Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
MrsFrizzle said:
If "bankid" doesn't mean "looks like a banker," what does it mean?
Click to expand...

Based on the pictures he posted, I'm pretty sure it just means being middle aged and bald.

MrsFrizzle said:
Whoever made up these classifications is so illiterate they just put "-id" onto the ends of common English words. That is not how actual scientific nomenclature works.
Click to expand...

Will it come as a massive surprise to you that all the classifications are 100% balloon wanker tripe?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Wally Balljacker, Dynamite Ninja, Scribbler and 2 others
UltraSonichu said:
Based on the pictures he posted, I'm pretty sure it just means being middle aged and bald.



Will it come as a massive surprise to you that all the classifications are 100% balloon wanker tripe?
Click to expand...


I like how these people who either never went to college, dropped out of college, or studied something completely unrelated to social sciences believe they are experts in social sciences. It'd be like a medical doctor claiming expertise in astrophysics just because he's really smart in general (and most of the loveshies/incels don't even have that last bit going for them.)

EDIT: Oh, experts in social sciences AND medical science. Surely, my Master's in Engineering means I know a lot about medicine, psychology, and sociology, right?
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Wally Balljacker, Dynamite Ninja, Marionette and 7 others
@Amud

Can you tell me something about what this classification system predicts, specifically, about people? Say, for instance , that you have a strongly ethnikid person around. How would you predict they would differ from you, an adenid/thallid/etc? What can you tell me about a strongly potatid individual, knowing nothing else about him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wally Balljacker, Dynamite Ninja, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 1 other person
Amud said:
These are all things I would like to address later today, when I get the chance. In the mean time, I will provide you with some reading material.

Note that the forum I'm linking to has a lot of advertisements, so I would suggest installing Adblock if you have not done so already.

1. An explanation of the various forms of "nobilid" features: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ich-phenotypes-contribute-the-most-to-society

2. An explanation of the damaged psychological state resulting from environmental and genetic deterioration: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?164029-SUBHUMAN-SYNDROME

3. A gallery of various Ignobilid phenotypes, arranged into five categories: www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?161569-New-racial-classification-schema

4. A handy reference chart to accompany (3.)
attachment.php
Click to expand...

You made this shit up. Also what is with the -id you add to all of your "phenotypes"? Its fucking stupid. Remember scienmajustikal, that word you made up?

You also are unable to post peer reviewed evidence that "scientists" such as yourself to be able to prove that genetic devolution, the link between modern skull types and intelligence, nor "Subhuman syndrome" actually have a basis in reality.
Amud said:
2. The information I linked was created and posted by myself. It doesn't matter what site I post it on. The point is, I came up with it. Maybe you should decide whether it is legit or not based on your own reading of it, rather than the connotation of the website it is posted on. Also, the idea of "Scientifically valid sources" is completely meaningless. There is no reason to trust academic authorities any more than you trust me. They are not spiritually ordained loremasters of the world, they are just people like you and me who just so happened to buy a slip of paper giving them "credentials" for tens of thousands of dollars every year.
Click to expand...
So basically you are saying "I made up my facts. Because you guys don't seem to trust me at all, I'm wrong and so are academic authorities."

You are literally saying you are wrong and that you made up your "evidence" that you are trying to prove a series of incredibly ridiculous claims with.

Amud said:
I didn't claim to be smart.
Click to expand...

Checkmate, cave man.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: CisCat, Wally Balljacker, Dynamite Ninja and 6 others
I would also raise the question on how you classify the face types as a whole. Like what specific qualities about each face lends them to that type? I mean, if this is scientific, you should be able to consistently measure and observe the same qualities. Could you please show your measurements to determine each facial type rather than just images of them? Like is there a ratio involved between elements? Is there specific facial marks that determine it?

I'd also raise the issue of how their skull forms differ from each other. I'm asking because I do know that tissue can cover over differences in skull morphology. How much does skull morphology have to do with your measurements? Because certain formations like your ethnikid seem to be based more on complexion and tissue observations than on skull morphology.

And to reiterate another's question: why not try and classify the other races as well by common facial features? Why not expand your field and do more experiments?
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Wally Balljacker, Dynamite Ninja, Scribbler and 5 others
Amud said:
Not all bankids are bankers,
Click to expand...

How? If one is not a banker than how can one possibly be a "bankid"? The word "bank" is in the name of that fakey bullshit skull type you made up. That makes no fucking sense.

Amud said:
Lol, someone is getting really upset. You'd better chill out and stop being rude if you want me to take your questions seriously.
Click to expand...

Implying that anyone takes you seriously.

Amud said:
Why can't I have multiple idea societies? I think a traditional society OR a hunter-gatherer society would both be preferable to whatever it is we have now.
Click to expand...

Then prove it by putting your money where your mouth is and go live naked in the woods.

Amud said:
They were forced to develop farming because after the ice age cleared up, the human population began to explode and hunting and gathering just didn't allow them to procure enough food to feed that growing population. Farming was not adopted by choice, but by necessity. Hunting and gathering is still the superior method, it's just that it is more effective for smaller populations.
Click to expand...

If it were adopted by necessity then that would still make it a choice. They could have chosen to simply cannibalize each other.

Amud said:
4. We could pay high school kids minimum wage to do it. You don't have to be smart or capable to perform simple medical procedures.
Click to expand...

Because first aid works for everything! Including cancer!
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: CisCat, Wally Balljacker, Dynamite Ninja and 8 others
Positron said:
Remember he has super Neandie immune system. I bet he has Wolverine's mutant healing too.
Click to expand...

I looked into that a bit actually. That neanderthal immunity was likely useful to migrating H. sapiens as they entered Europe, since it did give them immunities to diseases native to the area (think Native Americans getting European level immunity from smallpox by coitus for instance), but it wasn't "super" or magical. The death toll by disease in Europe kind of proves that statement being shit pretty well.

A bit offtopic, but another gene we possibly picked up from the Neanderthals was a variant of a gene that involves risk taking. Basically, the neanderthals might have had a variant of the gene that makes the holder of it more inclined to take risks. This variant is super rare in Africans but is more common in Asian and European peoples. Our love blooming in the cold of Europe could've transferred it over.

A last tidbit is that the "red hair from Neanderthal" idea is mostly out of favor now, since our analysis of neanderthal DNA shows that while they too had gingers, they had genes for that we don't.

Source: http://genetics.thetech.org/ask/ask429
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Wally Balljacker, Ti-99/4A, Dynamite Ninja and 10 others
Can someone in this thread please explain to me why this dude seems to believe that women have some sort of innate psychological drive to despise and wish downfall upon dudes with large eyes, wide foreheads, long nose bridges and small chins? Out of all of the bullshit he's been spewing this one boggles me the most.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CisCat, Dynamite Ninja, Marvin and 3 others
MarineTrainedTard said:
I like how these people who either never went to college, dropped out of college, or studied something completely unrelated to social sciences believe they are experts in social sciences.
Click to expand...

Often they simply claim that the social sciences aren't real, and that all you need to understand everything there is to know about sociology, anthropology or criminology is a bit of common sense.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Ti-99/4A, Dynamite Ninja, Afinepickle and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back