Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Nick's cult of exceptional individuals are extra assblasted on Twitter today, as the tiktok campaign crashed and burned in less than a week. They have doubled down on their profound intellectual arguments as a result ( cringe, simp, wignat etc) and are coping by dogpiling on anybody who is even a little critical of their leader. Anybody want to hazard a guess at what Nick's next move will be? As the walls seem to be closing in.
Again just like the Catboy Stream a few months ago. I don't think this will necessary be the 'end' but it shows a reality about Nick.

It's just a failed venture to try emulate the success of the Groyper Wars from 2019. Every event and thing Nick has been doing these days have been trying to reach the peak of the Groyper Wars from back then but it hardly works. He's always in a constant state of trying to keep the morale of his flock high ever since he tasted the high from last year but the fact is that he stained his record too much with his bad optics.

It'll always be a one-trick thing considering the fact that his 'optics' failed and the media has already labeled him as an evil nazi, not too different from Spencer. When Spencer was cited as Alt-Right Nazi no.1 by the media, no matter the dislikes on every YouTube video and comments on every article, it stained his record badly considering it's the MSM and see where he turned out.

EMJ has his own brand of autism. I.e. 1) if an African moves to Poland, learns Polish, and becomes a Catholic, he's now ethnically Polish
Shit, that's true? Got a clip or proof of that? That sounds literally like Civic Nationalism lol which Nick absolutely hates and I'm pretty sure Nick is on good terms with EMJ right? Seems odd Nick would hang with a guy who literally has a racial policy no different than Charlie Kirk's except its Catholic instead of "He may be Black and Gay, but he's a Soldier and he advocates for Small Government! So he's a conservative!"
 
Last edited:
Shit, that's true? Got a clip or proof of that? That sounds literally like Civic Nationalism lol which Nick absolutely hates and I'm pretty sure Nick is on good terms with EMJ right? Seems odd Nick would hang with a guy who literally has a racial policy no different than Charlie Kirk's except its Catholic instead of "He may be Black and Gay, but he's a Soldier and he advocates for Small Government! So he's a conservative!"
EMJ really doesn't believe in the racial parts of those on the far right at all, they just wanted their own Jordan Peterson daddy intellectual and emphasize his catholicism and hardness on gays & jews. sorta the opposite of the other optics allainces they've made actually like the mentioned Milo & Greg Johnson, clearly more open to gays & less caring of Jews but more sympathetic to the topics on race. i'm surprised he's gotten such a big following since he seems pretty unappealing unless you're extremely serious about catholicism and or really against 'revolutionary jews'. something interesting I discovered is that he's been appearing constantly on Iranian state media for the past few years as a commentator, almost always on foreign policy; far right Catholics and Shia Muslims sharing a common interest in this man is kinda funny to me.
firefox_2020-04-25_22-51-49.png
 
Nick's cult of exceptional individuals are extra assblasted on Twitter today, as the tiktok campaign crashed and burned in less than a week. They have doubled down on their profound intellectual arguments as a result ( cringe, simp, wignat etc) and are coping by dogpiling on anybody who is even a little critical of their leader. Anybody want to hazard a guess at what Nick's next move will be? As the walls seem to be closing in.
The TikTok campaign has shown how impotent AmNats are. The only thing they accomplished was making some dumb thot cry and her asking them to leave her alone.

Fuentes can't get Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro to debate him, so him and his followers want a debate with a Literately Who.


This is the funniest thing to come out of the ordeal, bar none, IMO. I saw it live the other night, and the Twitter account @nixonist made a clip. Chat was very conflicted about her.


Shit, that's true? Got a clip or proof of that? That sounds literally like Civic Nationalism lol which Nick absolutely hates and I'm pretty sure Nick is on good terms with EMJ right? Seems odd Nick would hang with a guy who literally has a racial policy no different than Charlie Kirk's except its Catholic instead of "He may be Black and Gay, but he's a Soldier and he advocates for Small Government! So he's a conservative!"
AmNats and WigNats think that EMJ does good historical research, but that he's basically delusional.

EMJ:
  • “Without the Catholic Church, Europe would resemble Somalia.” (Ethnos Needs Logos by EMJ)
  • “If it weren’t for St. Boniface, my ancestors would still be chasing pigs through the forests of Germany and worshiping trees.” (https://archive.li/mvr0w)
This Occidental Observer article is comprehensive on EMJ's views. Note that The Occidental Observer is Kevin McDonald's publication. He wrote The Culture of Critique book series.

 
  • Like
Reactions: [W]ehrSturmBrigada
From how I see it, their strategy is to desperately recreate the "meme magic" they had circa 2014-16 when right wing politics were making some comeback with a younger demographic, when there was a growing wave of disdain towards the far left/SJW/Tumblr types, and when posting memes about them was trendy. That's what got many of them into this and they feel by recreating this they can get more people to their side again.

There's multiple problems with this strategy but the biggest one is that social media platforms are far more ban happy than they were in 2016. There's also the fact that as time has proved internet activism accomplishes fuck all in the real world unless there's some astroturfing going on (see: ResetEra's userbase of "gaming industry professionals", astroturfed groups like Sleeping Giants, and every journalist with connections writing a hit piece). Instead of learning lessons from groups that actually accomplish shit, they'd rather post memes online and go through burner social media accounts. Then there's the obvious fact that their idea of "optics" is posting Holocaust jokes...which only gain traction among edgelords with no firm political values looking to offend people this week.

the core problem of nick Fuentes is his low IQ. He has above avg IQ and thinks that makes him a genius. He is too ignorant to realize that has no 0 unique ideas and everything he preaches is an idea stolen from someone else: andrew anglin, richard spencer, mike enoch, kevin macdonald, jared taylor, david duke, 4chan, etc. All he can do is repeat the circle-jerk that excites the base but has no ability to push the movement forward because if these ideas were sufficient, the movement would have already won.

As for internet. I agree banning are a huge issue but not the biggest flaw. The bigger flaw is that we're reached a saturation point content wise. Even before red ice got banned from youtube, the content was stale and blackpilled. There is only so much you can do online, eventually you gotta go IRL. Nick has done a poor job analyizing the flaws of UTR17. Yes optics are an issue, getting labeled as a nazi is a huge problem BUT wrapping yourslef in the American flag and saying, "no I'm an American Nationalist. America First." is not a solution. Media will still call you a racist, white supremacist, nazi. IMO the 2 biggest problems from UTR were 1) inability to articulate the message or vision. Why are we so upset? 2) Lacking reframe to deal with the racism, nazi, attacks. I think optics was 3rd. Nicke hasn't done a good job fixing these weakness. America First is not a strong vision and he has no responses after being called a racist or nazi.

E Michael Jones is probably the only one in that entire group that actually believes what he says (and is the only one that doesn't devolve into wignat autism). The rest of them are just grifters looking to peddle their dumb beliefs for shekels really.

If you believe this, idk what to say. Real grifters are hunter avallone, destiny, jordan peterson, joe rogan... even charlie kirk and ben shapiro and especially dave rubin. These are the people in it for the money and/or ego boost.

I'm a white American, too.

I'd rather deport you before most of the blacks in the United States.
spoken like a true cuck. "I know blacks hate white people, riot/loot at least once a decade and will forever turn my inner cities into no-go zones but I'll fight to the death to protect their right to destroy my nation and play basketball."
 
Last edited:
far right Catholics and Shia Muslims sharing a common interest in this man is kinda funny to me.
Nick straight up said several streams ago that he wanted America to have something like the IRGC

The irony of TradCat's whining incessantly over people supporting Iran/Islam or meme about starting a war with Iran is epic, while those who built their zoomer ideology are going on Iranian State TV or they themselves legitimately want to be like the Iranian Islamic Republic, is not lost.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Coh
E Michael Jones is probably the only one in that entire group that actually believes what he says (and is the only one that doesn't devolve into wignat autism). The rest of them are just grifters looking to peddle their dumb beliefs for shekels really.

I don't understand this r.etarded trend on KF where people assume nobody believes in anything. Most of the Far Right and Far Left believe what they talk about, there are easier ways to make money and not torpedo your public image. Saying Mike Enoch and TDS is a grift is just insane, and we are in a thread about Nick meticulously tallying everything he has lost and been banned from and yet he's all doing it for the easy life. What? If people wanted to grift they could literally just defend Israel and be a neocon. If we want to talk right wing grifters we can talk Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro, not the small crowd that has several larger governent affiliated groups trying to attack and imprison them.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand this r.etarded trend on KF where people assume nobody believes in anything. Most of the Far Right and Far Left believe what they talk about, there are easier ways to make money and not torpedo your public image. Saying Mike Enoch and TDS is a grift is just insane, and we are in a thread about Nick meticulously tallying everything he has lost and been banned from and yet he's all doing it for the easy life. What? If people wanted to grift they could literally just defend Israel and be a neocon. If we want to talk right wing grifters we can talk Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro, not the small crowd that has several larger governent affiliated groups trying to attack and imprison them.

People are idiots, and I don't bother trying to argue them out of position they didn't argue themselves into in the first place. Most people who use the word 'grift' don't even know what it means, they just interpret it to mean "lolcow who makes money".

I was in Nick's Discord server, at least until the other guys started lusting after the trap. He believes in what he says, but he's also a weird shut-in who also really wants friends, and those friends convinced him that he can't "redpill" people unless he couches it in ironic jokes. He's explained his strategy himself. Problem these guys do talk to actual grifters who can see right through them and what they're doing and either want a piece of the pie or to control it and offer them access to politics that they'll never actually see.
 
I don't understand this r.etarded trend on KF where people assume nobody believes in anything. Most of the Far Right and Far Left believe what they talk about, there are easier ways to make money and not torpedo your public image. Saying Mike Enoch and TDS is a grift is just insane, and we are in a thread about Nick meticulously tallying everything he has lost and been banned from and yet he's all doing it for the easy life. What? If people wanted to grift they could literally just defend Israel and be a neocon. If we want to talk right wing grifters we can talk Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro, not the small crowd that has several larger governent affiliated groups trying to attack and imprison them.

While I agree with your main point I don't think that it is white/black situation. What I mean by that is that they might believe in 50% of things that they say instead of 0% or 100%. And that remaining 50% might be altered for better monetization.

Also, its not like there is infinite amount of Kirks in the world. I couldn't see Enoch doing what Kirk is doing so its not like that is an option for him.
 
While I agree with your main point I don't think that it is white/black situation. What I mean by that is that they might believe in 50% of things that they say instead of 0% or 100%. And that remaining 50% might be altered for better monetization.

Also, its not like there is infinite amount of Kirks in the world. I couldn't see Enoch doing what Kirk is doing so its not like that is an option for him.

I just meant in terms of pathways, Dan Crenshaw and the rest of the mainstream Neocons found their niche and Nick of all people could have done that, in fact according to him he was being lined up for that. Another example would be Rebel Media and all the people they kicked out, Nick could have been the funny zoomer neocon and Enoch (and others) could right now be doing autistic deepdives about how everyone should blame China for everything and I bet they would each have book deals. It's interesting watching Michelle Malkin walk that tight-rope same with Tucker Carlson but I truly think if they wanted the easy way out they could have. Hell even if they appealed to Q Boomers they could be more popular, but integrity demands we mock these dopes.
 
If these blacks are soo great, why wouldn't these nations accept them? They should be begging us to send them our great negros to culturally enrich them. You're acting just like liberal. Your own actions admit that these negros are inferior and no one in their right mind would want to live with them so why do you want us to live with them?



They already riot. LA Riots, Katrina. even BLM. The only reason you can even maintain this black presence in USA is because you give them free money (welfare) + put them in jail. Eventually one or both of these systems will fail.



Guess what, gay marriage was nonsensical 10 years ago. Diversity, becoming a minority, was non nonsensical 40 years ago. Open borders between blacks and whites (desegregaiton) was nonsensical 60 years ago. Even pouting kids on puberty blockers was nonsensical 5 years ago. Anything can become "sensible" with enough of a media push. The first step is to break the taboo. normalize an idea and get people to stop being triggered by it, than it's downhill. Once you normalize deportations it'll be 100% sensible just like every other policy the liberals promoted which most people thought was total lunacy and became reality.

Also majority doesn't matter. Vocal minority controls society.




Yes. I'm a WHITE American.

Yes or no. do you want to take back the inner cities or not? You're just repeating bad faith liberal talking points. Reality is you've already accepted diversity now, diversity tomorrow, diversity forever and the quality of life in USA is now worse than many Asian nations because of diversity. Asians can live in their major cities, we cannot. You're a coward that's taking the path of least resistance, white fighting to suburbia, becoming a refugee in your own nation and annexing land to non whites. People like you are the reason America has fallen so much. You're just trying to conflate being weak with being sensible. Reality is deporting these non whites is FAR EASIER than taking this land from native Americans like the founding fathers did.


Holy fuck you're stupid. Clearly you've never been a major city you shit kicking bumpkin. Gentrification in a number of cities has been happening for the last decade everywhere. Why the fuck do you think urban rent is so high?
 
Nick's twitter feed is now just him retweeting TikTok accounts of being banned, Zoomers, and Based Black Men.

Just the state of it all
 
Makes me wonder, what's JD (The Black Groyper) and the Jewish Groyper doing these days? I know JD had his account on Twitter banned a while ago but I wonder if Jewish Groyper is still relevant.

Are they actually Groypers or they're just paid to keep up appearances so Nick can point to them and claim "See I'm not racist and antisemitic!"? Do other Groypers actually like them? It seems like they're just cardboard cut-outs but it is ironic that Nick mocks Charlie Kirk for having a Based Gay Black Man but he himself has a Based Catholic Black Man, not even mentioning Milo himself as well.

It's almost like the only difference between Nick and Charlie at the end of the day is that they have different views on economics and they both wrestle for Trump's affection.
 
Nick has done a poor job analyizing the flaws of UTR17. Yes optics are an issue, getting labeled as a nazi is a huge problem BUT wrapping yourslef in the American flag and saying, "no I'm an American Nationalist. America First." is not a solution. Media will still call you a racist, white supremacist, nazi. IMO the 2 biggest problems from UTR were 1) inability to articulate the message or vision. Why are we so upset? 2) Lacking reframe to deal with the racism, nazi, attacks. I think optics was 3rd. Nicke hasn't done a good job fixing these weakness. America First is not a strong vision and he has no responses after being called a racist or nazi.
I don't think most IRL activities (namely rallies) are effective for the far-left or far-right, at least in America.

The problem with Unite The Right (UTR) is that they thought they could hold a right-wing rally in a liberal state and a liberal city. Had it been held in a conservative state and conservative city, an incident like James Fields/Heather Heyer wouldn't have happened. I haven't read about Field's case because I don't care, but the police handled the situation poorly from the start regarding crowd control, etc. The government gave them a permit for a rally, then revoked it, etc.

Roads should have been blocked off to regular traffic besides exiting the city in almost all circumstances. They should have clearly separated the rally's supporters and detractors.

Besides the Fields/Heyer ordeal, the optics weren't particularly bad. I'm sure there was more obscure symbology, but the go to example/photo of UTR bad optics is a guy with a NSDAP flag. His flag looked brand new (it had creases still, like it was brand new) and to my knowledge the man that had it has never been doxed. Which is extremely odd because his face is distinctly visible and the photo of him was used in basically every news article about the event. You'd think he would have been one of the first people doxed. If he has been, I'd loved to be corrected because I've always wondered who that guy is.
I don't understand this r.etarded trend on KF where people assume nobody believes in anything. Most of the Far Right and Far Left believe what they talk about, there are easier ways to make money and not torpedo your public image. Saying Mike Enoch and TDS is a grift is just insane, and we are in a thread about Nick meticulously tallying everything he has lost and been banned from and yet he's all doing it for the easy life. What? If people wanted to grift they could literally just defend Israel and be a neocon. If we want to talk right wing grifters we can talk Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro, not the small crowd that has several larger governent affiliated groups trying to attack and imprison them.
I wouldn't classify either of them as "grifters."

I think Charlie Kirk, Hunter Avallone, etc. are grifters. I don't think Ben Shapiro is a grifter either. Like him or hate him, he's been fairly consistent in his positions over the years.

Fuentes' is different than TRS in a big way: TRS doesn't try to hide their genuine opinions under "irony" and Nick does, particularly so since the Groyper War.

I'm skeptical that Fuentes believes the GOP/Trump are viable avenues for the positions he holds. It seems like he went back into MAGA mode during/after the Groyper War. Particularly when Kirk started calling out Groypers at his events as not actually supporting Trump because Trump has done X, Y, Z things that the Groypers don't actually support, such as all Trump's actions regarding Israel.
He believes in what he says, but he's also a weird shut-in who also really wants friends, and those friends convinced him that he can't "redpill" people unless he couches it in ironic jokes. He's explained his strategy himself. Problem these guys do talk to actual grifters who can see right through them and what they're doing and either want a piece of the pie or to control it and offer them access to politics that they'll never actually see.
Nick has poor judgement when it comes to friends (see: Baked Alaska). It wasn't smart of him to think that "irony" could be used as a shield against the press.

Pat Buchanan (one of Nick's idols) hasn't said anywhere near the controversial shit that Nick has, and he was labeled a Nazi by the press, and also by Donald Trump.
"The Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani," Trump's 2000 statement read. "This is not company I wish to keep."

"I used to like Pat," said Trump in the interview. "I was on Crossfire with him. I thought he was a nice guy. Then I read the things he had written about Hitler, Jews, blacks, gays, and Mexicans. I mean, I think it's disgusting. That speech he made at the '92 Republican convention was a disaster. He wants to divide Americans. Clearly, he has a love affair with Adolf Hitler, and that's sick. Buchanan actually said gay people had chosen 'satan[ism] and suicide' Now he says he welcomes gay people into his campaign. The guy is a hypocrite."
Makes me wonder, what's JD (The Black Groyper) and the Trump's Chosen Groyper doing these days? I know JD had his account on Twitter banned a while ago but I wonder if Trump's Chosen Groyper is still relevant.

Are they actually Groypers or they're just paid to keep up appearances so Nick can point to them and claim "See I'm not racist and antisemitic!"? Do other Groypers actually like them? It seems like they're just cardboard cut-outs but it is ironic that Nick mocks Charlie Kirk for having a Based Gay Black Man but he himself has a Based Catholic Black Man, not even mentioning Milo himself as well.

It's almost like the only difference between Nick and Charlie at the end of the day is that they have different views on economics and they both wrestle for Trump's affection.
JD is on Twitter and TikTok. He gets banned all the time and usually comes back within the next day or so. His last Twitter username I know of is "ontheappj_d," but he's been temporarily restricted within the last few days, so he's probably got another one.

I think JD's beliefs are sincere. From what I've gathered, he's from West Virginia, religious, and isn't fond of the Juden. He's musically talented and has posted many videos of him singing and playing piano at church. I'm not sure if he's Catholic, though. His church videos seemed very Protestant-esque. He's done live videos on Twitter where he dropped hard Ks.

Quick explainer for those who haven't read the older pages of this thread, the Twitter user "AmericaFirstJew" first made his appearance during the Groyper War when he asked Charlie Kirk a question while wearing a Bernie Sanders kippah. I watched the event via a DLive live stream that had Azzmador and Andrew Anglin. When Anglin saw him ask the question, he didn't think the guy was genuinely a Jude. Soon after, he surfaced under the username "AmericaFirstJew" on Twitter, and while he's definitely not a Sander's supporter, from all indicators, he's a Jude.

I hadn't really thought about the guy in a while until KiwiJoe's comment, but I just looked on Twitter to see if I could find him.

It looks like his "AmericaFirstJew" Twitter account was banned in January 2020, but he's got a new one that's "AmericaFirstJ." It's a private account, though.

As to whether they're actually accepted by AmNats, it's hard to speculate. I'd say definitely yes for JD. Historically speaking, White Nationalists and Black Nationalists have bonded over the JQ. Current forms of Black Nationalism (namely Nation of Islam) aren't really targeted at younger, (especially Christian) black people. Hoteps are, but they don't have the sheer online presence and numbers that people like Nick and his friends do, though. I'm also not sure if Hoteps are religious (namely Christian) either.

In regards to AmericaFirstJew, I think he's accepted by AmNats, but it's an extremely thin line, and I'd say he's used in the same way Charlie Kirk uses his based black, homosexual, MAGA friend Rob Smith. For a while, AmNats tried to pressure AmericaFirstJew into converting to Catholicism. One of Nick's close friends, JoeTheBoomer, has a podcast called The Daily Brapp. I recall a stream they did late last year where he was talking to AmericaFirstJew and trying to convert him to Catholicism. Mind you, AmNats believe that Jews are a race, so even if he converted, if he ever dissented with their group think, they would just attribute that to him being a Jude. A black guy like JD doesn't really have that issue.
 
I don't think most IRL activities (namely rallies) are effective for the far-left or far-right, at least in America.

The problem with Unite The Right (UTR) is that they thought they could hold a right-wing rally in a liberal state and a liberal city. Had it been held in a conservative state and conservative city, an incident like James Fields/Heather Heyer wouldn't have happened. I haven't read about Field's case because I don't care, but the police handled the situation poorly from the start regarding crowd control, etc. The government gave them a permit for a rally, then revoked it, etc.

Roads should have been blocked off to regular traffic besides exiting the city in almost all circumstances. They should have clearly separated the rally's supporters and detractors.

Besides the Fields/Heyer ordeal, the optics weren't particularly bad. I'm sure there was more obscure symbology, but the go to example/photo of UTR bad optics is a guy with a NSDAP flag. His flag looked brand new (it had creases still, like it was brand new) and to my knowledge the man that had it has never been doxed. Which is extremely odd because his face is distinctly visible and the photo of him was used in basically every news article about the event. You'd think he would have been one of the first people doxed. If he has been, I'd loved to be corrected because I've always wondered who that guy is.

I wouldn't classify either of them as "grifters."

I think Charlie Kirk, Hunter Avallone, etc. are grifters. I don't think Ben Shapiro is a grifter either. Like him or hate him, he's been fairly consistent in his positions over the years.

Fuentes' is different than TRS in a big way: TRS doesn't try to hide their genuine opinions under "irony" and Nick does, particularly so since the Groyper War.

I'm skeptical that Fuentes believes the GOP/Trump are viable avenues for the positions he holds. It seems like he went back into MAGA mode during/after the Groyper War. Particularly when Kirk started calling out Groypers at his events as not actually supporting Trump because Trump has done X, Y, Z things that the Groypers don't actually support, such as all Trump's actions regarding Israel.

Nick has poor judgement when it comes to friends (see: Baked Alaska). It wasn't smart of him to think that "irony" could be used as a shield against the press.

Pat Buchanan (one of Nick's idols) hasn't said anywhere near the controversial shit that Nick has, and he was labeled a Nazi by the press, and also by Donald Trump.


JD is on Twitter and TikTok. He gets banned all the time and usually comes back within the next day or so. His last Twitter username I know of is "ontheappj_d," but he's been temporarily restricted within the last few days, so he's probably got another one.

I think JD's beliefs are sincere. From what I've gathered, he's from West Virginia, religious, and isn't fond of the Juden. He's musically talented and has posted many videos of him singing and playing piano at church. I'm not sure if he's Catholic, though. His church videos seemed very Protestant-esque. He's done live videos on Twitter where he dropped hard Ks.

Quick explainer for those who haven't read the older pages of this thread, the Twitter user "AmericaFirstJew" first made his appearance during the Groyper War when he asked Charlie Kirk a question while wearing a Bernie Sanders kippah. I watched the event via a DLive live stream that had Azzmador and Andrew Anglin. When Anglin saw him ask the question, he didn't think the guy was genuinely a Jude. Soon after, he surfaced under the username "AmericaFirstJew" on Twitter, and while he's definitely not a Sander's supporter, from all indicators, he's a Jude.

I hadn't really thought about the guy in a while until KiwiJoe's comment, but I just looked on Twitter to see if I could find him.

It looks like his "AmericaFirstJew" Twitter account was banned in January 2020, but he's got a new one that's "AmericaFirstJ." It's a private account, though.

As to whether they're actually accepted by AmNats, it's hard to speculate. I'd say definitely yes for JD. Historically speaking, White Nationalists and Black Nationalists have bonded over the JQ. Current forms of Black Nationalism (namely Nation of Islam) aren't really targeted at younger, (especially Christian) black people. Hoteps are, but they don't have the sheer online presence and numbers that people like Nick and his friends do, though. I'm also not sure if Hoteps are religious (namely Christian) either.

In regards to AmericaFirstJew, I think he's accepted by AmNats, but it's an extremely thin line, and I'd say he's used in the same way Charlie Kirk uses his based black, homosexual, MAGA friend Rob Smith. For a while, AmNats tried to pressure AmericaFirstJew into converting to Catholicism. One of Nick's close friends, JoeTheBoomer, has a podcast called The Daily Brapp. I recall a stream they did late last year where he was talking to AmericaFirstJew and trying to convert him to Catholicism. Mind you, AmNats believe that Trump's Chosen People are a race, so even if he converted, if he ever dissented with their group think, they would just attribute that to him being a Jude. A black guy like JD doesn't really have that issue.
What is Nick's stance on the Constitution Party?

They seem to be on his level. While the Constitution Party seems to advocate for Small Government compared to Nick's brand of Statism (then again the GOP advocates for Small Government on paper as well, and Nick is a Statist as always), for the most part, Nick and the CP seem to be aligned on a lot of things.

The CP aren't Catholic LARPers but at least they're religious in the general Christian sense. They seem to be very traditional and paleoconservative as well. I don't know what's their stance on the JQ but you probably can't ever be 'redpilled on the JQ' in the mainstream anyways without getting Epstein'd, the most you can is just not get into too many wars in the Middle East, I think the CP are anti-interventionism anyways.

Sure they are a small party but at least it would send a better message advocating for a party that actually shares about 70% of their views instead of a party that would absolutely hate them if the Nick and his clique ever became mainstream.
 
The TikTok campaign has shown how impotent AmNats are. The only thing they accomplished was making some dumb thot cry and her asking them to leave her alone.

Fuentes can't get Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro to debate him, so him and his followers want a debate with a Literately Who.


This is the funniest thing to come out of the ordeal, bar none, IMO. I saw it live the other night, and the Twitter account @nixonist made a clip. Chat was very conflicted about her.

View attachment 1254774

AmNats and WigNats think that EMJ does good historical research, but that he's basically delusional.

EMJ:
  • “Without the Catholic Church, Europe would resemble Somalia.” (Ethnos Needs Logos by EMJ)
  • “If it weren’t for St. Boniface, my ancestors would still be chasing pigs through the forests of Germany and worshiping trees.” (https://archive.li/mvr0w)
This Occidental Observer article is comprehensive on EMJ's views. Note that The Occidental Observer is Kevin McDonald's publication. He wrote The Culture of Critique book series.

that video is showing a total simp city. lmao
 
EMJ has his own brand of autism. I.e. 1) if an African moves to Poland, learns Polish, and becomes a Catholic, he's now ethnically Polish, 2) a one of Trump's Chosen People can convert to Catholicism, and if that one of Trump's Chosen People agrees with EMJ then it's a legitimate conversion but if he doesn't then it's Trump's Chosen People trying to subvert the Catholic Church, 3) that Catholicism is solely responsible for Germany becoming an advanced society, 4) that Trump's Chosen People won't allow for Europeans to collectively advocate for themselves, but they'll allow Catholics to do so, etc.

Honestly, EMJ is more autistic than any other subgroup like WigNats, etc. because he has a binary of you're either Catholic or not. If you're not Catholic, then you're basically an adversary.

Even the Nuremberg Laws weren't that autistic lmao.
I have no idea who this person even is, but all of this insane shit reeks of the sort of wannabe-crusader autism propagated by internet catholics on /his/.
 
I don't think most IRL activities (namely rallies) are effective for the far-left or far-right, at least in America.

The problem with Unite The Right (UTR) is that they thought they could hold a right-wing rally in a liberal state and a liberal city. Had it been held in a conservative state and conservative city, an incident like James Fields/Heather Heyer wouldn't have happened. I haven't read about Field's case because I don't care, but the police handled the situation poorly from the start regarding crowd control, etc. The government gave them a permit for a rally, then revoked it, etc.

While Charlottesville is a liberal city thanks to UVA and Virginia has gone blue in recent years, most of the state is usually red or reddish-purple outside the massive population centers in Richmond, the Hampton Roads/Virginia Beach area, and the DC suburbs of Northern Virginia. The traditionally purple swing districts in Roanoke, Staunton, and the Southside are all going more blue as time goes on as well.

One of the reasons why so many people still view Virginia as a swing state and not a full blue state is because it was a deep red Bible Belt stronghold as recently as the late 90's and early 2000's.

Lynchburg is the home of Liberty University, and both Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell hail from Virginia.

Then you've got the Southwestern counties that are west of the Roanoke and New River Valley areas, which are extremely morally conservative, but oddly enough were often reddish-purple swing counties in the pre-Obama years since you had a lot of Blue Dog Democrats who supported the UMWA and they all flipped to the GOP after Obama's statements about the coal industry and the concurrent Great Recession.

If anything, Virginia's past as a deep red Bible Belt state and the OG Southern state may have a lot to do with why the Dems has been so gung-ho in their policies in that state all throughout the 2010's.

Honestly, there are times where I feel like it comes across as the DNC trying to punish the state for its conservative Southern past. I know that's crazy and paranoid, but it does sometimes look that way.


Sperging about Virginia politics aside, I do agree that Unite The Right was a very bad idea on all fronts. If they were smart about it, they would not have picked a liberal college town and they would've banned any displays of overt Nazi or White Nationalist symbols and iconography outside of maybe the Confederate Flag.

But let's be honest here, a bunch of edgy /pol/ tards and far-right Boomers are not the kind of people you'd expect to have any semblance of intelligence or self-awareness.

Especially when you had honest-to-god lolcows like Richard Spencer, Augustus Sol Invictus, and Matt Heimbach as major ringleaders and honored guest speakers at the rally. Combine that with the police intentionally mishandling the entire thing and Antifa doing what they do best and pouring napalm onto an already blazing trash fire, and it's honestly a miracle that only one person got killed in Charlottesville that day.
 
Last edited:
Sperging about Virginia politics aside, I do agree that Unite The Right was a very bad idea on all fronts. If they were smart about it, they would not have picked a liberal college town and they would've banned any displays of overt Nazi or White Nationalist symbols and iconography outside of maybe the Confederate Flag.

But let's be honest here, a bunch of edgy /pol/ tards and far-right Boomers are not the kind of people you'd expect to have any semblance of intelligence or self-awareness.

This is what's so strange about what's going on in America when you compare it to arguably more extreme and organized across Europe, even in strongholds like Germany where these movements have actually attained political power.

What I notice with a lot of the TDS/Fuentes crowd is they are still infatuated with the swastika almost on principle. I've heard conversations where it's basically the "nigg.er" of symbols, and that it's a barometer for what you should be able to say/display without fear. In fact I think Enoch as recently as last week was in a Twitter fight with some European fascist who was complaining about what he described as the boorish larping Americans do that hurt the movement. I mean there's at least half a dozen of way more popular groups in Europe and they really go as far away from "let's dress like Nazis" as they can. Which makes sense, because it can only ever work against you. It makes it so easy for Antifa, and Antifa are gay nerds. If you stop making them look good to boomers this becomes way easier.

Their love of Fashy regalia is like Sargon dying on Nigg.er Rape Hill, just move the fuck on and figure out what you're actually trying to accomplish. Stop talking about The Greatest Story Never Told and sharing gas chamber memes, you can actually do a Holocaust Denial angle if you do it right and remove it from the sensational memeing.
Charlottesville was entirely a result of gay optics, take off the fucking Stahlhelms and stop carrying swastika shields you made from an old table. For some reason, they all keep trying to keep one toe in the wignat pool like SJWs trying to appeal to poor blacks; they're not going to like you.
 
Back