- Joined
- Aug 11, 2019
I can understand the risk aversion mentality.
Look at what happened with Iron Man 3. People say the Marvel movies don't take risks and I point to that one and go "They took a risk with the Mandarin twist and the nerds collectively lost their goddamn minds" which interestingly, I think the twist happened because they wanted to avoid accusations of racism with the Mandarin character. They risk averted themselves right into a shitstorm anyway!
Personally, I thought the twist was interesting, though it needed something to compensate for it to make it fully work. Guy Pierce being the bad guy when I already knew he was the bad guy isn't quite enough to make up for it.
To be honest, Iron Man 3 could have been the easily best of the trilogy since it psychologically explores Tony Stark's character and PTSD the most., but the problem was that the TWIST ITSELF wasnt well made. Risks are that, risks, but calculated planned risks are much better than just "meh, lets do this because it will catch them offguard" (which seems to be what Rian Jarhead Johnson loves to do).
Tho it makes me wonder if they will still have the mandarin now that Tony is gone (now sure, they could always bring him back when they get despered but still), they hinted that that real REAL Mandarin is still around...so is he going to be a villain to who? The only one that makes thematical sense is Spiderman but he aint staying for long (for the better I say).