Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[heyitsmike]

I'm dubious of the widespread efficacy of this at this point. In the past I've definitely agreed with it but more and more I see more "moderates" who are just digging in their heels and NeverTrumping harder than before. They're actively shutting their eyes and ears to a lot of what's coming from the left because I guess they feel if they pay as little attention to it as possible they can't be influenced by it. They had low-key TDS before that was barely kept in check and being presented with evidence that it was misfounded is, instead of curing it, causing a flareup. It's not that they support what the left is doing, but they're willing to ignore it or just kind of view only the most positive (in their minds) aspects of it.

Maybe that's just my experience though.

Those people you describe, Trump was never going to get them anyway.

The ones he's getting are the readers of JK Rowling's books, wearers of Drew Brees's jersey and watchers of Gone With The Wind. The see their idols getting cancelled and know the mob would be happy to do it to them too. So of course they're not going to say anything. But they see it.

He's said outright that if he had his way no cities would have to burn down over this, and the military would already be there on day 1 of rioting to show them that this can't happen in a civilized country.

And once again the collective wisdom of the base proves itself to be better than that of a bunch of high paid poltical pundits. People who work jobs like Tucker Carlson or Ben Shapiro or Erick Erickson, the kind where you don't even need to shower after a day's work, have overly cerebral ways of approaching personal conflicts.

They're the kind of people, that if some unknown person was repeatedly stealing food from the office refrigerator, they'd address everyone and ask them to stop. Or they'd put a note on the door that said the same. Or they'd send an email to HR.

Tucker's audience is the kind of people that would make Ex-Lax brownies, stick them in the refrigerator, set back and let nature run its course.

Which one do you think is more effective?

 

[Ghostse]

If you want to see the world Democrats want, just look at South America.

A small, wealthy elite in enclaves protected by private police & the literal goddamn army, while the rest of the poors are in shacks squabbling for handouts, completely dependent on the state, at the mercy of random criminal violence. They cannot vote for any candidate who won't increase the handouts because doing so would be slitting their own throats. You must vote with your ethnicity or the other ethnicities will take everything from you, while holding themselves out as the only thing that keeps all other ethnic groups from coming for you.

What business exists, exists to profit the political elite either directly or indirectly. Laws get passed specifically to inhibit competitors from entering the market.

They want everyone to be breaking laws doing a little side hustle, because if you do become a threat they have something they can nail you for. Doesn't have to stick, doesn't have to be serious, but cooling your ass in prison for even 90 days can keep a smoldering spark from starting a flame.

You can see that in the cities worst hit by riots. Who cares if they are literally burning 30 year old businesses and affordable housing project? They aren't in the rich areas, those working class can just tough it out - I'm completely safe. I can go out and score some points by marching with them as my city burns, because who cares? That's not my stuff.

If you really wanted to see some interesting changes, don't abolish the police. Outlaw private security.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Tucker has strong right-wing principles and believes that we need to crack down on this madness because it's hurting (even killing) Americans. He's said outright that if he had his way no cities would have to burn down over this, and the military would already be there on day 1 of rioting to show them that this can't happen in a civilized country.

I think Tucker is somewhat out of step with his audience. His audience already knows how fucked up it all is. That's why they voted for Trump.

The difference is that he thinks we should spend political capital on pushing back while his audience wants to let it ride and let the Dems destroy each other and alienate the moderates. Of course Congressional Republicans are okay with this because just letting it ride would also be the coward's response. So for once the base isn't being screwed over because playing it slow is actually what the base wants.

I'm okay with Tucker pouring gasoline on the fire though. I'm all about that.

He is more of the nationalist man of the people right wing style elite, similar to Trump. A bunch of millionaires that can still understand the needs of the normies and don't view them as dirt to be brushed away with. Something left wingers can't figure that out as they are so out of touch of even giving a fuck about the plebians and only solution is to import more mudpeople to vote D, by the way at lower rates because they fucked civics in the education system. Its all self defeating bullshit that will collapse some day.

 

[Jarolleon]

I'm dubious of the widespread efficacy of this at this point. In the past I've definitely agreed with it but more and more I see more "moderates" who are just digging in their heels and NeverTrumping harder than before. They're actively shutting their eyes and ears to a lot of what's coming from the left because I guess they feel if they pay as little attention to it as possible they can't be influenced by it. They had low-key TDS before that was barely kept in check and being presented with evidence that it was misfounded is, instead of curing it, causing a flareup. It's not that they support what the left is doing, but they're willing to ignore it or just kind of view only the most positive (in their minds) aspects of it.

Maybe that's just my experience though.

Like the Iowa governor. Just gave felons voting rights, obviously to sabotage Trump in the election because he doesn't bend the knee.

 

[heyitsmike]

I wonder if the Iowa governer enfranchised felons because she's turned against Trump and intentionally sabotaging him.

Or she just thinks it's the right thing to do?

 

[Yamma Damma]

Well that did not quite go how Rick Wilson expected, did it?
View attachment 1380946

Damn. They don't have my money because their pizza is nasty where I live, but they sure do have my respect.

Just wanna say, I fucking love how they take advantage of blowing up on twitter and immediately sell out to some mask&posture ads, like holy fucking shit, its almost like you waited for this to happen. Also, most of the hidden tweets are just KPOP retards spamming fancams, although there is 2 or 3 tweets that they hid which were against the person's point, shame they cant just swallow the fact that they are wrong.
Hidden Tweet One
Hidden Tweet Two
Hidden Tweet Three

That's how it goes if your tweet goes viral. You use your second tweet to boost yourself, boost others, or your agenda (trans rights anyone?). And then your third or fourth tweet is you being a pussybitch by saying "I'm muting this thread because [notification hell or can't take the heat]". You'd think that'd be signs of a bot if blue checkmarks weren't proof you're human.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Or she just thinks it's the right thing to do?

There arn't many politicians left of that type no more. As for released felons, if they did their time and getting voting rights back, they should get their 2nd amendment rights back as well. That is something Trump could run on, give people who served their time, their right to protect themselves rather than getting busted for owning guns to protect themselves.

 

[Jarolleon]

Or she just thinks it's the right thing to do?

Possibly, but the timing sure is suspicious. With every public figure in the country with the exception of Trump and a few Fox News pundits literally bending the knee to BLM it makes you wonder if the Republicans are sick of our modern-day Julian the Apostate and are ready to join "The Right Side of History" and beg their new masters for forgiveness before it's too late (as if that's even possible). On the other hand, she could have wanted voting rights for felons all along and exploited the present political climate to get it through with minimal objections.

 

[LightDragonman1]

Guess what's trending on Twitter?

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23IfDonaldTrumpIsReelected&src=trend_click

 

[heyitsmike]

Possibly, but the timing sure is suspicious. With every public figure in the country with the exception of Trump and a few Fox News pundits literally bending the knee to BLM it makes you wonder if the Republicans are sick of our modern-day Julian the Apostate and are ready to join "The Right Side of History" and beg their new masters for forgiveness before it's too late (as if that's even possible).

Quit being a conspiracy nut like the Democrats.

A cursory Google search would have shown you that this has been in the works for a while.

Iowa still bars ex-felons from voting, frustrating Democratic caucusgoers

The state's Republican governor wants to fix the issue via state constitutional amendment, frustrating Democrats and advocates who have pushed for more immediate action.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[ForTheHoard]

Domino's reply is saved for posterity.

https://archive.vn/wrJc9

 

[Flexo]

There arn't many politicians left of that type no more. As for released felons, if they did their time and getting voting rights back, they should get their 2nd amendment rights back as well. That is something Trump could run on, give people who served their time, their right to protect themselves rather than getting busted for owning guns to protect themselves.

Hey, my boy @Bender is a convicted felon, you sure you want him voting?

I am more of the opinion that felons shouldn't be allowed to vote, HOWEVER I do agree there are too many felonies as it is. So rather than returning rights, I'd rather see the law code cleaned up, several offenses pushed down to the misdemeanor level, and then those who now have only misdemeanors on their record then being allowed to vote.

Also, I've just started researching revocations of felonies (again, for my boy @Bender) so I'm not set on details yet - and it could vary from state to state - but that also looks like a process where minor felonies are stricken from your record, and then you (should) get the right to vote back then. But as usual I recommend checking with your simple country hyper-chicken lawyer rather than a drunk bending unit.

@AnOminous might also know.

 

[McGregor]

What was done: If Donald Trump Gets Reelected: "I'll wet myself!" "I'll throw a tantrum!" "I'll be embarrassed for America for another whole four years!"
What any self respecting campaign might at least attempt: If Donald Trump Gets Reelected: "Nuclear fire will rain over Seoul South Korea. The Chinese will invade Vietnam as a show of strength and spark off World War 3 with the Japanese leading the charge, and our American soldiers filling in the ever more widening gaps at sea, on land and as always in the air. To save on food, Donald Trump will kill the tranies and people near the border. Joe Biden won't kill tranies or people near the border."

See the difference? I see it...

 

[AnOminous]

Hey, my boy @Bender is a convicted felon, you sure you want him voting?

I am more of the opinion that felons shouldn't be allowed to vote, HOWEVER I do agree there are too many felonies as it is. So rather than returning rights, I'd rather see the law code cleaned up, several offenses pushed down to the misdemeanor level, and then those who now have only misdemeanors on their record then being allowed to vote.

Also, I've just started researching revocations of felonies (again, for my boy @Bender) so I'm not set on details yet - and it could vary from state to state - but that also looks like a process where minor felonies are stricken from your record, and then you (should) get the right to vote back then. But as usual I recommend checking with your simple country hyper-chicken lawyer rather than a drunk bending unit.

@AnOminous might also know.

The law varies from state to state. I think that's probably unconstitutional and the rule should be, as it was, "one man one vote," as they used to say it before feeeemales were human. In many states you can vote after you've served your time. In a few, you can vote even while serving your time.

I think revocation of voting rights during a felony conviction but restoration following the end of a sentence is the right rule, but that's just my opinion. I think voting is a right inherent to being a citizen, but that you forfeit it by committing a crime. However, the punishment of imprisonment is why you lose the right to vote, and once you've served the sentence, it should be over and your rights should be entirely restored.

What any self respecting campaign might at least attempt: If Donald Trump Gets Reelected: "Nuclear fire will rain over Seoul South Korea. The Chinese will invade Vietnam as a show of strength and spark off World War 3 with the Japanese leading the charge, and our American soldiers filling in the ever more widening gaps at sea, on land and as always in the air. To save on food, Donald Trump will kill the tranies and people near the border. Joe Biden won't kill tranies or people near the border."

This. Democrats lose because they're fucking pussies and don't go below the belt. We need another one of these.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

The law varies from state to state. I think that's probably unconstitutional and the rule should be, as it was, "one man one vote," as they used to say it before feeeemales were human. In many states you can vote after you've served your time. In a few, you can vote even while serving your time.

I think revocation of voting rights during a felony conviction but restoration following the end of a sentence is the right rule, but that's just my opinion. I think voting is a right inherent to being a citizen, but that you forfeit it by committing a crime. However, the punishment of imprisonment is why you lose the right to vote, and once you've served the sentence, it should be over and your rights should be entirely restored.



This. Democrats lose because they're fucking pussies and don't go below the belt. We need another one of these.

I believe in one man one vote.

I am the man, and I have the vote.

 

[Sekirodiealot]

The law varies from state to state. I think that's probably unconstitutional and the rule should be, as it was, "one man one vote," as they used to say it before feeeemales were human. In many states you can vote after you've served your time. In a few, you can vote even while serving your time.

I think revocation of voting rights during a felony conviction but restoration following the end of a sentence is the right rule, but that's just my opinion. I think voting is a right inherent to being a citizen, but that you forfeit it by committing a crime. However, the punishment of imprisonment is why you lose the right to vote, and once you've served the sentence, it should be over and your rights should be entirely restored.



This. Democrats lose because they're fucking pussies and don't go below the belt. We need another one of these.

Oh yeah daisy's alive today is in her mid 50s. Don't know why, just wanted to say that

 

[Private Pyle]

Oh yeah daisy's alive today is im her mid 50s. Don't know why, just wanted to say that

She was actually part of the 2016 election campaign against Trump. It wasn’t as effective.

 

[Jarolleon]

The law varies from state to state. I think that's probably unconstitutional and the rule should be, as it was, "one man one vote," as they used to say it before feeeemales were human. In many states you can vote after you've served your time. In a few, you can vote even while serving your time.

I think revocation of voting rights during a felony conviction but restoration following the end of a sentence is the right rule, but that's just my opinion. I think voting is a right inherent to being a citizen, but that you forfeit it by committing a crime. However, the punishment of imprisonment is why you lose the right to vote, and once you've served the sentence, it should be over and your rights should be entirely restored.



This. Democrats lose because they're fucking pussies and don't go below the belt. We need another one of these.

I think they try to go too far below the belt these days and just make fools in themselves with puerile bullshit.

 

[Mysterious Girlfriend X]

So, Amazon just posted a description of Mary Trump’s book - the president’s niece:

Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man

https://archive.md/h2tNg

View attachment 1381246
Mary L. Trump

https://archive.md/Nj0Z1

The world's most dangerous man! That is perhaps the coolest title you could ever lay on a guy.

If you had written this kind of shit into a fiction story I would have told you it was too over-the-top, but this bitch wants us to treat it like it's all 100% real.

Seriously, this isn't even on the level of a soap opera, it's on the level of the parody soap opera Joey acted in on FRIENDS.

 

[Cast Iron Pan]

If you had written this kind of shit into a fiction story I would have told you it was too over-the-top, but this bitch wants us to treat it like it's all 100% real.

Seriously, this isn't even on the level of a soap opera, it's on the level of the parody soap opera Joey acted in on FRIENDS.

Apparently she thinks her section of the family got burned by PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DONALD JOHN TRUMP in granddaddies will 30 years ago and she nurses a hefty grudge.