- Joined
- Apr 24, 2020
Unfortunately, these studies never do this, but I'd like to see the US results broken down by state.
haha eat shit doxing faggots. Not so funny now, is it?
U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers
- Thread starter snailslime
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Archiving some videos from Portland last night directly to the farms.
- Joined
- May 27, 2019
The CV of a fucking loser:
Homepage:
https://jaredessig.com/
Another pillar of the community:
Meth wasn't kind to her it seems:
The next ugly mug
Her band has the name Dying Wish:
https://open.spotify.com/artist/4igS2MSwOIf3F9YeL929IO
Band photo:
other info:
Last edited:
introvertedobserver
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
Most of the people in those communities don't agree with them. They're a very vocal, small minority. Put all this shit on a ballot and it'd get slapped down hard. Like 80%-95% "fuck no".
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
I'm late on this, but you make some good points, you just forgot that before they can even reach the Pacific they have to clear Taiwan and all it's very US friendly airstrips. And after that there's Japan, the Phillipines, South Korea and Guam. Their problems start the second they leave port.
Were they not paying attention when the federal agents responsible made a public statement and cited the exact act that gave them power to operate? Jesus Christ.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Also, this is pretty relevant to all these people shrieking about tearing down the system and then crying when the system kicks them in the teeth. Use this when they complain about "muh freedoms" and need a quick easy to understand meme.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2020
I'm enjoying the salt from the commies when the right refuses to help and stays at home comfy under a blanket.
jje100010001
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2020
The thing is, this 'Jeremy Vajko' had already been arrested before back in June- I wonder why he still has the position (other than if he didn't bother to update his Linkedin profile).
Might be the latter, considering his increasingly 'crustpunk' appearance compared to his Linkedin profile image, but considering the number of Twitter subversives who have appeared in the employ of Microsoft, really makes you think...
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2018
When I went through high school, there were two options for satisfying the Government portion of our social studies requirement:
American Government was for Juniors and Seniors. This was the more popular of the two options given how full my section of the class was. Like @heathercho , we learned about the Constitution, separation of powers, the bill of rights, other essential amendments, and how Congress operated -- including the different forms of vetoes -- along with a brief side lesson on parliamentary procedure and Robert's Rules of Order. We also learned some simple law stuff such as the impact of ex post facto laws and bills of attainder. About the only complaint I might have in retrospect is that we covered enough topics that it was difficult to really get into any of the them on a deeper level due to the time constraints associated with a one-semester class.
Fundamentals of Government was a class intended for Freshman (and maybe Sophomores) that wanted to meet their Government requirement immediately and not wait until they had upper class status. I have no idea how the course was structured, but I suspect it was a lite version of American Government in that it covered the same topics but perhaps with less detail and none of the side topics/discussion.
Unrelated to the American Government requirement, there was an elective class titled International Relations that examined different areas of the world and their governance by looking at one or more countries from each area as specific examples. Naturally, a such a course only focused on the key similarities and difference, but it was taught by someone who made the class as fun and informative as possible. I doubt the class would be offered in the present day, however. The portion of the class that covered the Middle East included a brief discussion on the pillars of Islam -- not to indoctrinate but to show how the area's religious beliefs had significant influence on both the laws and governance there. I can picture today's parents finding that "problematic" for whatever reason, especially since the district is now trying to add gender studies courses to the high school curriculum
.
American Government was for Juniors and Seniors. This was the more popular of the two options given how full my section of the class was. Like @heathercho , we learned about the Constitution, separation of powers, the bill of rights, other essential amendments, and how Congress operated -- including the different forms of vetoes -- along with a brief side lesson on parliamentary procedure and Robert's Rules of Order. We also learned some simple law stuff such as the impact of ex post facto laws and bills of attainder. About the only complaint I might have in retrospect is that we covered enough topics that it was difficult to really get into any of the them on a deeper level due to the time constraints associated with a one-semester class.
Fundamentals of Government was a class intended for Freshman (and maybe Sophomores) that wanted to meet their Government requirement immediately and not wait until they had upper class status. I have no idea how the course was structured, but I suspect it was a lite version of American Government in that it covered the same topics but perhaps with less detail and none of the side topics/discussion.
Unrelated to the American Government requirement, there was an elective class titled International Relations that examined different areas of the world and their governance by looking at one or more countries from each area as specific examples. Naturally, a such a course only focused on the key similarities and difference, but it was taught by someone who made the class as fun and informative as possible. I doubt the class would be offered in the present day, however. The portion of the class that covered the Middle East included a brief discussion on the pillars of Islam -- not to indoctrinate but to show how the area's religious beliefs had significant influence on both the laws and governance there. I can picture today's parents finding that "problematic" for whatever reason, especially since the district is now trying to add gender studies courses to the high school curriculum
.It wouldn't surprise me if government classes in $CURRENT_YEAR are more watered down, cover less topics, and don't get into any sort of detail apart from what's needed to pass tests and meet the rubric established for the class. I'd also agree that there is a greater tendency for students, especially teen-aged ones, to let lecture content go in one ear and out the other for any class or content that's required and deemed uninteresting.
And some of the older teachers that taught into the late 80's and beyond still called government classes "Civics" even though that might no longer be true or accurate.
And taught them to go to Google and use the first result as their answer, even if it's not the best or flat out incorrect. True research and evaluation skills seem to be a dying art.
I got the impression @Bungus Scrungus neither wanted nor expected repayment of the 50 cents, but they also didn't want to be rude or cause a scene when the older sibling insisted on repaying and taking responsibility for what happened.
Yet another example of the hypocrisy of their concept of "targeted harassment." People that contradict their hugbox beliefs, no matter how civilly, are deemed harassing and deserve an orchestrated effort to have them kicked off the platform.
While it's good to see the Feds stepping in to protect Federal property and take care of business when state/local law enforcement can't or won't, I fear the worst is yet to come, especially with how polarized this year's Presidential election is already shaping up to be.
(Edited for spelling and clarity)
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 27, 2019
I find these military scenarios highly amusing, because they're all unrealisitc.
If there would be a conflict between the USA and China it would be a gay ops/cyberwar and it also would contain classic communist infiltration techniques like:
infiltrate the civilian administration of the opposing power,
corrupt the elites,
weaken the military and police force by said corrupted elite,
infiltrate the higher educational bodies and also academia,
secretly support degenerates and perverts (LGBT+) to weaken the core values of the opposing power e.g family, religion etc.,
create ngo's whom sole target is the government of the opposing power, on both federal and state level,
start indoctrinating children at kindergarten level,
instigate civil unrest for e.g. racial issues, ...
WAIT A MINUTE!
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Lolbertarian here.
Insurrection and attacks from foreign nations are the few things the national military is supposed to be used for. Maybe if the military was going in to take oil from a bunch of peaceful leftists that were minding their own business I'd be more inclined to be sympathetic. But that's not happening; they're willfully destroying our cities and chanting that they want to destroy the country and institute top-down authoritarianism under a Marxist flag.
Bag 'em and tag 'em.
- Joined
- May 27, 2019
I think the dude isn't working there anymore, look at the pictures and the car, he went over the top some time ago.
He's nothing more than a junkie with a load of mental health issues.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2019
Oh now they're crying about rights, huh?
Not a peep when you're cancelling people on social media and harassing people with armed mobs, but the second you get vanned you cry for "muh rights"?
Pathetic. You get what you deserved.
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2018
The absolute state of people not knowing shit about how the US government works and basic legal concepts pisses me the hell off, for most of my time at college/university focused on Political Science/political philosophy, AOC and her ilk needs to be no where near a ballot let alone in government.
The police announcer sounds so sarcastic and "you deserve this you little bitches" in his announcements normally he sounds dead inside. I wonder what changed.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
- Joined
- May 27, 2019
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
not even that would be feasible. china already considers HK an integral part of the PRC, if foreign military intervention ever becomes a serious concern, they'll immediately march a gorillion of PLA dudes into the place and start fortifying everything. trying to take a gigantic megacity from a heavily entrenched and well prepared enemy would be an absolute nightmare, a suicide mission with almost no chance of success.
~viva por sempre, mi general~
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2019
Lolbertarians get the rope first. Fucking milquetoast fence sitters.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2018
US Marshals Service Special Operations Group and Border Patrol Tac Teams. The Marshals SOG are just deputies that have volunteered and were selected for additional training. It works like most smaller Sheriff's Department SWAT teams.
Kansas City, Missouri - The city where the black mayor ordered anyone that stepped off the sidewalk during protests arrested is at risk of becoming another Portland? OK, I guess that makes sense if you're a crazy person. Also, the mayor sent a letter to the governor of Missouri asking for additional resources to help combat the spike in murders. Apparently the governor kicked the request to the feds. The Marshals Service already runs a permanent joint taskforce in KC for apprehending fugitives and investigating federal gun crimes. The mayor should only be surprised he got no heads up before the press sectary made his letter part of her brief.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
Agreed, an invasion of Hong Kong would be worst-case SHTF stuff and I could only see the US consider it after extensive blockades and breakdowns of Chinese supply lines
- Status