Millennial Woes / Colin Robertson - Chain-smoking Alcoholic, Racist Degenerate, Welfare Leech, Weilder of the God Rod

I don't have the original comment, but you can see context from replies which back up my original statement. Maybe King Sobieski or Phantom Organisation saved it and will post it here. Because when Greg realised he couldn't reply to KS's second question without outright lying (see how he answers the first one immediately and the second is left hanging), he realized that it wasn't a good look and deleted the whole tweet thread.
Comments are not evidences, it is only speculation at best.
 
Behaviour of what? Sexual assault? Why aren't there police report because this is a serious allegation.

Sadly, I don't think infecting teenage girls with incurable STDs that you picked up from cornholing other men at gay clubs before these girls were even born is technically illegal, but it is disgusting. Mark Collett, as he states himself, saw clear evidence to kick Colin out of PA, and Colin himself agreed with that decision. If it was "all lies", as he is saying now, why did he agree with Collett, and why is he defending him now, and desperately asking followers in his chat rooms not to say mean things about him? (see tweet below)


I'll tell you why - because Colin knows that Mark has at least some of the dirt on him, actual proof, and if Mark goes public Colin is finished. I believe that the only reason Mark isn't going public is because he wants to protect Colin's victims, who would be outed by this action, but you can smell Colin's fear in this tweet. Why else would you praise a man's judgment, when that same man had outed you publicly as a sex pest and sunk your e-begging career?
 
Sadly, I don't think infecting teenage girls with incurable STDs that you picked up from cornholing other men at gay clubs before these girls were even born is technically illegal, but it is disgusting. Mark Collett, as he states himself, saw clear evidence to kick Colin out of PA, and Colin himself agreed with that decision. If it was "all lies", as he is saying now, why did he agree with Collett, and why is he defending him now, and desperately asking followers in his chat rooms not to say mean things about him? (see tweet below)


I'll tell you why - because Colin knows that Mark has at least some of the dirt on him, actual proof, and if Mark goes public Colin is finished. I believe that the only reason Mark isn't going public is because he wants to protect Colin's victims, who would be outed by this action, but you can smell Colin's fear in this tweet. Why else would you praise a man's judgment, when that same man had outed you publicly as a sex pest and sunk your e-begging career?
It is again just a speculation, yours are as good as mine. If there is any truth to it, maybe they are all part of the same immoral sex pest ring? Mark, Colin, Lucy, etc. Look at Mark here, does he not look like a turned asset? Someone who can be blackmail by the establishment to do their bidding. https://youtu.be/XlRCEZxT3sQ

Same goes with Lucy Brown who "betrays" Tommy Robinson and shit on his cocaine addiction but as it turns out, there are rumours of her being a cokehead herself too. She is definitely a confirmed alcoholic, there are also hard evidence of her taking advantage of a mentally ill man financially and emotionally.

What we have yet to see from Colin's accuser on Colin's misconduct is any sort of hard evidence but there seem to be plenty of evidence on the accuser such as Lucy Brown. Maybe there is somet truth to what Hazel has said, it is all about publicity.
I don't know if this has been stated, but Woes brother, Alan, works at Daily Record, the newspaper that "doxxed" him. Perhaps Woes tipped off the scoop to gain publicity.
Seeing you are a victim in a relationship with NPD partner yoursel and I know this is a thread of Colin Robertson but there seems to be a lack of impartiality in your accusation and I find it hard to believe what you have said. What i meant to say is, narcissism is not a male exclusivity and for all we know, Colin could be the victim of NPD friends.
 
It is again just a speculation, yours are as good as mine. If there is any truth to it, maybe they are all part of the same immoral sex pest ring? Mark, Colin, Lucy, etc. Look at Mark here, does he not look like a turned asset? Someone who can be blackmail by the establishment to do their bidding. https://youtu.be/XlRCEZxT3sQ

Same goes with Lucy Brown who "betrays" Tommy Robinson and shit on his cocaine addiction but as it turns out, there are rumours of her being a cokehead herself too. She is definitely a confirmed alcoholic, there are also hard evidence of her taking advantage of a mentally ill man financially and emotionally.

What we have yet to see from Colin's accuser on Colin's misconduct is any sort of hard evidence but there seem to be plenty of evidence on the accuser such as Lucy Brown. Maybe there is somet truth to what Hazel has said, it is all about publicity.

Seeing you are a victim in a relationship with NPD partner yoursel and I know this is a thread of Colin Robertson but there seems to be a lack of impartiality in your accusation and I find it hard to believe what you have said. What i meant to say is, narcissism is not a male exclusivity and for all we know, Colin could be the victim of NPD friends.

Colin the VICTIM? But of course! People like Colin are always the victims. Look at his reply to the original fallout after Mark Collett made the video where he EXPELLED Colin from Patriotic Alternative, and told his audience that he had seen clear evidence that left him no other option, and that people just had to trust him on this, because he didn't want a greater scandal, either for PA or the victims.

football manager resignation.png


Now, if you were to read this, you would think that Colin had chosen to WALK AWAY from the organisation rather than the truth of being expelled, and he's doing the pass-ag bit "they'll be better off to be free of me", which is designed to make the reader feel sorry for him. Rather than the reality, which was that he was PUSHED OUT for being a sex pest.

And he frames his anti-social, predatory behaviors in terms of "character flaws" and "stress and addiction", again, so that none of this is his fault, and he too is a victim - A VICTIM OF MODERNITY LMAO. A far cry though from his new line as coached by his mentor Johnson, of "IT'S ALL LIES! THEY'RE ALL OUT TO GET ME!!!11" Something he knows that his paranoid, obsessive fans will happily run with, and probably put down to some kind of diabolical Jewish-Feminist plot.

Colin is no victim. He is relying on the inner party of PA not releasing evidence, and the victims, and those close to the victims, saying nothing out of embarrassment, so that he can get his grooming and grifting cult back on the road again. Hopefully those who have the incriminating jpegs will post them here before that happens though, and put an end to his lies.
 
Colin the VICTIM? But of course! People like Colin are always the victims. Look at his reply to the original fallout after Mark Collett made the video where he EXPELLED Colin from Patriotic Alternative, and told his audience that he had seen clear evidence that left him no other option, and that people just had to trust him on this, because he didn't want a greater scandal, either for PA or the victims.

View attachment 1629707

Now, if you were to read this, you would think that Colin had chosen to WALK AWAY from the organisation rather than the truth of being expelled, and he's doing the pass-ag bit "they'll be better off to be free of me", which is designed to make the reader feel sorry for him. Rather than the reality, which was that he was PUSHED OUT for being a sex pest.

And he frames his anti-social, predatory behaviors in terms of "character flaws" and "stress and addiction", again, so that none of this is his fault, and he too is a victim - A VICTIM OF MODERNITY LMAO. A far cry though from his new line as coached by his mentor Johnson, of "IT'S ALL LIES! THEY'RE ALL OUT TO GET ME!!!11" Something he knows that his paranoid, obsessive fans will happily run with, and probably put down to some kind of diabolical Jewish-Feminist plot.

Colin is no victim. He is relying on the inner party of PA not releasing evidence, and the victims, and those close to the victims, saying nothing out of embarrassment, so that he can get his grooming and grifting cult back on the road again. Hopefully those who have the incriminating jpegs will post them here before that happens though, and put an end to his lies.

Nobody has a clear idea what happened yet. It could be malicious from a third party. I certainly wouldn't attach any credibility to a single purpose anti-Woes Kiwi account.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Shaka Brah
Nobody has a clear idea what happened yet. It could be malicious from a third party. I certainly wouldn't attach any credibility to a single purpose anti-Woes Kiwi account.

You should have watched more of Stefan Molyneux and less of Colin, because Stefan would have taught you that ad homs are 'not an argument'. Please engage with my arguments and the evidence that I have posted. Whether I post on other threads is an irrelevance. And as for me being "anti-Woes", well, yes, of course I am. You say that like it is a bad thing, "gigantic faggot". But unlike you, I am making a case for WHY I am "anti-Woes", as you put it.

Now, as for your assertion "Nobody has a clear idea what happened yet.". This is blatantly untrue. The inner circle to PA know exactly what has been going on, and that is why No White Guilt, who was party to the information, made the following video about that infamous PWR episode.



Now, see his pinned comment under the video. This is it here. I am posting it here in case the video or the comment is later deleted, as so many things are regarding Colin. NWG posted this comment as a defense of Mark and PA, because rabid Woes fanboys like you ("OMG GUISE MILLENIYULE 2020 IS ON!!!!") and Greg Johnson, were attacking Mark Collett and/or the girls involved, refusing to believe anything bad about their boy, and misrepresenting what happened. But this comment makes it clear that Colin is guilty of bad behaviour - this is not "3rd party malicious plot". Or is NWG lying as well? Is everybody lying except your precious boy?

Pinned by No White Guilt
No White Guilt
5 months ago (edited)
A few points: Nota Bene – Much of the truth about this event has now come to light. I want to commend those of you who comported yourselves with maturity and exemplified the character of the West during this objectionable episode. I also want to condemn you pieces of garbage who attacked me, Mark, women in the white positive sphere, the unnamed victim – those of you who demanded to know the sordid details of other peoples’ dirty laundry (You would not want yours known to the world and you do not “deserve” to know any of this – you imbeciles), those of you who fanned resentment etc. You have a lot of work to do on your characters – perhaps you should follows Woes’ idea and get yourselves some therapy.

1. Everyone saying that the behavior in question was unsolicited pics, lewd language, a pickup gone wrong, or a breakup gone wrong, is WRONG.

2. As you would not want your dirty laundry shared, Mark is not going to share the personal details of what happened - that would harm Woes rather than help him. Having said that, Woes did speak for himself in his public statement, and I shared the important parts of that statement in this video.

3. This is not a he said she said scenario.

4. Even if Mark mentioned the reputation of PA in his announcement, that is not the first issue in my eyes and I doubt it was for him. Unbecoming conduct that rises to the level of dismissal was the issue.

5. This has nothing to do with “women in politics.” The unnamed woman was not in a position of power and women would still have access to (and therefore influence) power holders even if women were not permitted to participate in politics whatsoever.

6. Mark did not introduce the issue to the public. Perhaps he could have said less, but the news was already public and spreading rapidly.

Show less
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johan Schmidt
that is why No White Guilt, who was party to the information, made the following video about that infamous PWR episode.
Isn't that 'No White Guilt' guy a homosexual with terminal AIDS? He looks like a queer, he talks like a queer. He supports Donald Trump. He is an aging confirmed bachelor of the Lindsay Graham persuasion who lives in the DC metro area. I assume that he probably is a queer.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Shaka Brah
Now, see his pinned comment under the video. This is it here. I am posting it here in case the video or the comment is later deleted, as so many things are regarding Colin. NWG posted this comment as a defense of Mark and PA, because rabid Woes fanboys like you ("OMG GUISE MILLENIYULE 2020 IS ON!!!!") and Greg Johnson, were attacking Mark Collett and/or the girls involved, refusing to believe anything bad about their boy, and misrepresenting what happened. But this comment makes it clear that Colin is guilty of bad behaviour - this is not "3rd party malicious plot". Or is NWG lying as well? Is everybody lying except your precious boy?

Pinned by No White Guilt
No White Guilt
5 months ago (edited)
A few points: Nota Bene – Much of the truth about this event has now come to light. I want to commend those of you who comported yourselves with maturity and exemplified the character of the West during this objectionable episode. I also want to condemn you pieces of garbage who attacked me, Mark, women in the white positive sphere, the unnamed victim – those of you who demanded to know the sordid details of other peoples’ dirty laundry (You would not want yours known to the world and you do not “deserve” to know any of this – you imbeciles), those of you who fanned resentment etc. You have a lot of work to do on your characters – perhaps you should follows Woes’ idea and get yourselves some therapy.

1. Everyone saying that the behavior in question was unsolicited pics, lewd language, a pickup gone wrong, or a breakup gone wrong, is WRONG.

2. As you would not want your dirty laundry shared, Mark is not going to share the personal details of what happened - that would harm Woes rather than help him. Having said that, Woes did speak for himself in his public statement, and I shared the important parts of that statement in this video.

3. This is not a he said she said scenario.

4. Even if Mark mentioned the reputation of PA in his announcement, that is not the first issue in my eyes and I doubt it was for him. Unbecoming conduct that rises to the level of dismissal was the issue.

5. This has nothing to do with “women in politics.” The unnamed woman was not in a position of power and women would still have access to (and therefore influence) power holders even if women were not permitted to participate in politics whatsoever.

6. Mark did not introduce the issue to the public. Perhaps he could have said less, but the news was already public and spreading rapidly.

Show less
Thanks. I had not seen that. That is important information.

So it is confirmed that the story is already out there. No White Guilt in the US is aware of this, is it isn't just a local UK-the-cat-is-out-of-the-bag.

If the story is already out, then odds are extremely good that it has already been posted here. No White Guilt is specified what actions are NOT the reason for kicking him out. (Not that it means they didn't happen, but they did not rise to the bannable offense).

We can try and dig trough the details, but if I wanted to make my best guess it is because:
1) He got ready to go full pacman on some poor girls kitty at the conference hotel, knickers down to the floor already making it the step too far.
2) He has been spreading his Gift Giving viral load all across the groups without properly cluing women in prior to their warty surprise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VirgoVixen
Isn't that 'No White Guilt' guy a homosexual with terminal AIDS? He looks like a queer, he talks like a queer. He supports Donald Trump. He is an aging confirmed bachelor of the Lindsay Graham persuasion who lives in the DC metro area. I assume that he probably is a queer.
W-wait, you're accusing No White Guilt of being an unreliable witness due to his homosexuality, when Colin's chief cheerleader is a known fag, and champions the fag cause in his work? And your boy is an admitted bisexual who "can't even remember the names of all the people I had sex with" during his "gay phase". ("It was very easy to get sex in the gay scene, especially when you're 17."). I imagine it's also very easy to get incurable STDs in the gay scene when you're 17, and you're too scared to tell the big hairy 40-year-old rawdogging you that you would prefer him to wear a rubber.

Yes. we'll believe the word of Grindr Greg, Johnson, who was exposed in a leaked recording of facilitating (and then wanted to cover up) a gay grooming /sexual harrassment operation being run from his Counter Currents meet-up groups. A guy who says that "homophobia is jewish". And a man who has been so discredited that his only ally left anywhere is the man whose reputation he is trying to rehabilitate. Yes, we'll believe him and the degenerate bisexual when he says that this was nothing but a "bad break up".

1602333512108.png


Greg, famous for lying by omission and clever wordplay when questioned on his sexuality and dubious behaviour, thinks that he get Colin out of this mess, by making Colin and Mark Collett equally correct. But he can't. No White Guilt's post shows that. And the video Collett made with No White Guilt makes very clear that they not "disputing disingenious smears". They've GOT THE DOCUMENTS, Colin has been banged to rights, and they want him gone before he causes further destruction.


And riddle me this, trauma-bonded fanboy, if No White Guilt is lying because he is a homosexual, and Mark Collett is lying because he is, a, er heterosexual, why does Colin not call either of these people out for ruining his reputation? Not only does he not call them out, he still DEFFERS TO THEIR JUDGMENT!! (archive of a tweet below, which shows Colin defending Mark Collett's judgment against the slander of Colin's own fans, who have called Collett a simp for throwing their precious boy under the bus.


And in case you are wondering why I am having to resort to an archive... well... as you'll see from the replies under the NiallAnglo tweet, rightwing accounts and comments on twitter, youtube, forums, are usually banned or deleted within a few months, which means that gathering proof to make my case has gotten really hard. I really should have saved more of the stuff that I saw at the time, because it has probably gone forever.

But don't worry, fanboys, I'll keep on diggin' :^)

Thanks. I had not seen that. That is important information.

So it is confirmed that the story is already out there. No White Guilt in the US is aware of this, is it isn't just a local UK-the-cat-is-out-of-the-bag.

If the story is already out, then odds are extremely good that it has already been posted here. No White Guilt is specified what actions are NOT the reason for kicking him out. (Not that it means they didn't happen, but they did not rise to the bannable offense).

We can try and dig trough the details, but if I wanted to make my best guess it is because:
1) He got ready to go full pacman on some poor girls kitty at the conference hotel, knickers down to the floor already making it the step too far.
2) He has been spreading his Gift Giving viral load all across the groups without properly cluing women in prior to their warty surprise.

I agree with your take on events, and thanks for being another person who sees what is going on here. Here are my takes on your guesses.

1. The forced oral sex thing, I have only seen hearsay evidence of - based on social media comments (most of which are now deleted AFAIK). But the forced oral sex thing would make sense in the light of Colin's STD. Harvey Weinstein, another noted predator who used his social status to get beautiful young women to do what he wanted, also recoursed to the oral sex route when he had disease/performance issues with his penis. Harvey also did forced oral sex as a substitute for the real thing. An alternative idea is that Colin thought he might be able to overcome their objections to sex with his warty god-rod if he managed to warm them up suitably with his tongue first. I'm going to have to stop now, I feel sick.

2. I absolutely believe you've hit the nail on the head here. The most damaging evidence is Colin saying that he did not "knowingly" give the women any STDs. Like, who the hell says that? Somebody guilty who doesn't want to be caught lying, that's who. Because, technically, he can argue that by using the word "knowingly", he's not lying. He DID give them the gift of incurable warts (and God knows what else), but it's all in the intent, and he didn't intend to do it. So he's not guilty. HE"S A VICTIM OF MODERNITY!!!!

As my old pastor would say, if he could read this thread "You lie down with fags, you get up with warts." There is a reason that female porn stars do not perform with MSM (men who have sex with men, or fags as they are better known). Because they know the reality of the LGBT life - disease. And lots of female porn stars have been bullied on Twitter for their position. One even killed herself from all the bullying from the LGBT "community". But as these "traditionalists" like Colin and the PA virgins show us, she was right to draw the line somewhere.
 
So two months ago, Colin Robertson told Greg Johnson that he was going to put out a video to explain how everyone else is lying about him and that he is a victim of a "malicious" concerted attack against his good name.


OK, Colin, so where's the video? Oh, that's right, you're not going to put out a video, because you know perfectly well that to accuse the women, Mark Collett and No White Guilt of lying would be to risk them dropping information to show that it is YOU who is the liar, and maybe one of the women making good on her threat to go to the police. (She was previously begged not to do this by Mark Collett, who told her that police involvement would mean the end of Patriotic Alternative. She was gaslit that to go public on the matter would be to prevent the saving of the white race. She was finally persuaded as a compromise that Colin Robertson would be publicly disavowed from PA.)

So there will be no video. Colin is not so stupid. But he wants those sweet, sweet Millenniyule sheckels. So he's just going to slink onto a new platform, DLive, and hope that his hardcore fanbase follows him there. The live chat will be heavily moderated by his fanboys, and life will carry on as normal.

But this leaves the question - who is going to associate their brand publicly with Millennial Woes? Who is going to participate in Millenniyule because clout is more important to them than ethics? We all know that Greg Johnson doesn't care about white families, and thinks spreading STDs to young women is a-ok - he admitted so himself on Twitter. But will Red Ice Radio want to have a "cozy fireside chat" with a sexual predator? Will that jive with their pro-family, pro-tradition brand? And who are the women who will shrug and decide that internet attention is more important that condemning degeneracy? Time will tell.
 
Greg Johnson
Greg thinks that Ethan Ralph is on "the rise" while Sargon is declining

Roughly 01:19:15
Greg: "Tell us more about Sargon, I think he's a fascinating figure and it seems like he's increasingly irrelevant and you're increasing relevant, and I wonder what's the difference."

Let's be honest Ethan Ralph and Sargon are both on the decline unless you prefer them in Dumpster fire mode instead of "their prime"
 
  • Like
Reactions: MeltyTW
Greg thinks that Ethan Ralph is on "the rise" while Sargon is declining

Roughly 01:19:15
Greg: "Tell us more about Sargon, I think he's a fascinating figure and it seems like he's increasingly irrelevant and you're increasing relevant, and I wonder what's the difference."

Let's be honest Ethan Ralph and Sargon are both on the decline unless you prefer them in Dumpster fire mode instead of "their prime"
I think Sargon is on a redemption arc ever since the Akila Hughes lawsuit. Him winning that judgment is funny as fuck.
 
Back