Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
What if a guy was living in California and he was having a really hard time getting laid, he could just say he was transexual, get arrested, get sent to a women’s prison, and then he could rape a woman who is trapped inside there with him and can’t escape from him.

If a 13 year old girl was arrested for shoplifting, would you put her into a cell with a adult male criminal? Fuck no! Why not? Because he would rape her! So why would you put someone who has a penis in a females prison? It just don’t make any fucking sense! The number of males who want to become transgender is going to SKYROCKET in California now! Being sent to prison is going to be a fucking awesome thing for criminals now. These people are going to LOVE going to prison now so that they can rape women! Prison is suppose to be a punishment. Not the greatest gift to man ever! Prison should not be a reward. You should not love being in prison. Prison will be such a fun time now for these people. People will be getting arrested on purpose.
I sympathize with your stance on this matter, but 13 yr old girls shoplifting don't go straight to prison. They get a scare from juvie and parole at worst. Now if confused and horny boys are covered under this law for under-18 facilities, that's another discussion...
 
@whatever I feel like I under stand the romeo and juliet cases. But I'm afraid this is gonna be abused by the gay community since they like em young.
California doesn't have Romeo and Juliet, and it's telling that rather than introduce it, they use its absence as a shield for adult pedos. (It also means their sex ed teaches children how to commit felonies.)
 
What if a guy was living in California and he was having a really hard time getting laid, he could just say he was transexual, get arrested, get sent to a women’s prison, and then he could rape a woman who is trapped inside there with him and can’t escape from him.

If a 13 year old girl was arrested for shoplifting, would you put her into a cell with a adult male criminal? Fuck no! Why not? Because he would rape her! So why would you put someone who has a penis in a females prison? It just don’t make any fucking sense! The number of males who want to become transgender is going to SKYROCKET in California now! Being sent to prison is going to be a fucking awesome thing for criminals now. These people are going to LOVE going to prison now so that they can rape women! Prison is suppose to be a punishment. Not the greatest gift to man ever! Prison should not be a reward. You should not love being in prison. Prison will be such a fun time now for these people. People will be getting arrested on purpose.
In all seriousness, I truly think that politicians pushing this shit are simply as clueless as my husband was until he found out about Yaniv. It took multiple attempts to get it through his head that almost all trans women are heterosexual male degenerates. He simply could not connect the idea of trooning out with not being gay. The assumption that they’re just a bunch of effeminate homosexuals is deeeeeeeeeply embedded and very hard to dislodge. Because for many decades it was mostly true. But now it’s flipped.

People who support this idiocy think women are safe with these perverts because they think they’re all gay men and they also think most of them hate their penises and want genital surgery. That’s why they think bringing up the existence of lesbians is relevant. If these guys were all a bunch of gays who are 100% repulsed by vagina, then technically speaking lesbians WOULD be more of a risk in prisons or bathrooms with other women. But as we all know, we are not comparing the relative danger of one group that is entirely uninterested in sex with women to a group that is. We are comparing the relative danger of one group that is more violently obsessed than 99% of males with sex with women and highly likely to be in prison for sexual assaults against women and children to a group that is also interested in sex with women but almost without exception is not in prison for violent crimes against women and children.

This is also why there is so much insistence upon hiding the reality of AGP, and calling breast implants/removal “gender confirmation surgery“ or whatever they’re calling it this week. They know most people think it’s about genitals, but as we all know, only about 10% of them want their dicks inverted, but most of them do want boobs by any means necessary. So they obfuscate so people will assume wrongly.

Rate me optimistic, but I just truly do not think this many people would be this insane and this determined to not hear any rational ideas if they weren’t beginning from this wrongheaded notion, and if said notion weren’t being carefully cultivated in them. And as long as the troon fascists prevent any and all studies and statistics from being done or publicized, they can continue to hide the truth. And of course we are at the point now where even if they heard the truth, they’re so conditioned to defend the indefensible that they’d reflexively defend how this is all really fantastic and women shouldn’t mind, but if they hadn’t concealed it at the start it would've been different.
I fucking hate Scott Wiener.

MTFs who are into men will want to stay in men's prisons. FTMs will not want to go into men's prisons. Only troon AGPs will use this fucked up law to gain access to women's prisons.

California has mostly kept MTF transgender inmates at Mule Creek without issue and there is absolutely NO REASON to allow them into women's prison because they claim to be trans. I have no problem with inmates who have completely transitioned being moved to a women's prison, but an inmate who still has a functioning penis does not belong in a women's prison.
I have a problem with the ones who have completely transitioned moving to the women’s because I don’t think all the ones who want their dicks cut off are gay. Many are just the absolute most revolting straight male “transbians” who are the deepest into the ”I’m a real female lesbian” delusion. However, you are correct that gay MTFs want to stay in male prison (though perhaps with some protections so they have more control over their boyfriend choices) and of course FTMs want to be with females. Very very few TIMs who are not either actually AGPs or heterosexuals cynically calculating this low effort lulzy way to exploit the system and get unlimited access to rape targets would want to cut off their access to all that dick.
 
Last edited:
Pretty optimistic of him to think he'll have pussy on tap in the women's prison; the inmates will be the ones giving the beatings.

There's already one male serial sex offender in Limerick women's prison who has a GRC but hasn't transitioned medically. He has two guards with him at all times in the common areas to protect him but mostly the other inmates.

Interestingly, in that case the Prison Services said they couldn't move him to a men's prison because it's not up to them, the judge gives the orders and said that he was to be kept in the women's unit. With Barbie, the judge is saying it's not up to her what prison he goes to, the Prisons Services has to decide where to put him. These cases are barely over a year apart.

It's almost like they didn't think this through.

:thinking:
 
What is logical about recognizing that 24 year olds are allowed to rape 15 year olds (so long as it's vaginal) without immediately being sex offenders and, instead of correcting that, allowing gays to have the same privilege?

Vaginal-only is logical because that’s how you make babies.
This rule gave judges discretion to not make a young man sign the sex offenders register if he had fathered a baby with his underage girlfriend, because getting a job and providing for said baby could be prioritised instead.
You don’t get babies from anal sex, so the vagina-only loophole wasn’t an anti-gay rule, it was a pro-baby anti-deadbeat dad rule.

I’d rather we all went with a blanket ‘don’t fuck kids in any hole at all’ rule, personally, but there was some sort of noble intent there when it was upheld in 2015

.B3036D11-9AF7-4934-BE54-10301B616052.jpeg

 
In all seriousness, I truly think that politicians pushing this shit are simply as clueless as my husband was until he found out about Yaniv. It took multiple attempts to get it through his head that almost all trans women are heterosexual male degenerates. He simply could not connect the ideas of trooning out with not being gay. The assumption that they’re just a bunch of effeminate homosexuals is deeeeeeeeeply embedded and very hard to dislodge. Because for many decades it was mostly true. But now it’s flipped.

People who support this idiocy think women are safe with these perverts because they think they’re all gay men and they also think most of them hate their penises and want genital surgery. That’s why they think bringing up the existence of lesbians is relevant. If these guys were all a bunch of gays who are 100% repulsed by vagina, then technically speaking lesbians WOULD be more of a risk in prisons or bathrooms with other women. But as we all know, we are not comparing the relative danger of one group that is entirely uninterested in sex with women to a group that is. We are comparing the relative danger of one group that is more violently obsessed than 99% of males with sex with women and highly likely to be in prison for sexual assaults against women and children to a group that is also interested in sex with women but almost without exception is not in prison for violent crimes against women and children.

This is also why there is so much insistence upon hiding the reality of AGP, and calling breast implants/removal “gender confirmation surgery“ or whatever they’re calling it this week. They know most people think it’s about genitals, but as we all know, only about 10% of them want their dicks inverted, but most of them do want boobs by any means necessary. So they obfuscate so people will assume wrongly.

Rate me optimistic, but I just truly do not think this many people would be this insane and this determined not hear any rational ideas if they weren’t beginning from this wrongheaded notion, and if said notion weren’t being carefully cultivated in them. And as long as the troon fascists prevent any and all studies and statistics from being done or publicized, they can continue to hide the truth. And of course we are at the point now where even if they heard the truth, they’re so conditioned to defend the indefensible that they’d reflexively defend how this is all really fantastic and women shouldn’t mind, but if they hadn’t concealed it at the start it would've been different.

I have a problem with the ones who have completely transitioned moving to the women’s because I don’t think all the ones who want their dicks cut off are gay. Many are just the absolute most revolting straight male “transbians” who are the deepest into the ”I’m a real female lesbian” delusion. However, you are correct that gay MTFs want to stay in male prison (though perhaps with some protections so they have more control over their boyfriend choices) and of course FTMs want to be with females. Very very few TIMs who are not either actually AGPs or heterosexuals cynically calculating this low effort lulzy way to exploit the system and get unlimited access to rape targets would want to cut off their access to all that dick.
I'm probably younger than your husband and I wasn't nearly as clueless to understand that degenerate dipshits would take full advantage of transtrending.

How and where was he raised? :crocodile:
 
I'm probably younger than your husband and I wasn't nearly as clueless to understand that degenerate dipshits would take full advantage of transtrending.

How and where was he raised? :crocodile:
North Carolina, and he’s in his 30s. To be fair he just isn’t that much of an internet person, thank god.
 
Last edited:
Vaginal-only is logical because that’s how you make babies.
This rule gave judges discretion to not make a young man sign the sex offenders register if he had fathered a baby with his underage girlfriend, because getting a job and providing for said baby could be prioritised instead.
You don’t get babies from anal sex, so the vagina-only loophole wasn’t an anti-gay rule, it was a pro-baby anti-deadbeat dad rule.

I’d rather we all went with a blanket ‘don’t fuck kids in any hole at all’ rule, personally, but there was some sort of noble intent there when it was upheld in 2015

.View attachment 1626901

Still takes some effort to completely misinterpret and misrepresent that bill on purpose. Or an agenda.
 
BTW, Scott Wiener is the same guy who also authored the bill that lowered knowingly spreading HIV to others into a misdemeanor charge. And that other one that allows judges to not put gay men on the sex offender list if they fuck underage boys.

Wiener and Newsom need to go. There's a special place in hell for both of them. Yes I'm MOTI.

Scott Wiener is exactly the kind of ratfaced fuck who will one day be busted in a NAMBLA sting. His obsession with legislating other’s sexuality and sexual practices is indicative of something gross and ugly inside him.

I fucking hate Scott Wiener.

MTFs who are into men will want to stay in men's prisons. FTMs will not want to go into men's prisons. Only troon AGPs will use this fucked up law to gain access to women's prisons.

California has mostly kept MTF transgender inmates at Mule Creek without issue and there is absolutely NO REASON to allow them into women's prison because they claim to be trans. I have no problem with inmates who have completely transitioned being moved to a women's prison, but an inmate who still has a functioning penis does not belong in a women's prison.

We’ve got numerous troons here on the farms who’ve had the chop— Greta, Rhys, Danny Spice— yet remain violent, threatening shitheads. Getting his dick removed didn’t reduce Greta’s overwhelming height or build— he could still do a number on an average size woman without a sweat.

Male prisoners are still male and are still going to deal with male health issues. Seems a waste of resources to send them to a women’s facility. A gyno at a women’s prison is going to provide fuck all care for a male inmate.
 
Vaginal-only is logical because that’s how you make babies.
This rule gave judges discretion to not make a young man sign the sex offenders register if he had fathered a baby with his underage girlfriend, because getting a job and providing for said baby could be prioritised instead.
You don’t get babies from anal sex, so the vagina-only loophole wasn’t an anti-gay rule, it was a pro-baby anti-deadbeat dad rule.

I’d rather we all went with a blanket ‘don’t fuck kids in any hole at all’ rule, personally, but there was some sort of noble intent there when it was upheld in 2015

.View attachment 1626901

Thats ridiculous, because the crime is so much worse, we must punish you less! The legal system isn't about "punishment" but what you had there certainly isn't "rehabilitation" either.
 
Thats ridiculous, because the crime is so much worse, we must punish you less! The legal system isn't about "punishment" but what you had there certainly isn't "rehabilitation" either.

you miss the point, the perp can still be punished, it‘s the post-punishment sex offenders registry that the judge has discretion over, and in this scenario that’s not about punishment OR rehabilitation, it’s about protection of and providing for the baby.
 
you miss the point, the perp can still be punished, it‘s the post-punishment sex offenders registry that the judge has discretion over, and in this scenario that’s not about punishment OR rehabilitation, it’s about protection of and providing for the baby.
It should also be about protecting everyone else. The registry is, supposedly, about protecting the community at large. Whether there is another child involved doesn't make the person any safer.
 
I’ve snipped some bits from this court document https://www.courts.ie/viewer/pdf/e3...5e8dee785fe/2019_IECA_109_1.pdf/pdf#view=fitH

this person is absolutely going to kill someone, likely a woman tasked with taking care of him (doctor, psych, nurse, warden, therapist, cook, cleaner etc)

He needs long term secure psychiatric intervention. It’s not his fault, he had no hope of growing up normal (personality disorders are largely the result of very early childhood neglect and/or abuse) and he has no idea how to relate to people in a healthy way because he was never taught how to...

...but sympathy is irrelevant and won’t help. He needs to be kept away from the public. He is going to peak trans all of Ireland though, so there is that.

Threatens suicide as a control tactic:

View attachment 1624741
Origin of personality disorder:

View attachment 1624742

Mum leaves abusive dad, takes son with her.
Son is removed age 10 because he is now the main perpetrator of violence towards her.
Foster families cannot cope either (now pubertal, he’ll be able to back his violence up with strength):

View attachment 1624743

Moves to residential care unit, abuses staff, is attacked by other residents:
Refuses to attend school, makes up own ‘pseudo school’
View attachment 1624747

More violence and sexual violence against carers and other residents. Meets a troon and starts trooning too (age 15)

View attachment 1624748
Not convincingly troony- seems to have researched dysphoria, clearly controlling and manipulative

View attachment 1624755

View attachment 1624756
View attachment 1624757
Assessment by a different psych 18 months/2 years later (17?) seems to be beyond redemption. Bit of a munchie too.
View attachment 1624758
View attachment 1624759

Anyone who lets this man walk free will end up facilitating a murder, I’m sure of it.

Edit: missed off this little gem. Of course he wants to be a ‘sex worker’. No doubt that was what he was studying for, alone in his pseudo-school.
View attachment 1624804

riddlertrans.jpg
 
you miss the point, the perp can still be punished, it‘s the post-punishment sex offenders registry that the judge has discretion over, and in this scenario that’s not about punishment OR rehabilitation, it’s about protection of and providing for the baby.
Then require the deadbeat father to pay child support but still put them on the registry. As far as I know there is no state that won't put a father that rapes their own child on the registry, and I see this as a similar situation.
 
Back