Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

If a dude who is only attracted to women wants something put up his ass sometimes it doesn't make him gay. Does looking at a man's body make you hard? Do you want to suck a dick? If no, then you're not gay.

Men basically have a clit inside their assholes. Their wives or girlfriends could touch it to get them off and it would feel a million times better than if she gave them a hand job. It also wouldn't be gay, because she's not a dude. This is a psychological hangup that only straight men have and it makes 0 logical sense to me.
A finger up the ass for a good old prostate milking makes some sense. But, a girl throwing on a strap on and railing a dude with a synthetic penis seems pretty gay.
 
Tbh, my family is enviroment-friendly and I try to care about segregation etc. I think climate change is real, but I don't think it's as serious or apocalyptic as they are presenting it now. I think we are doing good or at least we are trying to be more ecological - banned plastic bags or straws, more segregation, less pollution.
But I just don't get why it become such a serious, mainstream topic in the last year. You know, I think enviroment and state of our planet is more serious and actually important topic, unlike how many black gays are presented in cartoon or how video games makes you sexist, what is the pay gap in Hollywood, or how problematic everything is. But those were mainstream topic in the last decade.
I also don't think girl with autistic disorder is the best candidate to be the face of the movement. They want to appeal to older politians who are from generation with different look at mental disorders yet they choose girl who because of her ilness are going to be awkard or seemingly robotic. I think lightly autistic people can lead a normal life and do great in many professions but public speaker is just not one of them.
Vice isn’t written for people like you, or me who cares for land I’m gonna inherit live on and pass on to my kids, or this dude who’s so committed to caring that he shits in a bucket full of sawdust so he can mulch his trees with it.
it’s written for upper middle class urbanites who fake-care long enough to hit retweet and no further. Brown gay cartoon characters are just as much of an opportunity to shit on grandma for watching Leave it to Beaver reruns, and that’s what their audience is.
 
Because for ages, but especially in the 90s, bisexuals were the devil incarnate in the gay community.

It was common for those just "experimenting" with homosexuality, especially women, to go out of their way to identify as lesbian then claim bisexuality when they found a Chad they wanted to marry and had to explain why they were riding Chad's cock.

For a lot of bisexual people, not just women but men too, it was a matter of survival to identity as gay instead of bisexual because one's gay friends would turn on you the second they found out you still had feelings for the opposite sex due to a fear that you A. were just "experimenting" for kicks and B. Would use being bisexual to basically get straight privilege and be able to pass as straight/have your homosexual experience excused as "going through a phase" and not held against you in a way that could ruin your life, once you resume a life of heterosexuality.

But for lesbians, especially those of the militant variety, being bisexual meant you were a traitor in waiting. Ironically, this was especially common amongst the lesbian/feminists who would be at the foreground of the TERF movement, as far as their politicization of their gayness meaning that you had to be 100% gay or else be a traitor.
A bit of a stray thought; I’ve noticed how pansexuals and omnisexuals are much accepted by the LGBT community compared to how shunted bisexuals can be. I’ve even seen bisexuals and pansexuals argue which group is more oppressed.
I wonder if it’s because pan/omnisexuality is seen as more trendy or something else.
 
If a dude who is only attracted to women wants something put up his ass sometimes it doesn't make him gay. Does looking at a man's body make you hard? Do you want to suck a dick? If no, then you're not gay.

Men basically have a clit inside their assholes. Their wives or girlfriends could touch it to get them off and it would feel a million times better than if she gave them a hand job. It also wouldn't be gay, because she's not a dude. This is a psychological hangup that only straight men have and it makes 0 logical sense to me.
The male prostate can be stimulated due to the thin layer between the rectum and prostate. There's also a big difference between men actively trying to stimulate it and those enjoying pegging and potentially not even knowing about this. Also the "male version" of a clitoris is the glans of the penis, what you just said is nonsense, or at least not a proper comparison.

Either way I don't have much of an opinion on the matter since it isn't something that's of my concern. But the general perception is that anal penetration of a male is stereotypically homosexual simply because it's an act overwhelmingly performed by homosexual men. Because of that, it's a stigma that it has which is unavoidable.
 
Last edited:
A bit of a stray thought; I’ve noticed how pansexuals and omnisexuals are much accepted by the LGBT community compared to how shunted bisexuals can be. I’ve even seen bisexuals and pansexuals argue which group is more oppressed.
I wonder if it’s because pan/omnisexuality is seen as more trendy or something else.
It's definitely the trendy thing, it's more progressive to be the totally different sexuality of pansexuality.
 
I've been warning these assholes about "kicked dog syndrome", and their brilliant fucking response is to assume that that warning is proof that their kafka trap is a legitimate test, because "only people with underlying white supremacist sympathies will behave like white supremacists!" Apparently, the notion that you can only abuse, malign, and discriminate people for so long until you push them into the welcoming arms of people with the opposite messaging just doesn't seem real to them, despite the majority of them having just enough self-awareness to realize they owe their current political fervor to the existence of, and the backlash to, the their behavioural mirrors on the religious right.
The irony is as much as these people bitch about the "Alt-Right" and such it's their behavior that is allowing the Right to consolidate so much power these days.

Like you said it's amazing they don't see the parallels between themselves and the old MM.
 
Have we officially gotten to the point where furries are now a protected LGBT minority? Are they just letting in the whole barn now?
And I love how that one gendertrender is implying all black people listen to hip hop.
my personal fantasy is that one day, all exceptional people will decide to unite in one gigantic “movement”, Call it the LGBTQEFAGF+.........

It will be then that all of these people will gather in a single place to celebrate there exceptionalism. There will be music, dancing, and a new type of Soy and Bug derived “food.” And once the celebration hits its height.....

Then the bomb drops.

The loss of San Francisco and everything within a ten mile radius of it is considered a acceptable, yet necessary, loss.
 
Vice isn’t written for people like you, or me who cares for land I’m gonna inherit live on and pass on to my kids, or this dude who’s so committed to caring that he shits in a bucket full of sawdust so he can mulch his trees with it.
it’s written for upper middle class urbanites who fake-care long enough to hit retweet and no further. Brown gay cartoon characters are just as much of an opportunity to shit on grandma for watching Leave it to Beaver reruns, and that’s what their audience is.
TBH, I am upper middle class. I just try to be ecological and don't talk about it much, few close family members are biologist so I was kind of teached that since I remember. And I actually see how we are trying to be more enviroment friendly, my city introduced more segregation a few years ago etc.
I just don't get why in the lat 10 years we did not talk much about enviroment, if problems are so huge (I don't this they are that big), but instead number 1 topic was representation or gender or pretty radical feminism. Only last year that climate protests became super mainstream. Why they did not talk about it much earlier? Potential ecological catastrophe, whatever you believe in serious climate change or not, is something that can actually affect people far more than how allegedly female characters are portrayed in movies.
 
1580844120124.png
 
TBH, I am upper middle class. I just try to be ecological and don't talk about it much, few close family members are biologist so I was kind of teached that since I remember. And I actually see how we are trying to be more enviroment friendly, my city introduced more segregation a few years ago etc.
I just don't get why in the lat 10 years we did not talk much about enviroment, if problems are so huge (I don't this they are that big), but instead number 1 topic was representation or gender or pretty radical feminism. Only last year that climate protests became super mainstream. Why they did not talk about it much earlier? Potential ecological catastrophe, whatever you believe in serious climate change or not, is something that can actually affect people far more than how allegedly female characters are portrayed in movies.
Yeah, as a late '00s kid growing up in an archetypal upper-middle-class limousine liberal suburb, I went from hearing all about environmental issues and a smattering of MLK and civil rights (around the time of the 2008 election) in elementary school, to microaggressions and fat acceptance by senior year of high school. I can't even imagine being in elementary school a decade later than I was :stress:
 
Fellas, is it gay for a man to engage in sexual activity with a woman?

I remember some reddit autist claiming that it's 2.19% gay to fuck a trap, because the average penis is 2.19% of the volume of an adult male. He provided no details about how that changed, when dealing with midget traps, though.
 
I remember some reddit autist claiming that it's 2.19% gay to fuck a trap, because the average penis is 2.19% of the volume of an adult male. He provided no details about how that changed, when dealing with midget traps, though.
It's probably more gay for a midget trap because it's just the bones that are smaller than normal.
 
I've been warning these assholes about "kicked dog syndrome", and their brilliant fucking response is to assume that that warning is proof that their kafka trap is a legitimate test, because "only people with underlying white supremacist sympathies will behave like white supremacists!" Apparently, the notion that you can only abuse, malign, and discriminate people for so long until you push them into the welcoming arms of people with the opposite messaging just doesn't seem real to them, despite the majority of them having just enough self-awareness to realize they owe their current political fervor to the existence of, and the backlash to, the their behavioural mirrors on the religious right.

"Treat others the way you want to be treated" is totally lost on these people.
 
Yeah, as a late '00s kid growing up in an archetypal upper-middle-class limousine liberal suburb, I went from hearing all about environmental issues and a smattering of MLK and civil rights (around the time of the 2008 election) in elementary school, to microaggressions and fat acceptance by senior year of high school. I can't even imagine being in elementary school a decade later than I was :stress:
Me neither, and I was a suburban kid of the 80's when MLK/Civil Rights was all that was taught to us.

"Treat others the way you want to be treated" is totally lost on these people.
Exactly. That's what annoys me more than anything here.
 
So the new D&D UA is out. For those who don’t know, every once in a while, the Dungeons and Dragons guys will release a pdf full of what is essentially playtest subclasses and races. The newest one is a cleric subclass focusing on the love domain, a la Aphrodite and Hathor and the like. It’s ruffled the usual feathers.
1F201C2D-B5E7-46FC-B48C-4E9B7F41B732.jpeg

9246F544-431A-4982-AB6E-C69ADAF22943.jpegABF0DC5E-1BC3-4EED-85B2-A7197AD814C1.jpegEF868CD8-2370-4CA6-B2F9-B03CC5844C1A.jpeg3B9ACE92-3E17-4DE1-8E8A-48D13E8DB18F.jpegA767D0C8-0146-4759-BA14-CA0B57C69234.jpeg
 

Attachments

So the new D&D UA is out. For those who don’t know, every once in a while, the Dungeons and Dragons guys will release a pdf full of what is essentially playtest subclasses and races. The newest one is a cleric subclass focusing on the love domain, a la Aphrodite and Hathor and the like. It’s ruffled the usual feathers.
View attachment 1130694
View attachment 1130703View attachment 1130704View attachment 1130705View attachment 1130706View attachment 1130707

Do any of these faggots have those complaints about ANY of the other compulsion spells? I want to see them bitching about how summon outsider permits a character to force a native of another plane to show up, and I definitely want to see them reeing and screeching about extraplanar colonialism.

Edit - also lol at the 1:1 possibility that they are projecting they own biases onto all of this, and have completely forgotten that being a cleric of Selune doesn't require a gender, it requires a CHA score, although canonically, the VAST majority of such clerics are priestesses of Selune, not priests.
 
So the new D&D UA is out. For those who don’t know, every once in a while, the Dungeons and Dragons guys will release a pdf full of what is essentially playtest subclasses and races. The newest one is a cleric subclass focusing on the love domain, a la Aphrodite and Hathor and the like. It’s ruffled the usual feathers.
View attachment 1130694
View attachment 1130703View attachment 1130704View attachment 1130705View attachment 1130706View attachment 1130707

"I already cover my drinks in real life, I don't want to do it in dnd."

LOL

edit: also browsing their Twitter I found this.

EP5aWjHXsAElJAX
 
Back