Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lets see. What would be a good verified tag name for @umad?

1. Inconsequential Troll.
2. Butthurt Extraordinaire.
3. Professionally Salty.
4. Virgin with Rage.
5. Phallus-y Whore.

Cast yer votes folks!

I vote Virgin with Rage, because he could never get someone to pound his ass IRL. Here though...
 
But the fact is i do win them. It's not my fault if they base their arguments on fallacious statements.

How we did get here? Take a look at the post up yours. That's how.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

If an argument is fallacious, it does not necessarily mean the conclusion is false.

Also, reminding you that this is an argument about maxilla bones until it turned into fallacy arguments because you are the one screaming them.
 
Hilarious that you think you win them. Most of your arguments are fallacious, not their's.
Oh really? Did i recently make any statement about someones life or appaerence without providing proof? I don't think i did. Did i use personal attacks? I don't think so. Did i base my argument about a statement wich i thinked was true but it was not? I don't think so.
 
Oh really? Did i recently make any statement about someones life or appaerence without providing proof? I don't think i did.
Like what? The past 650 or so pages of this thread? That shit's been proven, mate.

Did i use personal attacks? I don't think so.
Most of those so-called "personal attacks" were jokes because the serious arguing like we're doing now is getting pretty pointless.

Did i base my argument about a statement wich i thinked was true but it was not? I don't think so.
Examples?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sanic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

If an argument is fallacious, it does not necessarily mean the conclusion is false.

Also, reminding you that this is an argument about maxilla bones until it turned into fallacy arguments because you are the one screaming them.
Fallacies of presumption fail to prove the conclusion by assuming the conclusion in the proof. Fallacies of weak inference fail to prove the conclusion due to insufficient evidence. Fallacies of distraction fail to prove the conclusion due to irrelevant evidence, like emotion.

I only used them for personal attacks. Is that wrong? You can't claim something about me without proof.
 
Lets see. What would be a good verified tag name for @umad?

1. Inconsequential Troll.
2. Butthurt Extraordinaire.
3. Professionally Salty.
4. Virgin with Rage.
5. Phallus-y Whore.

Cast yer votes folks!
all of the above is sadly not an option.
2 if I have to pick just one.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja
Fallacies of presumption fail to prove the conclusion by assuming the conclusion in the proof. Fallacies of weak inference fail to prove the conclusion due to insufficient evidence. Fallacies of distraction fail to prove the conclusion due to irrelevant evidence, like emotion.

I only used them for personal attacks. Is that wrong? You can't claim something about me without proof.
lol wtf are you talking about nigger
 
Most of those so-called "personal attacks" were jokes because the serious arguing like we're doing now is getting pretty pointless.

Seriously. It's like arguing with a 5 year old. No what what is said and how much he is proved wrong he just keeping screaming the same tired line. Just because you ignore the proof doesn't mean it's not there.But just keep being an Ostrich. Stick your head in the sand and hope it goes away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back