Richard C. Kyanka v. Ashley K. Martin (2020) - Lowtax's second divorce

[Ghostse]

Note, drug dealing is one of the triggers that nearly absolutely always bars a custody award and justifies assigning one parent sole custody. Dana Outlaw didn't pick this line of attack for nothing. Arguably it's below the belt, and I don't think Richard is dealing drugs and I seriously doubt Dana Outlaw does. But he's said stuff that, if taken as true, would lead inevitably to that conclusion. Court is a bad place to be a really shitty liar. You need to choose your lies strategically, not just blurt out whatever dumb bullshit you think gets you past the next five minutes.

Dealing, yes. But I said "using" wasn't the deal killer. He can shut down the "dealing" angle by admitting that he's the one scarfing pills; he then just has to explain his allergy and previously clean piss report.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

Dana Outlaw is not fucking around and must have told Lowtax to get stuffed. Momtax must despise Outlaw, she and her golden boy are used to get their way, but this time it might be very hard if not impossible.

Kansas City is a corrupt shithole on par with Chicago, just on a smaller scale. Someone like Dana Outlaw, a law professor, may want to see the corrupt system knocked down a peg or two by fucking over a powerful attorney’s son’s repeated attempts at skirting around the law. If she’s really pushing it, Carol Kyanka and other corrupt attorneys like her may also be the target here.

 

[break these cuffs]

Kansas City is a corrupt shithole on par with Chicago, just on a smaller scale. Someone like Dana Outlaw, a law professor, may want to see the corrupt system knocked down a peg or two by fucking over a powerful attorney’s son’s repeated attempts at skirting around the law. If she’s really pushing it, Carol Kyanka and other corrupt attorneys like her may also be the target here.

I seriously doubt she's Serpico. Hopefully Rich doesn't try to shoot her in the face regardless.

 

[AnOminous]

Dealing, yes. But I said "using" wasn't the deal killer. He can shut down the "dealing" angle by admitting that he's the one scarfing pills; he then just has to explain his allergy and previously clean piss report.

He then doesn't get to deliver any remotely credible testimony for the rest of the case, because practically the first thing he said in front of the court was perjury. He has no move. It's a smothered checkmate. Dana Outlaw is a monster.

 

[waffle]

KC is corrupt as shit, but taxmom is not a "real" lawyer. Nobody I know knows her or has heard of her, as far as I know she never actively practiced law. She was only admitted to the bar in 2008 and from what I can see had some inhouse counsel or HR job at a dental practice. Pure speculation, but she probably went to lawshool when she was older just to get promoted/feel cool.

 

[Beavis]

KC is corrupt as shit, but taxmom is not a "real" lawyer. Nobody I know knows her or has heard of her, as far as I know she never actively practiced law. She was only admitted to the bar in 2008 and from what I can see had some inhouse counsel or HR job at a dental practice. Pure speculation, but she probably went to lawshool when she was older just to get promoted/feel cool.

Sounds like dad made all the money.

 

[Fapcop]

What else do you do with an active prescription to oxy if you're allergic to opiates and can't take them?

There is no such thing as “being allergic to opiates”.

You can be allergic to one opiate like codeine, which would then mean you can’t take codeine or morphine.

(The usual procedure for pain control is then to prescribe another opiate like hydrocodone or oxycodone.)

By “allergic” he could have meant that he doesn’t tolerate them very well or doesn’t like the effects, that can happen. But for the man to be allergic to all opiates would really be a medical sensation.

This really isn’t an “OMG! Either he says he sold them or he admits to lying about taking them!” situation. Calm down folks.

If worst comes to worst, he could always say he flushed them.

The doctor prescribed some for pain control, the pain wasn’t that bad and he doesn’t tolerate opiates well, so he flushed them. End of story.

What is the opposing counsel going to do? Subpoena his toilet?

 

[northstar747]

They ask why he keeps getting the scripts filled.

But your right. I have a "idiopathic" reaction to vicodin which means I get a huge fucking migrain. So my options are stronger shit or weaker shit.

So lowtax could go the route of i m retarded and don't understand medical jargon etc.

 

[Ghostse]

He then doesn't get to deliver any remotely credible testimony for the rest of the case, because practically the first thing he said in front of the court was perjury. He has no move. It's a smothered checkmate. Dana Outlaw is a monster.

That's correct and why I am wishing I could join that court hearing zoom as Lowtax & Team are forced to try to explain why they attempted to deceive the court. I know he will be responding via his lawyer, but It would be so satisfying watching Lowtax getting called out on his shit by someone he can't ban, dismiss, or ignore.

Also I think I misread your earlier post; yes, Lowtax doesn't actually have a choice because the "admitting to the court you are slinging pills" will definitely get custody yanked faster than a magician doing the table cloth trick.

 

[Twinkie]

They ask why he keeps getting the scripts filled.

But your right. I have a "idiopathic" reaction to vicodin which means I get a huge fucking migrain. So my options are stronger shit or weaker shit.

So lowtax could go the route of i m retarded and don't understand medical jargon etc.

That's a classic junkie trick, a literal junkie told me about it. Not saying you don't have a reaction to vicodin but junkies pretending they can't tolerate X medication is very often how they get scripts for stronger Ys.

 

[TinyKitty]

There is no such thing as “being allergic to opiates”.

You can be allergic to one opiate like codeine, which would then mean you can’t take codeine or morphine.

(The usual procedure for pain control is then to prescribe another opiate like hydrocodone or oxycodone.)

By “allergic” he could have meant that he doesn’t tolerate them very well or doesn’t like the effects, that can happen. But for the man to be allergic to all opiates would really be a medical sensation.

Even if you have a mild anaphylactic reaction to an opioid the first time you take it, you're still never given it again because the next anaphylaxis could easily be fatal. If you're allergic to one opioid, medically you're assumed to possibly be allergic to all of them, possibly fatally. No one wants the legal liability of rolling the dice on that.

What usually happens next is that your medical chart gets a big red flag and specialists are required for your treatment plan for anything involving pain relief. You're part of every hospital legal department's nightmares and anything inpatient will be a big deal.

It makes you a complex medical case in a way that leaves a lot of documentation.

 

[Ghostse]

Even if you have a mild anaphylactic reaction to an opioid the first time you take it, you're still never given it again because the next anaphylaxis could easily be fatal. If you're allergic to one opioid, medically you're assumed to possibly be allergic to all of them, possibly fatally. No one wants the legal liability of rolling the dice on that.

What usually happens next is that your medical chart gets a big red flag and specialists are required for your treatment plan for anything involving pain relief. You're part of every hospital legal department's nightmares and anything inpatient will be a big deal.

It makes you a complex medical case in a way that leaves a lot of documentation.

If that's what's really going on, it might also explain his insano medical bills.

But the fact that A) Its a pillhead talking about meds and B) the fact we never heard of this shit before, when as everyone's said this would be an extremely noteworthy event, makes me press X pretty hard.

 

[Sabrina]

It's not, because he still has the script. He's lying. "I'm not a junkie, I can't even take pain pills!"

 

[I can't imagine]

It's not, because he still has the script. He's lying. "I'm not a junkie, I can't even take pain pills!"

Yeah, it's a bit of a stretch to believe that a doctor would give a prescription for a controlled substance to a person with a known allergy to said medication. Which would, logically, mean that he either: a) is lying about the allergy, or b) is deliberately concealing his allergy from his doctors and hoarding narcotics for some reason. Either scenario would require some explanation on his part. And any answer is going to look bad to the judge.

 

[Windex]

It's not, because he still has the script. He's lying. "I'm not a junkie, I can't even take pain pills!"

It seems his only option is to hand wave it away as a misstatement. “Oh I meant I have a bad reaction to them -(insert bullshit here like extreme constipation or anxiety) I won’t touch the stuff unless I really really have to, that’s why I fill them!”

Even that is a Hail Mary and a half.

 

[smackpops]

there is no way junkytax is selling those pills. he has to go through way to much trouble to get em i guarantee he is dealing with a pain clinic n they do not make things easy.

 

[TinyKitty]

It seems his only option is to hand wave it away as a misstatement. “Oh I meant I have a bad reaction to them -(insert bullshit here like extreme constipation or anxiety) I won’t touch the stuff unless I really really have to, that’s why I fill them!”

Even that is a Hail Mary and a half.

I guarantee what he says will be some form of that.

 

[AnOminous]

They ask why he keeps getting the scripts filled.

The real answer is obvious, it's because he's a drug addict. He loves drugs, and loves opioids specifically, and gobbles them by the handful, and washes them down with booze and wine.

He isn't allergic to shit. That's just a really stupid lie that has now come back to bite him on the ass.

 

[TinyKitty]

The real answer is obvious, it's because he's a drug addict. He loves drugs, and loves opioids specifically, and gobbles them by the handful, and washes them down with booze and wine.

He isn't allergic to shit. That's just a really stupid lie that has now come back to bite him on the ass.

And that lie is axiomatic pillhead junky behavior. I hope Dana Outlaw continues to hammer him on it.

 

[Pepper Jack]

If he has a prescription for oxys that he’s regularly filling - and that isn’t hard to prove for the GAL - the oxys are going somewhere.

So these are the possibilities:

- He's taking them, is under the influence of opiates when he parents but chooses to deny this to everyone and lies about his use of them (“allergies”);

- He’s selling them from the home in which he wants to keep children, which is a serious offence and also makes the childrens home a risky place full of inappropriate people;

- They are being stolen, which means they aren’t kept secured which is a massive risk to the kids as they could access them, ingest them and die;

- He’s providing them to someone else under force and duress, showing he lacks the ability to protect himself or the children.

All of these justify the removal of custody and a move to supervised contact only. Oxys that you can’t or won’t account for the whereabouts of are a pretty fatal addition to a contested custody case.

There is a 0.00% chance Rich is selling or losing his pills. If he says he is allergic then he is a liar, because addicts lie about everything to keep the supply coming and to convice everyone that they are not an addict.

I have seen Rich on his GG streams, I have heard his voice and his shortness of breath, and I have witnessed his downward spiral for a year. This is classic opioid addiction behavior. He hit the tipping point where you lose control of the addiction and his spike in abusive behavior is another sign as well. Percocet Rage is a real thing.

Rich is an opiod addict.