Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Assman]

So they are accurate? This is why you should probably give a shit about your spelling lmao, a tard slip-up like this don't look good

Hey now. This is a thread, not a PhD thesis.

 

[break these cuffs]

Hey now. This is a thread, not a PhD thesis.

But Melinda is perfect.

 

[redcent]

I type 95 WPM and am 34 years old.

34 years old, you say? I'm going to make a guess that you did your degree when you got out of school (~18 years old) so your degree was done at least ten years ago. Ten years to atrophy...

He has never beat any women either. He yoked up an ex of his in a headlock. She testified she received a red mark on her cheek and an injury for one hour (the red mark until it faded). That's not "beating". Also, she provoked it by years of psychological abuse against Marshall. You can only mentally abuse someone so long before they physically lash out.
Either way, he did nothing worthy of condemnation. There is no capital punishment in The Torah for physically striking another person when in a fight, even your spouse. There is a curse for attacking someone. But it's not "attacking" if there were events that led up to being struck. As it is written, "a fool's mouth calls out for a beating".

"A fool’s words get him into fights;
yes, his mouth calls out for a beating." (Prov. 18:6)

you look quite the fool to us, though, Ruth. Does that mean you call for a beating?

I didn't use any money received from The Stalker to pay for my $160 laptop. I used money from my small business because it was a business expense. C'mon now, I though you stalked my finances via the federal cases, you should know better.

Cohabitate? Marshall and I are legally married you moron. He legally adopted my children too.

Even if we were not legally married I maintain a First Amendment right to live with him without a legal paper through a religious Ketubah. The government can't do shit about that.

Neither does $160 pay for a deposit. Neither do I need to pay for a deposit if I move from here. I had a Torah sister invite me to rent a house on her land. I also have the option of going back to one house with Marshall. I may even go ahead and move over seas finally.

You're an idiot. I would mock you and say "nice try" but damn, you just made the second dumbest comment EVER.




You swear like I care about spelling on a thread.

As I said before, I don't use social media. IE I don't use reddit, Twitter. Facebook or YouTube. Like I said before, I side with the Ultra Orthodox on this issue: social media is evil. From my POV, its a BaMaH [בָּמָה]

so why does marshal use social media then? There's been caps of his ramblings on Twitter and Facebook. Does that make him evil?

Look at yourself and say that again! If you mentally abuse a man that doesn't mean they have to be a doormat and just sit there and take it just because they are a man. If you mentally abuse a man, don't be surprised when he gets up in your face and hits you.

how thin skinned do you have to be to retaliate verbal shit with physical abuse? You want to retaliate just say "fuck you" and move on with your day, that's what everyone else does. You and marshal both have this same problem: you can't take an insult (hence why you tried suing the farms) and you not dealing with it has led to this thread exploding

 

[Fwiffo]

I didn't use any money received from The Stalker to pay for my $160 laptop. I used money from my small business because it was a business expense. C'mon now, I though you stalked my finances via the federal cases, you should know better.

Cohabitate? Marshall and I are legally married you moron. He legally adopted my children too.

Even if we were not legally married I maintain a First Amendment right to live with him without a legal paper through a religious Ketubah. The government can't do shit about that.

Neither does $160 pay for a deposit. Neither do I need to pay for a deposit if I move from here. I had a Torah sister invite me to rent a house on her land. I also have the option of going back to one house with Marshall. I may even go ahead and move over seas finally.

You're an idiot. I would mock you and say "nice try" but damn, you just made the second dumbest comment EVER.




You swear like I care about spelling on a thread.

As I said before, I don't use social media. IE I don't use reddit, Twitter. Facebook or YouTube. Like I said before, I side with the Ultra Orthodox on this issue: social media is evil. From my POV, its a BaMaH [בָּמָה]

And even if I did use social media, I would not be using it to compare lives, I have never been jealous of anyone in my life. I didn't even know what jealousy was until about age 22 when someone explained it to me. That's how much of a simpleton I am when it comes to evil. I actually had to talk to evil people more often to figure out how they think.





Look at yourself and say that again! If you mentally abuse a man that doesn't mean they have to be a doormat and just sit there and take it just because they are a man. If you mentally abuse a man, don't be surprised when he gets up in your face and hits you.




Yes, briefly. I would like to read more though. How about you?



As a woman I am forbidden by The Torah from fighting in the army of Israelites. That is the duty of my husband and sons. We aren't in The Land, so this question doesn't really apply.



My husband doesn't beat our children, so this isn't an issue.




Does this comment have a point? It just sounds like a person who drank alcohol and put some rambling on a page. Your facts are even accurate. The ignorance of this comment, just WOW

View attachment 1230613
Are you serious?
Absolute weaklings.

I think you attributed someone else’s comment to me, I didn’t say anything about posting privileges.

My rambling can be distilled to one point: you are here because you are a) hilarious in your bungling and b) you are just like the dozens of other losers that are categorized here. You are here for the same reason the fat homeless schizo obsessed with telomeres is here: you are funny in your failure.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I wonder if Melinda knows that a Ketubah isn't actually legally enforceable because it's a religious document. We ain't living in Israel, you can't legally enforce your J.ew shit here.

 

[Fannyscum]

Ruth is an appropriate name because with this broad you never get the full tRUTH.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Strictly for laughs? Obviously you haven't read most of other user's comments. You script fairytales in your head. About every 5 pages you show up and blurt out some nonsense comment like this one. You are blind to your own internal sickness that blurts out these fairytales to feed your own inner demons. You do realize that its a waste of thread space and I could care less about these types of comments that you make?

Just when I’ve thought you’ve reached peak stupid, you drop a moronic comment filled with weapons-grade autism.

First, you fucking moron, it’s “I couldn’t care less”. God you’re stupid.

Second, if you couldn’t care less, why are you replying to me? Because you’re a narcissist.

You really are the gift that keeps on giving. A demon-possessed heathen of a human being that exists to entertain us!

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I'm honestly interested why Melinda rarely seems to respond to me. She's clearly not following her "do not interact" list, and responds to mostly everyone. Not to suck my own chink dick, but I have the feeling Melinda either fears me or can't muster an extra brain cell to argue with me. Not to say she doesn't respond to me, but it's not as often as most.

Okay, my auto-fellatio is over now

 

[Tommy Wiseau Kin]

how thin skinned do you have to be to retaliate verbal shit with physical abuse? You want to retaliate just say "fuck you" and move on with your day, that's what everyone else does. You and marshal both have this same problem: you can't take an insult (hence why you tried suing the farms) and you not dealing with it has led to this thread exploding

If the so called “verbal abuse” was so bad, he could have not been a retard and just walk away from the relationship before hitting the breaking point.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I see that this woman doesn't know that women fight in the IDF. Before that, you got the Partisans. If you want more historical accounts, read the Chanukah. Book of Judges, Book of Judith. Though I like the story of Jael in Judges myself. I know that Melinda here hasn't read it since Book of Judges is the seventh book (the Nevi'im) and she can't get past the Torah.

 

[redcent]

I see that this woman doesn't know that women fight in the IDF. Before that, you got the Partisans. If you want more historical accounts, read the Chanukah. Book of Judges, Book of Judith. Though I like the story of Jael in Judges myself. I know that Melinda here hasn't read it since Book of Judges is the seventh book (the Nevi'im) and she can't get past the Torah.

Melinda has such a backwards understanding of "gender equality", apparently it's part of the patriarchy to push women into getting jobs or fighting in armies, despite women (and men) fighting to get the right to be in such jobs.

I've heard screeching about "patriarchy" before usually to do with some snowflake gender nonsense. But Ruth is that far out in the left field. Wouldn't the "patriarchy" be fighting to keep her in the kitchen jobless barefoot and constantly pregnant?

Iiirc she doesn't think jobs support her being "feminine" enough which by her definition isn't wearing make up and heels but be constantly pregnant or boob feeding. What.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

As long as she did not physically attack him, there was no need for him to defend himself physically. Attacking someone without being attacked beforehand is abuse and not defense. It makes you the attacker. You transition from victim to perpetrator, no matter if you have been mentally abused by said person (press X to doubt) before or not, no matter if you have been provoked or not. Since women generally pose less of a threat to men (unless maybe they have a gun) than men pose to women, he could have walked away and taken himself out of the situation but I guess he wasn't smart enough for that. Smart is not his thing.

I can't believe how many basic things have to be explained to these people. Thank God the law doesn't accept the delusional ideas of lunatics but only it's own concepts and theories.

You can't tell someone to just "walk away" when they have children wrapped up in the scenario.

Your moral theory is not true in the slightest bit! Just because women are smaller on average than men doesn't give them the right to verbally and mentally abuse a man without being struck. They don't get sovereign immunity from striking just because they are women.

Verbal attacks and mental abuse warrant physical attacks. That's why The Torah says to kill adulterers. Adultery is mental abuse on a partner. And what's the punishment? A PHYSICAL attack. That's also why it says THE FOOL'S MOUTH CALLS OUT FOR A BEATING, HIS MOUTH GETS HIM INTO FIGHTS. IE--verbal abuse calls out for physical striking.

Not to mention the particular person I was talking about tried burning Marshall with a cigarette/threw it at him, but I won't even emphasize that point, because even if she didn't her pagan idolatrous behavior got what she provoked.

34 years old, you say? I'm going to make a guess that you did your degree when you got out of school (~18 years old) so your degree was done at least ten years ago. Ten years to atrophy...


you look quite the fool to us, though, Ruth. Does that mean you call for a beating?
so why does marshal use social media then? There's been caps of his ramblings on Twitter and Facebook. Does that make him evil?



how thin skinned do you have to be to retaliate verbal shit with physical abuse? You want to retaliate just say "fuck you" and move on with your day, that's what everyone else does. You and marshal both have this same problem: you can't take an insult (hence why you tried suing the farms) and you not dealing with it has led to this thread exploding

The definition of a "fool" is someone who doesn't follow The Torah. So your attempt at trying to mimic my use of Proverbs is erroneous. You are trying to take the word "fool" out of the Hebraic context. Doesn't work.

Marshall uses social media, yes. This is a point that we don't agree on. But it's not a cause for divorce. Like I said before, he and I are about at about a 95% agreement on what The Torah says. The points we disagree on are not salvation issues and are not reasons for divorce.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

You can't tell someone to just "walk away" when they have children wrapped up in the scenario.

Your moral theory is not true in the slightest bit! Just because women are smaller on average than men doesn't give them the right to verbally and mentally abuse a man without being struck. They don't get sovereign immunity from striking just because they are women.

Verbal attacks and mental abuse warrant physical attacks. That's why The Torah says to kill adulterers. Adultery is mental abuse on a partner. And what's the punishment? A PHYSICAL attack. That's also why it says THE FOOL'S MOUTH CALLS OUT FOR A BEATING, HIS MOUTH GETS HIM INTO FIGHTS. IE--verbal abuse calls out for physical striking.

Not to mention the particular person I was talking about tried burning Marshall with a cigarette/threw it at him, but I won't even emphasize that point, because even if she didn't her pagan idolatrous behavior got what she provoked.





The definition of a "fool" is someone who doesn't follow The Torah. So your attempt at trying to mimic my use of Proverbs is erroneous. You are trying to take the word "fool" out of the Hebraic context. Doesn't work.

Marshall uses social media, yes. This is a point that we don't agree on. But it's not a cause for divorce. Like I said before, he and I are about at about a 95% agreement on what The Torah says. The points we disagree on are not salvation issues and are not reasons for divorce.

Why don't you let the thread die

 

[Toasty]

What the hell do you want now?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Lol, you don't use social media, Melinda? What the fuck do you think this site is, if not social media?

This is just people talking on a thread. It functions very differently than the ones I mentioned. This website might technically fall under a standard definition of social media, but I don't see simple threads like this one on the same level as Facebook, etc.

It isn't scholastic opinion, it's demonstrable. The Assyrian calendar lasted until they were conquered by Macedonia, and we know the Greek calendar well, so we can decipher the Assyrian calendar, which means we can also decipher the Sumerian calendar and the documents dated using it, which predate the comparable Hebrew texts, including the Torah. What you're saying simply doesn't align with reality.

Also you are again totally misrepresenting Kant. You are making a contextual judgement, not an absolute. Rape is either right or wrong. Spousal is a modifier in this context. Rape is the act. We are judging the act. Adding a modifier to an act doesn't make a new act. You've admitted rape is wrong, therefore by Kantian ethics spousal rape must also be wrong since it is the same thing.

Please provide evidence that the Torah is the earliest written document.

You are talking about calendars but that is all based on dating according to scholastic opinion.

I'm not misrepresenting Kant at all. The moral absolute here is spousal rape. You're trying to subdivide rape and that is not correct, philosophically speaking. Kant did not say that maxims have to be generalized in such a way.

As far as your evidence question, which I am willing to answer, let's first define "evidence". People can argue what constitutes valid "evidence". So don't just give me the cookie cutter dictionary definition. What are you asking for in context of science and academia?

Why don't you let the thread die

There is no such thing on Kiwi Farms

 

[Toasty]

Literally no one cares. Go away.

Edit, Guess I am optimistic, apparently there are a few kiwi's left who still want to see this puppet dance. Oh well, bring your best stick to poke her with then.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

There is no such thing on Kiwi Farms

Clearly you haven't been on KF as long as I have, lurking or otherwise, nor have you likely seen threads not associated with you

 

[Spergichu]

This is just people talking on a thread. It functions very differently than the ones I mentioned. This website might technically fall under a standard definition of social media, but I don't see simple threads like this one on the same level as Facebook, etc.




You are talking about calendars but that is all based on dating according to scholastic opinion.

I'm not misrepresenting Kant at all. The moral absolute here is spousal rape. You're trying to subdivide rape and that is not correct, philosophically speaking. Kant did not say that maxims have to be generalized in such a way.

As far as your evidence question, which I am willing to answer, let's first define "evidence". People can argue what constitutes valid "evidence". So don't just give me the cookie cutter dictionary definition. What are you asking for in context of science and academia?

If you're so against social media, why do you let Marshall post videos on YouTube and use other social media sites?

 

[Toasty]

If you're so against social media, why do you let Marshall post videos on YouTube and use other social media sites?

Jesus, don't encourage the boring twatwaddle to flow from her any further. You won't get a solid answer any way, if you get any answer at all. Just deflection, excuses and Torah blabety blah.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

There is no such thing on Kiwi Farms

Yes there is, it's not hard to see threads that are locked or have died off. You were on the second page before you came back to post. In a month you would have been on the fourth.