Crime Officer-involved shooting under investigation in Kenosha - Get ready for more riots... there's video

Officer-involved shooting under investigation in Kenosha

KENOSHA, Wis. (CBS 58 ) -- An officer-involved shooting investigation is underway in Kenosha on Sunday, Aug. 23.

The shooting happened near 28th Avenue and 40th Street around 5:11 p.m., after officers were called for a "domestic incident."

According to police, officers provided immediate aid to the person. They were transported via Flight for Life to Froedtert in Milwaukee for treatment. The person is in serious condition.

A large crowd gathered near the scene following the shooting.

Kenosha Sheriff’s Department and Wisconsin State Patrol were requested immediately so that the scene could be turned over to an agency other than Kenosha police.

The Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ), Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) will handle the investigation.

 
1598550319886.png
1598538324527.jpg
1598551186467.jpg
1598556080714.jpg
1598555028155.jpg
1598556174561.jpg
1598557060651.jpg
1598557475387.png
1598558819463.png
1598559813475.png
1598560906469.jpg
1598561891509.png
1598562002144.png
1598563154739.jpg
1598564088284.jpg
1598564654584.jpg
1598565239696.jpg


1598566678232.png
1598567756404.png

1598570192594.png



1598571651433.jpg
1598570005796.png

1598576580652.gif
1598576946052.jpg
1598577563519.png
1598598869259.jpg
1598610697543.jpg
1598620662169.png
1598623860125.png
1598624558716.png
1598629609933.jpg

1598647834493.png
1598546631902.gif
 
Breonna Taylor was up to her eyeballs in a drug ring. Not innocent. Not saying she should have been killed, but that warrant was 100 percent legit.
I find the rallying around of this case to be very puzzling. Like, if you want to use it as an argument against no-knock raids, I get that. But they're saying the cops "murdered" her. It's like, bruh, the dude she was with shot at the cops, of course they returned fire. It's not like they fired for no reason.
 
lol they fucking charged him with premeditated murder. This is clearly intended to make him walk because after seeing video there's no fucking way this was premeditated. Either that or the prosecutor is a fucking retard. Zimmerman was charged with 1st Degree Murder and he went out with a gun and ignored the 911 callers directions.

This was during a violent riot peaceful protest and he killed a pedophile, a domestic abuser and shot a burglar in the arm. Yeah, the jury is going to be REAL sympathetic.
I can see how they are going to run the 1st degree narrative in court.
>First they need him to cop to the illegal carrying of weapons and transfer over state line, or make a strong case for why he should get time/punishment for doing so.
>Because he illegally carried a firearm and went over state lines, he MUST have done so with the intent to use it. The ONLY reason he would do it is to hope he gets into a shootout. Therefore any shootings were 100% premeditated.

Cap this, because this is the only way I can see any of these faggot political attorneys and DAs try to even run with a 1st degree premeditated murder charge. The videos disprove all forms of premeditation, his age helps him in many ways, the ADL couldn't link him to the far right, and his "victims" are shitbags and paedophiles. The deck is stacked against them badly.

The only way they can even try to get him with the 1st degree is to run with the "he went over there hoping to shoot someone" and stack the jury with as many soy sippers and blacks as possible. Media and the people prosecuting him will spin the state line issue as if he drove for hours to get to Kenosha from Illinois so he could shoot some peaceful protestors, instead of it being a 30 minute drive from his rural village of Antioch with a population of less than 15,000 people. Media will completely ignore how he was attacked, or that one of them feigned surrender before pulling a gun on him and tried to kill him.

This case is going to be one to watch. The media circus might be something.
 
One of the things I'd like to know is how many rounds he had left.

He allegedly had a 30-round magazine. Mr. Pedo McHeadshot also allegedly got tagged in a couple other locations, so it wasn't necessarily 1-shot 1-kill.

But it's hard to paint him as the reincarnation of Eric Harris if he had 30 rounds at the beginning of the night and 24 at the end of the night, with every shot accounted for.

Hopefully he didn't fuck around with his gun when he got home, and handed it to the cops as it was when he left the scene.

Maybe Trump will pardon him.
 
>Because he illegally carried a firearm and went over state lines, he MUST have done so with the intent to use it. The ONLY reason he would do it is to hope he gets into a shootout. Therefore any shootings were 100% premeditated.

That doesn't even make sense considering the prosecutor's odd choice (maybe based on the defendant blabbermouthing to the cops) to charge him with merely reckless homicide with regard to headshot chomo (the headshot apparently only grazed and it was the heart/lung hit that croaked him). I seriously don't understand the switch to first degree intentional for the death that was obviously self defense.

This guy talked to the cops and said some seriously dumb shit is my guess. And they're going to base whatever prosecution they have on whatever he said. But for some reason they haven't made that shit public. My opinion is they think they have him on something that he said. But they know what he said would actually make him more sympathetic to the public. So they're trying to hide the actual person and then bury him in court later.
 
"He didn't rape a child, he merely raped his ex-girlfriend."

Yes, Snopes, we know. That's why the police were called. The ex-girlfriend called the police when he came around again because she was afraid that she was going to be raped again.

I guess the woke thing to do would've been to let it happen :story:

To be clear, he didn't rape her:

As LNB lay there, on her back, the defendant, suddenly and without warning, reached his hand between her legs, penetrated her vaginally with a finger, pull it out and sniffed it, and said, “Smells like you’ve been with other men.”
https://archive.vn/YcYRU

I'm not defending him but people need to be clear about the facts of a case.
 
That doesn't even make sense considering the prosecutor's odd choice (maybe based on the defendant blabbermouthing to the cops) to charge him with merely reckless homicide with regard to headshot chomo (the headshot apparently only grazed and it was the heart/lung hit that croaked him). I seriously don't understand the switch to first degree intentional for the death that was obviously self defense.

This guy talked to the cops and said some seriously dumb shit is my guess. And they're going to base whatever prosecution they have on whatever he said. But for some reason they haven't made that shit public. My opinion is they think they have him on something that he said. But they know what he said would actually make him more sympathetic to the public. So they're trying to hide the actual person and then bury him in court later.
Well, what could he have said that would a) bump it up to a 1st degree and b) still make him look sympathetic? I think him being underage really helps his case here. Wouldn't be surprised if he was crying in the interview once it finally hit him what happened and what the possible consequences are. Last thing prosecution want is a teenager crying over something that is traumatic.
 
Okay but that's still fucked up and definitely sexual assault.

I mean, unless he's Joe Biden.
It's still rape according to the FBI's definition.

The revised UCR definition of rape is: Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.

 
Breonna Taylor was up to her eyeballs in a drug ring. Not innocent. Not saying she should have been killed, but that warrant was 100 percent legit.
I find the rallying around of this case to be very puzzling. Like, if you want to use it as an argument against no-knock raids, I get that. But they're saying the cops "murdered" her. It's like, bruh, the dude she was with shot at the cops, of course they returned fire. It's not like they fired for no reason.

I was talking in regards to the no knock aspect of it which I am not a fan of and do believe it lead(s) to unnecessary conflict/death. If you want other examples then Daniel Shaver, or Duncan Socrates Lemp.

Meanwhile Snopes tries to call bullshit on it.
Meanwhile, I like to know if any of these guys screeching on whether this is a pedo or not can just give us a fucking link to the guy's criminal offense page.
IIRC this is it https://archive.is/UyRaf
 
Last edited:
As this is a State and not a Federal offense, Trump cannot pardon him. Only the Governor of WI can, if he gets convicted.

The governor is a massive blue soy boy who had to be blackmailed by 75% of the politicians in his state to allow the Nasty Girls in.

No way in the seven hells he's going to pardon our hero
 
Kyle Rittenhouse works as a community lifeguard in Kenosha and was doing so on the day of the riots he shot several rioters during.

This article defeats a variety of arguments raised against him: he traveled interstate much earlier in the day for work, the rifle was not his but a friend's (which actually may open the friend up to criminal liability under that possession of a deadly weapon statute), and he was lawfully present on the car lot's property. The prosecution really jumped the gun in rushing to prosecute this kid, their case is completely fucked.
 
Kyle Rittenhouse works as a community lifeguard in Kenosha and was doing so on the day of the riots he shot several rioters during.

This article defeats a variety of arguments raised against him: he traveled interstate much earlier in the day for work, the rifle was not his but a friend's (which actually may open the friend up to criminal liability under that possession of a deadly weapon statute), and he was lawfully present on the car lot's property. The prosecution really jumped the gun in rushing to prosecute this kid, their case is completely fucked.

And yet again it contributes to the "narrative" which appears actually to be the reality that this was a nice guy who may have made a dumb choice one day but who only did what he did because he had to.

I want to see the prosecutor try to paint this guy as a monster. He obviously isn't.
 
I love the "hE wAs A mAsS sHoOtEr!" claims. If he was intending to kill as many commies as possible, there would be 20+ bodies in the street. With his great aim and nerves of steel, the soyboy harvest would have been sudden and bloody.

I need to find that video of the guy in Texas that tried to protect his store with a bat or machete and got massively curbstomped. It'd be nice to show a side by side of what happens with or without the second amendment.

Mass shooter requires 4 bodies, doesn't it? He killed 2, injured 1.

I can see how they are going to run the 1st degree narrative in court.
>First they need him to cop to the illegal carrying of weapons and transfer over state line, or make a strong case for why he should get time/punishment for doing so.
>Because he illegally carried a firearm and went over state lines, he MUST have done so with the intent to use it. The ONLY reason he would do it is to hope he gets into a shootout. Therefore any shootings were 100% premeditated.

Cap this, because this is the only way I can see any of these faggot political attorneys and DAs try to even run with a 1st degree premeditated murder charge. The videos disprove all forms of premeditation, his age helps him in many ways, the ADL couldn't link him to the far right, and his "victims" are shitbags and paedophiles. The deck is stacked against them badly.

The only way they can even try to get him with the 1st degree is to run with the "he went over there hoping to shoot someone" and stack the jury with as many soy sippers and blacks as possible. Media and the people prosecuting him will spin the state line issue as if he drove for hours to get to Kenosha from Illinois so he could shoot some peaceful protestors, instead of it being a 30 minute drive from his rural village of Antioch with a population of less than 15,000 people. Media will completely ignore how he was attacked, or that one of them feigned surrender before pulling a gun on him and tried to kill him.

This case is going to be one to watch. The media circus might be something.

That gun charge isn't going to stick, based on this -
1598659800375.png


I'm pretty sure his $450 dollar AR-15 is 26" or more long, which means it wasn't possession of a deadly weapon, according to Wisconsin law, and according to Lin Wood, the gun was a legally loaned gun belonging to a resident of Wisconsin, so the gun isn't from out of state, and there's no evidence that Kyle was ineligible to possess a firearm. There's also a pair of gun lawyers weighing in claiming that the Wisconsin law is drafted in such a way that there may be a loophole that allows anyone over 16 to lawfully possess and carry a long rifle, which the AR-15 certainly qualifies as - https://archive.vn/loKja

1598660143355.png

There's also the clause about "FOID being available to someone that has a sponsor older than 21 years old, and eligible for an FOID."

Kyle is walking on the gun charges, from the looks of all this.

Also, maymays -
1598660419761.png

1598660430480.png

I didn't crop these.
 
Mass shooter requires 4 bodies, doesn't it? He killed 2, injured 1.



That gun charge isn't going to stick, based on this -
View attachment 1554979

I'm pretty sure his $450 dollar AR-15 is 26" or more long, which means it wasn't possession of a deadly weapon, according to Wisconsin law, and according to Lin Wood, the gun was a legally loaned gun belonging to a resident of Wisconsin, so the gun isn't from out of state, and there's no evidence that Kyle was ineligible to possess a firearm. There's also a pair of gun lawyers weighing in claiming that the Wisconsin law is drafted in such a way that there may be a loophole that allows anyone over 16 to lawfully possess and carry a long rifle, which the AR-15 certainly qualifies as - https://archive.vn/loKja

View attachment 1554986
There's also the clause about "FOID being available to someone that has a sponsor older than 21 years old, and eligible for an FOID."

Kyle is walking on the gun charges, from the looks of all this.

Also, maymays -
He may very well walk on the gun charges. Won't stop the media pretending that they have a slam dunk case against him like they did with Zimmerman to try and charge up their viewers to vote their way.
 
Back