Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

He's taking advantage of the situation to drive more traffic to his Soundcloud page.

Not even joking. Dude is a rapper that sells his music on Soundcloud.

Fucker better be careful or his career's gonna follow XXXTentacion's.

(I couldn't remember that bitch's "name" by the way so I googled "shitty soundcloud rapper who got shot in the head" and it came through for me.)
 
If there was a coup attempt or civil war it would be executed by military brass who are fully bought in on the system, and the people who follow them because they're trained to. Just look at the letters that got sent out to the military with those generals pledging their loyalty to BLM and disparaging the President. You'd have to have a charismatic military leader to take back control from people like that.
Those letters are measured statements that they intend to follow the Constitution, legal orders, and the rule of law. Sure the devil is in the details of who gets to interpret what that actually means, but I read it as reassurance since both sides are full of panic that the evil hitlers on the other side are going to stage a military coup.
 
"Record turnout for democrats" This bitch is fucking delusional if she thinks that Joe "Crappy Pants" Biden is going to get high turnout in November. Moreover, I'd say that the outcome of the various special elections this year is proof that it will be the GOP who gets the high turnout, not the dems. Honestly, this makes me wonder if her and the rest of the democrat party are actually really worried about poor turnout and trying to get everyone to think that there's no problem in this regard.
 
Ah, so if Trump vetoes it they can start shrieking "But you said you looooved the military now you won't fund them look how much he hates the military that we suddenly think needs all this funding everybody!"

They really are transparent little shits.
I don't like the Confederates. But they were Americans, goddammit. And I will defend them insofar as they have a right to be remembered and considered. That doesn't mean approval and that doesn't mean agreement. But Americans, good, bad, and misguided deserve to be remembered for their contributions to our betterment over time.

To erase them is the ultimate sin.
 
All he's saying is that he shouldn't have walked out there in full camo because it made it look like the military was mobilizing to get involved in domestic affairs.
The Insurrection Act was invoked. The Military was mobilizing to get involved, until a bunch of generals signed public letters that they would never do that.
 
Why are some of you niggers getting spooked about "military coups"?

Like put down the Tom Clancy novels and actually think about the sheer improbability of what's apparently keeping you up at night. Nobody is insane enough to attempt a military coup in the still (relatively) functional United States. It would only incur instant civil war and balkanization.
 
The Insurrection Act was invoked. The Military was mobilizing to get involved, until a bunch of generals signed public letters that they would never do that.
Is that why we ended up having a bunch of prison guards needing to defend the city? Didn't really watch who all actually was out there that closely so would seem fucked up if the military was supposed to be used and just refused to.
 
There's plenty of precedent for using the Insurrection Act.

Rutherford B. Hayes (R), October, 1878 -- to suppress the Lincoln County War

Grover Cleveland (D), July, 1894 -- the Pullman Strike (look into that one.)

Woodrow Wilson (D), April, 1914 -- the Colorado Coalfield War

Herbert Hoover (R), July 1932 -- the Bonus Marchers in D.C. (definitely look into that one)

Franklin D. Roosevelt (D), July, 1943 (while the military was already quite busy with other things) -- the Detroit race riot. Hmm, sound familiar?

Dwight D. Eisenhower (R), September, 1957 -- Protecting the Little Rock Nine

John F. Kennedy (D) - twice: September 1962, and September 1963 -- the first for The Battle of Oxford, the second to enforce desegregation of Alabama public schools.

Lyndon B. Johnson (D) - FOUR TIMES: July, 1967 -- '67 Detroit Riot, April, 1968 -- Washington DC riots, April 1968 -- Baltimore riots, April 1968 -- Chicago riots. 1968 was a year of widespread riots. Sound familiar?

George H.W. Bush (R) - twice: September 1989, Saint Croix, Virgin Islands in the aftermath of Hurricane Hugo, May, 1992 -- the Rodney King riots in LA.

Goodness. Do the Democrats REALLY want to double down?
 
I still can't get over how dumb this is. I'm sure they've never even considered the cost and coordination involved. To change the name of the base you need to change and/or pay for changing:
- The signage on base.
- The road signage around and going to base.
- Insignia and patches for the base and tenant commands.
- Directories, both print and electronic.
- Paper charts and maps.
- Callsign books.
- PLAs, command websites and email addresses.
I'm sure there's more stuff I'm missing.

And to do that for how many military bases? Talk about fraud, waste and abuse.
But it gives more work to pencil pushers and code monkeys, the true base of the Democratic Party.
 
Is that why we ended up having a bunch of prison guards needing to defend the city? Didn't really watch who all actually was out there that closely so would seem fucked up if the military was supposed to be used and just refused to.
The National Guard apparently had severe problems in DC, from disloyal and uncooperative leadership to a horrible lack of training to their ethnic composition causing trouble with enforcement (The DC Nasty Guard is 60% black, and reportedly many sympathized or were related to the looters they were asked to stop).

 
Goodness. Do the Democrats REALLY want to double down?

Of course they do. Trump doesn't get to do what other Presidents have done. They need to pretend whatever Trump is proposing is unprecedented and terrible, and is clear evidence he's steering us toward a dictatorship. Even when it's a completely reasonable thing to do based on the evidence, and clearly understood Presidential powers based on precedent. Why should they not double down when the usual clowns carry their water? Why stop doing it if they think it's working?

Trump has to go. No tactic is too extreme.
 
Why do they even want us to forget about that era? Aren't they constantly appealing to it to make people in the here and now feel guilty for what happened back then? How the hell are they going to keep pulling that off if there aren't any memorials around? Shitty textbooks, I guess.
They love WW2 so much they're appalled that we didn't give the Confederates the Nazi treatment back in the day. So they want to create a counter-myth to the Lost Cause that simultaneously conforms with their Good incrementally triumphing over Evil view of the past 200 years, and will hopefully trigger the Fudds enough in conjunction with all the other "walls closing in" to start the Boogaloo so they can smash the white patriarchy in one big Armageddon-level showdown once and for all.
 
Back