You have an unfortunate bone structure nothing you can do about that, but have you thought about altering your wardrobe? In most of your pictures you appear to be wearing ill fitting circus tents in bizarre gaudy colors. Those dresses would look ridiculous on a cis woman and they aren't doing you any favors either.
Nope.
Also curious why you're okay with the outright transphobia in this thread? Is my sense of dress really worse than that, lol?
There isn't a single picture of my every day wear in this thread and the most reposted image is about 10 years old. The one witchy outfit being reposted is one I tend to wear for entertaining kids.
And you know what? People loved that outfit.
This is more what I look like normally -
http://i.imgur.com/rfM98O2.jpg
The sad thing about all these beautiful questions is that there is no way in hell that crazy bitch will answer any of them.
Nope. And I'm not obligated to, or engage with anyone who calls me a crossdresser or hurls transphobic abuse to me. It's sort of beautiful.
see, y'all are playing too nice with this guy. stop trying to reason with degenerates.
intro dropped the truth bomb on like page 5. you've failed as a man, and thus attempted to escape reality by browbeating everyone into believing you're a special oppressed minority instead of a hilarious spectacle. you need constant encouragement from the internet because every time you look in the mirror, no amount of dogma and idiomatic brainwashing covers up the sad, flabby white guy in makeup.
see, that right there is a caustic opinion. most members disagree with me, many will rate me as such. that's fine. welcome to freedom.
"Freedom" is famously when vulnerable minorities are lambasted by fascists. Or err, was that fascism? I forget.
if you could stop name dropping the Roma community, that'd be gr8. we don't need your "help."
That's not what the 20+ Roma women I work with seem to think.
You can speak for yourself, but so can they.
The minute I'm not wanted I'll disengage. Fuck, it costs me 10+ euros a week, so there's that.
It is a bingo square like pretending objective reality doesn't exist is for SJWs.
Pretending some tiny fraction of a fraction of a percent of the population gets to dictate the language the majority uses is hubristic in the extreme.
It is also laughable, which is why we laugh at it here.
Dictionaries are not "objective reality" lol. They're a vague agreed upon list of definitions. If you want to get into it. Generally, when we want to look at "objective reality" we look to the experts in various fields, since no one person can know everything.
Also keep in mind this forum outright rejects the behavioural sciences in order to justify abusing minorities. Your relationship with "reality" is verrrryy hazy.
If Chloe was living in Europe you would have had a point about how her (alleged) ethnicity puts her in a disadvantage. In America on the other hand nobody gives a fuck about her being Romani and for all intenet and purposes she's white. And we can't even be certain about Chloe being Romani as she has lied before.
It's not just in Europe. It shapes where she is to begin with - not only did her parents reject her in part due to the conservative and often very religious nature of Roma families, she also doesn't have much(or any?) in the way of extended family. I don't think it's fair to say she's white for all intent and purposes. She's white passing, but it's not like her ethnicity hasn't affected her life at all.
2) If our definition of doxing is fales, what is the supposedly proper definition of the term?
Posting personal information with the intent of singling someone out for abuse/demeaning them.
Because you don't have a reasonable point. There can be no middle ground with you because you hold radical and extremist views. You seem to think that all trans people are beyond criticism and ridicule. That they somehow should have a protected status, because...reasons. That's not only radical and extremist, its sexist.
A middle ground would be to agree that everyone who acts like a fool deserves to be mocked and laughed at, or at least talked about, regardless of color, religion, social status, or sexual orientation.
The fact of the matter is you and other SJW-types are the radical fringe of a fringe community. You are a small percentage of a small percentage of the civilization, yet you claim to speak for everyone who is transgendered. The fact is most trans people want you to shut the fuck up. You hurt the community more than you help. You make all trans people seem like attention seeking, drama whoring, mentally unbalanced and unstable people. Most trans people just want to live their lives normally. They don't let being trans define their whole lives because they are regular people who just happen to be trans. Yet you place them on a pedestal and try to control other peoples speech and thought. That's the kind of shit Orwell warned us about. You are fascists who despise that the rest of us are free to speak our minds and hold opinions different from your's. Not only are you fascist in your actions and opinions, but you are also an elitist.
Here's what you don't get - so are you. You are one tiny group, one small set of viewpoints - generally americentric, somewhat(or in some cases very) conservative. There is a whole world out there that may very well disagree with both of us.
In terms of the trans community - I interact with trans people more often than most of you here, including most of the other trans people. And I'm not all that fringe or extreme at all. Some trans people I know tend to isolate themselves a bit due to negative experience - I don't do that.
I don't let being trans define me either. I am a great many things beside that, and I rarely bring it up in every day life. But it's still part of me, and there's no point pretending it doesn't significantly affect the life I've lived. I don't believe it's shameful, and I don't believe in apologising for it or sucking up to people who attack people like me.
Also not responding to Sugoi because she's a huge hypocrite lol.
)
