Semper Fi to
@moseph.jartelli,
@Russtard ("Greer's frequent harasser"),
@badboy2000, and whoever's email handle is Hitler Did Nothing Wrong. You are oficially legends, now. Here's some free drink coupons; enjoy your stay in Valhalla.
You beat me to this. Literally the best part. YOUR HONOR, IT'S JUST ONE VICTIM SO FAR.
My sides.
"You fuck
one goat..."
Yes, frien
I too have Tucker Carlson face as I read this screed.
Tucker Carlson Face needs to be an emoji here.
So we have confirmation on what Russell thinks of Nick Rekieta, by the way - he is "some YouTube show".
Ouch, what a burn!
"Some YouTube show"--holy fuck, if you're mentioning it as part of building your case in a complaint, why wouldn't you specify the exact show, and add it to your Exhibits?
Because it's made by an actual lawyer, that's why.
View attachment 1621461
I'm still trying to do the mental gymnastics on this bit. He wasn't able to file a complaint because of his disability, but a year prior (with the same disability in play) he was able to file a complaint? Also wouldn't this be grounds for him suing the police department for discrimination if this was truly the case, why no suit against them? I'm sure at least one of them's a 9.
I'm pressing X to doubt on the "the police only took telephone complaints, so I didn't file one" bit. If that were true, it would be discriminatory against people with any sort of disabilities that impair their ability to speak. It would be a violation of the ADA.
Russell's just trying to cover his ass for never having bothered to file a police report because he either didn't see it as worth the trouble, or there was nothing to report.
He was far too casual when filing this lawsuit, with using words like "stuff" and "bash."
That, and so many of his claims are just so vague. In a legal claim, you need to be very clear as to the specific and exact nature of the offenses against you and the harm done (or, if you're responding to a claim, why the claims against you are false or exaggerated). Most pro se litigants (or respondents) have a very hard time laying out the bare, simple facts of their case because they aren't educated or experienced in legal writing. Granted, the LDS Business College was kind of shit at providing the education promised, but Russell has no excuse for presenting a claim this badly written.
And one other thing:
On page 28, paragraph 180, Russell says, "There are thousands of pages on Greer at Kiwi Farms and it is impossible to sift through each page..."
Impossible? No. Russell just didn't want to do all the work involved in combing through the entire thread. Occasionally, someone new to the thread will rate my old posts here, and it's kind of amusing to see them work their way through the entire goddamned thread via my notifications, usually over a period of weeks. If some random internet autist can summon that kind of dedication, Russell ought to as well.