Sluthate.com

[Stratomsk]

Did i use personal attacks? I don't think so.

Spoiler: MASSIVE NUMBER OF UMAD PERSONAL INSULTS.

LMAO i'd rather die than have a gay relationship.

Don't even know how someone can call getting a penis up your anus relationship.

If being gay is not wrong,why only females can reproduce?

One of your admin is trans,therefore according to your association logic i can call all of you trans.

Implying you are not a virgin. FUCKING LOL

No IT (neither he/she) is not a better person. It is a deranged disgusting person.

Atleast im not trans.

As much as your mum's anal yesterday.

Another kiwifaggot? How surprising.

No but your mum does when she gets pounded.

Because you're a bunch of neckbeards whose only life accomplishement is feel good because "we troll people on the interwebz"
.
.
.
So Mrs Kiwifag tell us what you have done in your life..."well i trolled people on the interwebz..."

I

I don't talk with pedos. Go away.

We could say the same about your trans admin.

Any cheeky insults for trans? Tell me trans-sama.

Pedo detected. Just look at that avatar.

Hold on,im going to get my Beretta cause some mean retards on the interwebz called me faggot

Eww a pedophile.

Please tell some real asshole your edgy opinion.

take screenshots neckbeard

@Glaive I suppose you're a grown man how about you stop playing the troll on the internet and go do something productive for the society instead of running a forum filled with neckbeards with autism. You know,you could donate the money of the hosting to starving childs or god knows what,everything would be more justified than wasting it to run your retarded forum.

There are so many more, @umad.

 

[JU 199]

Lets see. What would be a good verified tag name for @umad?

1. Inconsequential Troll.
2. Butthurt Extraordinaire.
3. Professionally Salty.
4. Virgin with Rage.
5. Phallus-y Whore.

Cast yer votes folks!
all of the above is sadly not an option.

3. Professionally salty sounds about right.

 

[Handsome Pete]

Fair enough. You may claim whatever you want,but it does not mean it's true.

I can say unicorns exist but do i have the proof ? No.

Can I coin the phrase "full Church?" As in, "umad has just gone full Church."

Seriously, the only good thing about this thread was the dank skullz, and now we don't even have that anymore thanks to all this fallacy sperging.

 

[ON 190]

3. Professionally salty sounds about right.

I agree. Professionally Salty.

@Stratomsk, you are doing Cop Dog's work with that list of insults.

@umad, feeling the salt, buddy-boyo?

 

[Stratomsk]

Lets see. What would be a good verified tag name for @umad?

Some votes have come in. I'll update this until I have at least 15 votes. I'll also be going off the "Agree" rating on posts that are voting to speed up the process.

1. Inconsequential Troll. (0)
2. Butthurt Extraordinaire. (2)
3. Professionally Salty. (5)
4. Virgin with Rage. (1)
5. Phallus-y Whore. (0)

Cast yer votes folks!

Go take the poll, folks!

 

[Simplicity111]

Lets see. What would be a good verified tag name for @umad?

Some votes have come in. I'll update this until I have at least 15 votes.

1. Inconsequential Troll. (0)
2. Butthurt Extraordinaire. (1)
3. Professionally Salty. (2)
4. Virgin with Rage. (1)
5. Phallus-y Whore. (0)

Cast yer votes folks!

Actually Professionally Salty has 3 counting @flossman's vote.
Edit: the deed is done.

 

[Frank Rizzo]

Lets see. What would be a good verified tag name for @umad?

Some votes have come in. I'll update this until I have at least 15 votes. I'll also be going off the "Agree" rating on posts that are voting to speed up the process.

1. Inconsequential Troll. (0)
2. Butthurt Extraordinaire. (2)
3. Professionally Salty. (5)
4. Virgin with Rage. (1)
5. Phallus-y Whore. (0)

Cast yer votes folks!

3 Please.

 

[José Mourinho]

Poll is added at the top. Have fun

 

[SpessCaptain]

I voted for the Emperor.

Will @umad ego go back to his own website and get rid of the rampaging closet queers and 'cheese-pizza' fanatics, other than talking to a brick wall?

 

[Stratomsk]

Poll is added at the top. Have fun

I can't give you an "Achievement" rating but I can at least give you this.

Spoiler: My Heart.

 

[Simplicity111]

How much votes do we need for the tag?
Also what color do you guys want it to be?

 

[Stratomsk]

How much votes do we need for the tag?
Also what color do you guys want it to be?

White, because @umad is so fucking salty its unreal.

@Null? Can we have this?

 

[DuskEngine]

hey @umad i've got some free speech for u kill yourself lol

 

[Stoned Tablet]

Insulting my intelligence so soon? My profile will tell you I'm a female. Surely you can come up with some more varied insults based on that fact.

The statement that it is, in fact, a feature every "well-developed" human has means that it is one of the key deciding factors in whether or not someone is beautiful. In your opinion, at least.



One symmetrical facial feature does not equate to symmetry in regards to other, separate parts. You can have a symmetrical jaw and an asymmetrical nose.

Still, symmetry is only an objective standard of beauty. It is not the be-all-end-all.



1. That's exactly my point. You're biased due to hindsight and personal investment. You went in looking for the connection and you found it. Not saying that people don't treat you differently depending on your appearance (not to the extreme degree that SH preaches), but it can't be used as evidence as to how the world at large operates. It's an anecdote, nothing more.

3. Really? From one person or many partners?

4. This doesn't mean that women lose sympathy. It's about getting that same sympathy for male victims as well. It's about equal treatment on an optimal level. Treating female victims of sexual harassment and assault as more sympathetic than male victims hurts us as a society. Victims of female-on-male rape can't even press charges for the most part because the law doesn't see such acts as rape. Feminism is just as much about rectifying that injustice as it is about equal wages.

6. So fame can override any predisposition society has towards people with "unconventional" looks?

1)If not appearance, then what else could it have possibly been? Did I miss something?

3) One person

4)Fair enough. I agree with this point. But it's going to be damn difficult

6)Fame can help somebody who doesn't look ugly look a lot better. I think it's a similar concept to the study in which people asked females to rate a guys face with their income and job title next to their photo. When a high income / high status job was listed next to the photo the person's rating went up dramatically compared to if that information was not provided or if the income was low / job status was low.

Here's some studies done on quality of life of post-op orthognathic surgery patients that assess their quality of life and markers of success:

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S2176-94512014000100123&script=sci_arttext
http://applications.emro.who.int/emhj/1301/13_1_2007_150_159.pdf
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/24358.pdf

 

[XH 502]

1)If not appearance, then what else could it have possibly been?

3) One person

4)Fair enough. I agree with this point. But it's going to be damn difficult

6)Fame can help somebody who doesn't look ugly look a lot better. I think it's a similar concept to the study in which people asked females to rate a guys face with their income and job title next to their photo. When a high income / high status job was listed next to the photo the person's rating went up dramatically compared to if that information was not provided or if the income was low / job status was low.

1) I'd say it was people being nice and encouraging after a major surgery. Kind of like how when someone loses a significant amount of weight and people praise them for their hard work. It's not a sentiment of "congratulations, now you're attractive", rather it's one of "you worked for something and succeeded".

3) Don't let the SlutHaters know about that.

4) To echo the old adage: nothing in life worth having comes easy.

6) So appearance is not the sole factor upon which someone's attractiveness is measured? Isn't that the opposite of what you've been arguing?

 

[EI 903]

All I can think of when these doofuses start sperging about maxillas and facial surgery:

Spoiler

 

[SpessCaptain]

1)If not appearance, then what else could it have possibly been? Did I miss something?

3) One person

4)Fair enough. I agree with this point. But it's going to be damn difficult

6)Fame can help somebody who doesn't look ugly look a lot better. I think it's a similar concept to the study in which people asked females to rate a guys face with their income and job title next to their photo. When a high income / high status job was listed next to the photo the person's rating went up dramatically compared to if that information was not provided or if the income was low / job status was low.

Here's some studies done on quality of life of post-op orthognathic surgery patients that assess their quality of life and markers of success:

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S2176-94512014000100123&script=sci_arttext
http://applications.emro.who.int/emhj/1301/13_1_2007_150_159.pdf
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/24358.pdf

Too bad they can't do surgery on your personality.

 

[MerriedManJr]

1)If not appearance, then what else could it have possibly been? Did I miss something?

3) One person

4)Fair enough. I agree with this point. But it's going to be damn difficult

6)Fame can help somebody who doesn't look ugly look a lot better. I think it's a similar concept to the study in which people asked females to rate a guys face with their income and job title next to their photo. When a high income / high status job was listed next to the photo the person's rating went up dramatically compared to if that information was not provided or if the income was low / job status was low.

Here's some studies done on quality of life of post-op orthognathic surgery patients that assess their quality of life and markers of success:

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S2176-94512014000100123&script=sci_arttext
http://applications.emro.who.int/emhj/1301/13_1_2007_150_159.pdf
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/24358.pdf

Comrade, you continue to disappoint me. You are allowing yourself to become an intellectual hostage of the global bourgeois. The only quality life is a life of permanent revolution, not a life spent chasing an unattainable bourgeois ideal. People spending money to achieve the standard of beauty set by capitalists are class traitors and counter-revolutionaries. Stop playing their game. They want you to read these articles and prostitute your labor in order to win status. Rise above, comrade.

 

[Stoned Tablet]

I love it. Just so much negative cognitive bias towards anything I'm saying just because I admitted that I posted a few threads about aesthetics on sluthate.com.

I don't believe in their Chad theories, ER bullshit or any other ideologies.

 

[MerriedManJr]

I love it. Just so much negative cognitive bias towards anything I'm saying just because I admitted that I posted a few threads about aesthetics on sluthate.com.

I am biased against capitalist puppets, it's true. Have you considered getting off the fucking internet? It is a useful tool for the revolution, but it also allows bitter virgins to congregate and come to believe that their stupidity is acceptable.

Edit: Stop editing your posts so much. Write what you want to say the first time, like a big boy.