Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
umad said:
Actually no.


  • It is reasonable to, at least provisionally, reject an improbable proposition for which no adequate evidence has been presented. So, if you can show that all of the common arguments for a certain proposition are fallacious, and the burden of proof is on the proposition's proponents, then you do not commit this fallacy by rejecting that proposition. Rather, the fallacy is committed when you jump to the conclusion that just because one argument for it is fallacious, no cogent argument for it can exist.

    Where's the evidence to the claims you all are making?
Click to expand...

No one cares, go home. It's a school night.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fareal, Simplicity111 and Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.
umad said:
Actually no.


  • It is reasonable to, at least provisionally, reject an improbable proposition for which no adequate evidence has been presented. So, if you can show that all of the common arguments for a certain proposition are fallacious, and the burden of proof is on the proposition's proponents, then you do not commit this fallacy by rejecting that proposition. Rather, the fallacy is committed when you jump to the conclusion that just because one argument for it is fallacious, no cogent argument for it can exist.

    Where's the evidence to the claims you all are making?
Click to expand...
And you said something stupid!

HOW COULD YOU RUIN THIS FRIENDSHIP?
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: Meowthkip, Scribbler, Cthulu and 4 others
Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. said:
I know. I'm not going to read it though. Two reasons why:
1.) Anecdotal evidence and case studies bear no statistical significance, and are useless in identifying trends.
2.) Judging by your previous posts, I'm guessing it's boring and indulgent as all fuck.
Click to expand...

1)I know that anecdotal evidence can be filled with faulty logic but I posted it in the hope that it might give you guys a lens on what I'm trying to say.
2)You don't care, that's fine. I understand.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: DuskEngine and Sanic
umad said:
Actually no.


  • It is reasonable to, at least provisionally, reject an improbable proposition for which no adequate evidence has been presented. So, if you can show that all of the common arguments for a certain proposition are fallacious, and the burden of proof is on the proposition's proponents, then you do not commit this fallacy by rejecting that proposition. Rather, the fallacy is committed when you jump to the conclusion that just because one argument for it is fallacious, no cogent argument for it can exist.

    Where's the evidence to the claims you all are making?
Click to expand...
Too bad a lot of our arguments had evidence and a lot of yours have been fallacious your entire stay here.
Also I love how you think researching every single fallacy in the book means you're a master of arguing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanic
I like we're on an argument on discussing fallacies even though this was originally about maxilla bones.

See this is why I dislike arguments about fallacies due to the large misuse and retards thinking that "pointing out fallacies = winning pointless Internet arguments".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, supdup, Sanic and 1 other person
umad said:
What's wrong if i decide to post here? If i do so im "mad butthurt" but if you do so its ok?
Click to expand...
Nothing, except you repeatedly said you wouldn't waste time on here. So the fact that you keep posting here makes you a butthurt little punk.

umad said:
The previous posts i did were just merely baits in order to make you lose time,wich indeed you baited
Click to expand...
Wow, wasting your own time to make us waste our time. Well played, puppetmaster. Well played.

supdup said:
It's much better than sluthate.

1. it's not called sluthate
2. no is worshiping an entitled spoiled mass-murderer brat
3. no one is comparing facial features
4. no one is a fascist racist wingbat.
Click to expand...
5. No one is a fucking PEDOPHILE (until your members OmeagaKV and mr.r joined)

umad said:
Oh,watch out,the sanic ad-hominem butthurt wannabe trolls duo is here! Im going to cry in the corner because you guiz are mean to me! :(
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Meowthkip, Scribbler, Randall Fragg and 5 others
umad said:
I don't think you're enough intelligent to get the point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Face#Shape

I did not say it was the key. to beauty. I said it was a anatomical feature every well-delevoped human had.
Click to expand...

Insulting my intelligence so soon? My profile will tell you I'm a female. Surely you can come up with some more varied insults based on that fact.

The statement that it is, in fact, a feature every "well-developed" human has means that it is one of the key deciding factors in whether or not someone is beautiful. In your opinion, at least.

Stoned Tablet said:
An correctly placed upper jaw/lower jaw IS SYMMETRY. you're thinking about the face in 2D. In 3D the upper jaw/lower jaw provides symmetry in the saggital and transverse plane. It creates a flat foundation for people to view the rest of the face.
Click to expand...

One symmetrical facial feature does not equate to symmetry in regards to other, separate parts. You can have a symmetrical jaw and an asymmetrical nose.

Still, symmetry is only an objective standard of beauty. It is not the be-all-end-all.

Stoned Tablet said:
1)No, because I had absolutely no idea that my looks were the cause of people treating me better. I connected the dots backwards, not forwards.
3)Yes
4)How can you get rid of these social advantages that are a barrier to equality? What do you propose? Ask people to be less sympathetic in cases of sexual harassment to women?
6)Sure, though his selling point is more of status as an famous actor combined with looks. I never said I agreed with Chad theory. A mix of masculinity + femininity is desirable on both males and females.
Click to expand...

1. That's exactly my point. You're biased due to hindsight and personal investment. You went in looking for the connection and you found it. Not saying that people don't treat you differently depending on your appearance (not to the extreme degree that SH preaches), but it can't be used as evidence as to how the world at large operates. It's an anecdote, nothing more.

3. Really? From one person or many partners?

4. This doesn't mean that women lose sympathy. It's about getting that same sympathy for male victims as well. It's about equal treatment on an optimal level. Treating female victims of sexual harassment and assault as more sympathetic than male victims hurts us as a society. Victims of female-on-male rape can't even press charges for the most part because the law doesn't see such acts as rape. Feminism is just as much about rectifying that injustice as it is about equal wages.

6. So fame can override any predisposition society has towards people with "unconventional" looks?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: RWS Watcher, Meowthkip, Dynamite Ninja and 7 others
@umad do you look like this?

icon_neckbeard-big.gif
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Meowthkip, Dynamite Ninja, Fareal and 6 others
Simplicity111 said:
Well it seems like you use them just to make you look like you "won" the argument. Most people don't obsessively post Wikipedia links about "which fallacy this guy used".
And I can't believe we're arguing about THIS now. How did we get here?
Click to expand...
But the fact is i do win them. It's not my fault if they base their arguments on fallacious statements.

How we did get here? Take a look at the post up yours. That's how.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Disagree
Reactions: Meowthkip, Dynamite Ninja, Ti-99/4A and 9 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back