HowHilarious
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2020
Also SJWs not only get mad that these pics are idealized (as if painted characters were not usually depicted with perfect skin lmao) but that Hilda in their fucking terminology is a "small fat" or some shit. Basically, overweight. And they want some fucking monstrum from My 500 Ib Life as a representation. Some even call these "skinny". So I guess this is where stretch marks came from, because just your average overweight person does not stretch their skin so much?An interesting tweet I saw that can be applied to a lot of things discussed here outside of fat characters:
View attachment 1541702
Now I think these paintings are cute. They're idealized pinups, but she's obviously fat, and the artist depicts it as an attractive feature. These contrast a lot to what SJW art tends to be, however.
Whenever someone makes a social justice flavored drawing of a fat person, they always throw in all the imperfect, unpleasant details, the stretchmarks, the cellulite, the uneven lumps, and they don't do anything to make them look ideal. If anything, they look no different than when someone that thinks fat people are gross draws an ugly fat bastard that the viewer is supposed to be repulsed by. I've even seen posts go around saying that drawing fat characters in a vein similar to Hilda isn't inclusive enough and is "too perfect" so irl fat people can't relate and project themselves onto it.
Basically the gist of this art sperging is a conclusion that's been stated over and over in this thread, in regards to fat characters, racial features, etc, these people drawing these things depict them as purposely ugly and unappealing and not in any way like they believe what they're drawing looks attractive or beautiful. Idealization is a major aspect of drawing art of characters you think are attractive, and it seems like a lot of these types aim to do the exact opposite.
So Hilda is not fat enough and they would prefer shit like this