TheAmbiguousLurker
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because some people feel like they need to take a jab at someone that made a well known video relating to the subject. The same thing happens with E;R's video when people criticize or mention LoK.Why do other people criticizing SU need to mention Lilly?
I miss when you could be a fan of a character without writing a shitty thesis on how just like you, they were totally raped and the many ways you can project on them. I like Sylvanas because of her cool backstory, her design, and my autistic love for elf characters, undead characters who use dark magic, and ranged/hunter characters. I just don't get this tumblr/Twitter fandom obsession with having to justify how much you like a character because of how much you can relate to their trauma or whatever else you project onto them.That Sylvanas backstory is pretty cool, and I totally see why people would like the character (and, to my understanding, no longer like the character because she's gone from gray morality and sympathetic excuses to just WAR CRIMES ALL TIMES because Blizzard is trying to push a narrative). Thing about that kind of character, though, is that you're supposed to enjoy them for that ambiguity and that sympathetic side, even though you know that they're wrong. It's a tragedy. It's okay to like and sympathize with a character that's deeply flawed or even villainous. You don't have to keep backpedaling and explaining how they're actually always right and justified and it's the rest of the world that's mean to them.
Honestly reminds me of Snape fans from some years ago. Everybody else in the universe was wrong and Snape was just a poor victim of circumstances and definitely not an embittered jackass who abused his students. (In fact, that time he threatened to kill somebody's pet was totally justified and a great method of teaching.)
And I'm totally certain this was all an non and not, say, Lily pretending some third-party and therefore impartial observer was psycho-analyzing her and proving how sympathetic and strong she is.
The thing that really gets me about this is that it's being used to justify Lily dealing with her 'trauma' by sympathizing with a character who is empowered by dealing with her trauma in dark and violent ways... but months ago, somebody told Lily that a lot of ReyLo shippers actually used that pairing to work through their own trauma and Lily said it was unhealthy and gross and no excuse.
Rules for thee.
Personally, I think it's a consequence of people getting so hung up on how relatable the characters are and not whether they're an entertaining character.I miss when you could be a fan of a character without writing a shitty thesis on how just like you, they were totally raped and the many ways you can project on them. I like Sylvanas because of her cool backstory, her design, and my autistic love for elf characters, undead characters who use dark magic, and ranged/hunter characters. I just don't get this tumblr/Twitter fandom obsession with having to justify how much you like a character because of how much you can relate to their trauma or whatever else you project onto them.
Fucking ironic considering she hates it when people claim how relatable characters are. Cant for the life of me find the video but she made a point about how fluttersby shouldht be co sidered a relatable character and how characters arent good cuz theyre relatable.Personally, I think it's a consequence of people getting so hung up on how relatable the characters are and not whether they're an entertaining character.
She also has no idea how fascism works, apparently. How does a show where the main characters take down a fascist regime in any way "fascism apologia". I've tried for a while to wrap my head around that one and gotten nowhere.Waaaah why do they call me a cunt when I spend half the video shrieking that the showrunner is a piece of shit and doing everything short of outright calling her a Nazi waaaaaaaaah!
The showrunner is responsible for everything, and is an executive producer I guess, but also this is a corporate product. Jerry just admit you have no idea how the entertainment industry works.
I guess it's for people who were okay with deposing Muammar Gadaffi, but took umbrage with torturing him to death afterward.She also has no idea how fascism works, apparently. How does a show where the main characters take down a fascist regime in any way "fascism apologia". I've tried for a while to wrap my head around that one and gotten nowhere.
Just part and parcel of why they're such a shitty person and a terrible critic to boot. As an SUfag I could just leave it there but like with any cow that vein of shit runs so much deeper. So, so much deeper.I guess it's for people who were okay with deposing Muammar Gadaffi, but took umbrage with torturing him to death afterward.
Lily's so brave for finally calling those people out
So Peet's been giving The Owl House a ton of praise.
View attachment 1561079
How long do you think it'll last?
View attachment 1561081
Btw, I didn't pay attention to the new comic page until just now.
View attachment 1561084
Fucking shit, that is terrifying!
I hear you.I miss when you could be a fan of a character without writing a shitty thesis on how just like you, they were totally raped and the many ways you can project on them. I like Sylvanas because of her cool backstory, her design, and my autistic love for elf characters, undead characters who use dark magic, and ranged/hunter characters. I just don't get this tumblr/Twitter fandom obsession with having to justify how much you like a character because of how much you can relate to their trauma or whatever else you project onto them.
I can't speak about a particular video, but I can confirm that Lily has said that she doesn't write her characters to 'be relatable' and that characters being relatable is actually something you want to avoid.Pisses me off i cant find the video to back myself up here but i remember it clear as day appart from what video its from
Best part is that the entire first half of her video was stolen from other SU videos. The only real contribution Lily had was
View attachment 1561530
This is basically Lily's fans saying "she was right all along so you have no reason to complain".
Well said. The only criticism of how the Diamond plot resolved that holds any water in my mind is that it was done too quickly, which it was but for more reasons than "ehh I'm bored with this let's wrap it up". The empathy thing in particular is very interesting to note since it seems a lot of newbie critics in recent years view media not as something to consume and perhaps enjoy or learn from but as a piece of meat to cut their teeth on. It's not so much media to them as it is target practice so any arguments will usually be made either in bad faith or completely miss the point.Honestly I've thought the 'Nazi space crystals' interpretation was always inherently disingenuous (it's also a term I only saw after Lily's video, but I'm not part of the SU community so I don't know if she popularized the interpretation (so to speak) or stole it from other people-- given Lily's ). Their literally aliens. Their society is stratified by effectively biological necessity-- different gems are actually made in different quantities and with different abilities and assigned to different tasks according to actual, um... gemological (I guess) necessity. And the Diamonds, being the 'purest' of the gems, would naturally assume based on their own society that their purity was absolute and inarguable.
And of course they need geological resources to continue the species, so they're conquerors. They like collecting 'lesser species' because most of them are -- through Gem society perspective -- objectively inferior. Pink subscribed to the same idea and it was only by experiencing life on a different level that she realized that maybe the Diamond perspective (and the Gem perspective overall) was imperfect. Impure, you might say.
So fighting them, while it might be enough to deflect, wouldn't result in a societal change. It had to be done by showing the Diamonds a different perspective and make them change their minds.
I can't really speak on the actual execution (I only watched a smattering of SU episodes) but given that this was how Gem society was literally explained in some of that smattering I'm baffled that people can't disassociate their human-morality viewpoint and realize that the Gems had their gem-centric morality and that they had to have a conversation in order to make any true difference in their society (and that it's going to take time to make that change after tens of thousands of years of contiguous existence with this naturally imposed societal distribution). Except, having finished that sentence, so many people these days, despite claiming to have so much empathy, are incapable of disassociating from their preconceived assumptions and actually empathizing with other people, so of course they wouldn't understand this core reality.
Which is an inadvertent segue to:
I hear you.
Used to be that if you enjoyed a character, you enjoyed a character. You didn't have to identify or relate to them, and if they were a villain it was pretty well understand that they were charismatic and fun and there was a difference between, say, enjoying Jean-Claude Frollo's performance in Hunchback of Notre Dame and, you know, thinking that it was totally acceptable for him to lust for Esmeralda, burn down Paris in a fit of sexual frustration, and also that time he almost threw a baby down a well.
However, a shift occurred at some point in the last several years (probably with the rise of Tumblr), where it became an issue to enjoy things that were 'problematic', even if you didn't actually agree with them. So suddenly people have to twist themselves in knots not to explain why they enjoy a character's performance, but why it's okay for them to enjoy that character. Suddenly every 'problematic' character you like, you have to explain why they're actually in the right. You have to justify their actions, because your enjoyment of them is a direct reflection on you as a person and not, say, just appreciating a good performance or finding a villain charismatic or entertaining.
This kind of coincides with the fact that people's empathy has notably retracted over the years. Now you can't enjoy a character by thinking of things from their point of view and understanding them but still disagreeing. Some people seem to be literally incapable of liking a character that they can't find desperate, tenuous identifiers with because they're no longer capable of leaving their own perspective and thinking "Yeah, I get this guy. He's clearly evil, but he's got a good look and he's fun to watch and he makes sense so I'm enjoying watching this."
I think one of the most ridiculous things I've ever seen was a webcomic where a vampire villain was talking to one of the heroes and using kind of misogynist language and metaphor regarding taking over a city. This dude was clearly a villain, he had been established since nearly the start of the arc as a villain, there was no questioning he was a villain and you were supposed to find this monologue uncomfortable and creepy-- and then somebody in the comments started off a huge discussion about how it was 'misogynistic' and 'gross' and basically blamed the comic artist (who was trying to evoke those exact emotions to play up how unseemly this guy was) of being misogynist because he wrote this speech. The artist had to apologize and clarify on the next page in the artist's comments that he didn't agree with the previous page's monologue and was sorry if he offended anybody. Because apparently it is impossible to create a character and not agree with what they say, especially in a context where it's clear you don't agree with what they're saying.
I can't speak about a particular video, but I can confirm that Lily has said that she doesn't write her characters to 'be relatable' and that characters being relatable is actually something you want to avoid.
Given that big rant (again, totally not by Lily) about how Lily identifies and relates to Sylvanas, that's pretty funny.
Best part is that the entire first half of her video was stolen from other SU videos. The only real contribution Lily had wasnotaccusing Rebecca Sugar of being a Nazi sympathizer.
Do you remember the title? What he said in the video?Does anyone have an archive of more of his old videos besides the partial dailymotion one? I'm looking for his two part RVI he made on Pokemon creepypastas.
Anyone care to find this post? If it had nearly 1,000 likes and comments, it shouldn't be hard to find.God I knew I should have saved those Tumblr posts... She was already gearing up to shit on the Owl House if Luz didn't end up confessing her love to Amity and start a uwu lesbian relationship at the seasons finally (she didn't) and, in a rarity for her on Tumblr, got shit on by the community for it. Someone else screencapped that post and made thier own Tumblr post pointing out how stupid Lily was being and it got almost 1,000 likes/ comments/ ect. So Lily, realizing the Owl House doesn't have a "hatedom" yet due to not shitting the bed (it's a not bad in my opinion) retracted her statement and decided to praise the finale despite it being more action & plot oriented and having no hints of lesbianism at all.
Sadly, I didn't save the post pointing out Lily's stupidity and, honestly, I don't think it matters too much. We all know that Lily will jump on the Owl House hate wagon if it goes down the shitter (or even drops a bit in quality), give blind and boring praise if it doesn't, or passive aggressively make "not too damning jabs" at it if she get bored with it it under the guise of "having an opinion" like she does with Gravity Falls or other things generally considered good but aren't to Lily's specific tastes.
Right now I'm just waiting for the semi-envitable fan-fic where she throws in a "bad ass" self-insert that ends up being lesbians with Eda, Lilth, or maybe that weird short octopus girl thing.
Their literally aliens. Their society is stratified by effectively biological necessity-- different gems are actually made in different quantities and with different abilities and assigned to different tasks according to actual, um... gemological (I guess) necessity. And the Diamonds, being the 'purest' of the gems, would naturally assume based on their own society that their purity was absolute and inarguable.
However, a shift occurred at some point in the last several years (probably with the rise of Tumblr), where it became an issue to enjoy things that were 'problematic', even if you didn't actually agree with them. So suddenly people have to twist themselves in knots not to explain why they enjoy a character's performance, but why it's okay for them to enjoy that character. Suddenly every 'problematic' character you like, you have to explain why they're actually in the right. You have to justify their actions, because your enjoyment of them is a direct reflection on you as a person and not, say, just appreciating a good performance or finding a villain charismatic or entertaining.
This reminds me of when middle schoolers make their first OCs and go to Google translate to look up names that "mean" something or say something about the character.I never saw the full name of the hybrid thing before, and kinda wish I haven't. "Bonita Delyth"... Bonita, according to Google translator, means pretty in Spanish, making it the second time Liliana decides to randomly put a Spanish word as a name for a character that has nothing to do with the language. At first I thought Delyth was just a shitty way to call the hybrid thing "delight", but apparently it's an actual Welsh name that means "pretty and blessed". Meaning that her entire name is "pretty, pretty and blessed". Might as well call her Cutie Precious Babu, at least it would be linguistically coherent.
Edit: Third time actually. I forgot about Amorosa. What it's up with Liliana fucking with languages she obviously doesn't handle herself? Does she thinks it makes her more interesting or more diverse?
![]()
Yes what terrible writing to see a romantic relationship develop over the course of a story. Every relationship in media should just be like Cinderella going to the ball, dancing with the Prince and then BAM they're in true love after meeting and barely saying a word to each other.