Umm, not that I ask for this a lot, but do you have any evidence beyond this? Because I've been writing and reading English for more than 15 years, I doubt this affected me a lot.
They're called being able to think outside of modern insanity.
That's some absurd reasoning Holden.
I have yet to see Null use anti-aircraft guns to silence dissidents (If another trans-thread gets derailed, all bets are off...)
Okay, what does this even mean? I'm not surprised that you didn't like my comment, but how is the word "should" a concept? How do you not believe in "should"? You are constantly describing the way you think the world should be, or describing a sane society, or whatever. I.e., you've argued multiple times that the age of consent should be lowered to 12. Or are you just being a tryhard edgelord and don't actually understand what the words you use mean?
@Null confirmed for buying old Russian nuclear warheads.
She probably still gets more than @Holden, at least she makes Ken buy Barbie a drink or two before getting it on.
Most people don't understand nuances of anything ever. This is not necessary.
Almost any woman can "get more" than almost any man. So this attack is hilarious. It's like saying that a fish is better at swimming than I am. Really?
Hmmm, n.. no. No.
Re-read the sentence and look at the context, the term 'gets more' was used to describe a deeper understanding rather than the acquisition of sex.
I have a Trinity College Certificate in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. No, I'm not posting it b/c dox.
A solid question. My point is that it is pretty senseless to think about "should" in any way but brief explanations. What "should" happen is what you make happen. Otherwise it is just fantasies.
Yeah, but you don't think it's gross to have sex with someone who's basically a kid?
