U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Black people are a reality. They need to be dealt with. Some a bit more harshly than others.

This is just a little call-back to reality for some people. I admit to being racist. I am. Very much so.

But, and you can take this message back to your villages if you like, I feel a rubicon type of event has been crossed, and I just want to say I have had just about enough of tolerating your bullshit, for now.

But come hell or high water, one of us is not going to have a good outcome.

But there is going to come a time.

That time is not far off.

I deal with black people all the time in my environment.

I'm not sure if I made my point. But it's STFU 'o' clock.

And no one wants to go there.
Holy shit, this is as they say, a really hot take!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sammich and Brocade
The Lend-Lease act was our informal bitchmade declaration of war
As long as you believe in conspiracy theories, that might be true from your subjective point of view. Germany has declared a war on USA because of the war between Americans and the Japanese, not because of the lend-lease what barely constituted 3% of a military supply of the USSR.
 
As long as you believe in conspiracy theories, that might be true from your subjective point of view. Germany has declared a war on USA because of the war between Americans and the Japanese, not because of the lend-lease what barely constituted 3% of a military supply of the USSR.
All points of view are subjective.

A total of $50.1 billion (equivalent to $565 billion in 2018 ) worth of supplies was shipped, or 17% of the total war expenditures of the U.S. In all, $31.4 billion went to Britain, $11.3 billion to the Soviet Union, $3.2 billion to France, $1.6 billion to China, and the remaining $2.6 billion to the other Allies.

According to the Russian historian Boris Vadimovich Sokolov, Lend-Lease had a crucial role in winning the war:
On the whole the following conclusion can be drawn: that without these Western shipments under Lend-Lease the Soviet Union not only would not have been able to win the Great Patriotic War, it would not have been able even to oppose the German invaders, since it could not itself produce sufficient quantities of arms and military equipment or adequate supplies of fuel and ammunition. The Soviet authorities were well aware of this dependency on Lend-Lease. Thus, Stalin told Harry Hopkins [FDR's emissary to Moscow in July 1941] that the U.S.S.R. could not match Germany's might as an occupier of Europe and its resources.
Nikita Khrushchev, having served as a military commissar and intermediary between Stalin and his generals during the war, addressed directly the significance of Lend-lease aid in his memoirs:
I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin's views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were "discussing freely" among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany's pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don't think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.
David Glantz, the American military historian known for his books on the Eastern front, concludes:
Although Soviet accounts have routinely belittled the significance of Lend-Lease in the sustainment of the Soviet war effort, the overall importance of the assistance cannot be understated. Lend-Lease aid did not arrive in sufficient quantities to make the difference between defeat and victory in 1941–1942; that achievement must be attributed solely to the Soviet people and to the iron nerve of Stalin, Zhukov, Shaposhnikov, Vasilevsky, and their subordinates. As the war continued, however, the United States and Great Britain provided many of the implements of war and strategic raw materials necessary for Soviet victory. Without Lend-Lease food, clothing, and raw materials (especially metals), the Soviet economy would have been even more heavily burdened by the war effort. Perhaps most directly, without Lend-Lease trucks, rail engines, and railroad cars, every Soviet offensive would have stalled at an earlier stage, outrunning its logistical tail in a matter of days. In turn, this would have allowed the German commanders to escape at least some encirclements, while forcing the Red Army to prepare and conduct many more deliberate penetration attacks in order to advance the same distance. Left to their own devices, Stalin and his commanders might have taken twelve to eighteen months longer to finish off the Wehrmacht; the ultimate result would probably have been the same, except that Soviet soldiers could have waded at France's Atlantic beaches.

America is solely responsible for the continued existence of the soviet union up until its collapse and everything that came from that. The current marxist takeover might well be the blood price for that act.
 
bUt wHiTe KiDs dOnT gO tO jAiL iF tHeY gEt CaUgHt WitH wEeD

Christ, I hate that goddamn line.

If you review the police files and criminal records for these hoodlums it becomes apparent on why it occurs. It spent about 10 minutes explaining these reasons for this to a couple of SJW's at my alumni dinner for the university I got my B.S. and B.A. in. I can still recall the discussion I had.

Obviously, I did not use the same wording as my discourse with the other guests at the table was far more P.C.

Let me just say that no first time offender for weed gets jail time.

We have a ton of diversion programs, drug treatment, etc. that is designed with treatment in mind. Heck, most weed charges are dismissed by the court or the D.A. does not choose to file as minor possession is not worth the time it takes to build the case for even a plea bargain. Nearly all cops hate enforcing weed laws as the more seasoned officers don't think its worth their time, the more junior officers don't care and think it should not be criminalized, and the quota hires are too SJW to hook someone up for it.

Nearly, all of the cases are due to increased policing due the neighborhood being a shithole, the cops looking for a suspect to a violent crime, someone in the car being on probation, or just someone looking like a thug. Now before someone asks why if the cops don't care about weed, why are some individuals arrested? It's because the cops are looking for information about the violent crime and are trying to use the weed as leverage. Again, nearly all these cases are resolved without jail but what it does start is a record of a police encounter / arrest history. Why is the thug looking guy arrested? They are stopped because they look like a goddamned criminal. Again, this starts a record and hurts the thug looking guy the next time he is stopped.

I explain all the reasons to her and the date, the response??? Systematic racism...

Fuck...the couple is at a table with a Jap, who has family friends that spent time at internment camps. Those individuals were hated when the war ended but they never whined and went wilding like the jogger demographic.

But...But...model minority myth!!!

If the system was truly racist then won't it work to suppress allow those American Japs after the war? Would it not keep them in the same social position as the poor poor Blacks? At a certain point, it becomes apparent that something exists in Black culture that is just utterly corrosive to them forming strong communities.
 
All points of view are subjective.

A total of $50.1 billion (equivalent to $565 billion in 2018 ) worth of supplies was shipped, or 17% of the total war expenditures of the U.S. In all, $31.4 billion went to Britain, $11.3 billion to the Soviet Union, $3.2 billion to France, $1.6 billion to China, and the remaining $2.6 billion to the other Allies.

According to the Russian historian Boris Vadimovich Sokolov, Lend-Lease had a crucial role in winning the war:

Nikita Khrushchev, having served as a military commissar and intermediary between Stalin and his generals during the war, addressed directly the significance of Lend-lease aid in his memoirs:

David Glantz, the American military historian known for his books on the Eastern front, concludes:

America is solely responsible for the continued existence of the soviet union up until its collapse and everything that came from that. The current marxist takeover might well be the blood price for that act.
You just copy-pasted the article which fits your agenda the way you want. I can do exactly the same, only with the actual information:
Under Lend-Lease, 8,000 anti-aircraft and 5,000 anti-tank guns were delivered. In total, the USSR received 38 thousand units of anti-aircraft and 54 thousand anti-tank artillery. That is, the share of Lend-Lease in these types of weapons was 21% and 9%, respectively. However, if we take all Soviet guns and mortars as a whole (revenues for the war - 526.2 thousand), then the share of foreign guns in it will be only 2.7%. During the war of the USSR, 202 torpedo boats, 28 patrol ships, 55 minesweepers, 138 submarine hunters, 49 landing ships, 3 icebreakers, about 80 transport ships, and about 30 tug boats were transferred under Lend-Lease. A total of about 580 ships. In total, during the war years the USSR received 2588 ships. That is, the share of Lend-Lease equipment is 22.4%. The most notable were the Lend-Lease car deliveries.In total, 480 thousand cars were delivered under Lend-Lease (85% of them were from the USA). Including about 430 thousand trucks (mainly US 6 Studebaker and REO firms) and 50 thousand jeeps (Willys MB and Ford GPW). Despite the fact that the total revenue of cars on the Soviet-German front amounted to 744 thousand units, the share of Lend-Lease equipment in the Soviet fleet was 64%. In addition, 35,000 motorcycles were shipped from the United States. But the supply of small arms under Lend-Lease was very modest: a total of about 150,000 thousand units. Considering that the total revenues of small arms to the Red Army during the war amounted to 19.85 million units, the share of Lend-Lease weapons is approximately 0.75%. During the years of the war, 242.3 thousand tons of motor gasoline was delivered under Lend-Lease in the USSR (2.7% of the total production and receipt of a / m gasoline in the USSR).The situation with aviation gasoline is as follows: 570 thousand tons of gasoline were delivered from the USA, 533.5 thousand tons from Britain and Canada. In addition, 1,483 thousand tons of light gasoline fractions were delivered from the USA, Britain and Canada. Reforming produces light gasoline from light gasoline fractions, the yield of which is approximately 80%. Thus, out of 1483 thousand tons of fractions, 1186 thousand tons of gasoline can be obtained. That is, the total supply of gasoline through Lend-Lease can be estimated at 2230 thousand tons. In the USSR, about 4750 thousand tons of aviation gasoline were produced during the war. Probably, this number also includes gasoline produced from fractions supplied by the allies. That is, the production of gasoline from the USSR’s own resources can be estimated at about 3350 thousand tons.Consequently, the share of Lend-Lease aviation fuel from the total amount of gasoline delivered and produced in the USSR is 40%. 622.1 thousand tons of railway rails were delivered to the USSR, which is 36% of the total number of rails supplied and produced in the USSR. During the war, 1900 steam locomotives were delivered, while in the USSR for 1941-1945, 800 steam locomotives were produced, of which 70 in 1941. If we take the number of locomotives produced from June to the end of 1941 as a quarter of the total production, then the number of locomotives produced during the war will be approximately 300 pieces. That is, the share of Lend-Lease steam locomotives in the total volume of locomotives produced and delivered in the USSR is approximately 72%. In addition, 11075 wagons were delivered to the USSR. For comparison, in the years 1942-1945 in the USSR 1,092 railway wagons were produced. During the war years, 318 thousand tons of explosives were delivered under Lend-Lease (of which the United States - 295.6 thousand tons),which is 36.6% of the total production and supply of explosives in the USSR. Under the lend-lease, the Soviet Union received 328 thousand tons of aluminum. If you believe B. Sokolov (“The role of Lend-Lease in the Soviet military efforts”), which estimated Soviet aluminum production during the war at 263 thousand tons, then the share of Lend-Lease aluminum from the total amount of aluminum produced and received by the USSR will be 55% 387 thousand tons of copper were supplied to the USSR — 45% of the total production and supply of this metal to the USSR. Under the Lend-Lease Union received 3606 thousand tons of tires - 30% of the total number of tires produced and delivered in the USSR. It delivered 610 thousand tons of sugar - 29.5%. Cotton: 108 million tons - 6%. During the war years, 38.1 thousand metal-cutting machines were delivered from the USA to the USSR, 6.5 thousand machines and 104 presses from the United Kingdom. During the war, 141 thousand meters of machine tools and forging presses were produced in the USSR.Thus, the share of foreign machine tools in the domestic economy amounted to 24%. The USSR also received 956.7 thousand miles of field telephone cable, 2.1 thousand miles of marine cable, and 1.1 thousand miles of submarine cable. In addition, 35,800 radio stations, 5,899 receivers and 348 locators, 15.5 million pairs of army boots, 5 million tons of food and so on were delivered to the USSR under Lend-Lease.

lendliz1.jpg
lendliz3.jpg
lendliz4.jpg
Most of the support came not even from the US, but the UK. So your whole argument is wrong at the very beginning of the discussion about Lend-Lease, and to be honest the discussion itself is nevertheless pointless.
 
Last edited:
I need a copy of this book.

This is the copy I have:


This appears to be the most recent edition:


As you can see, the Afrocentrism is front and center.
 
Christ, I hate that goddamn line.

If you review the police files and criminal records for these hoodlums it becomes apparent on why it occurs. It spent about 10 minutes explaining these reasons for this to a couple of SJW's at my alumni dinner for the university I got my B.S. and B.A. in. I can still recall the discussion I had.

Obviously, I did not use the same wording as my discourse with the other guests at the table was far more P.C.



I explain all the reasons to her and the date, the response??? Systematic racism...

Fuck...the couple is at a table with a Jap, who has family friends that spent time at internment camps. Those individuals were hated when the war ended but they never whined and went wilding like the jogger demographic.

But...But...model minority myth!!!

If the system was truly racist then won't it work to suppress allow those American Japs after the war? Would it not keep them in the same social position as the poor poor Blacks? At a certain point, it becomes apparent that something exists in Black culture that is just utterly corrosive to them forming strong communities.
White people are really bad at this whole white supremacy thing... or the Asians really hate blacks. I don't know.

View attachment 1448883
I'm pretty sure I've heard it argued that 'The System' is so inherently anti-black that it props up other minorities to keep them down. Hence the 'model minority' 'myth'.
 
You just copy-pasted the article which fits your agenda the way you want. I can do exactly the same, only with the actual information:
Under Lend-Lease, 8,000 anti-aircraft and 5,000 anti-tank guns were delivered. In total, the USSR received 38 thousand units of anti-aircraft and 54 thousand anti-tank artillery. That is, the share of Lend-Lease in these types of weapons was 21% and 9%, respectively. However, if we take all Soviet guns and mortars as a whole (revenues for the war - 526.2 thousand), then the share of foreign guns in it will be only 2.7%. During the war of the USSR, 202 torpedo boats, 28 patrol ships, 55 minesweepers, 138 submarine hunters, 49 landing ships, 3 icebreakers, about 80 transport ships, and about 30 tug boats were transferred under Lend-Lease. A total of about 580 ships. In total, during the war years the USSR received 2588 ships. That is, the share of Lend-Lease equipment is 22.4%. The most notable were the Lend-Lease car deliveries.In total, 480 thousand cars were delivered under Lend-Lease (85% of them were from the USA). Including about 430 thousand trucks (mainly US 6 Studebaker and REO firms) and 50 thousand jeeps (Willys MB and Ford GPW). Despite the fact that the total revenue of cars on the Soviet-German front amounted to 744 thousand units, the share of Lend-Lease equipment in the Soviet fleet was 64%. In addition, 35,000 motorcycles were shipped from the United States. But the supply of small arms under Lend-Lease was very modest: a total of about 150,000 thousand units. Considering that the total revenues of small arms to the Red Army during the war amounted to 19.85 million units, the share of Lend-Lease weapons is approximately 0.75%. During the years of the war, 242.3 thousand tons of motor gasoline was delivered under Lend-Lease in the USSR (2.7% of the total production and receipt of a / m gasoline in the USSR).The situation with aviation gasoline is as follows: 570 thousand tons of gasoline were delivered from the USA, 533.5 thousand tons from Britain and Canada. In addition, 1,483 thousand tons of light gasoline fractions were delivered from the USA, Britain and Canada. Reforming produces light gasoline from light gasoline fractions, the yield of which is approximately 80%. Thus, out of 1483 thousand tons of fractions, 1186 thousand tons of gasoline can be obtained. That is, the total supply of gasoline through Lend-Lease can be estimated at 2230 thousand tons. In the USSR, about 4750 thousand tons of aviation gasoline were produced during the war. Probably, this number also includes gasoline produced from fractions supplied by the allies. That is, the production of gasoline from the USSR’s own resources can be estimated at about 3350 thousand tons.Consequently, the share of Lend-Lease aviation fuel from the total amount of gasoline delivered and produced in the USSR is 40%. 622.1 thousand tons of railway rails were delivered to the USSR, which is 36% of the total number of rails supplied and produced in the USSR. During the war, 1900 steam locomotives were delivered, while in the USSR for 1941-1945, 800 steam locomotives were produced, of which 70 in 1941. If we take the number of locomotives produced from June to the end of 1941 as a quarter of the total production, then the number of locomotives produced during the war will be approximately 300 pieces. That is, the share of Lend-Lease steam locomotives in the total volume of locomotives produced and delivered in the USSR is approximately 72%. In addition, 11075 wagons were delivered to the USSR. For comparison, in the years 1942-1945 in the USSR 1,092 railway wagons were produced. During the war years, 318 thousand tons of explosives were delivered under Lend-Lease (of which the United States - 295.6 thousand tons),which is 36.6% of the total production and supply of explosives in the USSR. Under the lend-lease, the Soviet Union received 328 thousand tons of aluminum. If you believe B. Sokolov (“The role of Lend-Lease in the Soviet military efforts”), which estimated Soviet aluminum production during the war at 263 thousand tons, then the share of Lend-Lease aluminum from the total amount of aluminum produced and received by the USSR will be 55% 387 thousand tons of copper were supplied to the USSR — 45% of the total production and supply of this metal to the USSR. Under the Lend-Lease Union received 3606 thousand tons of tires - 30% of the total number of tires produced and delivered in the USSR. It delivered 610 thousand tons of sugar - 29.5%. Cotton: 108 million tons - 6%. During the war years, 38.1 thousand metal-cutting machines were delivered from the USA to the USSR, 6.5 thousand machines and 104 presses from the United Kingdom. During the war, 141 thousand meters of machine tools and forging presses were produced in the USSR.Thus, the share of foreign machine tools in the domestic economy amounted to 24%. The USSR also received 956.7 thousand miles of field telephone cable, 2.1 thousand miles of marine cable, and 1.1 thousand miles of submarine cable. In addition, 35,800 radio stations, 5,899 receivers and 348 locators, 15.5 million pairs of army boots, 5 million tons of food and so on were delivered to the USSR under Lend-Lease.

View attachment 1448872View attachment 1448874View attachment 1448875Most of the support came not even from the US, but the UK. So your whole argument is wrong at the very beginning of the discussion about Lend-Lease, so the discussion itself is nevertheless pointless.

It's pretty retarded to just discard what Stalin said to Khrushchev like it's nothing, like it was an easy thing or a pleasant thing for him to ever say.
Joseph Stalin said:
If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war.
Nikita Khrushchev said:
When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.
That's all that needs to be said.
 
I'm pretty sure I've heard it argued that 'The System' is so inherently anti-black that it props up other minorities to keep them down. Hence the 'model minority' 'myth'.
>model minority
What the shit is wrong with being a "model minority"? When did it become "white supremacy" for non-whites to have their shit together?
 
>model minority
What the shit is wrong with being a "model minority"? When did it become "white supremacy" for non-whites to have their shit together?
They're just smart enough to realize that we've never gone full Moon Man, but still have to keep the "white supremacy" idea alive, so they assume that anyone we did "allow" to succeed must have been "one of the good ones" as judged by Whitey.
White people are far removed from animals. Their biggest folly is mercy. Mercy is what led America to where it is now. When you leave no one to mourn, there are no tears, and no one to come put you to the sword later.
Then you end up with a fatalistic shithole like the Middle East with generations of people who kept their heads down so the Sultan wouldn't chop it off, and now have a severe lack of initiative and a strong tendency to congregate in gangs and terrorist groups.
 
Last edited:
>model minority
What the shit is wrong with being a "model minority"? When did it become "white supremacy" for non-whites to have their shit together?
It's a wrench right in the narrative of not being able to succeed because the system is keeping you and all the other non-whites down. So in the worldview of these people 'model minorities' are only controlled opposition and need to be dragged down to the level of the oppressed jogger population in the name of true anti-racist solidarity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back