So maybe it's just me, but whenever I hear about transwomen and/or troons in general lament their vaginoplasty, it makes me wonder if they think that the female genetalia is some bastion of sexual sensation and super responsive in the first place. Like they somehow expect to still have the same level of sexual stimulation after the fact. Even if the vaginoplasty was a perfect one to one replication of a real vagina (which it isn't, as we know), do they not realize that the age-old joke of females never orgasming isn't 100% a joke? I guess not, since none of them have probably ever seen a real vagina in the wild, let alone serviced one.
After all, a man's glans is compromised of a huge bundle of nerve endings; makes it super easy to get off, compared to a woman's vaginal canal, which has less concentrated bundles of nerves. Stimulation was never an issue for these troons because they had sexual stimulation on easy mode since day one.
If anything, the surgery is giving them an accurate female experience when it comes to sexual stimulus, what with the difficulty most natal women experience achieving orgasm from penetration alone. Shouldn't that make them more ~EUPHORIC~ now that they can truly know what females have to work with? Top it all off with much lower testosterone than normal and their libidos are going to tank considerably. They'll likely never experience fully satisfying orgasm ever again.
Like I said in a previous post, I'm all for people doing whatever they want to their bodies, provided it doesn't hurt anyone else. I don't care about the actual surgery process since it's not my junk being rearranged. But goddamn, some of these troons being disappointed or regretting the decision to literally halve their sexual epicenter and invert it, thinking they would still experience the same gratification afterward, does frustrate me a bit.