a story and makes assumptions i never said nor can her confirm the rest of full of claims so incorrect that i am being extremely serious when i say it's something i could show to anybody who finds that and say "see, that's why it's not me".
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Conrix
4Macie said:
@Holden
This is the forum for you to talk about your article, not your ideals. The fact that you can't even stay on topic shows that Null is right in saying you shouldn't have permission to edit the article.
Click to expand...
I am on topic. You talk about blackmail and whether trying to means I did it or not. But you're talking to somebody who knows rapists are sacred to modern women, so my point was that I'm not trying to look "normal" to loons.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Trombonista, Broseph Stalin and Conrix
if null doesn't let me he'll just post another article full of inaccurate info. it's much easier if i can edit and he can remove what he believes isn't necessary. i have no need to spread my views, just tell the truth. but null doesn't want to do that and still keeps a mental patient around.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Trombonista and Conrix
Holden said:
if null doesn't let me he'll just post another article full of inaccurate info. it's much easier if i can edit and he can remove what he believes isn't necessary. i have no need to spread my views, just tell the truth. but null doesn't want to do that and still keeps a mental patient around.
Click to expand...

Get back to work on writing your own version of your article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cephalometrist and 4Macie
I don't really care dude. I'm in a stack of shit right now. I'll see if I have time to do stuff over the weekend. You're better off appealing to Ceph but I don't think anyone will lend you as much time as I have.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Sammy, 4Macie and KingofManga420
I have absolutely no attention of appealing to him, since 1. he is immensely stupid and can't understand arguments 2. is a SJW whose attacks have no citations and use words like "entitled" 3. has no other goal but to write slander and try to dox me with contradictory information, which shouldn't be the goal of any site that isn't basically illegal

I am simply asking you if you want me to go on replying to the points you asked about there.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Trombonista
Holden said:
also, what the fuck do i care about some "consent" anyway? consent is a joke. it's a retarded whim. that it's even considered by law or anybody is insane.
Click to expand...


Here is evidence that holden does not care what is written in his article. He says he does not care about consent. Write what ever you wish without regards to his consent.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Meowthkip, 24isthehighestnumber, Crisseh and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back