JK Rowling’s latest book is about a murderous cis man who dresses as a woman to kill his victims - Discuss all the JK Rowling tranny shit here

[augment]

IDGI the book is about a cross-dressing killer? Why are the trannies mad?
Oh right everything is somehow about them, all the time.
https://youtu.be/ngy3L27zItA

 

[TheProdigalStunna]

TBH, if you want the perfect recipe to make a TERF, seeing the toll of the world's most rabid fanbase as well as enough fuck-you money to not give a shit about what they say is probably the way to do it.

 

[PurpleEater]

More sperging:

 

[Miss Misery]

So I have an old FB account I haven't touched in nearly three years and most of my friends are SJW types.

I am so tempted to log in to it again and post a glowing review of this book, just to see the fallout.

 

[behavioral swamp thang]

I'll buy it on cuz JK Rowling is the only person to donate out of being a billionare on top of being a based TERF. Most of her donations went to true and honest women's shelters.

 

[Doctor Placebo]

JK "Transgenders Go in the Blender" Rowling
JK "Steel Booted Kicks in the Lady Dicks" Rowling
JK "Other 59% Solution" Rowling

 

[Azovka]

Her book’s getting review-bombed on GoodReads. Not that GR was ever viable when it comes to book reviews, but nonetheless, it’s amusing.

 

[Granola Grenadine]

She actually has three kids: Jessica, David and Mackenzie.



Basically she said (and doubled down on) the fact that there are only two biological sexes.

In 2019 she tweeted:

"Dress however you please.
Call yourself whatever you like.
Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you.
Live your best life in peace and security.
But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill"

This was in support of Maya Forstater, a woman who was fired from her job after she tweeted "Smart people I admire… are tying themselves in knots to avoid saying the truth that men cannot change into women (because that might hurt mens feelings).’

JK Rowling is and always has been standing up for women, but ironically, SJWs can't see or accept that.

.....That quote again. I think I may have finally figured out what's been bothering me about it and the response to it. Arguably, the opposition is correct...from a psychological standpoint. But from a physiological and at least much of a biological standpoint...Rowling and Forstater would be correct.

In other words, I am now 99% certain these exceptional individuals (ngl, I miss that filter) screaming about "violent transphobia" are like certain people I know personally: they legitimately believe MtF transgender treatments and surgeries involves surgically constructing a literal vagina and adding some estrogen to match, not the stink ditch most of us here are (unfortunately) aware of.

 

[CatParty]

 

[Coccxys]

Will this finally stop dummies from talking about Harry Potter as if it's some sort of Bible instead of insipid kiddie shit? One can only hope.

This will be the one time they separate the author from the work. I have seen so many try to "claim" Harry Potter for their little group and say it's not JK's anymore.

This whole reaction is very telling, it hits close to home because most of them know deep down that they're bog standard cis men. In an attempt to make themselves feel special have convinced themselves the best thing to do is cut their balls off and wear dresses. They know they can't escape the fact they are just a man in a dress, why else would they push so hard to say that you can be trans without disphoria?

 

[Bumblino]

Isn't that the plot for the movie psycho? Or am I retarded?

 

[BeboRefugee]

More sperging:

They're going to try to kill her, aren't they?
It's the only way they have left to silence her.

 

[Hard Toothbrush]

So I have an old FB account I haven't touched in nearly three years and most of my friends are SJW types.

I am so tempted to log in to it again and post a glowing review of this book, just to see the fallout.

Do it. And post the salt.

 

[alreadyhome]

They're going to try to kill her, aren't they?
It's the only way they have left to silence her.

I hope that never happens, but I'm sure she's already thought of the possibility (based on her novel's plots and characters mentioned earlier) and maybe has security or something around.

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

Pink News got it's info from the Telegraph and apparently that's not even the plot. But sure why let facts get in the way of the Troon army and our fun.

View attachment 1596487

View attachment 1596489

View attachment 1596490

https://mobile.twitter.com/NickCohen4/status/1305597575798685709

Hey, trash. I'm not going to defer to anything.

Why don't you sit back and defer to the lived experiences of people who actually perpetuate transphobia and homophobia and let us tell you when we're being hateful?

9:30ish

Great piping hot take. "Sexual assault is illegal. So if the person comes in to the woman's bathroom, whether they are a man or a woman, if they sexually assault a woman, they're going to jail."

Great, Vaush. Guess what? In both instances, the woman got raped. Whether the person goes to jail or not it has no bearing on the fact that it happened. Women would actually prefer to prevent assaults altogether rather than get assaulted and get justice later. That's actually the entire reason that we have sex segregated bathrooms in the first place. You hear this from the feminists all the time even in this country: teach boys not to rape. The difference between America and Britain is that Britain has a rather long and storied history of people surrendering their rights in the name of security. You are expected to sacrifice your freedoms for the safety of other people there, not like here in America. We just got started with that shit back in 9/11 and we hate it.

So why are TERFs so much more common in Britbongland? It's because women there expect to be protected and guarded by everyone. They have knights and chivalry and princesses embedded in their history and culture. Remember that British woman from a few years ago who got harassed and groped on a train by two migrants and no one did anything? After the fact, she blamed all the white men on the train around her for not intervening to protect her, rather than the migrants themselves. Men who literally didn't know her, she expected them to put their lives on the line to protect her. Not police officers or soldiers, but just regular guys on the train heading home from work. Ridiculous. But that's what their culture is like.

 

[MelloYello]

Is it not part of the whole plot that he is not transgender and instead mentally deranged?

>insane eunuch deluding himself he's a woman
> not mentally deranged

That's a bit of an oxymoron right there....

The only real path they have left to get at her is pushing her comments as hate speech and attempting to have her jailed over it. (They're already screaming that this book is hate speech and she deserves to be arrested.)

Spoiler alert: That's not going to work either.
Maybe they could hold a collective self-immolation protest, like that one guy Null covered on MATI.

 

[irishAzoth]

everyone with those Hogwarts Houses in their bio handles are going to be pissed
especially Hufflepuffs

 

[Thumb Butler]

Even if stinking rich, Rowling is brave for telling the "woke" to fuck themselves, they're trying to ruin free speech for everyone.

 

[Jack Awful]

Harry Potter is the closest thing many millenials had to the bible and it's amazing to see them go from getting tattoos, putting their Hogwarts house name on their Tinder bio, referencing Hermione on protest signs like she's a real person, etc. to acting like JK is Hitler over opinions on gender.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

Balls of the size of Jupiter