Isn't that 'No White Guilt' guy a homosexual with terminal AIDS? He looks like a queer, he talks like a queer. He supports Donald Trump. He is an aging confirmed bachelor of the Lindsay Graham persuasion who lives in the DC metro area. I assume that he probably is a queer.
W-wait, you're accusing No White Guilt of being an unreliable witness due to his homosexuality, when Colin's chief cheerleader is a known fag, and champions the fag cause in his work? And your boy is an admitted bisexual who "can't even remember the names of all the people I had sex with" during his "gay phase". ("It was very easy to get sex in the gay scene, especially when you're 17."). I imagine it's also very easy to get incurable STDs in the gay scene when you're 17, and you're too scared to tell the big hairy 40-year-old rawdogging you that you would prefer him to wear a rubber.
Yes. we'll believe the word of Grindr Greg, Johnson, who was exposed in a leaked recording of facilitating (and then wanted to cover up) a gay grooming /sexual harrassment operation being run from his Counter Currents meet-up groups. A guy who says that "homophobia is jewish". And a man who has been so discredited that his only ally left anywhere is the man whose reputation he is trying to rehabilitate. Yes, we'll believe him and the degenerate bisexual when he says that this was nothing but a "bad break up".
Greg, famous for lying by omission and clever wordplay when questioned on his sexuality and dubious behaviour, thinks that he get Colin out of this mess, by making Colin and Mark Collett equally correct. But he can't. No White Guilt's post shows that. And the video Collett made with No White Guilt makes very clear that they not "disputing disingenious smears". They've GOT THE DOCUMENTS, Colin has been banged to rights, and they want him gone before he causes further destruction.
And riddle me this, trauma-bonded fanboy, if No White Guilt is lying because he is a homosexual, and Mark Collett is lying because he is, a, er heterosexual, why does Colin not call either of these people out for ruining his reputation? Not only does he not call them out, he still DEFFERS TO THEIR JUDGMENT!! (archive of a tweet below, which shows Colin defending Mark Collett's judgment against the slander of Colin's own fans, who have called Collett a simp for throwing their precious boy under the bus.
archived 24 Sep 2020 13:26:59 UTC
archive.is
And in case you are wondering why I am having to resort to an archive... well... as you'll see from the replies under the NiallAnglo tweet, rightwing accounts and comments on twitter, youtube, forums, are usually banned or deleted within a few months, which means that gathering proof to make my case has gotten really hard. I really should have saved more of the stuff that I saw at the time, because it has probably gone forever.
But don't worry, fanboys, I'll keep on diggin' :^)
Thanks. I had not seen that. That is important information.
So it is confirmed that the story is already out there. No White Guilt in the US is aware of this, is it isn't just a local UK-the-cat-is-out-of-the-bag.
If the story is already out, then odds are extremely good that it has already been posted here. No White Guilt is specified what actions are NOT the reason for kicking him out. (Not that it means they didn't happen, but they did not rise to the bannable offense).
We can try and dig trough the details, but if I wanted to make my best guess it is because:
1) He got ready to go full pacman on some poor girls kitty at the conference hotel, knickers down to the floor already making it the step too far.
2) He has been spreading his Gift Giving viral load all across the groups without properly cluing women in prior to their warty surprise.
I agree with your take on events, and thanks for being another person who sees what is going on here. Here are my takes on your guesses.
1. The forced oral sex thing, I have only seen hearsay evidence of - based on social media comments (most of which are now deleted AFAIK). But the forced oral sex thing would make sense in the light of Colin's STD. Harvey Weinstein, another noted predator who used his social status to get beautiful young women to do what he wanted, also recoursed to the oral sex route when he had disease/performance issues with his penis. Harvey also did forced oral sex as a substitute for the real thing. An alternative idea is that Colin thought he might be able to overcome their objections to sex with his warty god-rod if he managed to warm them up suitably with his tongue first. I'm going to have to stop now, I feel sick.
2. I absolutely believe you've hit the nail on the head here. The most damaging evidence is Colin saying that he did not "knowingly" give the women any STDs. Like, who the hell says that? Somebody guilty who doesn't want to be caught lying, that's who. Because, technically, he can argue that by using the word "knowingly", he's not lying. He DID give them the gift of incurable warts (and God knows what else), but it's all in the intent, and he didn't intend to do it. So he's not guilty. HE"S A VICTIM OF MODERNITY!!!!
As my old pastor would say, if he could read this thread "You lie down with fags, you get up with warts." There is a reason that female porn stars do not perform with MSM (men who have sex with men, or fags as they are better known). Because they know the reality of the LGBT life - disease. And lots of female porn stars have been bullied on Twitter for their position. One even killed herself from all the bullying from the LGBT "community". But as these "traditionalists" like Colin and the PA virgins show us, she was right to draw the line somewhere.