Snowflake Chloe Wilkinson / DissociaDID and Nanette Zuniga / Nan / TeamPinata

CLASSIC TURN AROUND.

She was called out for using diminutives but she was called Chloe so that wasnt okay. Classic deflection.

View attachment 1219353
This is even more stupid when you consider that all of her personal social media is still in the name "Chloe Wilkonson". So much for not existing for 7 months. If you're that bothered by a random person calling you Chloe, wouldn't you change the Facebook profile to your preferred name?

Also, hello Kiwifarms. Dissociadid has been a personal cow for me for quite some time, and I'm really enjoying this discussion. I joined the site for it.
Nice to see other people astounded by how she can dupe so many into believing utterly ridiculous claims.

Looking forward to seeing how the ominous Twitter message develops..
 
She either ignores it, or goes for option 4, blaming the whole thing on a previously unmentioned evil persecutor alter and Nan didn't know about any of it before now because amnesia walls.

No way, she's already setting the stage for another suicide scare. She'll be back in 3 days saying the stress was too much for her and she's too fragile to address it all right now.
 
Or she could just be asleep.
it was like nearly 2am when she posted her tweet as I recall. I don't know what her usual posting habits are.
 
At the risk of posting too much, I contemplated it and it's really funny when someone who's created their entire platform on discussing her mental health and goes out of her way to flaunt her diagnosis being professional ect. turns boldfaced around when presented with a complication in their story's credibility and the go to defense is "My mental health is none of your business".

Chloe, sweetie honey, you made it YOUR business by monetizing it. You lost your right to tell people to butt out of your personal affairs when you made them public. It's not a good look when pushed about your inconsistencies to tell people to stop probing. Even worse to allow people to deplatform those asking the questions that are making you uncomfortable.
 
Just found out that Fragmented Psyche has ason. I'm so disturbed by these people having kids around when they start roleplaying as babies or animals or angry men of the mist.
Just be thankful that Nan has no kids

Edit: Thought this was interesting too;
Go to 16:15
Her comments here contrast pretty much every other video on her channel
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay so Nan says in that deviantart post linked above (here’s the link again to that sneeze fetish forum where she says this too) that Shasta is an OC. So I just sat through Nan’s alter video where she talks about all her alters and yeah Shasta is an alter. Here’s the vid, time stamp is 11:20. “Shasta is a fictive from Nan’s original graphic novel.” This woman is literally making up OCs to be her alters and admitting it lmao

also regarding Nin and Nan’s relationship, I think they both do love each other and are serious about the relationship, but I cannot see what Chloe stands to gain from it. I think Chloe likes to take care of people and lord knows Nan needs a lot of care. So Nan likes the attention and kindness Chloe gives her, and Chloe likes the extreme neediness of Nan? From what I’ve seen of them interacting together, it seems that Nan is too obsessed with faking DID and ultimately comes off as incredibly detached from Chloe and self-centered when they’re together. Who knows what their private relationship is lik
 
I'd be willing to bet that the therapist saw the nature of the art and found the pedophilic undertones disturbing when combined with whatever Nan had shared in therapy. On that note, I think it's important to note than in recent years Nan has actually developed brain damage as a result of an accident. Doesn't brain damage lower inhibitions and make people with such inclinations more likely to act on them?

It depends on the type of brain damage, I'm sure, but that would make sense. Nan doesn't strike me as a pedophile in the sense that she gets off on children because they are children, more as someone who just has absolutely no sexual boundaries. Minors, family, and friends are all fair game, and she's constantly shoehorning her weird fetish into non-sexual places, showing it off to people who don't even know she finds it sexual.

There was a fetish D&D campaign and-- I'd post some links, but my cat just sneezed again.

Why am I suddenly reminded of this comic?
 
It depends on the type of brain damage, I'm sure, but that would make sense. Nan doesn't strike me as a pedophile in the sense that she gets off on children because they are children, more as someone who just has absolutely no sexual boundaries. Minors, family, and friends are all fair game, and she's constantly shoehorning her weird fetish into non-sexual places, showing it off to people who don't even know she finds it sexual.

I don't necessarily think Nan is a 'classic' pedophile with an exclusive attraction to children and nor do I think she is someone who consciously identifies as a pedophile. But I do still think she is a pedophile of some description. She is attracted to children and teenagers based on her art and her interaction with real teenagers. She is in some way predatory for exposing her young audience to what she considers sexual themes without being transparent about that because as she has admitted she gets a sexual thrill out of being exhibitionistic with her fetish.

It is so much easier for pedophiles who aren't exclusively attracted to children to go undetected because they can be in relationships with adults. But often those adults are child-like in appearance or disposition. We already know that she is in some way into or accepting of paraphilic infantilism through her engagement with Chloe as a 'little' and her association with people like DID Mom who actively act as sexualised children. I acknowledge that there is a difference between adult baby shit and actually being into children but they are so closely linked.

When we look at Nan's other risk factors, I'm just convinced she is a pedophile whether she is aware of it or not. One of her 'teen' alters has already tried to start a sexual relationship with a real teenager. It was just good luck that everyone involved was horrified by that. It's only a matter of time before she crosses that line again. I'd agree that she has no sexual boundaries and I would agree that she isn't your stereotypical pedophile, but I wouldn't say that warrants any points in her favour.
 
Caught up with the thread while I could (slammed with IRL shit), just wanted to say that this is looking like it’s possibly gonna shape up to Chloe throwing Nan under the bus to save some face. But, it’s hard to say... if she’s shrewd, which she is, she will, but this could also go down the very stupid path of “this is me dealing with muh trauma. I was taken advantage of as a kid while I was sick and this is just how I cope with it.” Like how some pedos were sexually abused as a child and take it out on other children or look at pics/art and claim it’s how they cope and work through the trauma.

Or, amnesia wall, like it’s been said before.
 
Has anyone else had the same thought as me that both Nan and Chloe draw "Nin" as very small and childlike, yet also weirdly sexual (short skirt, thigh highs, and a crop top)? Also, if Nin is an integration of Chloe and Nina, and Chloe was "the Body", then why is Nin not drawn to look like the Body? Who is the Body now???

IMG_5386.jpegFullSizeRender-1.jpegFullSizeRender.jpegIMG_5384.jpegIMG_5385.jpeg
 
Has anyone else had the same thought as me that both Nan and Chloe draw "Nin" as very small and childlike, yet also weirdly sexual (short skirt, thigh highs, and a crop top)? Also, if Nin is an integration of Chloe and Nina, and Chloe was "the Body", then why is Nin not drawn to look like the Body? Who is the Body now???

Nin is the new main, because somehow integration of a fractured identity creates an entirely new identity even if it happens to be the main personality because #forrealscience.
 
Nin is the new main, because somehow integration of a fractured identity creates an entirely new identity even if it happens to be the main personality because #forrealscience.
So then none of them identify as looking like the body? Seems pretty convenient for a girl who clearly has body/appearance issues to "identify" as looking completely different from her physical self.
 
So then none of them identify as looking like the body? Seems pretty convenient for a girl who clearly has body/appearance issues to "identify" as looking completely different from her physical self.

Chloe's whole schtick is convenience when it comes to being critiqued. Though I wouldn't say she has appearance issues, not to seem like a thirst post but she's generally attractive and seems to know and understand it especially when interacting with her fanbase. Her main self confidence issues probably stem from being extremely ordinary and dull outside of her purchased diagnosis which matches up with various accounts of her prior to being removed from her university if I'm remembering my Chloe lore correctly.
 
Has anyone else had the same thought as me that both Nan and Chloe draw "Nin" as very small and childlike, yet also weirdly sexual (short skirt, thigh highs, and a crop top)? Also, if Nin is an integration of Chloe and Nina, and Chloe was "the Body", then why is Nin not drawn to look like the Body? Who is the Body now???

View attachment 1220464View attachment 1220460View attachment 1220461View attachment 1220462View attachment 1220465

The 'kitty' thing makes me want to jump into a lake in a fake suicide bid and get sucked into the propeller of the police boat sent to rescue me.

Chloe's whole schtick is convenience when it comes to being critiqued. Though I wouldn't say she has appearance issues, not to seem like a thirst post but she's generally attractive and seems to know and understand it especially when interacting with her fanbase. Her main self confidence issues probably stem from being extremely ordinary and dull outside of her purchased diagnosis which matches up with various accounts of her prior to being removed from her university if I'm remembering my Chloe lore correctly.

Maybe I'm being a certified faggot but I don't find Chloe particularly attractive. Tombstone teeth, crazy eyes, that weirdly enhanced thigh gap, a weirdly oval shaped head. She looks like an alien to me.
 
Is there any info on what Chloe's parent's think of any of the DID stuff? We assume they paid for the diagnosis, have either of them been in a video or said anything publicly? I agree that they are likely not abusive, but what kind of parents raise someone like Chloe?

I wonder what Chloe's parent's think about 30 year old Nan. Chloe says they are potentially a bit homophobic, to what degree?
Does Nan have a job? Do you think Chloe and Nan actually had sex when she was visiting in the UK?
 
Back