2019-12-23 - Lindsay B. Lieberman on behalf of "K.W."

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Angry Shoes said:
Something tells me that someone with the last name 'Goldberg' doesn't care about Christmas.
Click to expand...
:optimistic: Depends on whether they put more importance on being jewish or being civilized, i think being ethnically jewish doesn't stop every single of them from seeing the light (yes the dmca is making me feel triggering Goldberg because what a freaking Scrooge)
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Cpl. Long Dong Silver, OforOwesome and 4 others
Zaryiu said:
:optimistic: Depends on on whether they put more importance on being jewish or being civilized, i think being ethnically jewish doesn't stop every single of them from seeing the light (yes the dmca is making me react aggressively because what a freaking Scrooge)
Click to expand...
The best part about being culturally jewish is you can take offense to things you claim to no longer believe in.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Snack Cracker, Pee Cola, spiritofamermaid and 16 others
Reminds me of "mattress hoe", she texted her college friend to fuck her in the ass then, called it rape, made a big deal about how police were useless. Last I heard she was making amateur porn and doing public BDSM exibision "art".

Rich girls in my experience are typically fucked up and closet freaks, I had a trust fund friday night special for a a few years. I did worse things to her than cum on her face and it wasn't nearly enough for her.
 
  • TMI
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Pillar of Autism, Snack Cracker, Pee Cola and 27 others
mhm, I remember seeing a thread on this girl a few days ago on /pol/, maybe they're attempting to clean it up again (not like it worked last time).
45654546546.png
 
  • Informative
  • Islamic Content
  • Winner
Reactions: Snack Cracker, spiritofamermaid, Cpl. Long Dong Silver and 26 others
Mediocre said:
mhm, I remember seeing a thread on this girl a few days ago on /pol/, maybe they're attempting to clean it up again (not like it worked last time).
Click to expand...
Please pardon my ignorance but is this an instance of a cunt being superglued shut like Yahoowa does in the Old Testament at some point?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Robert Sanvagene, Dork Of Ages, The Un-Clit and 2 others
This would not have happened if her father had just settled down with a nice Jewish girl, instead of some yellow shiksa.

BlueSpark said:
From what I remember her white father is a goy.
Click to expand...
Highly doubt it. Goldman Sachs is notoriously Jew heavy, even by banking standards. Even if he is a gentile, its great to see the daughter of a scumbag Wallstreet banker used like a cheap street whore.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Snack Cracker, Pee Cola, spiritofamermaid and 16 others
troon patrol said:
Brings up an interesting concept. IF I HAVE THIS CORRECT. Trust fund brat takes a load to the face for a legitimate porn production company. She's 18 so the standard adult content contract is bullet proof and its perfectly legal to possess images of her. That means the porn production company owns the rights to the pic of her with cum all over her face and I'm sure a LOT more OC. Now if I were the porn company I'd be asking for a few million $$$ to own the rights to all images of princess considering who her dad is and what its worth to them to have a legal leg to stand on to claim they actually own daughter with cum on her face. That still doesn't jump the hurdle of being transformative modifying the original content for parody purposes. @Null Do I have this right?
Click to expand...

This is a fairly infamous story among pornographers - it is generally believed that facialabuse sold the content back to the parents. They no longer offer it for download from their site and these lawyers have been launching DMCAs for years. They're probably valid in the sense that they do own the copyright to the video, but not in the sense that they own screenshots or derivative works.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Clotso Coof, Snack Cracker, spiritofamermaid and 20 others
The story about this chick and a father trying to clean it up is pretty old now.

like most people have already said, she did it as some sort of revenge and her father has spent a fortune trying to clean it off the Internet.

the facial abuse people may have gotten sued but it didn’t stick because she consented and got paid (only 250 dollars lol) she was facial abuses poster girl, if you look at the normal “talent” they have this chick is a full 10/10 in comparison.
But it seems facial abuse may have sold the video rights back to parents

I think our holiday loving lawyer friend is on retainer to just do websearches and auto inbox any “infringing” content, bill 450 bucks and hour and repeat.

I sure hope null does the right thing and clean this mess up ASAP and doesn’t waste this esteemed lawyers time causing him to bill his client thousands of dollars....
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Snack Cracker, spiritofamermaid, He Who Points And Laughs and 20 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back