Megathread Insane Parents of "Transgender" Kids - Parents who push a transgender identity on their children

[Non-Expert!]

5. Since he isn’t her biological child and she clearly did not bond with either twin even if she actually did gestate them, she’s just doing this to a stranger’s son, not her own. No bio connection kicking in making her feel even the tiniest bit bad for planning to mutilate the boy, since he isn’t hers.

ETA: I recall that in the UK, at least, an awful lot of foster carers seem to be making a habit of transing all the kids they take in. Same thing as this nutcase: not their biological material, so they’re free material to reconfigure for attention and additional $$.

PARENTS: this is real. Make sure that your kids always go to school with clean clothes, clean teeth, clean ears, trimmed nails ... do NOT let anybody in your house unless they are your shadow, or the plumber. Keep garbage and debris out of sight from the street. Do not discuss or do weird shit around the kids because they can repeat it at school and it can be misconstrued and reported.

Once that knock on the door comes, you are already in trouble and you are at risk of losing your parental rights. The law overwhelmingly favors the tipster, however malicious, and the social workers, some of whom are sociopaths. This is the world we are living in. Research the topic. Until the laws tighten up, protect your kids from being social experiments.

Do what you need to do to keep your children off the radar. Because of our children are at risk. Not just "those kids, over there."

------------------------------

South Dakota lawmakers vote to jail doctors for treating trans teens

The bill, which would bar doctors in the state from providing puberty-blockers to anyone under 16, now heads to the state’s senate

www.theguardian.com

Of course, the trans lobby is screaming bigotry.

I am glad to see that somebody cares. Hopefully reason will rule.

 

[OttoWest]

5. Since he isn’t her biological child and she clearly did not bond with either twin even if she actually did gestate them, she’s just doing this to a stranger’s son, not her own. No bio connection kicking in making her feel even the tiniest bit bad for planning to mutilate the boy, since he isn’t hers.

ETA: I recall that in the UK, at least, an awful lot of foster carers seem to be making a habit of transing all the kids they take in. Same thing as this nutcase: not their biological material, so they’re free material to reconfigure for attention and additional $$.

See also Charlize Theron trooning out her adopted, black seven year old son.

 

[AnOminous]

See also Charlize Theron trooning out her adopted, black seven year old son.

Emasculating black men has long been a thing with white supremacists like that South African whore. You can leave the apartheid country but not the apartheid in your soul.

This cunt has personally convinced me white people shouldn't adopt black babies.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

Some gender clinics have noted the troubling preponderance of transitioning children in adoptive and foster families. The reasons are probably multi-pronged, including the fact that some kids "in the system" have been sexually abused and sexual abuse victims are more likely transition candidates, and that the parents don't mind sterilizing them so much.

A family friend (my parents' generation) adopted a daughter who became sexually promiscuous as a teen, and instead of getting her on good birth control, had her get abortion after abortion, eventually she developed scar tissue and an STI that made it impossible for her to ever get pregnant. It almost seems like the mom is delighted by it, like she's happy about the fact that now they might have the adoption experience in common.

Some parents really, really don't want their children to exceed them in any sense, no matter how much lip service they pay to boosting their kid's prospects.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Some gender clinics have noted the troubling preponderance of transitioning children in adoptive and foster families. The reasons are probably multi-pronged, including the fact that some kids "in the system" have been sexually abused and sexual abuse victims are more likely transition candidates, and that the parents don't mind sterilizing them so much.

A family friend (my parents' generation) adopted a daughter who became sexually promiscuous as a teen, and instead of getting her on good birth control, had her get abortion after abortion, eventually she developed scar tissue and an STI that made it impossible for her to ever get pregnant. It almost seems like the mom is delighted by it, like she's happy about the fact that now they might have the adoption experience in common.

Some parents really, really don't want their children to exceed them in any sense, no matter how much lip service they pay to boosting their kid's prospects.

Yeah ... ok. Just got off the phone with Satan. He has set aside a special administrative cubicle for the boomer you mentioned, and a small locker space for her possessions.

These are reasons for why many of us literally had the fuck scared out of us in High School, and never became egg donors.

 

[Spooky Bones]

I'm firmly convinced that troons are being used to push an agenda that will usher in legalizing pedophilia. I don't think those in power really care about troons (other than the money drug companies can make off of them) but there seem to be quite a few pedos in positions of power throughout the world.

Think about the push for trans kids to have body autonomy. If they are mature enough to decide to delay puberty, take hormones, even get surgery in some cases -- surely they are mature enough to consent to sex. And the notion that kids know their gender from a young age has sexual undertones to it. Plus, pedophiles with young kids could get a few more years of access at their age of attraction if they can delay their kid's puberty. One doctor, in hindsight, even suspected as much in one of the cases at the NHS gender clinic in the UK.

If you can convince people to say that a trans "woman" is a real woman even though the vast majority know this to be a lie, couldn't you also convince them to say that kids are able to consent to sex even though they don't agree with it? If anti-pedophiles were treated the way transphobes are (ostracized, being fired for their views, deplatformed on social media), I could see them getting away with it.

I can only think of the radical leftist German elementary schools where "the sexual liberation of children" was practiced including having kids touch teacher's junk and simulating intercourse, and a leftist milieu involving far worse. It reads like practices of the (U.S.) cult The Family/Children of God.

In Germany,

For the revolutionaries of 1968, [adult-child sexual interaction] was an educational tool that helped "create a new person," according to the "Handbook of Positive Child Indoctrination," published in 1971. "Children can learn to appreciate eroticism and sexual intercourse long before they are capable of understanding how a child is conceived. It is valuable for children to cuddle with adults. It is no less valuable for sexual intercourse to occur during cuddling."

This thread and topic are incredibly difficult not to a-log about.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

Some gender clinics have noted the troubling preponderance of transitioning children in adoptive and foster families. The reasons are probably multi-pronged, including the fact that some kids "in the system" have been sexually abused and sexual abuse victims are more likely transition candidates, and that the parents don't mind sterilizing them so much.

A family friend (my parents' generation) adopted a daughter who became sexually promiscuous as a teen, and instead of getting her on good birth control, had her get abortion after abortion, eventually she developed scar tissue and an STI that made it impossible for her to ever get pregnant. It almost seems like the mom is delighted by it, like she's happy about the fact that now they might have the adoption experience in common.

Some parents really, really don't want their children to exceed them in any sense, no matter how much lip service they pay to boosting their kid's prospects.

Isn’t scar tissue from abortions only from surgical abortions? Aren’t those unpleasant? The daughter never stopped and thought maybe she should use a condom or something?

Someone I am acquainted with elsewhere online had her daughter come out as trans. She’s 12 or 13. I know the mother divorced her first husband because he was abusive, but I don’t know in what way. And the girl is a bit homely (very pronounced jaw) and I’m sure that doesn’t help, when being pretty becomes so important for girls in middle school.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Emasculating black men has long been a thing with white supremacists like that South African whore. You can leave the apartheid country but not the apartheid in your soul.

This cunt has personally convinced me white people shouldn't adopt black babies.

Why is she strutting around with a couple of black kids in the first place? Why didn't she do the horizontal boogie and create her own damn kids?

Honestly I have to agree with you here. I am deeply cynical about white folks who adopt black kids. Even if they are "well-intentioned" it is still paternalistic, given our history.

If blacks adopt white kids, or Hispanics adopt black kids, the assumption is not that it is best for the kid to get them away from their own communities. When white folks adopt, the assumption is that they are by default, giving the kids a "better life" due to what? That we are better than their parents.

This is all a legacy of colonialism and it stinks.

Instead of adopting, we should be supporting well-performing institutions within their communities.

The trans kid stuff, of course it is someone else's biological kid .... duh,

 

[AnOminous]

Why is she strutting around with a couple of black kids in the first place? Why didn't she do the horizontal boogie and create her own damn kids?

It's an act of performative wokeness in which how the white rich person doing it looks is much more important than the actual welfare of the child.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Isn’t scar tissue from abortions only from surgical abortions? Aren’t those unpleasant? The daughter never stopped and thought maybe she should use a condom or something?

Someone I am acquainted with elsewhere online had her daughter come out as trans. She’s 12 or 13. I know the mother divorced her first husband because he was abusive, but I don’t know in what way. And the girl is a bit homely (very pronounced jaw) and I’m sure that doesn’t help, when being pretty becomes so important for girls in middle school.

You can get scar tissue from chlamydia or gonahhrea (sp.) Or I believe, any other bacterial infection that works its way up to the uterus. Surgical abortions are also very invasive. The teen body is still maturing, too.

As far as the adoptive daughter making rational choices about her sexual behavior, I would wager that she craved that bond that was missing in her life from day 1, so she sought out a substitute. Just an opinion. And multiple abortions for a teen girl? Talk about adding layers and layers to the trauma.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

Crazy adoptive and foster parents could have their own thread on here. Lot of bad behavior. You hear about the trailer trash getting kids for the benefits, but the middle class saviors are worse in a different way.

@Unpaid Emotional Labourer, any source on foster parents transing kids? Not that I don't believe you but I'd like to know more.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

Crazy adoptive and foster parents could have their own thread on here. Lot of bad behavior. You hear about the trailer trash getting kids for the benefits, but the middle class saviors are worse in a different way.

@Unpaid Emotional Labourer, any source on foster parents transing kids? Not that I don't believe you but I'd like to know more.

No studies, to my memory, but the power behind troons don’t allow studies, so it isn’t surprising. However, if you search “UK trans foster kids” the first page or two of results contain many of the individual cases I’m referring to. Because they're successful at transing out all these foster kids. The judges keep ruling in their favor.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

No studies, to my memory, but the power behind troons don’t allow studies, so it isn’t surprising. However, if you search “UK trans foster kids” the first page or two of results contain many of the individual cases I’m referring to. Because they're Successful as transing out all these foster kids. The judges keep ruling in their favor.

Wow, that's horrifying.

I feel bad for the biological parents. I assume that like in the US, British people who have their kids taken into care are generally from disadvantaged backgrounds, are more likely to have been in care themselves, possibly struggling with mental illness or substance abuse...they would lose against upper middle class parents trying to ruin their child.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Wow, that's horrifying.

I feel bad for the biological parents. I assume that like in the US, British people who have their kids taken into care are generally from disadvantaged backgrounds, are more likely to have been in care themselves, possibly struggling with mental illness or substance abuse...they would lose against upper middle class parents trying to ruin their child.

Sorry ... not the case. One of the reasons why Child Protective Services are pretty much universally reviled (a lot of their employees even despise them) is because they knock on your door based on any batshit tip, and some social workers are too lazy to actually investigate and either get people help for any actual problems they have or close the case.

As part of the investigation, they ask you a bunch of question. They are known to twist words around and simply take the kids. They do this to middle class people. Low income people of color are generally a pain in the ass. Social worker is going to have to actually work, which a lot of them don't want to do. Middle class people don't have any real problems but their kids are more adoptable ... lower class white person with a child under the age of 3? Forget about it, you'll never see your kid again.

Child Protective Services would be far less hated, if they actually helped families' lives improve.

Instead, all the system serves for is to remove children from their parents. That is it. And if you lose your parental rights, you lose control of the child's fate. As long as it is legal to butcher a child's genitals, this is within the realm of the possible.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

Sorry ... not the case. One of the reasons why Child Protective Services are pretty much universally reviled (a lot of their employees even despise them) is because they knock on your door based on any batshit tip, and some social workers are too lazy to actually investigate and either get people help for any actual problems they have or close the case.

As part of the investigation, they ask you a bunch of question. They are known to twist words around and simply take the kids. They do this to middle class people. Low income people are generally a pain in the ass. Social worker is going to have to actually work, which a lot of them don't want to do. Middle class people white people don't have any real problems but their kids are more adoptable ... lower class white person? Forget about it, you'll never see your kid again.

Child Protective Services would be far less hated, if they actually helped families' lives improve.

Instead, all the system serves for is to remove children from their parents. That is it. And if you lose your parental rights, you lose control of the child's fate. As long as it is legal to butcher a child's genitals, this is within 5he realm of the possible.

Must be nice to live in a fantasy world where all parents are good and just and there's no druggy single moms who let their boyfriends beat up their kids. The US is a country of opioid addiction and grinding generational poverty and dysfunction. There are legitimate reasons people get their kids taken away.

I don't get why judges in the UK are okay with foster parents transing kids, though.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Must be nice to live in a fantasy world where all parents are good and just and there's no druggy single moms who let their boyfriends beat up their kids. The US is a country of opioid addiction and grinding generational poverty and dysfunction. There are legitimate reasons people get their kids taken away.

I don't get why judges in the UK are okay with foster parents transing kids, though.

Some parents are really shitty parents. But this is the real problem: many foster and adoptive parents are shitty parents. And when CPS comes aknockin, they typically put the kids with the grandparents (who created the shitty parent who just got her kid taken away.) Or an aunt or an uncle. So here you have a druggie with a bruiser boyfriend ... did she emerge out of a fairy's ass? No! Who do you think she smokes crack with? Mom, or big sis ... of course.

So the same parents who beat the living shit out of mom, and told her she was worthless, now have the kids.

CPS is an agency. Although they do have mission statements they are supposed to honor, agencies work, to perpetuate themselves. I am so sorry, I was not born this cynical. If the agency solved the problems, how would they justify their existence?

I am assuming that you are speaking as a parent of small children, and as an American, like I am? I suppose that our experiences differ, and are equally valid.

I agree it would be nice to live in a fantasy world, in which all children were living in safety and were loved by their parents. But tragically, that is not the case and often when the state gets involved, it is a frying pan into fire situation. Not always. There are some success stories but that is not what we are concerned about here.

I am so sorry. This is a depressing topic, and my only point is, until the laws favor sane, rational and well-intended parents, I strongly advise people to do what they need to do, to keep their kids out of "the system" especially if it means checking into rehab, and booting your boyfriend out. Because once they are in "the system" then you can not protect them from further abuse, such as being convinced that they need a sex-change operation.

Peace.

 

[AnOminous]

Child Protective Services would be far less hated, if they actually helped families' lives improve.

They're the government. Name all the times the government deciding to involve itself intimately with your life led to it improving. CPS is both too intrusive and too useless. It seems like they'll interfere with a family based on practically nothing, while at the same time waiting until some other family beats their kid to death, doing nothing over and over again after red flag after red flag. And now troon shit. I expect them to respond just as incompetently to that as to anything else they deal with.

CPS takes good people and turns them into bitter, burned out husks who hate the human race, who then leave, and they're left with the actively terrible people who started out terrible.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

You're right. It's bad if they take them away and it's bad if they stay. Going to rehab or kicking out the boyfriend can't fix a lifetime of dysfunction and trauma. I don't know how we as a society can fix that.

Anyway, to get back on topic, I'm curious about how many of the parents of older children who troon out (so middle/high school, where it's not the parents pushing them into it) are truly supportive and how many are pretending to be to not get attacked by other liberals?

 

[Non-Expert!]

They're the government. Name all the times the government deciding to involve itself intimately with your life led to it improving. CPS is both too intrusive and too useless. It seems like they'll interfere with a family based on practically nothing, while at the same time waiting until some other family beats their kid to death, doing nothing over and over again after red flag after red flag. And now troon shit. I expect them to respond just as incompetently to that as to anything else they deal with.

CPS takes good people and turns them into bitter, burned out husks who hate the human race, who then leave, and they're left with the actively terrible people who started out terrible.

Ok, look, here is a hint. Listen to . I don't want to get into it any more. I can not. The only supporting "evidence" about this topic is this vague stuff, that anybody who has ever dealt with the system, will repeat. practically verbatim.

Protect our children from this madness. And what we really need to do is get off our asses, stay on topic, focus on a small battle that is winnable, and push for anti-troon legislation to protect minors. All minors.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

We've discussed packers for kids, but we haven't discussed the equally disturbing child MTF version: tucking.

Spoiler: some quotes, spoilered because they'll make you look like a sicko if your boss sees

"She has a pretty big penis for her age, and more so with an involuntary erection. ... [She] is going to turn 9 soon."

"We have been using leolines [a brand of underwear for troons] since she was 6."

"My daughter is also very "blessed" in that department."

"My 6 year old has no dysphoria either. She's never said a word about her penis."

I only quoted from the first few screenshots, there's way more than that.