US CA Rep. Katie Hill Allegedly Involved Female Staffer In 2-Yr ‘Throuple’ Relationship - (Ho-CA)

Freshman Rep. Katie Hill (D-CA), Vice Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, shared with Elle in a June 2019 interview a quote from the late Rep. Elijah Cummings, Chairman of the Committee “that has stuck with her.”

In one of those first meetings, Hill says, Cummings said something that has stuck with her. “It [was] that our role on Oversight is to get to the truth and to follow the truth wherever it leads us and to expose that for the American people,” Hill tells me over the phone. “To make sure that they have the information that they should have to, frankly, evaluate their government.”
It is in that spirit that we are sharing information obtained from multiple confidential sources relating to Rep. Hill, who’s currently in divorce proceedings. It is this writer’s view that events that occur within a marriage or affairs that lead to its demise should be kept between the parties involved and are not the business of the general public. When those events or affairs occur within one of the parties’ workplace, though, and that workplace is the United States Congress, the public should know about them as they determine that elected official’s fitness to serve.

Photographs and text messages obtained by RedState show that Rep. Hill was involved in a long-term sexual relationship with a female campaign staffer. The woman, whose name is not being released, was hired by Hill in late 2017 and quickly became involved in a “throuple” relationship with Hill and her estranged husband, Kenny Heslep.

Before-Kiss-Blur-620x712.jpg
Kiss-Blur-Copy.jpg

Heslep and the staffer, according to text messages provided to RedState, believed the polyamorous arrangement to be a long-term, committed relationship. The trio took multiple vacations together, including to Alaska, where this photograph was taken.

1571472624567.png

RedState was also provided with intimate photographs of the women, which we have chosen not to publish.

According to a source close to the staffer, the throuple agreed to continue their committed relationship when Hill moved to Washington, D.C. on January 2019, but that Heslep and the staffer quickly noticed a difference in Hill’s demeanor. By late May, Hill broke off her relationships with both Heslep and the staffer, claiming she wanted to focus on “this important work” and that it wasn’t fair to be involved in a relationship. The staffer, as these text messages show, was distraught and trying to figure out how to move on with her life.

Text-2-620x1001.png


In this message, Hill references their continuing work relationship and that she “want[ s] it to be as ok as possible.”

Text-1b-576x1024.png


The staffer asks if the political risk led Rep. Hill to end the relationship.

Text-1-576x1024.png


To which Hill replied:

No. I mean I guess maybe partially. Honestly, though, it’s that I want to be alone.
I don’t want to be accountable to anyone else. I want to be entirely focused on this work that I think is so important
And that’s not fair to anyone as a partner.
According to the text messages reviewed, after Hill left the throuple Heslep was told “by numerous sources” that Hill had been involved in a sexual relationship for a year with her then-finance director, now Legislative Director, Graham Kelly. In a post on his now-deleted Facebook account, Heslep posted a screenshot of a text message between himself and a friend of the couple in which the friend admits that he now knows about the Hill/Kelly affair.

text-friend-576x1024.png


Heslep asked the friend:

I’m just going to ask you this plainly bc I respect you. Did you know about Graham and Katie?
The reply:

I do know, yes, but I didn’t know until recently.
After Heslep found out about the alleged affair between Hill and Kelly, he filed for divorce.

72699068_2553001234927700_2106743877447712768_n-620x1013.jpg


He wrote:

“I didn’t file for divorce because she was bi! I just didn’t know she opened our relationship.”
A review of FEC records for Hill’s 2018 and 2020 campaigns reveals that the staffer was first paid in November 2017, with her payment classified as “salary,” making her an employee. California law doesn’t expressly prohibit consensual sexual relationships between an employer and a direct report, but it’s certainly a murky legal and ethical area. Some legal pundits contend that an employee can’t truly consent to a sexual relationship with the person who signs their paycheck.

Also of concern in the alleged throuple relationship is the age differential between Hill, Heslep, and the staffer. The staffer was 22 and a new college graduate when the relationship started; Hill and Heslep were in their 30s.

In addition to the legal and ethical issues raised by allegations of a congresswoman having not one, but two extramarital affairs with people on her staff, concurrently, there are issues of national security. Hill serves on two influential committees in that regard: Oversight and Reform and Armed Service. She has access to extremely sensitive national security information. If people who don’t have our nation’s best interests at heart had access to the photographs, text messages, and other information provided to RedState, Rep. Hill would be an easy blackmail target.

Hill’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Article from RedState (lol)
Archive
 
Last edited:
Do not, I repeat, Do Not Trust a Woman in Power. Particularly a woman that comes in to power after you're already in a relationship.
In defense of women, the husband looks and talks like a cuck. He had a pretty sweet deal for a while. This is the staffer he and his wife were fucking:
View attachment 988352
Or maybe it was just his wife that was hitting that.
Pretty sure it was the wife alone.

As for why she resigned, Im going to go with the easy answer that it's probably been going on for far longer than the "2-year throuple relationship" and with a lot more people, some who know and a lot who probably dont know about each other.

To be honest the dude in the article accusing her of being a liability is right--even she doesnt want them coming forward because she's in a pretty easy position to be extorted and blackmailed if she continued to try and run. As a politician already caught in this scandal, she could be #metoo'd -- and they may ignore it but I think as a politician the news will still run it as they have with this story.

She doesnt really have to change her lifestyle and Im sure she's got connections and money.

Ive read somewhere that the average number of partners people have is something like 14-18, more if youre promiscuous and if youre only into serious long term relationships, its something like 8-12 (the article also mentioned this is closer to the "desired" amount of partner experience people look for, which is something like 7-8). It also depends on age and how old you are before you "settle down", some people live their "bachelor/ette lifestyles" into like their 40s if they still look good, they just slow it down.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
katie.PNG

*sip*

Laws and ethics are for the little people. The ruling elite don't have to follow the laws they pass, and their media lackeys will only cover what they have to.

It's in California.
Admittedly, months before official legalization but it's been effectively legal for years. Cops didn't care about personal use.
 
there could more images and up to 700 according to this creepy looking guy

and these people had a open relationship and with these few leaked images it wouldn't surprise me if there is more images and videos. I bet on a online storage site.

View attachment 988576

and this one from /pol/ very funny

View attachment 988578
Well, she uploaded the pictures herself to websites where untold thousands of people could look at them whenever they wanted. She's the one who made the damned choice to publish these. If you don't want your nudes being passed around then maybe don't fucking upload them to public websites.
 
I don't think this should be a thing in all honesty. Same with the media freaking out at any Republican wearing blackface 30+ years ago.
As for her crumbling relationship with her husband and swinger lifestyle; if Newt Gingrich is allowed to do the monstrous things he did and not have Republicans and Democrats outraged, I don't see how this matters.

It matters because it didn't happen 30 years ago, it was happening currently.

Additionally - it's because she's a Democrat. I don't mean that in a "team vs team" sense that I'm happy this is happening to her. I mean if your party's platform is "Rape happens when someone has power over you and you feel like you need to have sex with them" you cannot fuck people you have power over - full stop (except Bill Clinton). This goes extra hard when your position of power is Congresswoman for the United States of America - which is one of the largest positions a person can have and the person you're fucking is 10 years your junior and an intern.

If that girl didn't work for Katie Hill I don't think many people would give a shit, except for the hilarity of it.
 
Well, she uploaded the pictures herself to websites where untold thousands of people could look at them whenever they wanted. She's the one who made the damned choice to publish these. If you don't want your nudes being passed around then maybe don't fucking upload them to public websites.
What are you talking about? It was a private site. She had a a password and everything.
 
From what I've been told by a couple of people who work on the hill, apparently, solid evidence of her banging her legislative director (the guy she left both her husband and the female campaign staffer for earlier this year) exists, which, as I pointed out a few pages ago, is a major no-no. Also in the supposed trove of 700+ pictures are multiple other sexual partners dating back as early as 2010. (The people who told me this are only right like roughly 75% and 60% of the time, respectively, and one is a GOP operative, so take it with a grain of salt; there's most likely at least some truth to it, though.)
 
What are you talking about? It was a private site. She had a a password and everything.
I think he's confused over that bong picture and a few other being something shared by her husband in a "wifeswapping thread" somewhere on "the internet."

edit: Speaking of which, seeing as how we know the source of all of the pictures leaked so far, the idea that 700 other pictures exist from some other source, that we've never seen, makes me think that it's a load of bullshit meant to push the revenge porn angle.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
All of the exceptional individual Democrats trying to spin this away on social media as not a big deal seriously is making me question the standards of professional and personal conduct for most people.
In a vacuum, it's really not a big deal. Some Democrat representative turns out to be a polyamorous sexual degenerate/druggie and diddled a staffer, and her estranged husband leaked it (and the various times he tried to pimp her out online) to fuck with her. I'm sure we're all totally surprised.
The only reason she had to ultimately resign was because of the massive contrast that has with her party line re: power dynamics and consent, and the fact that she was representing a more purple district unwilling to undergo the cognitive dissonance to rationalize that hypocrisy away.

and that's a good thing!
 
I for one am outraged. I find it completely inconsiderate and gross to sit bare-assed on furniture other people will likely be using.
Imagine thinking that a few layers of fabric are enough to keep bacteria and detritus from your asshole off of whatever you're sitting on.

Her body is really gross. No Tits no Hips.
She has them, they're just concealed behind all that beer-fat.
 
Last edited:
Well, she uploaded the pictures herself to websites where untold thousands of people could look at them whenever they wanted. She's the one who made the damned choice to publish these. If you don't want your nudes being passed around then maybe don't fucking upload them to public websites.
Yeah, surely it’s not “revenge porn” if YOU UPLOAD THEM YOURSELF.
 
Well, she uploaded the pictures herself to websites where untold thousands of people could look at them whenever they wanted. She's the one who made the damned choice to publish these. If you don't want your nudes being passed around then maybe don't fucking upload them to public websites.
She also shouldn't flatter herself, she has a horse face and the body of a 12 year old male. She's also not a child, so she knew what she was doing.

The most offensive part of this by far is these people’s insistence on using "throuple,” like there aren’t already words for groups of three people
Yup, like overly privileged scum bags.

I remember the old days when if you were are aware photos were being taken of you and anyone released them, you were still to blame.
 
4324574fd4400382776693c62a65417e.png

She wasn't forced to resign because nude photos of her were "leaked", she was forced to resign because she fucked her campaign staff. The only double standard involved in this entire process is that if she had a different political party affiliated with her name, this headline would read much, much differently.
 
As far as that iron cross being "a hate symbol", the ADL image specifically has a swastika inset into it, and her tattoo is a smudged up college black-line piece of shit she probably got with her sorority sisters. As far as "pointing out obvious double standards, that's fine, but all that "hate symbol" shit should never have been allowed to get off the ground, in the first place, especially with all the double standards associated with it.
Fuck that. She is part of the reeeeee squadron that set these standards, she, and the others, need to be held to them. Mercilessly and pitilessly and autistically. It's the only way we can go back to sanity. They need to feel the consequences they try to enforce on others.

She'll get a cushy lobbying job. She'll never hurt for money. Hitting her in the ego is the only punishment that will ever have any bite. It's like pointing out Sheila Jackson Lee's ethics violations. It won't hurt her, won't cost her a vote, and she'll never stop the good life she's set up gifting in the way only House reps can. But she wants to look like she's a good person. Desperately.
 
Back