No Face
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 23, 2017
what? at 16 weeks they have to use tools to dilate your cervix and physically remove the fetus, you can't do a medical abortion at that point. that's still an invasive procedure. abortion no matter how it's performed can traumatize a woman because of the potential social repercussions (or fear thereof)... though maybe traumatize is a harsh word. i don't think that it should be that way, but plenty of women have to deal with the shame of having had an abortion by themselves, and it can mess them up.
i think women should be allowed to get an abortion for literally any reason, but i also just think the idea that the woman got an abortion purely out of spite when she was in what seems to be a loveless marriage (that was opened up likely because the husband cheated on her and wanted an excuse to continue doing so guilt-free, and in which having kids was not considered until 9 years into the marriage itself, and only after the sidepiece had a kid first) is hilarious. even if that was the reason, the dude deserved it.
I'll try not to sperg about it, but it seems to me that abortion is indeed a moral question, and it has moral consequences whatever one's personal beliefs or choices about it end up being.
It seems very similar to me to how people in the poly community act, namely that they try to hide/destroy the fact that there could be any moral dimension to what they are doing. Shit like "tweet your abortion" and stuff like that just makes a mockery of what is ultimately a very important decision, and it seems to have many parallels to the cavalier attitude we see people embracing with respect to cheating and jealousy in this community.