reddit General

[Spooky Bones]

The story of a fedora-tipping archetype losing his girlfriend to QAnon is one of many fascinating tales out of r/QAnonCasualties ...

It is considerably longer. Link (archive)

 

[Banditotron]

View attachment 1470656

Why do people do this to themselves? The internet is not for everyone.

View attachment 1470801

What kind of psycho fucks 100 different people!? What kind of psycho fucks 100 different people in the course of 4 years!? What kind of psycho fucks 100 different people a year!!!???

Having sex 100 times a year with one person is a happy, healthy, intimate and lucky relationship.

Having sex at least once per person in a year with 100 different people is...

some sort of dysfunction.

What he said. A major one.

Local redditor solves islamic homophobia

Islam isn't homophobic, they just think gays can fly.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

OT: what is the median age of people who use Reddit?
Have Gen Z taken over, or are the millennials pretending to relate to Gen Z still use it?

 

[Yangon]

As for multiple partners being pleasurable, well... what's better, the same dinner every night, or different meals every day? I'm not advocating for casual sex, I've been happily married for a very long time, but it's pretty easy to see the allure.

That was kind of my point, though. Casual sex seems like the same dinner every night to me. You go to a party, get drunk, suck some guy off and he fucks you from behind or something. If you have random sex with a different guy 3 times a week, I don't really think there's any room for sexual exploration, trying out new things, etc. Like, they never fuck a guy, it feels good and then want to fuck him again in different positions or something?
What's better, the same dinner every night cooked with different kitchenware, or different meals every night cooked with the same kitchenware?

First, just because someone said something on reddit does not make it true. They could be showing off, or anything as a reason to simply lie/troll.

I would also question the sheer availability of that many men. Sure 50 could maybe work, but when you are over 100 in a handful of years, how are they meeting that many different men on such a regular basis.

That too, I mean there are probably legions of horny men desperate to fuck, but I imagine those women have some standards and won't fuck any random creep. 3 different men every week just blows my mind.

What kind of psycho fucks 100 different people!? What kind of psycho fucks 100 different people in the course of 4 years!? What kind of psycho fucks 100 different people a year!!!???

What kind of psycho keeps a spreadsheet with names of all their lays? And then brags about it on Reddit? This reads like some frat dudebros bragging about how many chicks they scored. I guess women and men are not that different after all.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

View attachment 1470801

“ding, ding, ding”

Nobody but me's going to do the math to figure out that if each guy only comes about a tablespoon, she spent her four years at college swallowing a gallon and a half of man chowder.

 

[Longjack Attack]

OT: what is the median age of people who use Reddit?
Have Gen Z taken over, or are the millennials pretending to relate to Gen Z still use it?

I think it's a mixture in between and that depends on what subreddits you go to. r/unpopular opinions are filled with them.

 

[ditto]

Agnostic. Science. Mensa. 164 IQ. Wendig style stacatto sentences. Flag on the moon. How'd it get there?

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

First, just because someone said something on reddit does not make it true. They could be showing off, or anything as a reason to simply lie/troll.

I would also question the sheer availability of that many men. Sure 50 could maybe work, but when you are over 100 in a handful of years, how are they meeting that many different men on such a regular basis.

But alas, some people do indeed shag about. What you have to do is stop thinking from your own perspective and consider a different view. They are not having sex for the fun of sex, but as a means to connect and be desired. The sex is simply a tool to get that validation in their own minds. Its sadly common with lasses who have experienced abuse in their childhood, it fucks up their ability to connect with men with something other than sex.

They end up unable to have meaningful relationships and make love, so they continue to shag about and fuck like an animal. Thus making the problem worse, and feeding that vicious cycle.

As to the edit, I suspect its not exactly going down overall, its just that over a number of partners, the chances of failure increase and this is just statistical noise. If you did bigger and longer studies, anything over 2 would level out to be much the same.

If you’re attending a state university with 35,000 undergrads, there being 100 guys you could have sex with isn’t implausible. And then if you’re attending a large university in a large city with other universities, for example, in Boston or NYC, your options will be enormous.

Perhaps some of these individuals are troons, because this behavior from gay men is not as abnormal.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Yeah, gay dudes will also consume a gallon and a half of jizz. It just takes them a lot less time.

 

[Jar-Jar Fanboy]

How is having a sex partner count in the triple digits, and in such a short timespan, even possible? I mean, I know about the Carousel and all that, but I don't even imagine hookers having that many in a year.

Does being skeptical of such wanton harlotry mean I'm sheltered?

Well, for the chick that blew 400 guys, you could blow multiple guys at once, using both hands and your mouth, and that would go pretty quick. Say each guy takes 10 minutes to bust a phat nut, based on my calculations, it would take approximately 67 hours to blow 400 guys. So, 67 hours, spread over 4 years would be about 16.75 hours per year sucking dick, or 90 minutes per month, and that's based on 10 minutes to bust. If you have dudes that last half that time, or do multiple at once, you can shave a few hours off. For the chicks that said they banged 100 guys, that's only 25 a year. Say you go to the bars about twice a month and hook up with a new guy each time, it's extremely possible. Sure, you're a disgusting thot that I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but it's pretty easy to bang 100 dudes over 4 years if you try

 

[Foundry]

I've been wondering if the image of US universities presented by Hollywood is as false as the image of high school. Someone I knew went to do a semester in a humanities subject at a well-respected US College and she came back completely disillusioned, saying that it was a.) far less challenging than the standard she had grown used to in the UK, and b.) that there was a really weird, patronising vibe and that everyone acted like overgrown children.

There are a few types of colleges in the U.S. and they each tend to have different cultures largely depending on composition of their student population.

Spoiler: Expensive schools for rich kids, aka similar to what you see in movies

Schools composed of coddled rich kids with easy life will look like what you see in movies. There are large parties, fraternities and sororities are an important part of campus life and can set you up for life if you play cards right, students part hard, there are pranks, sport events full of people, lots of drugs and sex, carefree life since your rich parents can bail you out of trouble and cover all costs. These tend to be the most outspoken and socially progressive schools. These universities pamper and coach their students too. Interestingly, the students and faculty espousing progressive values will ostracize occasional poor kids who got there on scholarships, especially if these poor kids are immigrants. There is a darker underbelly of these schools with hazing that occasionally ends in deadths that rich parents and schools desperately cover up, secret organizations, campus politics full of backstbbing, rich and royalty bribing universities to get in, get good grades, turn blind eye to cheating, etc. If they are Ivy League schools or Universities focused on research, studies are taken more seriously, and partying stops around test and exam times.

Spoiler: Less expensive schools for everyone else

Polar opposite are schools made of mostly children of blue collar workers and anyone below upper middle class. Most people attending these tend to be career focused and determined to better their life. Almost everyone takes studying seriously, many people live far away from college campus to save money, most have part-time jobs to be able to get by, and people have little to no time to waste on watching university sports teams or get involved in student government. Sororities and fraternities are seen as distractions, and people tend to join occupation or study related organizations instead. Stressed, poor, and busy people who are dispersed over wide geographical area naturally party less. Parties are smaller and much more subdued as well, due to all responsibilities people have and consequences of being reckless. Advantages of these schools is that everyone minds their own business, there is less propaganda, and they cost less. However, these schools pamper students far less and you need to seek guidance on your own.

Spoiler: Small Specialized Schools

These schools focus on small area to attract a specific students and faculty. If they focus on professional or academic discipline, they tend to excel or be pretty good at worst. If they focus on catering to specific identity, they are usually shit.
These schools have tiny populations, so you get the most attention from faculty and most guidance, but miss out on being a part of a diverse human hive that many people associate the college experience, tiny social scene, small parties, everyone knows everyone, and no large school amenities like gyms, pools, restaurants, huge libraries, research facilities, big pretty campus, etc. If you are 100% sure of what you want to do in the future and partying is a minor concern for you, these can be a very good investment. However, you can be screwed if you decide to change your area of study.

Spoiler: Diploma Mills

They just focus on pushing as many people through as possible, while making as much money as possible. Very easy to get in, degrees are useless, professors are shit, little to no resources for their students, and they are all around a waste of money. They capitalize on desperate, naive, or stupid people. Middle of the road as far as partying, debauchery, and social scenes go.

Then there are of course schools that fall in between these. No matter the school, professional networking is very important for your career and people taking it most seriously tend to be the most successful.
Also, keep in mind that people writing and directing movies are usually from well off families and attended college a long time ago. What you see is most commonly 15 to 30 years removed from how things are right now. Of course, they tend to exaggerate and simplify things in typical Hollywood fashion as well.

 

[God Emperor]

Casual sex seems like the same dinner every night to me. You go to a party, get drunk, suck some guy off and he fucks you from behind or something. If you have random sex with a different guy 3 times a week, I don't really think there's any room for sexual exploration, trying out new things, etc.

... I mean, I respect your opinion, but this seems nonsensical to me.

Having sex with different people is the same thing over and over? It is a perfect recipe for sexual exploration and trying out new things, it would be new every time, by definition.

The food metaphor illustrates is perfectly; the mechanics of it remain the same, you sit down, you eat the food with a knife and fork, you chew and swallow, it provides you with nutrition, but to call different meals, in different restaurants, the same is crazy.

Different people have sex in different ways, no two are exactly the same, they vary incredibly.

 

[God Emperor]

OT: what is the median age of people who use Reddit?

71% of Reddit users are under 25 years old, 63% are male, 81% are white, 59% are single, 58% are students.

Paints a picture, doesn't it?

r/dataisbeautiful - [OC]The Results of the Reddit Demographics Survey 2016. All data collected from users on r/Samplesize

25 votes and 4 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

 

[0 0]

... I mean, I respect your opinion, but this seems nonsensical to me.

Having sex with different people is the same thing over and over? It is a perfect recipe for sexual exploration and trying out new things, it would be new every time, by definition.

The food metaphor illustrates is perfectly; the mechanics of it remain the same, you sit down, you eat the food with a knife and fork, you chew and swallow, it provides you with nutrition, but to call different meals, in different restaurants, the same is crazy.

Different people have sex in different ways, no two are exactly the same, they vary incredibly.

You're not going to communicate well with a person you just met and decided to sleep with, much less convince them to try something new. The food analogy really, really doesn't work. The other person isn't a lump of meat on a plate, it's another person. Just compare sex to anything you do with another person for fun, although obviously (or presumably) you'll only keep it to more intimate people.

As silly as it sounds, let's say you want to bring a friend for golfing, for sake of example, versus some random nobody you found outside the range. You might still have fun with the random nobody, but odds are you aren't going try hitting the golf balls like baseballs in midair with your clubs if it isn't your friend.

 

[God Emperor]

You're not going to communicate well with a person you just met and decided to sleep with, much less convince them to try something new. The food analogy really, really doesn't work. The other person isn't a lump of meat on a plate, it's another person. Just compare sex to anything you do with another person for fun, although obviously (or presumably) you'll only keep it to more intimate people.

As silly as it sounds, let's say you want to bring a friend for golfing, for sake of example, versus some random nobody you found outside the range. You might still have fun with the random nobody, but odds are you aren't going try hitting the golf balls like baseballs in midair with your clubs if it isn't your friend.

I think you're, uh... overestimating the importance of 'communication' here.

You're not building IKEA furniture with your chosen life partner, you're fuckin'.

Golfing isn't something you do together, it's something someone else does while you watch, and vice versa - a more apt comparison would be dancing, or fighting, or having sex with someone.

 

[0 0]

I think you're, uh... overestimating the importance of 'communication' here.

You're not building IKEA furniture with your chosen life partner, you're fuckin'.

Golfing isn't something you do together, it's something someone else does while you watch, and vice versa - a more apt comparison would be dancing, or fighting, or having sex with someone.

You dance and fight much better the more you're accustomed to the other person, don't you?

 

[God Emperor]

You dance and fight much better the more you're accustomed to the other person, don't you?

Well sure, and they dance and fight better the more accustomed they are to you, no one is arguing that sex doesn't get better over time with a dedicated partner - ain't nothing wrong with monogamy.

But, frankly, there's an upper limit to that, and provided the person you're having sex with isn't totally inexperienced or selfish, the difference between a long term partner and a casual sex partner is pretty slim.

Every person is unique, and that's the allure of multiple partners.

You increase your odds of having a good time, and of having a bad time, the wider you cast your net and the more people you have sex with.

Everyone should sleep around when they're young, try EVERYTHING at least once, see what you like and get some good practice in, and above all, have fun (there will be plenty of time to have sex with only one person when you're older).

Provided you're not doing it out of some sort of pathological compulsion, and you're being safe about it, it's perfectly fine and healthy.

In that regard, it's a lot like drinking, doing drugs, and partying in general.

 

[0 0]

Well sure, and they dance and fight better the more accustomed they are to you, no one is arguing that sex doesn't get better over time with a dedicated partner - ain't nothing wrong with monogamy.

But, frankly, there's an upper limit to that, and provided the person you're having sex with isn't totally inexperienced or selfish, the difference between a long term partner and a casual sex partner is pretty slim.

Every person is unique, and that's the allure of multiple partners.

You increase your odds of having a good time, and of having a bad time, the wider you cast your net and the more people you have sex with.

Everyone should sleep around when they're young, try EVERYTHING at least once, see what you like and get some good practice in, and above all, have fun (there will be plenty of time to have sex with only one person when you're older).

Provided you're not doing it out of some sort of pathological compulsion, and you're being safe about it, it's perfectly fine and healthy.

In that regard, it's a lot like drinking, doing drugs, and partying in general.

I see. I don't feel the same way, but I'll agree to disagree, though, and not take away from the thread much further.

 

[Adam The Ticket Seller]

https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/hx3gcy/republican_in_the_hospital_with_covid19_after/ (archive)
This has to do with religion because?
https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/hwwylp/a_trans_pastor_came_out_to_her_congregation_in_a/ (archive)
Compromised by troons

 

[KingCoelacanth]

Scrolled through /r/atheism and its just about what you expect. Almost nothing but articles bashing Christians, with a few posts about Islam that get hit with "this has nothing to do with religion why is it here" or "yeah, this is bad but Christians yada yada.."