A few people emailed the guy about Lucas and he sent out a few similar responses basically saying he's known about Lucas misrepresenting (either intentionally or because he's just too stupid to understand science) for years and was conferring with people at the university to figure out how to best handle it as they didn't want to end up in a PR nightmare of potentially being seen as harassing a mentally ill man.
In the end, after a few videos where Lucas was calling the email screenshots photoshopped and went on a, "If Dan Eisenberg disagreed with me he'd SAY SOMETHING ABOUT IT, YOU LIARS!" tirade in one or two videos, and must have got sent a C&D or something, because Lucas stopped name dropping him save for one or two videos continuing to misunderstand the papers he read and being all, "Well DAN if I'm incorrect why does YOUR PAPER say Misunderstood X, Y, and Z? DAN? HUH DAN?" before dropping it entirely.
I got a response from Dr. Eisenberg around Dec. 1 2019 about it, and there are some videos around 12/25 of him yelling about, "Well if it's WRONG why is it STILL ON THE INTERNET???" which happened sometime after he was told, one way or another, to shut the fuck up and stop name dropping Dan Eisenberg.
There was one video where he had Dan's first name in the title but that may have been removed as it was told to take it down or face legal consequences.
This video is the closest he gets where he said Dan Eisenberg and Chris...someone or other, one of the other researchers, contacted him and told him he couldn't put copy-pastes of their free to the public research behind his Patreon's paywall and make money off of their research and it's mostly him whining about how that's not fair and that if they were contacting him it must mean they'll think he's going to hit 30k subs. And, that he stopped talking about telomeres "out of respect" for them; it reads like he was basically given a script outline of what he was supposed to say.
He also admits, whether told to or because he's a moron, that their research, at no point, links older men to younger women and that he did that on his own because it's what he believes and is "the reason" he likes younger women.
Here's one where he pretends he's "forgotten" the researchers' names:
This one is the one from 12/25 where he's got the childish mindset of "If it weren't true, it wouldn't be on the internet" because we all know people aren't allowed to lie on the internet and research never gets updated or amended if new information is discovered.