Quinton Reviews / Quinton Kyle Hoover / Q_Review / OttselSpy24 / OttselSpy25 - I KNOW WE HIT THE LIMIT FOR ME TO DO THEM, BUT THOSE THINGS TAKE TIME, NOW SHUT UP AND LET ME TALK ABOUT GARFIELD AND MCDONALDS, WHILE MOCKING OTHER YOUTUBERS!!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Is Quinton able to redeem himself?

  • YASS QUEEN SLAY

    Votes: 273 13.4%
  • Not without Caleb

    Votes: 287 14.1%
  • Only inside a bouncy castle

    Votes: 801 39.3%
  • After his love quest is over

    Votes: 648 31.8%
  • With the love of a true and honest whaman

    Votes: 567 27.8%

  • Total voters
    2,036
To be fair that a very low bar to jump over that only requires you to actually care about the content you make and not abandon your friends for likes on twitter

So basically most normal people
Sadly even that too huge a bar to reach for someone like Quinton.
Due to him being a massive narcissist.
 
https://twitter.com/Q_Review/status/1260943444664553479
https://archive.vn/O80K2
Annotation 2020-05-14 122759.png
Annotation 2020-05-14 122935.png


The woman who made this video makes an appearance:
Annotation 2020-05-14 122958.png
 
This analogy is pretty fucking idiotic because with the same reasoning I can say that aliens didn't like SubSaharian Africa or Asia Minor.

Ancient Astronaut enthusiasts absolutely claim that architecture in sub-Saharan Africa (such as the ruins of Great Zimbabwe, Mapungubwe, and the Gedi Ruins) are the work of aliens.

I just noticed that I neglected to mention a little thing. Most of the great structures that still fascinate us from the past were made way back when Europe was just being inhabited (2500BC), around the same time period the Olmec civilization was starting to kick off in Mexico but beaten by the Chico of Peru by two millenia.

Most archaeological sites that ancient astronauts conspiracy theorists latch onto are nowhere near as old as the Egyptian pyramids and they don't date to c. 2000 BCE. Baalbek, Chichen Itza, Palenque, and Teotihuacán were built around the same time as Ancient Greece and Rome while Pumapunku, Uxmal, Calakmul, and Sacsayhuamán were built around the same time as the Middle Ages.

Two thousand years later the Greeks became a deal and we happen to know how they did what they did because the Romans knew.

Again: Teotihuacán was built around 200 years after the Parthenon and the Moai Statues of Easter Island were built during a time range that includes Saint-Chapelle and Saint Peter's Basilica. They are not especially ancient, though this seems to be a common misconception.

And very little of Mesoamerican architecture or history is all that mysterious to professional archaeologists or historians. Ancient astronaut conspiracy theorists are simply getting a lot of mileage out of their "theories" because the general public doesn't know a lot about pre-Colombian Mesoamerica.
 
I know I'm late, you can hit me with the emoji or whatnot, but you forgot to mention the part that when Aztecs got help from aliens, it's because white people want to push the narrative that they couldn't have accomplished feats of great technology on their own, but when Bosnians got help from aliens, it's because white people want to push the narrative that they're descendants of a superior culture. Does he even edit his scripts?
I swear, this guy is self-hatred incarnate. He is well on the way to becoming the milkiest of lolcows.

The difference is that Semir Osmanagić (the originator of the Bosnian pyramid theory) is, in fact, Bosnian.

But Erich von Däniken, originator of the Mesoamerican alien theories, is not from any part of Mesoamerica. Nor are Courtney Brown, Peter Kolosimo, Giorgio Tsoukalos, or Mike Bara and their theories are not especially popular among the actual modern descendants of Aztecs and Maya.
 
The difference is that Semir Osmanagić (the originator of the Bosnian pyramid theory) is, in fact, Bosnian.

But Erich von Däniken, originator of the Mesoamerican alien theories, is not from any part of Mesoamerica. Nor are Courtney Brown, Peter Kolosimo, Giorgio Tsoukalos, or Mike Bara and their theories are not especially popular among the actual modern descendants of Aztecs and Maya.

And why exactly aren't they? If Quinton's theory that claiming your own civilization is a product of alien interference is a way to establish it as superior to others, then why wouldn't the descendants of Aztecs and Maya be welcoming of the theories that theirs is?

Having thought about it, I actually agree that the theories about ancient civilizations being built by aliens have roots in an infantilizing view of them, however, people like Osmanagić prove that it is at the very best a rule with notable exceptions. The problem with Quinton's take is that he goes from "Claiming other civilizations were built by aliens is a way to demean them" to "This guy claims his civilization was build by aliens to make it seem better than others" without even attempting to explain why these seemingly contradictory statements actually aren't.

Once again, the issue isn't the subject. It's Quinton.
 
Once again, the issue isn't the subject. It's Quinton.
Rule of this thread. Even when Quinton is right he manages to make you want to refute him.
I think this little detail is something that is new to no one but I feel like pointing out. Quinton is very likely trying to create this video essays on documentaries as a way to bring his channel back to life, likely inspired by Ian from Innuendo Studios. So he picks easy targets (The History Channel) and proceeds to disprove them in a destructive critic. He started with The Tiger King, followed with Ancient Aliens and is working on two other videos, 2012 documentaries (that based on the script barely connects with 2012 at all) and a possible Nazi documentaries video that is teased at the end of the script. 2012 is likely going to be shorter (has only two whypipo jokes) so he might be preparing himself for the big load.
It's not going to be a controversial opinion that these videos have been his best in months, they have outperformed his other offerings and are Q at his best and at his worst, so he is going to keep doing it. If you have noticed these videos weren't listed on his schedule of upcoming videos, so he likely came up with this idea recently and is putting a lot of effort into it, kudos to him.
 
Is it too soon to say that Flowergothic is simping for Quinton?
Our boy has mad game.

I don't know, unless she has a feminine penis Quinton is not interested.

What I'm wondering though is did quinton realize that he can only use the lowest hanging fruit to suceed or will he use his Natzi documentary to release all his pent up ego. Also this nigger better not leave out bigfoot as someone that grew up watching the history channel I can tell you it's programing consisted of Aliens,Bigfoot,Doomsday,Conspiracy, and mythbusters.
 
And why exactly aren't they? If Quinton's theory that claiming your own civilization is a product of alien interference is a way to establish it as superior to others, then why wouldn't the descendants of Aztecs and Maya be welcoming of the theories that theirs is?

Having thought about it, I actually agree that the theories about ancient civilizations being built by aliens have roots in an infantilizing view of them, however, people like Osmanagić prove that it is at the very best a rule with notable exceptions. The problem with Quinton's take is that he goes from "Claiming other civilizations were built by aliens is a way to demean them" to "This guy claims his civilization was build by aliens to make it seem better than others" without even attempting to explain why these seemingly contradictory statements actually aren't.

Once again, the issue isn't the subject. It's Quinton.

It’s pretty clear you haven’t actually looked into Osmanagić or his theories if you think that they simply say that Bosniaks interacted with aliens. He claims that they are the descendants of aliens and ,more importantly, that civilization itself originated in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Bosniaks are the oldest inhabitants of the Balkans. (And by oldest civilization, I mean way oldest, as he claims that the so-called pyramids in Bosnia and Herzegovina were built during the Stone Age.) Nevertheless, those latter two ideas are precisely why his theories have been proven so popular with Bosniak nationalists. Nationalistic pseudohistory exists everywhere, but it’s especially popular in the Balkans, with each ethnic group trying to prove that they were the original and most ancient inhabitants of the area. Though Osmanagić himself does not appear to be a Bosniak nationalist, it’s not surprising that his theories have been embraced by them.

Conversely, the theories of Däniken and Tsoukalos about Aztecs, Maya, Egyptians, Polynesians, and more interacting with aliens don’t offer anything nearly as appealing to their modern descendants. What’s more, though I doubt it was intentional, their theories come off as uncomfortably similar to 19th century racialist ideas about how everything from the pyramids to Great Zimbabwe were built by White Europeans. I mean, Däniken and Tsoukalos could potentially claim that ancient Egypt and Mesoamerica were cradles of civilization, but that’s already accepted by mainstream history and archaeology, so they wouldn’t be offering anything particularly new.

To be fair, Osmanagić does try to present Maya as part of an advanced alien race, but I suspect that the reason that a lot of the modern Maya aren’t embracing him with open arms because he is under the impression that the Maya no longer exist.
 
It’s pretty clear you haven’t actually looked into Osmanagić or his theories if you think that they simply say that Bosniaks interacted with aliens. He claims that they are the descendants of aliens and ,more importantly, that civilization itself originated in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Bosniaks are the oldest inhabitants of the Balkans. (And by oldest civilization, I mean way oldest, as he claims that the so-called pyramids in Bosnia and Herzegovina were built during the Stone Age.) Nevertheless, those latter two ideas are precisely why his theories have been proven so popular with Bosniak nationalists. Nationalistic pseudohistory exists everywhere, but it’s especially popular in the Balkans, with each ethnic group trying to prove that they were the original and most ancient inhabitants of the area. Though Osmanagić himself does not appear to be a Bosniak nationalist, it’s not surprising that his theories have been embraced by them.

Conversely, the theories of Däniken and Tsoukalos about Aztecs, Maya, Egyptians, Polynesians, and more interacting with aliens don’t offer anything nearly as appealing to their modern descendants. What’s more, though I doubt it was intentional, their theories come off as uncomfortably similar to 19th century racialist ideas about how everything from the pyramids to Great Zimbabwe were built by White Europeans. I mean, Däniken and Tsoukalos could potentially claim that ancient Egypt and Mesoamerica were cradles of civilization, but that’s already accepted by mainstream history and archaeology, so they wouldn’t be offering anything particularly new.

To be fair, Osmanagić does try to present Maya as part of an advanced alien race, but I suspect that the reason that a lot of the modern Maya aren’t embracing him with open arms because he is under the impression that the Maya no longer exist.
huh, so strange because hasn't it has been proven time and time again that the inhabitants of the balkans are literally just a series of escaped slaves. Be it from the Romans, huns, or Ottomans?
 
Ancient Astronaut enthusiasts absolutely claim that architecture in sub-Saharan Africa (such as the ruins of Great Zimbabwe, Mapungubwe, and the Gedi Ruins) are the work of aliens.



Most archaeological sites that ancient astronauts conspiracy theorists latch onto are nowhere near as old as the Egyptian pyramids and they don't date to c. 2000 BCE. Baalbek, Chichen Itza, Palenque, and Teotihuacán were built around the same time as Ancient Greece and Rome while Pumapunku, Uxmal, Calakmul, and Sacsayhuamán were built around the same time as the Middle Ages.



Again: Teotihuacán was built around 200 years after the Parthenon and the Moai Statues of Easter Island were built during a time range that includes Saint-Chapelle and Saint Peter's Basilica. They are not especially ancient, though this seems to be a common misconception.

And very little of Mesoamerican architecture or history is all that mysterious to professional archaeologists or historians. Ancient astronaut conspiracy theorists are simply getting a lot of mileage out of their "theories" because the general public doesn't know a lot about pre-Colombian Mesoamerica.
Yeah, and you really notice it by how they either don't contextualize the sites, or deliberately muddy the waters by vastly overstating the age, pushing the construction way back to make them seem more improbable.
 
Back