- Joined
- Jan 23, 2020
Sometimes I'm like Dave is such an overrated hack! Why is he given a pass for all his dumb shit?And Thrawn has been redudced to, you know...
And fans keep parading him as the savior of Star Wars.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sometimes I'm like Dave is such an overrated hack! Why is he given a pass for all his dumb shit?And Thrawn has been redudced to, you know...
And fans keep parading him as the savior of Star Wars.
Could someone better-acquainted with Filoni Wars than I give me a rundown of how Anakin's character develops (or doesn't) over the course of that series in comparison with ROTS and the Clone Wars multimedia project?![]()
I agree. I used to like Ahsoka but I ended up tolerating her as she made that cameo in early SW Rebels and completely hate her since Filoni brought her back from the Sith temple where she should have had that perfect ending facing her former master. The fight at the Sith temple was a great way to end Anakin's Jedi chapter of his life.
He killed countless jedi and younglings too to be honest, also the fall to the Dark Side is essentially a destruction of the old self and the birth of a new entity, one that is wholly subservient to darkness that suppresses your light half. So past means nothing to a Sith, as was the case when he tried to kill Kenobi and choked Padme, and as I said before, tragedy is sort of the point of war and it would undoubtedly be something that would cause what little good remained with Anakin untold turmoil.But killing Ahsoka after all their time together in the Clone Wars was just horrifying.
Sad part is that she was probably the only consistently well-handled element in Aladdin's Rebels before her forced revival.Tragedy is sort of the point of war. We can't allow favoritism to dictate if a character lives or dies, not that we should go full GoT either, but from a writing standpoint, having her walkaway to do nothing of relevance for the next 30 years or become a glorified easter egg is not exactly a victory. And her death would certainly make Anakin's fall to the Dark Side more believable. It would show the reality of war, the corruption of the Republic and the Jedi that would force a child into a pointless war that they had no stake in. It would instill Anakin with more fear and paranoia, making his extreme obsession with keeping Padme alive all the more believable and mature than simply being a side effect of his mother dying. It would also make her lack of being mentioned in any prequel media or any media for that matter prior to Filoni Wars make more sense. She was never around for any big event or even took part in the reformation of Luke's academy like other surviving Jedi did. So death would've been the best explanation for that than simply saying that she was just content watching from some not-Dagobah because fans don't want to see her die. Favorite characters can die in SW, that's always been a thing, Chewbacca, Mara Jade, Anakin Solo, etc, their deaths all caused fans to become pissed off and mindlessly rageful to the point of sending death threats and whatnot, but deaths like those of Chewbacca held a great impact for the character in the public eye that was not aware of his standalone exploits, it proved that he was more than just a sidekick. He was a soldier and a hero in the end who ascended to godhood among wookiees. And I say this as someone who initially hated his death and Mara's.
You know tbh I kinda think Filoni wrote himself into a corner by introducing Thrawn back into canon in the first place. They had to find some way to get him out of the picture the moment he repaired and I doubt they could of gotten away with Rukh assassination him again since they would of had to convincingly jam the Noghiri subplot from the original 3 books into 1 season that already has a lot of subplots already and I don't think they could of used the original EU reason of Palpatine sending him to the unknown region since that would just mean letting others explain what he was doing in the ST or aftermath.Sometimes I'm like Dave is such an overrated hack! Why is he given a pass for all his dumb shit?
Ironically both Data and C-3PO have more emotion and character than these two people.
It's a lose-lose situation isn't it?You know tbh I kinda think Filoni wrote himself into a corner by introducing Thrawn back into canon in the first place. They had to find some way to get him out of the picture the moment he repaired and I doubt they could of gotten away with Rukh assassination him again since they would of had to convincingly jam the Noghiri subplot from the original 3 books into 1 season that already has a lot of subplots already and I don't think they could of used the original EU reason of Palpatine sending him to the unknown region since that would just mean letting others explain what he was doing in the ST or aftermath.
And imagining how horrifying it would of been if someone like Wendig got his grubby hands on Thrawn, is the one time I'm grateful that Filoni can be a greedy son of a bitch sometimes with characters he likes.
But even so, Anakin wouldn't need to kill Ahsoka at all, thus avoiding further corruption for Anakin (even though it doesn't matter how much time they spent in the Clone Wars). Her death could've been caused by Dooku, Grievous, anyone really, but it would serve as something that would make Anakin's fall more believable. It would cement him with a tremendous hate and distrust for the jedi and the Republic rather than what motivated solely by ego due to them "not respecting him". Seeing her die would serve as the perfect catalyst to make him even more overprotective of Padme and even more desperate and paranoid. He could even blame Kenobi for her death, since unlike his mother, you could have Kenobi right in the middle of the situation, make Anakin resent him for it and thus make their duel more meaningful. Having Ahsoka walk away just for the sake of living doesn't add anything to her character or story as I've said in my previous post where I state the following:
You know tbh I kinda think Filoni wrote himself into a corner by introducing Thrawn back into canon in the first place. They had to find some way to get him out of the picture the moment he repaired and I doubt they could of gotten away with Rukh assassination him again since they would of had to convincingly jam the Noghiri subplot from the original 3 books into 1 season that already has a lot of subplots already and I don't think they could of used the original EU reason of Palpatine sending him to the unknown region since that would just mean letting others explain what he was doing in the ST or aftermath.
I always thought that Beru should always have been Anakin's actual sister, with an actual bitter relationship between Anakin and what he saw as her less than worthy husband Owen.My buddy likes to point out that there's a bit of a plot hole between the prequels and originals - made worse with all the expanded material (both original multimedia and CGI) - Owen & Beru.
Of course a lot of that is due to the films themselves since somehow Vader never thought to go check the house he knew his stepsiblings were staying for Obi-Wan.
His fix fic is that rather than Asoka, Beru should have been in her place and as a literal lost little sister (Beru Skywalker). Then rather than Rex, Owen should have been a regular soldier and war buddy of Anakin. In both the movies and the shows, this would give someone his own age to bounce off of and given the audience a viewpoint of how everyone else in the galaxy viewed the war outside of the Jedi, politicians, and clones. Eventually he would marry Beru and give Anakin more to lose in the war than just a wife and child. Through their friendship, we could watch Owen's horror at Anakin falling from the friend he used to know before he goes fleeing to Tatooine for refuge.
Then at least we could smile in the episodes when Obi-Wan shows up and drags Anakin and Owen off on a new mission for the war. Because then we would understand the line "He feared you might follow old Obi-Wan on some damned-fool idealistic crusade like your father did."
He should have sent Thrawn off into the unknown regions and then the sequel trilogy should have replaced Hux with him. (I mean you can still keep Domhnall Gleeson as the actor - paint him blue and I think he'd make a dang fine Thrawn.)
At least hollywood admitted Cats was a mistake.Well I'll be fucked.
View attachment 1203260
Or they could of just lifted the Thrawn trilogy wholesale and not do what they did with the ST.He should have sent Thrawn off into the unknown regions and then the sequel trilogy should have replaced Hux with him. (I mean you can still keep Domhnall Gleeson as the actor - paint him blue and I think he'd make a dang fine Thrawn.)
CGI which supposedly included giving all the cat people butt holes before being edited out. Imagine the world where Cats was a success and its "art style" became the norm...Only because it tanked at the box office, if it made its money back or worse megabucks. Hollywood would have been flooding the theaters with more movies with that kind of CGI.
The Vong is Islamic? How?CGI which supposedly included giving all the cat people butt holes before being edited out. Imagine the world where Cats was a success and its "art style" became the norm...
Also the Tusken Raider language/alphabet is some kind of warped version of Arabic and Muslim calligraphy in Disney canon.
View attachment 1203352
I don't get it. Disney's Woke Brigade is willing to decry the Vong as "Islamaphobic" but Disney making savage sand assholes literal space muslims isn't? Then again, they have been trying to make them dindus and troons in some novels...
Fair amount of decent rule34 and SFW fan art is online but actual Disney SW İ drawing a blank here.That’s gotta be some good things about the Disney trilogy guys like, right?
It made us reappraise George and come to appreciate what he was trying to do after we spent the better part of a decade shitting on himThat’s gotta be some good things about the Disney trilogy guys like, right?
Question not the klan member in denial, for their logic is stupid and dumb. Especially when they borrow more from the Aztecs than anything else if you have to reference a culture.The Vong is Islamic? How?
kind of reminiscent of when some people called the Covenant from Halo islamophobic (despite the covenant being more of a hybrid between the Catholic Church and Islam but with aliens). NJO and Halo aren't anti Islam but anti extreme religious fundamentalism to the point of (literal) xenophobia.The Vong is Islamic? How?
The claims typically go like this: a zealous religious society that believes in essentially cutting a bloody swath against the part of the world that doesn't cow-tow to their religious beliefs, all while committing acts of pseudo-terrorism like dropping moons on planets like Serpindal or bombing planets like Ithor into oblivion. It's worth nothing that the timing of the NJO story arc only made these comparisons all the more rampant. as they were coming out just pre and post 9/11.The Vong is Islamic? How?